Hi Jörg,
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Jörg Riesmeier wrote:
> > I've just removed these patches[1]
>
> thank you for your quick response and for fixing this.
You are welcome.
> > Your input is extremely welcome and you are kindly invited to review the
> > packaging. Feel free to
Hi Andreas,
> > 05_performance.patch [...]
> > 04_Fixed-OFoptional-by-introducing-OFalign.patch [...]
> I've just removed these patches[1]
thank you for your quick response and for fixing this.
>> Is there a defined process of checking whether patches are still needed
>> for a new upstream
Hi Jörg,
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:11:14AM +0200, Jörg Riesmeier wrote:
> By the way, there are still patches enabled for the most recent Debian
> package
> that are no longer needed, e.g.
>
> 05_performance.patch is not needed because of this commit: http://
>
By the way, there are still patches enabled for the most recent Debian package
that are no longer needed, e.g.
05_performance.patch is not needed because of this commit: http://
git.dcmtk.org/?p=dcmtk.git;a=commit;h=8df1f5e517b8629ae09088d0935c2a8dd333c76f
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:14:25PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > It would be super nice to have dcmtk 3.6.6 in bullseye !
>
> Could you confirm that there is no ABI change since we are
> in transition freeze. If its
Hi Mathieu,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:14:25PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> It would be super nice to have dcmtk 3.6.6 in bullseye !
Could you confirm that there is no ABI change since we are
in transition freeze. If its just a simple
routine-upgrade
away and will not affect any
Source: dcmtk
Version: 3.6.5-1
It would be super nice to have dcmtk 3.6.6 in bullseye !
https://forum.dcmtk.org/viewtopic.php?t=5055
7 matches
Mail list logo
