> On 15 Mar 2019, at 08:37, Johan Wassberg wrote:
>
>> (would be great if you cant test this version and report back)
>
> Will see what we can accomplish in the lab!
systemd(-networkd) 241-1~bpo9+1 from stretch-backports seems to work
better.
The expiration is now present in the output from `i
Thanks for a fast reply!
> On 14 Mar 2019, at 15:31, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 14.03.19 um 15:16 schrieb Johan Wassberg:
>> Package: systemd
>> Version: 232-25+deb9u9
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>> this issue is a bit outside my confort zone but I still want to try t
Hi
Am 14.03.19 um 15:16 schrieb Johan Wassberg:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 232-25+deb9u9
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> this issue is a bit outside my confort zone but I still want to try to
> report this bug.
>
> It is probably the same as Launchpad#1800836[0] and according to
Package: systemd
Version: 232-25+deb9u9
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
this issue is a bit outside my confort zone but I still want to try to
report this bug.
It is probably the same as Launchpad#1800836[0] and according to that
ticket the issue fixed in a new version of systemd. But for al
4 matches
Mail list logo