Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 3. Juli 2019 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Don't worry about the delay, I'm very happy to merge this now, and have
> an opportunity to backport it in a point release later on. If I got the
> process right, having the changes in master should trigger an update of
> pot/po files by th
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Hi Guilhem,
Guilhem Moulin (2019-07-03):
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 at 04:45:47 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> > Sure, I even planned to do that when I heard about your post-mini-DebConf
> > “hiccup” ;-) I remained on the road for another 3 weeks and unfortunately
> > d
On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 at 04:45:47 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Sure, I even planned to do that when I heard about your post-mini-DebConf
> “hiccup” ;-) I remained on the road for another 3 weeks and unfortunately
> didn't find time since the mini Debconf. Thanks for the poke, I'll try to
> tend t
Hi there,
On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 at 04:21:46 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Roger Shimizu (2019-06-30):
>> Thank for the above doc, which is quite easy understanding and
>> straightforward!
>> […]
>> I confirmed with /boot set up in LUKS1, everything works fine.
>> It‘d configure non encrypted /bo
Hi Roger,
Roger Shimizu (2019-06-30):
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:06 AM Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > >>> One could argue that cryptodisk support has never been supported by
> > >>> d-i anyway,
> > >>
> > >> Yup
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:06 AM Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >>> One could argue that cryptodisk support has never been supported by
> >>> d-i anyway,
> >>
> >> Yup, and I suppose that's why I overlooked this in my mail to
Hi there,
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> One could argue that cryptodisk support has never been supported by
>>> d-i anyway,
>>
>> Yup, and I suppose that's why I overlooked this in my mail to
>> debian-boot :-P Jonathan Carter had a similar report last week
>>
Hi kibi,
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm also immensely grateful for all the security-related work Matthew
> Garrett puts everywhere he goes, but I'm not sure that MR qualifies as
> “requested by d-i [0]” as you mentioned in [2].
Just to state that publicly: no
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Guilhem Moulin (2019-04-15):
>> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 21:40:35 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> There are also some other highlights in this changelog entry, regarding
>>> key sizes, and some update to partman-crypto might be needed
Heya,
Guilhem Moulin (2019-04-15):
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 21:40:35 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > There are also some other highlights in this changelog entry, regarding
> > key sizes, and some update to partman-crypto might be needed…
>
> GRUB stuff aside?
My point above was that there ar
Hi Cyril,
[crytsetup team member here]
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 21:40:35 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> There are also some other highlights in this changelog entry, regarding
> key sizes, and some update to partman-crypto might be needed…
GRUB stuff aside? AFAICT not, but FWIW we poked debian-b
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20190410
Severity: important
[ Copy sent to grub2 and cryptsetup maintainers, in addition to
debian-boot@ who maintains debian-installer; please keep everyone in
copy when answering. ]
This bug report serves as an entry point from the d-i errata page[1].
It is
12 matches
Mail list logo