On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 06:13:09PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Indeed, you are right (and I was wrong). muttprint properly deals with both
> > "Subject: =?utf-8?Q?blah blah?=" and rightfully skips html alternatives in
> > multipart/alternative messages.
mutt or the mailer does.
>
Hi Rene,
Thanks for your prompt feedback!
Op Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:51:10PM +0200 schreef Rene Engelhard:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:30:08AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > I feel these days, muttprint is getting a bit stale. It is not suitable
>
> Yeah, true.
>
> > to use with modern
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:30:08AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> I feel these days, muttprint is getting a bit stale. It is not suitable
Yeah, true.
> to use with modern email:
But this is not an argument. What is "modern email"? Bogusly formatted mail?
Broken E-Mail from not proper encod
Package: muttprint
Version: 0.73-7
Severity: normal
Dear Rene Engelhard,
First of all, thanks for taking care of muttprint in Debian for over 15 years!
I saved a raw multipart/alternative (both text/plain and text/html) email
message in /tmp/mail.msg; ran
muttprint -p - -f - mail.ps
and ran e
4 matches
Mail list logo