On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:08:50AM +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Agreed. Unfortunately, the patch is malformed, [...]
Oops, sorry about that. Not sure why it happened.
Sending you the ganeti-2.15 patch now instead which should be identical.
(Since I don't have access to the computer
Hi Andreas!
On 22:13 Thu 06 Dec , Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I agree that fixing these merged-usr reproducability issues on their
> own
> is pretty useless, not only for ganeti but for all affected packages.
> Still I'm attaching a patch that makes ganeti reproducible in
> merged-usr vs
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Apollon,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 07:56:20PM +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Control: tags -1 upstream confirmed
>
> Hi Gunnar,
>
> On 09:50 Wed 05 Dec , Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > We have found ganeti to embed the system path for ip — which is /bin
> > on
Control: tags -1 upstream confirmed
Hi Gunnar,
On 09:50 Wed 05 Dec , Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> We have found ganeti to embed the system path for ip — which is /bin
> on non-/usrmerged systems, and /usr/bin on /usrmerged systems.
Thanks for the report! Unfortunately ganeti embeds a lot of other
Apollon Oikonomopoulos dijo [Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 07:56:20PM +0200]:
> > We have found ganeti to embed the system path for ip — which is /bin
> > on non-/usrmerged systems, and /usr/bin on /usrmerged systems.
>
> Thanks for the report! Unfortunately ganeti embeds a lot of other paths,
> detected
Source: ganeti
Version: 2.15
Severity: important
Hello,
You might be aware on the current discussion regarding
/usrmerged-systems breaking package builds for non-/usrmerged systems,
tracked in #914897 and with a long thread in debian-devel starting at
20181120211617.gxnuwxpx2hy44...@angband.pl
6 matches
Mail list logo
