Hello Craig,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 09:29:12PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> OK, found a minor problem. The procps version needs an epoch to correctly
> match. Not 3.3.17-1 but 2:3.3.17-1
First things first: manpages-l10n passed NEW!
To minimize the impact, I suggest that I prepare and upload 4.9
OK, found a minor problem. The procps version needs an epoch to correctly
match. Not 3.3.17-1 but 2:3.3.17-1
- Craig
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 08:03, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:50 PM Craig Small wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 07:39, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >>
>
With attached debdiff I was able to build and install:
manpages-de (4.9.2-1.1~dileks)
- Sedat -
manpages-l10n-4_9_2-1_dileks-v2.debdiff
Description: Binary data
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:50 PM Craig Small wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 07:39, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>
>> Small nit:
>> On a quick view on latest manpages-l10n I still see the duplicates in
>> debian/rules e.g. kill.1 (manpages-de).
>
> The criteria for removing a page out of manpages-* i
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 07:39, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Small nit:
> On a quick view on latest manpages-l10n I still see the duplicates in
> debian/rules e.g. kill.1 (manpages-de).
>
The criteria for removing a page out of manpages-* is actually more
complicated than that. It's not just "does the proc
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:38 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:59 PM Craig Small wrote:
> >
> > For testing this I installed Procps and *all*of the generated man pages and
> > that seemed to be fine.
> >
> > That's slightly different to the patch I put in the bug report but I
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:59 PM Craig Small wrote:
>
> For testing this I installed Procps and *all*of the generated man pages and
> that seemed to be fine.
>
> That's slightly different to the patch I put in the bug report but I emailed
> Helge the difference.
>
Thanks Craig.
Small nit:
On a
For testing this I installed Procps and *all*of the generated man pages and
that seemed to be fine.
That's slightly different to the patch I put in the bug report but I
emailed Helge the difference.
- Craig
user$ sudo LC_ALL=C dpkg -i manpages-de_4.9.1-2.1~dileks_all.deb
(Reading database ... 341292 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack manpages-de_4.9.1-2.1~dileks_all.deb ...
Unpacking manpages-de (4.9.1-2.1~dileks) ...
Setting up manpages-de (4.9.1-2.1~dileks) ...
Processin
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:05 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I modified Craig's procps_manpage.diff as it still shows conflicts on
> manpages-de installation: e.g. man5/sysctl.conf.5.
>
> Attached is my manpages-de_procps_dileks.debdiff.
> The list of file-removal is alphabetically sorted.
> The
Hi,
I modified Craig's procps_manpage.diff as it still shows conflicts on
manpages-de installation: e.g. man5/sysctl.conf.5.
Attached is my manpages-de_procps_dileks.debdiff.
The list of file-removal is alphabetically sorted.
The debdiff is on top of (pending) manpages-l10n 4.9.1-2 solving
issues
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:25 AM Craig Small wrote:
>
> The issue is you won't be able to install manpages-de afterwards (the fix is
> one-way). See #982355 for the other half to this.
>
Yeah.
AFAICS for procps and manpages-de this file caused the conflict:
de/man1/w.1.po
First, I wanted to
The issue is you won't be able to install manpages-de afterwards (the fix
is one-way). See #982355 for the other half to this.
- Craig
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 03:39, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> [ CC Helge & Craig ]
>
> With the attached debdiff on top of Helge's 4.9.1-1 tarball I was able
> to co-ins
I filed Debian Bug #982372 "manpages-de: procps: File sconflict
between procps and manpages-de".
To quote from [0]:
On d-u I see:
root# RELEASE="buildd-unstable" ; LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade -V -t $RELEASE
...
The following packages will be REMOVED:
manpages-de (4.9.1-1)
task-german (3.
14 matches
Mail list logo
