On 2020-09-10 14:17, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:14:57PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2020-09-10 11:58, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:45:31PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:01:01AM +0200,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:14:57PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2020-09-10 11:58, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:45:31PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > Well I would say that we have a
On 2020-09-10 11:58, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:45:31PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Well I would say that we have a solution but not yet the patch, but
> > > anyway I'll plan to work on
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:45:31PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Well I would say that we have a solution but not yet the patch, but
> > anyway I'll plan to work on writing a patch in the next days.
> Oh, great!
> thank you
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Well I would say that we have a solution but not yet the patch, but
> anyway I'll plan to work on writing a patch in the next days.
Oh, great!
thank you for being so quick!
> > > Improvement would be to ship
> > > that single
Hi,
On 2020-09-09 08:33, Holger Levsen wrote:
> control: tags -1 patch
>
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 11:11:22AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/policy-rcd-declarative
> > is a good solution to this: install that package, then instead of
> > dropping that file
control: tags -1 patch
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 11:11:22AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/policy-rcd-declarative
> is a good solution to this: install that package, then instead of
> dropping that file into /usr/local/sbin/policy-rc.d, do
> echo ".* .* deny"
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 02:44:12PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 04:25:56PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I think ideally
> > this would be using a system pathname and be part of a package that gets
> > then listed in the .buildinfo files.
>
> I cannot comment on this
> I think ideally
> this would be using a system pathname and be part of a package that gets
> then listed in the .buildinfo files.
This is how openSUSE does it as well, e.g with
https://github.com/openSUSE/post-build-checks/
and
https://github.com/openSUSE/brp-check-suse/
that get pulled into
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 04:25:56PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > thanks for that info! maybe dpkg could treat /usr/local not as tainted if
> > the
> > only file in /usr/local is /usr/local/sbin/policy-rc.d ?
> While we could perhaps add an exception in the Debian vendor profile.
> It does look
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 13:06:56 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 03:00:43PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2020-08-27 13:25, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Package: buildd.debian.org
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > >
hi,
adding Guillem to the loop (and preserving a full quote for him).
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 03:00:43PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020-08-27 13:25, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Package: buildd.debian.org
> > Severity: wishlist
> > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
