On 30 Aug, Reinhard Tartler wrote :
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: libdvdnav
21:23 j-b and I did a libdvdnav 5.0.1 to fix a crash
21:26 j-b
https://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/libdvdnav-devel/2014-August/000222.html
Control: reopen -1
* Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org) [140830 21:19]:
[ Alessio Treglia ]
* Build with dh-autoreconf. (Closes: #755111)
According to the build log it still FTBFS on ppc64el. I will check
what the reason is.
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Source: bitlbee
Version: 3.2.1+otr4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[2
Awesome. If Yaro's unable to sponsor it in a timely fashion, feel free
to ping me.
building now... will upload later if everything is smooth
Thanks Olly for staying guard!
Cheers
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Research
Source: bup
Version: 0.25-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1]: Entering
Source: apt-dpkg-ref
Version: 5.3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Apparently it needs a writable $HOME
Source: lame
Source-Version: 3.99.5+repack1-4
I think that you could also do a symbolic link between libdvdnavmini and
libdvdnav.
I have no idea why people did this stupid dvdnavmini: the size of the
library is not big and so is the symbols list size.
With my kindest regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704
Source: ants
Version: 2.1.0~rc2+git3-g9103999-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: bluefish
Version: 2.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[5
Source: cabal-debian
Version: 4.15.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
debian
Source: beignet
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[3]: Entering
Hi,
* Laurent Bigonville [Fri Aug 01, 2014 at 03:55:17PM +0200]:
An idea on how this could be fixed? In Ubuntu they have added a panic
hook to initramfs-tools that is being called in the panic() function.
Do you think it's the way to go here?
Otherwise I can also provide a patch for the
* Fernando Seiti Furusato (ferse...@br.ibm.com) [140830 21:30]:
The package opencore-amr fails to build from source on ppc64el.
Adding the usage of dh-autoreconf to the build fixes that and the
packages builds successfully.
I'd be willing to help fixing this bug by uploading an NMU. Actually
Hi,
* Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org) [140830 21:28]:
#732286: libcdio: use dh-autoreconf instead of autotools-dev for better
new-port coverage
thanks, could we get a fix of this bug also in unstable, or would it
help if I upload an NMU? (This package is relevant to get
reassign 759859 gcc-4.9 4.9.1-9
thanks
Hi,
2014-08-30 12:04:58 Lucas Nussbaum:
Source: ssh-agent-filter
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
During a rebuild of all packages
Version: 2.1.0~rc2+git3-g9103999-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[4
* Breno Leitao (bren...@br.ibm.com) [140830 21:32]:
pstoedit is failing to build on new architectures due to not autoreconfiging
before the build. The recommend way to solve it is using dh-autoreconf
scripts[1]. I just created a patch that fixes this problem. Find it attached
to
this bug.
Package: proftpd-mod-vroot
Version: 0.9.2-2+b2
Severity: grave
The proftpd module mod_vroot is broken, because the alias string
processing is erroneous. The result of the function vroot_lookup_path
may look like this without the attached patch:
static int vroot_lstat(pr_fs_t *fs, const char
package: piuparts-master
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Hi Axel,
On Freitag, 29. August 2014, Axel Beckert wrote:
And on the per-maintainer or per-package view, they don't seem to
appear yet: E.g.
hi eriberto!
i switch to testing some time ago, some time after gnome-alsamixer's build.
if you are talking about a chroot enviroment, yes i do :)
2014-08-30 17:49 GMT+02:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br:
Hi!
You need to use an unstable jail inside stable. Do you know how to make
Source: libc++
Version: 1.0~svn205159-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ganglia
Version: 3.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[3
Source: makepp
Version: 2.0.98.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: cpanminus
Version: 1.7004-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Apparently you need a write $HOME. Set
Source: libposix-strftime-compiler-perl
Version: 0.31-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: elastix
Version: 4.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[3]: Entering
Source: jruby
Version: 1.5.6-7
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
debian/rules
Source: kwave
Version: 0.8.12-1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: librpc-xml-perl
Version: 0.78-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: jenkins
Version: 1.509.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
debian
Source: libclc
Version: 0~git20140101-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: expeyes
Version: 3.1.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[2
Source: freedict
Version: 2014.02.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: ctpp2
Version: 2.8.3-14
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[2
Source: krb5
Version: 1.12.1+dfsg-7
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: dirspec
Version: 4.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: libopendbx
Version: 1.4.6-6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[3
Source: libcatalyst-engine-psgi-perl
Version: 0.13+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: drawtiming
Version: 0.7.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[3
Source: gdcm
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[3]: Entering
Source: midori
Version: 0.4.3+dfsg-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: postgresql-pljava
Version: 1.4.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: calligra
Version: 1:2.7.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: parley
Version: 4:4.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[2
Source: libconfig-model-backend-augeas-perl
Version: 0.117-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libhtml-formhandler-model-dbic-perl
Version: 0.28-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: haskell-ed25519
Version: 0.0.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: kamailio
Version: 4.1.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: libperl5i-perl
Version: 2.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
debian
Source: libvideo-fourcc-info-perl
Version: 1.005-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libebook-tools-perl
Version: 0.4.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
This looks like a regression in par2. I think there has been some
churn/forking in that project upstream.
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: bup
Version: 0.25-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
Source: php-xml-serializer
Version: 0.20.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: plastimatch
Version: 1.5.16+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make
Source: nifti2dicom
Version: 0.4.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[3
Source: votca-csg
Version: 1.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: oslo.rootwrap
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: python-tooz
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: request-tracker4
Version: 4.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1
Source: simba
Version: 0.8.4-4.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
debian/rules
Source: stdeb
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1]: Entering
Source: seqan
Version: 1.4.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
debian
Source: winff
Version: 1.5.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1]: Entering
Hi Olly!
El 30/08/14 a les 18:58, Olly Betts ha escrit:
The amended code here assumes sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(long long) - that's not
true on all architectures (both i386 and armel have 4 vs 8, for example).
True that. I should have kept that in mind, I've seen the problem
several times in
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:27:30 -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Apparently you need a write $HOME. Set it to /tmp/somewhere?
We're already doing this in debian/rules, SomeThing™ must have
changed ...
Relevant part
Hi Arkadiusz!
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:52 +0200 Arkadiusz =?utf-8?q?Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?=
ar...@maven.pl wrote:
btw. I was testing your patches on other distro than Debian and
unfortunately
it fails to build here. Probably due to some differences between
distros. Not
sure if that matters
tag 759942 + pending
thanks
Some bugs in the cpanminus package are closed in revision
5794fae12ad474bd3d18a30d96480fafc4bb5a72 in branch 'master' by gregor
herrmann
The full diff can be seen at
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/cpanminus.git/commit/?id=5794fae
Commit message:
Hi everyone,
(if you don't want to get Cc-ed any longer please let me know, just
trying to involve everyone and get some traction)
* Michael Prokop [Thu Jul 31, 2014 at 05:30:53PM +0200]:
* Matthew Gabeler-Lee [Thu Jul 31, 2014 at 10:29:18AM -0400]:
Recent package upgrades have made it all
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org writes:
I doubt any normal build system feeds STDIN to Pod::Man, but another
case where the current time is used is when there are Debian patches to
the source file. Quoting the dpkg-source(1) manual page:
The timestamp of all patched files is reset to the
[ I am not the calligra mainatiner ]
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 02:26:16PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
make[1]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
dh_install --list-missing
cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/usr/lib/kde4/wpgimport.so': No such file or
directory
dh_install: cp -a
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 02:57:22PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: votca-csg
Version: 1.2.3-1
[snip]
-- checking for module 'libgmx'
-- package 'libgmx' not found
-- Could NOT find GROMACS (missing: GROMACS_LIBRARY GROMACS_INCLUDE_DIR)
CMake Error at src/libcsg/CMakeLists.txt:25
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:13:29AM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
Hi everyone,
(if you don't want to get Cc-ed any longer please let me know, just
trying to involve everyone and get some traction)
* Michael Prokop [Thu Jul 31, 2014 at 05:30:53PM +0200]:
* Matthew Gabeler-Lee [Thu Jul 31,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Beren Minor wrote:
* Package name: gemrb
When attempting to build:
.
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:211 (MESSAGE):
Looking for Glew: not found!
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:212 (MESSAGE):
Please install the Glew library and headers first!
retitle 712821 ITP: libtiger -- Kate rendering library
owner 712821 !
thanks
I'm still interested in this - and it should be done before the end of
DebConf. I'm there, my intended sponsor is too, and we've picked a time
to do package review and such.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
severity 755140 serious
After a new jessie install today, I arrived at this bug.
I'm using systemd, gdm3, and gnome-flashback, so no gnome-shell.
Sorry not have the technical skills to fix this, but if we can't support
Gnome3 without gnome-shell, then things like gnome-flashback should be
Hello,
Le 08/30/14 21:05, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Relevant part (hopefully):
cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall
-O3 -DUSE_FBSPLASH -Wall -O3 -g -I/usr/include/freetype2/ -I. -c
mng_callbacks.c -o mng_callbacks.o
In file included from
Pinging these bug reports to delay autoremoval of conky from testing.
These RC bugs are fixed in conky/1.9.0-5, which I just uploaded to NEW
moments ago and should soon show up as [1].
Regards,
Vincent
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/conky_1.9.0-5.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: perl
Version: 5.20.0-6
Applications that dlopen(3) libperl at runtime usually hardcode the
name of the .so file at build time. Ideally, this name should contain
only the major version, not the minor one, so that ABI-compatible minor
updates do not break the application unnecessarily.
Am Sonntag, den 31.08.2014, 00:05 +0200 schrieb Martin Steghöfer:
Hi Olly!
El 30/08/14 a les 18:58, Olly Betts ha escrit:
The amended code here assumes sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(long long) - that's
not
true on all architectures (both i386 and armel have 4 vs 8, for example).
True
Control: tags 759775 unreproducible
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 09:34:58AM +0200, Joerg wrote:
Package: trash-cli
Version: 0.12.9.14-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
With the new version I can't put any file to trash bin anymore.
/usr/bin/trash-put tobedeleted
Traceback (most
severity 750883 important
thanks
Hi,
Since the package no longer FTBFS, I assume it's okay/intended to
downgrade severity of this.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
tags 759954 pending
thanks
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1]: Entering directory '/«BUILDDIR»/krb5-1.12.1+dfsg/build/doc'
sed -e 's|@SRC@|../../src|g' \
-e
Hi everyone,
while going through the list of initramfs-tools bugs I stumbled upon
this one.
* Stephen Powell [Sat Jan 05, 2013 at 09:57:08AM -0500]:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:49:14 -0500 (EST), Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Less than or equal to 4095 and 255 respectively, technically. ;-)
The full
Package: gtkpod
Version: 2.1.4-4
Severity: important
(Not sure about the severity, as I don't know how widespread this bug
is.)
Trying to run gtkpod:
polya:~ $ gtkpod
** (gtkpod:10468): WARNING **: Couldn't register with accessibility bus: Did
not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the
On Sunday 31 of August 2014, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
Thanks for the info! It is indeed relevant to upstream.
I see in your build log that the build tries to compile the *old*
version of the FileDialog classes.
That hint was enough. I do not apply autoconf-result patch because I'm
Robert Edmonds wrote:
This looks like a regression in par2. I think there has been some
churn/forking in that project upstream.
Yes, I just reproduced this. bup's test suite fails with par2 0.6.8-1,
but succeeds with par2 0.6.7-1 and par2 0.4-11.
The upstream changes in par2cmdline between
Control: retitle -1 gcc-4.9: Compiles zsh endlessly with
-fstack-protector-strong on s390x
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
if it's just zsh, then it's not serious.
I doubt that it's only zsh.
Apparently there are some stability issues with some s390 machines,
Looks rather like a regression than
Hi,
I have just done an NMU to fix this bug, please find the diff attached.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
diff -Nru smpeg-0.4.5+cvs20030824/debian/changelog
El 31/08/14 a les 00:22, Benjamin Drung ha escrit:
The C99 standard allows printing size_t with %zu, but Microsoft
Visual Studio needs %Iu instead [1]. [1]
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/tcxf1dw6.aspx
Thanks for the hint! But unfortunately that's only C99, but neither
C++11
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
Following a previous discussion on state of developers-reference[1], I:
- switched the package to git, and moved it to collab-maint;
- went through all bugs with patches;
- fixed a few other bugs;
- reviewed other bugs, fixed some of them, and closed those that
tag 759891 patch
thanks
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:57:50PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: golly
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
During a rebuild of all packages
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:27:50AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 29/07/14 05:05, Fred Korz wrote:
Package: libanjuta-3-0
Version: 2:3.8.4-3+b1
Severity: important
Does it still happen with anjuta 3.12?
For me, with anjuta 3.12, I get the following:
polya:~ $ gtkpod
**
Source: par2cmdline
Version: 0.6.8-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
par2 0.6.8 introduces a major regression from 0.6.7; it crashes when
parsing certain kinds of damaged file sets. I've attached a test case
that reproduces the issue. This was found using the bup test suite; see
related Debian bug
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 21:00 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
tags 712907 + help
thanks
Hi,
On 20/06/13 18:56, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The change introduced in version 1.86 added a new question in Debian
Installer, causing the installation to hang at the end asking where to
install
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:30:53PM -0400, Fred Korz wrote:
[...] I did notice, on the shell from which I
invoked /usr/bin/gtkpod 716 consecutive instances of (gtkpod:20613):
libanjuta-CRITICAL **: anjuta_status_progress_increment_ticks: assertion
'status-priv-total_ticks != 0' failed. By the
Hi Martino,
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Martino Dell'Ambrogio ti...@tillo.ch wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libtorrent-rasterbar on
wheezy-backports.
This is a straightforward rebuild of the current
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.14
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain, timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
`.deb` are ar archives. The archive internal headers currently capture
the time when the
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 01:20:09PM +0400, Vlad Orlov wrote:
Isn't this fixed already in perl 5.20, just like
https://bugs.debian.org/717881 ?
No, perl-base doesn't have a Multi-Arch annotation yet.
It's Essential:yes, so dependencies on it are generally left out
altogether. Also, packages
Robert Edmonds wrote:
I'm extracting a test case from a bup testsuite run that causes
par2verify to crash.
Opened #759997 against par2.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
301 - 400 of 471 matches
Mail list logo