Package: kde-cli-tools-data
Version: 4:5.20.5-2
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: onit...@gmail.com
When running kioclient5 under the en_GB locale, it incorrectly displays
the protocol specifier 'trash:' as 'wastebin:'
$ LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 kioclient5 --commands
...
kioclient5 move 'src' 'dest'
Package: telegram-desktop
Version: 2.2.0+ds-5
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: chandru...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
The latest version of telegram-desktop available in unstable repository
is 2.2.0, while the latest upstream version is 2.5.8. The version in
Debian misses several features that
Package: bridge-utils
Version: 1.6-5
Followup-For: Bug #966319
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
PS: I think that the manual page needs to explicitly say that "all" only means
all fixed interfaces. Right now, it mentions that it will catch all eth* but it
doesn't mention en* and
It seems that this issue is occured when link is executed via dh.
dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory=python --buildsystem=pybuild
invokes the following command:
x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -pthread -shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
-Wl,-z,relro -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wl,-z,relro -g -O2
Control: found -1 2.66.4-3
Control: notfound -1 2.66.4-1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 15:04:44 -0500, Charles Malaheenee wrote:
> After the recent update of libglib2.0 to 2.66.4-3, gnome-keyring is not able
> to
> unlock "Login" keyring. For example, it does not allow to
Hi,
[Please keep the BTS copied in on mails about this]
On 31/01/2021 14:16, Hamid Alaei V. wrote:
I think php is built with pcre 10.35 not 10.36.
Right, but that's nothing to do with Debian - if you got a PHP package
from Debian (or built on a Debian bullseye system), then it would be
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:04:13PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 15:34 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > As I've never used unattended-upgrades myself, I'm not familiar with
> > it. Is there any chance you could provide some quick tips on how to
> > set up a reproducer
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 at 11:45:08 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I suspect I know what change triggered this: it'll be the security hardening
> imported from the upstream glib-2-66 branch in 2.66.4-2. However, I couldn't
> reproduce this failure to unlock in a test VM.
I've prepared several sets of
Control: tags -1 - wontfix
Control: user debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org , usertags -1 + py2keep
Hi,
since migrating gEDA/gaf to Python 3 is a non-trivial effort and the
package has many users (popcon > 1000), I'm adding the "py2keep" user tag
as requested.
I fixed the use of unversioned
Temporarily purge libgcc-8-dev ,it will purge gcc and after doing
full-upgrade you can install gcc
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021, 3:27 AM Kamaraju Kusumanchi
wrote:
> Package: libc6-dev
> Version: 2.28-10
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> * What led up to the situation?
> I am trying to
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 20:03:37 +, A Ozbay wrote:
> I looked through journalctl output and saw this which looked out of ordinary:
> Jan 13 22:59:29 snorlax gnome-shell[2475]: JS ERROR: Error getting systemd
> inhibitor: Gio.IOErrorEnum:
>
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 01:02:47AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 2.1.18
> Severity: minor
>
> I'm not sure if these are getting removed automatically correctly ever:
>
> linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64:amd64 5.10.5-1 installed: No available version
Package: kiwix
Version: 2.0.5-2
Severity: important
Tags: security
I noticed that the data feed is not downloaded using https, so network
attackers could modify the data feed to change my choice of downloads
to something I didn't want to download.
Also most of the datasets point at http instead
Hi Lisandro,
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > > I don't know if this iis fixable, but a notein README.Debian will
> > > certainly help a lot.
> >
> > Ehm. That note is already in the package. But it's in
> > /usr/share/doc/backuppc/NEWS.Debian.gz where it belongs. README.Debian
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
According to https://bugs.debian.org/979640, this package is no longer
maintained.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lebiniou-data":
* Package name: lebiniou-data
Version : 3.54.0-1
Upstream Author : Olivier Girondel
* URL : https://biniou.net
* License : GPL-2+
control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>From your report it seems you have not installed recommended package
lxhotkey-plugin-openbox, without which you can use only command line
interface for this application. Please, confirm that. Thank you.
Sorry for the delay in responding to this, but I wanted to wait until
the technical question before the committee had arrived at a result
before replying to it.
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 06:49:37 -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
> In Debian, users of 'sysvinit' strike me as such a "disfavored class".
fixed 976621 mutt/2.0.5-1
thanks
On 2021-01-04 18:42:28, "Alan D. Salewski" spake thus:
[...]
The fix is in mutt-2.0.3, which was released on 2020-12-04, so we should get
the fix whenever that version makes it into Debian.
I just confirmed that this bug is fixed in the '2.0.5-1' version of
Dear Maintainer,
after recent upload of rdflib/5.0.0-1, tests fail with
this message:
(Reading database ... 18244 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ...
autopkgtest [12:41:57]: test python3: [---
Source: gmpc
Version: 11.8.16-19
Severity: normal
I have see that the project homepage do not point anymore to gmpc:
https://gmpclient.org/
I think that the homepage is now:
https://github.com/DaveDavenport/gmpc
Ciao
Davide
Note: this is a simplified bug report that I use to report homepage
Package: apt
Version: 2.1.18
Severity: minor
I'm not sure if these are getting removed automatically correctly ever:
linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64:amd64 5.10.5-1 installed: No available version in
archive
linux-image-5.9.0-2-amd64:amd64 5.9.6-1 installed: No available version in
archive
Hi,
with the bullseye deadline coming closer and Kai-Martin being unavailable,
I decided to give packaging gEDA/gaf 1.10.2 a try:
https://github.com/rlutz/geda-gaf-debian
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965098#80
I've only seen the above tips after doing the packaging,
Hello sddm maintainers,
is there any chance to get my VT 1 back, i.e. this fixed before the
release of bullseye?
If you need any further information I'm available to provide those
(and test things if needed).
Thanks & Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann
Hi Tino,
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 01:13:56 +0100 Tino Didriksen wrote:
> apertium-ukr should be removed from Debian. The pair that needed it has
> been upgraded to bundle the required version instead:
If you agree, can I retitle and reassign to file in a removal bug for
apertium-ukr, then?
Also, I
201 - 225 of 225 matches
Mail list logo