Bug#877350: Suggested wording

2017-11-05 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 03:52:58PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > Discussion on this bug appears to have died down, and lack of a > resolution has stalled the the ongoing processing of MIA developers. It's been a week with only a few comments, so I think what we've got is the following:

Bug#877350: Suggested wording

2017-10-30 Thread Clint Adams
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 06:51:43PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire (Front Desk) wrote: > Too many 'unfortunately's here; I suggest just to drop the first word of > the latter paragraph. I agree.

Bug#877350: Suggested wording

2017-10-29 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire (Front Desk)
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 03:52:58PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > The Missing In Action team has been trying to reach out to this > developer for some time; more details can be seen via mia-query[0]. > Unfortunately this was not successful and a final attempt was made via > the

Bug#877350: Suggested wording

2017-10-29 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 03:52:58PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > adds a footnote with the > SSH command required to query MIA (which I think is generally DD > accessible?). Yes, qa.debian.org is accessible to all DDs and whoever is in the 'qa' team (very rare, but I was in the qa team before

Bug#877350: Suggested wording

2017-10-29 Thread Jonathan McDowell
Discussion on this bug appears to have died down, and lack of a resolution has stalled the the ongoing processing of MIA developers. Given that we had got to the point where the backlog was being processed, this is unfortunate. In the interest of trying to get something people are happier with,