On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 03:11:55PM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> > This footnote might not be the best place to document the precise behaviour
> > of autobuilders (which currently is outside the scope of policy). On the
> > other hand, having a fully specified build process
Hi,
Quoting Bill Allombert (2021-11-17 14:40:57)
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:31:33PM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> wrote:
> > Quoting Bill Allombert (2021-11-17 13:06:09)
> > > > 1. "they are not normally used by the Debian autobuilders" should
> > > > instead
> > > >be "they
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:31:33PM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Quoting Bill Allombert (2021-11-17 13:06:09)
> > > 1. "they are not normally used by the Debian autobuilders" should instead
> > >be "they are never used by the Debian autobuilders" or it should state
> > >
Quoting Bill Allombert (2021-11-17 13:06:09)
> > 1. "they are not normally used by the Debian autobuilders" should instead
> >be "they are never used by the Debian autobuilders" or it should state
> >when they are used and when they are not
>
> If the base system on top of which the
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:10:54AM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Source: debian-policy
> Version: 4.6.0.1
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> currently, footnote [1] of ยง7 states:
>
> > While Build-Depends, Build-Depends-Indep and
5 matches
Mail list logo
