On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:00 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 07-12-2020 08:11, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > Yeah, it's a bit confusing why someone tagged this as affecting
> > experimental.
>
> That's because you fixed this bug in experimental. So the BTS apparently
> that's part of where the
Hi László,
On 07-12-2020 08:11, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Yeah, it's a bit confusing why someone tagged this as affecting
> experimental.
That's because you fixed this bug in experimental. So the BTS apparently
that's part of where the bug is relevant. The version in experimental is
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 9:27 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:47:52 + Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
> > gcc-9/g++-9, but succeeds to build with gcc-8/g++-8. The
> > severity of this report will be raised
Dear Laszlo,
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:47:52 + Matthias Klose wrote:
> The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
> gcc-9/g++-9, but succeeds to build with gcc-8/g++-8. The
> severity of this report will be raised before the bullseye release,
> so nothing has to be done
4 matches
Mail list logo
