Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
On Wednesday, 1 June 2022 01:27:32 CET Diederik de Haas wrote:
> What's the current status wrt this bug?
Just saw upstream commit 630dc25e43dacfb5af94cd41532e77c47ec1caff which should
become part of 6.1-rc9 and/or 6.1 and it would be interesting to know if that
would
On Wednesday, 1 June 2022 16:15:51 CEST Holger Levsen wrote:
> you seem to assume that I know how to report upstream bugs to the kernel.
> yet I don't know.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196157 is a (standard) Bugzilla
instance where you could create an account if you don't have it
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 04:01:10PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 June 2022 15:11:37 CEST Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 02:53:06PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > > So it would be really helpful if this would be added to the upstream bug
> > > report.
> >
On Wednesday, 1 June 2022 15:11:37 CEST Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 02:53:06PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > So it would be really helpful if this would be added to the upstream bug
> > report.
>
> then please do so?!?
And with that I've lost any motivation to further
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 02:53:06PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> So it would be really helpful if this would be added to the upstream bug
> report.
then please do so?!?
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP:
On Wednesday, 1 June 2022 14:09:28 CEST Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 01:27:32AM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > What's the current status wrt this bug?
>
> we downgraded the memory of our nodes to 8gb to work around the issue...
Andrew Morton said in
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 01:27:32AM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> What's the current status wrt this bug?
we downgraded the memory of our nodes to 8gb to work around the issue...
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 3 May 2021 11:26:55 + Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 11:39:05AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Do you still want to keep this bug open for some reason, or should we
> > close it? I'm fine either way, but here I
Hi Salvatore,
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 11:39:05AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Doing some maintenance on open bugs for src:linux to bring unnecessary
> still open bugs down, this one appeared as well on the radar of older
> bugs for older kernels.
>
> Do you still want to keep this bug
Hi Holger,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 07:53:48PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> package: linux-image-4.9.0-3-686-pae
> version: 4.9.30-2+deb9u2
> # severity: important ?
> forwarded: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196157
>
> Hi,
>
> upon upgrading the i386 build nodes for
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:22:06PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> (As a workaround I plan to use 8 machines with 15gb ram instead of 4 with 35…)
actually this wont work here, there are not enough storage ressources to run
8 instead of 4 machines…
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:35:39PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I would say only 'normal', because this isn't a sensible configuration.
I was saying today that there are probably 100 people running i386 with i386
kernels with more than 16gb ram in the world. And then corrected myself to
"1000"…
On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 19:53 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> package: linux-image-4.9.0-3-686-pae
> version: 4.9.30-2+deb9u2
> # severity: important ?
I would say only 'normal', because this isn't a sensible configuration.
[...]
> We want to run half of our i386 build nodes with a 32 bit kernel and
package: linux-image-4.9.0-3-686-pae
version: 4.9.30-2+deb9u2
# severity: important ?
forwarded: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196157
Hi,
upon upgrading the i386 build nodes for tests.reproducible-builds.org to Stretch
I noticed a huge performance loss, which I could "fix" by
14 matches
Mail list logo
