Bug#860763: imagemagick: /etc/imagemagick-6/policy.xml useless limits settings

2020-10-20 Thread Matt Roberds
Hello all! I just wanted to note that bug 941724 is probably related to this one: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941724 Also: Edmund Christian Herenz wrote: So from what I understand by reading this bugreport is that there is a workaround by removing the memory rule in

Bug#860763: imagemagick: /etc/imagemagick-6/policy.xml useless limits settings

2017-10-28 Thread Alf
> Or at least use debconf, to ask root if he wants the policy.xml on > package installation, as he will know whether the machine is going to be > a server handling remote requests, or merely a single-user desktop. > > Thanks in advance! That's a good idea. I was desperate like you when trying to

Bug#860763: imagemagick: /etc/imagemagick-6/policy.xml useless limits settings

2017-07-30 Thread RjY
Oh so this explains why IM started refusing to create/handle images more than a few thousand pixels tall despite having gigabytes of free memory. Yes, please remove the limits policy, it is annoying, especially when you don't know about it, and stuff that used to work, stops working, with no

Bug#860763: imagemagick: /etc/imagemagick-6/policy.xml useless limits settings

2017-05-28 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Package: imagemagick-6-common Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-9 Followup-For: Bug #860763 I agree with the original reporter here. The policy includes arbitrary limits which cannot easily be modified by invoking the commands. If we want to ensure the "resource" limits do not get exceeded in order to

Bug#860763: imagemagick: /etc/imagemagick-6/policy.xml useless limits settings

2017-04-19 Thread chris_blues
Package: imagemagick Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-5 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? The need to edit large images * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? removing the limits, defined in