Package: dgit
Version: 6.11
Severity: normal
notmuch had until recently "tar-ignore" in debian/source/options so
that a default set of VCS related things is dropped from the source
package, and (still has) a debian/.gitignore. This means that dgit is
sad because the source packagee does not match
David Bremner writes ("Bug#908417: dgit does not handle debian/.gitignore
missing from source package"):
> Package: dgit
> Version: 6.11
> Severity: normal
>
> notmuch had until recently "tar-ignore" in debian/source/options so
> that a default set of
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#908417: dgit does not handle debian/.gitignore
missing from source package"):
> I'm sorry to be dim, but I don't understand what you think the bug in
> dgit is ? dgit's design principle is that the source package and git
> tree ar
Hello,
On Sun 09 Sep 2018 at 06:07PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm sorry to be dim, but I don't understand what you think the bug in
> dgit is ? dgit's design principle is that the source package and git
> tree are idnntical. Are you arguing that this is not correct ?
Based on discussion on
Sean Whitton writes:
> Based on discussion on IRC, I believe that the problem is that the
> options that dgit passes to dpkg-source, while sufficient to ensure that
> .gitignore is included in the resultant source package, are not
> sufficient to ensure that debian/.gitignore is included. I.e. t
Control: retitle -1 do something about tar-ignore in d/s/options
David Bremner writes ("Re: Bug#908417: dgit does not handle debian/.gitignore
missing from source package"):
> Sean Whitton writes:
> > Based on discussion on IRC, I believe that the problem is that the
&g
Ian Jackson writes:
> David, would a warning have been sufficient, to avoid this being a
> significant inconvenience to you ? Something like this perhsps:
>
> debian/source/options contains a tar-ignore option.
> If this option matches anything, dpkg-source's source
> package will differs
David Bremner writes:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
>
>> David, would a warning have been sufficient, to avoid this being a
>> significant inconvenience to you ? Something like this perhsps:
>>
>> debian/source/options contains a tar-ignore option.
>> If this option matches anything, dpkg-source'
David Bremner writes ("Bug#908417: dgit does not handle debian/.gitignore
missing from source package"):
> As another example, since I removed tar-ignore from notmuch, I have
>
> W: notmuch source: diff-contains-git-control-dir
> .git/dgit/unpack/notmuch-0.27/.git
>
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#908417: dgit does not handle debian/.gitignore
missing from source package"):
> I will file a bug against dpkg requesting a command line option which
> resets the tar-ignore list.
I've just filed
#908742 Want way to reset tar-ignore list
>
Ian Jackson writes:
> David Bremner writes ("Bug#908417: dgit does not handle debian/.gitignore
> missing from source package"):
>> As another example, since I removed tar-ignore from notmuch, I have
>>
>> W: notmuch source: diff-contains-git-control-dir
>
Ian Jackson writes:
> It occurs to me that I think you can give a value for the tar-ignore
> option. So maybe you can say tar-ignore=.git ?
>
> Probably, then, you want to put into debian/source/options the output
> from
> dgit print-dpkg-source-ignores
> which is currently
> -i(?:^|/)\.
David Bremner writes ("Re: Bug#908417: dgit does not handle debian/.gitignore
missing from source package"):
> They're wrong for dgit, and maybe for DFSG, but not for building
> throwaway source packages that are not distributed.
Not to detract from your other comments,
Ian Jackson writes:
> David Bremner writes ("Re: Bug#908417: dgit does not handle debian/.gitignore
> missing from source package"):
>> They're wrong for dgit, and maybe for DFSG, but not for building
>> throwaway source packages that are not distributed.
&
14 matches
Mail list logo