On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Sveinar Søpler wrote:
[...]
> > The output produced by i386 and amd64 (or any other, for that matter) builds
> > of vkd3d-compiler should be identical; if it isn't, that would be considered
> > a bug. For the record, I would be inclined to agree that the -dev package is
> >
On 16.03.2021 13:32, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 2021-03-03 15:38, Francois Gouget wrote:
Just asking. I don't actually know if the 32- and 64-bit vkd3d-compiler
produce identical files or if one produces 32-bit files and the other
64-bit ones.
The output produced by i386 and amd64 (or any other,
On 2021-03-03 15:38, Francois Gouget wrote:
Just asking. I don't actually know if the 32- and 64-bit vkd3d-compiler
produce identical files or if one produces 32-bit files and the other
64-bit ones.
The output produced by i386 and amd64 (or any other, for that matter)
builds of vkd3d-compiler
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, Sveinar Søpler wrote:
> I actually ended up generating a "vkd3d-tools" package for my Ubuntu
> PPA packages with this binary set to Multi-Arch: no
Should that actually be Multi-Arch: foreign?
Just asking. I don't actually know if the 32- and 64-bit vkd3d-compiler
produce
I actually ended up generating a "vkd3d-tools" package for my Ubuntu PPA
packages with this binary set
to Multi-Arch: no
This way ppl can optionally choose to install this as either x86_64 or i386
depending on needs. However
i am very unsure if it is wise to be able to install a i386 binary
Package: libvkd3d-dev
Version: 1.2-3
Severity: normal
libvkd3d-dev 1.2-3 ships the architecture-dependent
/usr/bin/vkd3d-compiler file which is incompatible with "Multi-Arch:
same".
So as is the package is invalid.
Multiarch support in vkd3d is really needed though because Wine
depends on it
6 matches
Mail list logo
