On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 06:56:53AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> buster-backports is now open, but the monit package cannot be uploaded
> to it in its current shape.
>
> The version is not correct: 5.26.0-1~bpo9+1
>
> For buster-backports '~bpo10+1` should be used.
>
> Beware that `dch
On 7/13/19 9:11 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 7/13/19 8:25 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 08:29:08 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg
>> wrote:
>>> Please upload a new revision to unstable with source-only changes...
>>
>> Backport for Buster:
>>
On 7/13/19 8:25 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 08:29:08 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> wrote:
>> Please upload a new revision to unstable with source-only changes...
>
> Backport for Buster:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/monit
> Please sponsor this package.
I will
On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 08:29:08 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> Please upload a new revision to unstable with source-only changes...
Backport for Buster:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/monit
Please sponsor this package.
Sponsorship request:
https://bugs.debian.org/931972
On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 08:29:08AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Please upload a new revision to unstable with source-only changes to
I did just now (5.26.0).
On 7/4/19 3:51 PM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:13:03PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> My strong preference is for you to maintain the backport as you are the most
>> able maintainer of the package, so I hope we can find a solution where I can
>> support you with the
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:13:03PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> How often do you expect to need NEW processing for monit?
Probably, once every major release. Backport is a frequent request.
> Do you know any users of the package who have contributed patches or other
> maintainer type
On 2019-07-04 13:52, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:48:23PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Are you willing to maintain the monit backport if I sponsor the NEW
uploads
No. Next time _you_ may be unavailable to sponsor backport for
a buster+1. I won't give package users
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:48:23PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> The RT ticket show that you were added to the backports ACL
It doesn't help too much: initial upload must be sponsored.
> I guess Michal
> wasn't available to sponsor your initial backports upload
Unfortunately, nobody wasn't
On 2019-07-04 12:05, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:54:10AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Once packages can migrate normally again (somewhere next week if
everything goes as expected), monit will be back in testing and
backports is a viable option.
Feel free to do backport.
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:31:07AM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> We rely on monit at $DAYJOB, so I want to help you get monit back in buster.
Am afraid, there is no chance for monit to enter buster. Sorry for this
situation, but I believe this is not just my fault (see this bug
thread).
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:54:10AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Once packages can migrate normally again (somewhere next week if
> everything goes as expected), monit will be back in testing and
> backports is a viable option.
Feel free to do backport.
Latest one was dated Fri, 21 Dec 2018
Hi Bas,
On 04-07-2019 10:31, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Since the upload to t-p-u is unlikely to accepted, a buster-pu may be a
> reasonable alternative.
We normally don't add packages in via pu. As monit isn't in buster, a
buster-pu isn't really appropriate.
> If the stable update is also not
Sergey,
We rely on monit at $DAYJOB, so I want to help you get monit back in
buster.
Since the upload to t-p-u is unlikely to accepted, a buster-pu may be a
reasonable alternative.
Do you want me to file the bugreport so we can get the feedback from the
stable release managers?
If the
> We're sorry, but we'll be removing monit from buster shortly.
That's not serious, you're totally crazy. This package is essential in various environments and other distributions, e.g. openmediavault. Please rethink this and reintroduce monit into Debian 10.
The Debian release politics is
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 01:40:42PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> We're sorry, but we'll be removing monit from buster shortly.
Thanks for a great release menagement!
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Control: close -1
Hi Sergey,
We're sorry, but we'll be removing monit from buster shortly.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:21:38PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Can you ask somebody else to upload it then?
No.
Hi Sergey,
On 18-06-2019 12:04, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:19:07 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
>> we don't want packages going though it that don't need to.
>
> monit package going to be removed from buster. Maybe this
> justifies migration from t-p-u?
No, we want the fix
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:19:07 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> we don't want packages going though it that don't need to.
monit package going to be removed from buster. Maybe this
justifies migration from t-p-u?
I'm away from my build environment and hardly able to prepare
in time that you require
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 09:20:18PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > This debdiff looks good. Can you please upload it as
> > 1:5.25.3-1+really5.25.2-1 (with the source tar ball of 1:5.25.2) to
> > unstable as requested in bug 930313. tpu isn't covered well by QA, so we
> > don't want packages going
Arg.
On 17-06-2019 21:19, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
>
> Hi Sergey,
>
> On 17-06-2019 11:01, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
>> Please unblock package monit in t-p-u. The version
>> 1:5.25.2-3+deb10u1 has only targeted fixes for security
>> issue #927775 (two CVE's).
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Hi Sergey,
On 17-06-2019 11:01, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> Please unblock package monit in t-p-u. The version
> 1:5.25.2-3+deb10u1 has only targeted fixes for security
> issue #927775 (two CVE's). See attached diff.
This debdiff looks good. Can you please
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package monit in t-p-u. The version
1:5.25.2-3+deb10u1 has only targeted fixes for security
issue #927775 (two CVE's). See attached diff.
diff --git a/debian/changelog
24 matches
Mail list logo
