Hi,
On 21-10-2021 23:15, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> For the record,
> from the package maintainer perspective: good communication on the BTS,
Always :)
> integrating the proposed change,
or telling the NMU'er to upload without delay if it's the only change.
> and uploading without cancelling
Hi Paul
Paul Gevers writes:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Thanks you, but as I detect these issues in an automatic way without
> much manual labor, I don't need the credits :). And I uploaded to
> DELAYED exactly to give others the opportunity to fix it before me, so
> uploading to DELAYED in my opinion
Hi Nicolas,
On 21-10-2021 02:17, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> I will of course credit you for identifying this issue and taking the
> initiative to fix it, and will upload without delay once I receive your
> ACK (please CC me).
Thanks you, but as I detect these issues in an automatic way without
Hi Paul!
Paul Gevers writes:
> Source: python-volatile
> Version: 2.1.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Control: close -1 2.1.0-3
> X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
> Tags: sid bookworm pending
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: out-of-sync
>
[snip]
> I have immediately
Source: python-volatile
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.1.0-3
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between
5 matches
Mail list logo
