Bug#922296: libqtpas: should go away and binaries should be build from src:lazarus

2020-05-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Abou, On 10-05-2020 17:29, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > I have pushed new changes to git, can you please review before I upload? Other than that I think we should drop debian/gbp.conf (we seem to have different styles, which I think is fine), I OK with this. Please upload. Paul signature.asc

Bug#922296: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#922296: Bug#922296: Bug#922296: Bug#922296: Bug#922296: libqtpas: should go away and binaries should be build from src:lazarus

2020-05-10 Thread Abou Al Montacir
I have pushed new changes to git, can you please review before I upload? -- Cheers, Abou Al Montacir signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#922296: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#922296: Bug#922296: Bug#922296: Bug#922296: libqtpas: should go away and binaries should be build from src:lazarus

2020-05-10 Thread Graham Inggs
On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 00:39, peter green wrote: > Does anything other than the QT backend for the LCL actually use libqtpas, > either in Debian or otherwise? I see doublecmd-qt and winff-qt have dependencies on libqt5pas1, but that's probably via lcl-qt5.

Bug#922296: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#922296: Bug#922296: Bug#922296: Bug#922296: libqtpas: should go away and binaries should be build from src:lazarus

2020-05-09 Thread Abou Al Montacir
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 23:36 +0100, peter green wrote: > On 08/05/2020 21:32, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > Creating a source dependency between a general purpose (bindings) library > > and an IDE is wrong in my sens. > Lazarus already combines an IDE for developing applications and a library used > b

Bug#922296: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#922296: libqtpas: should go away and binaries should be build from src:lazarus

2020-05-09 Thread Abou Al Montacir
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 22:54 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > In line with the policy, I don't like bumping epoch. At least you have > > to discuss on debian-devel before proceeding. I suggest we keep a > > + version number until lazarus is at 2.6. That won't be too long > > and avoids have the epoch.

Bug#922296: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#922296: Bug#922296: Bug#922296: libqtpas: should go away and binaries should be build from src:lazarus

2020-05-08 Thread peter green
On 08/05/2020 21:32, Abou Al Montacir wrote: I started doing the migration, then had a thought that this is probably the wrong way to go. Indeed, despite the upstream decision to move libqtpas sources into Lazarus, this lib stays a pure binding library. So theoretically, it can be used by whate

Bug#922296: libqtpas: should go away and binaries should be build from src:lazarus

2020-05-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Abou, On 08-05-2020 22:32, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > Creating a source dependency between a general purpose (bindings) > library and an IDE is wrong in my sens. Although I share your feeling, about it being weird, I don't see the harm. But... > So I'd propose that we keep them separate source

Bug#922296: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#922296: Bug#922296: libqtpas: should go away and binaries should be build from src:lazarus

2020-05-08 Thread Abou Al Montacir
I started doing the migration, then had a thought that this is probably the wrong way to go.Indeed, despite the upstream decision to move libqtpas sources into Lazarus, this lib stays a pure binding library.So theoretically, it can be used by whatever project and not only Lazarus related ones.Creat

Bug#922296: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#922296: libqtpas: should go away and binaries should be build from src:lazarus

2020-04-19 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Abou, On 19-04-2020 19:47, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > Can you please tell me what needs to be done. I may try to do this. The source for libqtpas has been taken up in the lazarus source. So, what we need to do is build the libqt5pas1 and libqt5pas-dev binary packages when building lazarus. For