On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 at 17:41:17 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I think it would be nice if askpass was only included when actually
> needed.
>
> That seems to be the case, when no keyscript is set, and the KEY field is
> none,
> cause:
> […]
> Does the attached patch seem reasonable (ha
On Sun, 03 Oct 2021 at 00:03:17 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> It's like you say in the other bugs... people cannot rely on non-
> documented features, and you're right there - otherwise you could
> barely make any changes.
We could also rename internal functions, variables, and paths to
On Sat, 2021-10-02 at 22:39 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> What does “would be nice” means concretely, is there anything else
> than
> the slightly smaller initramfs image?
Well I guess there are mainly two beneficial points, IMO:
1) The actually saved space.
Sure it's not extremely much, but if
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 at 17:41:17 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I think it would be nice if askpass was only included when actually
> needed.
What does “would be nice” means concretely, is there anything else than
the slightly smaller initramfs image? Personally I'm not against doin
Package: cryptsetup-initramfs
Version: 2:2.4.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
I think it would be nice if askpass was only included when actually
needed.
That seems to be the case, when no keyscript is set, and the KEY field is none,
cause:
- if a keyscript is set, either this shall perform reading a
5 matches
Mail list logo
