Hi!
On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 03:58:34 +, peter green wrote:
> As far as the current description goes, I think it's generally not
> too bad but I think there are some minor improvements that could be
> made.
[…]
> * I feel it lacks a bit in "big picture", I *think* sqv is the main
> command
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 03:58:34AM +, peter green wrote:
> It looks like the description we have today was written when sq was
> first packaged, but wasn't actually incorporated into the package
> until later because of
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993633
>
> Version
At the time you wrote this, i think the sq package description was
pretty similar to what it is today:
It looks like the description we have today was written when sq was
first packaged, but wasn't actually incorporated into the package
until later because of
Hi Enrico--
On Sun 2021-04-04 10:02:27 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> The package contains a user-facing tool, and the package description
> contains mostly redundant technical details about how the package is
> generated.
>
> Could you please update the description so that it explains what the sq
>
Package: sq
Version: 0.25.0-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
thanks for packaging Sequoia.
The package contains a user-facing tool, and the package description
contains mostly redundant technical details about how the package is
generated.
Could you please update the description so that it explains
5 matches
Mail list logo
