https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html
> Am 31.03.2019 um 16:31 schrieb wf...@niif.hu:
>
> Michael Biebl writes:
>
>> Personally I prefer to revert the compat bumps when doing backports for
>> stretch (like in [1]) as I like to to keep the impact on the stable
>> system as minimal as
Michael Biebl writes:
> Personally I prefer to revert the compat bumps when doing backports for
> stretch (like in [1]) as I like to to keep the impact on the stable
> system as minimal as possible. Pulling in a newer i-s-h is a rather
> significant change.
I see. Dropping back to compat 10 is
wf...@niif.hu:
> Niels Thykier writes:
>
>> I don't think I have much to add to it really beyond what is covered in
>> https://nthykier.wordpress.com/2019/01/04/debhelper-compat-12-is-now-released/
>
> Thanks for the good writeup, I missed it.
>
:)
>> Sure it would be great to have one less c
Etienne Dysli Metref:
> On 27/03/2019 21.12, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I don't think I have much to add to it really beyond what is
>> covered in https://nthykier.wordpress.com/2019/01/04/
>> debhelper-compat-12-is-now-released/
>
>
> Hi Niels,
>
> Thank you for your explanation. One point, howe
Am 28.03.19 um 11:08 schrieb wf...@niif.hu:
> Felipe Sateler writes:
>
>> I'm not opposed to a backport, and I don't think there are many
>> problems with attempting it. However, I do not have time to prepare
>> and test such a backport. Help welcome.
>
> I can do the busy-work of backporting, b
Felipe Sateler writes:
> I'm not opposed to a backport, and I don't think there are many
> problems with attempting it. However, I do not have time to prepare
> and test such a backport. Help welcome.
I can do the busy-work of backporting, but I lack the perspective to
tell whether it's feasible
Niels Thykier writes:
> I don't think I have much to add to it really beyond what is covered in
> https://nthykier.wordpress.com/2019/01/04/debhelper-compat-12-is-now-released/
Thanks for the good writeup, I missed it.
> Sure it would be great to have one less caveat for upgrating to compat
> 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 27/03/2019 21.12, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I don't think I have much to add to it really beyond what is
> covered in https://nthykier.wordpress.com/2019/01/04/
> debhelper-compat-12-is-now-released/
Hi Niels,
Thank you for your explanation. One
wf...@niif.hu:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:29:29 +0100 =?utf-8?q?Ferenc_W=C3=A1gner?=
> wrote:
>
>> Debhelper compat level 12 is stable and available in stretch-backports,
>> but uses the --skip-systemd-native option of invoke-rc.d, thus adds
>> init-system-helpers (>= 1.54~) to misc:Pre-Depends.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 7:33 AM wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:29:29 +0100 =?utf-8?q?Ferenc_W=C3=A1gner?= <
> wf...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > Debhelper compat level 12 is stable and available in stretch-backports,
> > but uses the --skip-systemd-native option of invoke-rc.d, thus adds
> > init-sy
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:29:29 +0100 =?utf-8?q?Ferenc_W=C3=A1gner?=
wrote:
> Debhelper compat level 12 is stable and available in stretch-backports,
> but uses the --skip-systemd-native option of invoke-rc.d, thus adds
> init-system-helpers (>= 1.54~) to misc:Pre-Depends. This is necessary
> to
Package: init-system-helpers
Version: 1.48
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainers,
Debhelper compat level 12 is stable and available in stretch-backports,
but uses the --skip-systemd-native option of invoke-rc.d, thus adds
init-system-helpers (>= 1.54~) to misc:Pre-Depends. This is necessary
to fix
12 matches
Mail list logo