tags 724389 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for hfsplus (versioned as 1.0.4-12.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u hfsplus-1.0.4/d
tags 724421 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for necpp (versioned as 1.5.0+cvs20101003-2.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u necpp-
tags 724405 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libiodbc2 (versioned as 3.52.7-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -Nru libiodbc2-3
tags 724374 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gcc-avr (versioned as 1:4.8-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -Nru gcc-avr-4.8/d
Hi Grub maintainers,
Any chance of an upload soon? Almost all the other bugs have been
fixed or have delayed uploads to fix them.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ur package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded to &qu
ng your package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded to &quo
ng your package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded
making your package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded
ng your package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded
nce with making your package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgrade
with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded to "serious"
ur package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded to "se
-endif
> install -c -m 644 debian/useradd.default
> debian/passwd/etc/default/useradd
> install -d debian/passwd/sbin
> install -c -m 555 debian/shadowconfig.sh debian/passwd/sbin/shadowconfig
> diff -u shadow-4.1.5.1/debian/changelog shadow-4.1.5.1/debia
making your package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded
making your package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded
package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded to "se
ng your package
work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it
should be relatively painless for the most part.
I plan to ask for the removal of automake1.4, automake1.9 and
automake1.10 in approximately one month. Once they removed this bug's
severity will be upgraded to &qu
Control: tags -1 patch
Patch attached.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -ruN qwo-0.5/data/Makefile.am qwo-0.5.new/data/Makefile.am
--- qwo-0.5/data/Makefile.am 2009-05-28 14:05:43.0 -0400
+++ qwo-0.5.new/data/Makefile.am 2014-03-16 22:25:34.020589390 -0400
tags 741714 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for exult (versioned as 1.2-15.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u exult-1.2/debian/chan
tags 741720 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libsieve (versioned as 2.2.6-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u libsieve-2.2.6/d
est/pkg/exult.git
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:45:14PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > tags 741714 + pending
> > thanks
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for exult (versioned as 1.2-15.3) and
> > uploaded it to DELAY
Last patch was incomplete, here's the real patch:
--- libsieve-2.2.6/debian/changelog
+++ libsieve-2.2.6/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libsieve (2.2.6-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Switch to automake1.11. (Closes: #741720)
+
+ -- Eric Dorland Mon, 1
tags 741719 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for binutils-avr (versioned as 2.23.1-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -Nru binutil
me to hold off. Thanks!
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 741717 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ann (versioned as 1.1.2+doc-4.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -Nru ann-1.1.2+doc/d
tags 741718 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for autoproject (versioned as 0.20-5.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93
diff -u autopr
tags 741721 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for liece (versioned as 2.0+0.20030527cvs-11.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93
diff -u
tags 741722 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for qwo (versioned as 0.5-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93
diff -u qwo-0.5/debian/co
tags 741723 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for riece (versioned as 8.0.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93
diff -u riece-8.0.0/d
tags 741887 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for svox (versioned as 1.0+git20130326-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93
diff -Nru
tags 741897 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gpcl (versioned as 2.32-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93
diff -u gpcl-2.32/d
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Per announced plans I'm removing older automake versions. There are a few
packages I was not able to fix due to FTBFS bugs, but the rest are fixed or
have pending uploads to fix them. See
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=automake-cleanup-20
ds: autoconf, autotools-dev (>= 20010511.2)
> +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, autoconf, autotools-dev (>= 20010511.2)
> Description: A tool for generating GNU Standards-compliant Makefiles
> Automake is a tool for automatically generating `Makefile.in's from
> files called `Makefile.am'.
>
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d=CVE-2012-6085
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
But if anyone
feels strongly they can appeal to the release managers that this
should be included.
> > The master branch I didn't test yet. I'll give you a notice as soon as I
> > did.
>
> There are still card related issues in master. Thus I don't consi
et me know if you prefer that we handle it.
Sorry I meant to do both last night but it got late. I'll prepare and
upload the stable-security update tonight.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and upload feel free.
Nico Golde wrote:
>Hi,
>* Eric Dorland [2013-01-05 14:02]:
>> * Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org) wrote:
>> > On Fri, January 4, 2013 11:39, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> > > On Thu, January 3, 2013 04:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>>
* Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org) wrote:
> On Sun, January 6, 2013 06:38, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Gah. I went out of town for Saturday and Sunday. I meant to upload before
> > I left today but forgot. I just tried to now but I can't seem to reach my
> > main Debian m
to experimental. It
still needs NEW processing though but you can pick it up from the NEW
queue if you want.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
herrmann Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:21:49 +0200
> +
> lat (1.2.3-9) unstable; urgency=low
>
>* debian/control: Update homepage. (Closes: #656843)
> diff -Nru lat-1.2.3/debian/rules lat-1.2.3/debian/rules
> --- lat-1.2.3/debian/rules2012-05-27 07:57:16.00000 +0200
> +++ lat-1.2.3
OW_PIN_PROMPT,&issuers,&certs)) != CKR_OK) {
> fatal ("pkcs11h_certificate_enumCertificateIds failed", rv);
> }
> for (temp = issuers;temp != NULL;temp = temp->next) {
> printf ("Issuer: %s\n", temp->certificate_id->displayName);
> }
&
d.
> ##
> ## Ignore return result from chmod, because it might give an error
> ## if we chmod a symlink.
> @@ -198,7 +194,8 @@
> ## the file in place in the source tree.
> ##
> if %?TOPDIR_P%
> - -find $(distdir) -type d ! -perm -777 -exec chmod a+rwx {} \; -o \
&
_any_ output. I just want to avoid purely
> informational messages, keeping error and interactive messages
> intact.
>
> Regards,
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
This appears to be fixed in upstream (particularly in git commit
8050ee91bc4ef3653bae8d2e56f3612256a30cda). Any chance of getting this
fixed in Debian soon? I'd like to drop automake1.7 from the archive.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Descri
* Eric Dorland (e...@debian.org) wrote:
> * Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org) wrote:
> > Joey Hess, le Tue 19 Jul 2011 17:54:06 -0400, a écrit :
> > > Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > produces a package with a /usr/share/info/dir.gz. Shouldn't debhelper
> &
Sorry Joey I should have been clearer. Setting this at make install
time should have the right effect.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
attering, but
> we should
> still get it into Wheezy.
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.patches/8572
>
> This also affects the source packages automake, automake1.7, automake1.9 and
> automake1.10...
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
>
>
d I prepare a stable update as well or is it not
worth it?
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; 2: <201101232332.11736.th...@debian.org>
> 3: http://deb.li/prsc
>
> Thanks,
>
> with his security hat on:
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 00:32 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Sorry Jonathan, due to some personal commitments and the flu I haven't
> > gotten to this yet. But I'll prepare these by the end of the week.
>
> It ap
Proposed stable update for automake1.10.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -Nru automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog
--- automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog 2010-02-22 00:31:55.0 -0500
+++ automake1.10-1.10.3/debian
Proposed stable update for automake1.9.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
--- automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
+++ automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
@@ -408,7 +408,8
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 23:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Proposed stable update for automake1.9.
>
> This looks like the patches that are already in stable?
>
> +automake1.9 (1.9.6+nogfdl-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
Proposed stable update for automake1.7.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
--- automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
+++ automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+automake1.7 (1.7.9-9.1
* Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> not sure you got that mail (at least M-F-T said you didn't want a copy):
>
> Adam D. Barratt (31/07/2012):
> > On 31.07.2012 04:12, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.
essie/sid
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 3.8-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
.
>
> Downgrading to version 0.12.2-3 fix the issue
I'm going to need a bit more to go on. Any error messages?
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Daniel Schepler (dschep...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Package: automake
> Version: 1:1.11.6-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.13.2.tar.xz
In the new queue.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
libusb-dev. Are both necessary?
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tag 487191 fixed-upstream
thanks
* Andreas Jellinghaus (a...@dungeon.inka.de) wrote:
> I think you are right, so I edited the man page in svn trunk.
>
> Andreas
>
>
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tag 470637 fixed-upstream
thanks
* Andreas Jellinghaus (a...@dungeon.inka.de) wrote:
> Sendinglibopensc/card-belpic.c
> Transmitting file data .
> Committed revision 4010.
>
> will be part of 0.12 release.
>
> Regards, Andreas
>
>
--
Eric Dorland
lease.
>
> Regards, Andreas
>
>
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
post-el_2.5-2_all.deb: package says section is mail, override says lisp.
I believe mail is appropriate. While post-el is written in lisp, it's a major
mode for writing email, so mail seems like a much better fit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
kg-gnupg-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnupg-maint
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
automake-1.9, I show this warning:
> >
> > $ automake-1.9 --help > /dev/null
> > Useless use of /d modifier in transliteration operator at
> > /usr/share/automake-1.9/Automake/Wrap.pm line 60.
>
> This has been fixed in git Automake, in commit v1.11-34-g375
t; ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime
>
> Versions of packages gnupg2 recommends:
> ii libldap-2.4-2 2.4.23-7 OpenLDAP libraries
>
> Versions of packages gnupg2 suggests:
> pn gnupg-doc (no d
2-based PIN or pass-phrase
> en
>
> Versions of packages gnupg-agent recommends:
> ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP
> rep
>
> gnupg-agent suggests no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
v/null
> gpg: anonymous recipient; trying secret key DEADBEEF ...
> gpg: okay, we are the anonymous recipient.
> #v-
>
> It contrasts with:
> #v+
> $ man gpg2 | grep -B1 -- 'as quiet as possible'
>-q, --quiet
> Try to be as quiet as poss
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.11.1
Severity: wishlist
It would be great if whodepends also listed build dependencies, since these
are just as important as package dpendencies when trying to deprecate a
package.
-- Package-specific info:
--- /etc/devscripts.conf ---
--- ~/.devscripts ---
Not pr
depends on:
> ii libc6 2.13-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared
> lib
> ii libltdl72.4-2A system independent dlopen
> wrappe
> ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.0d-3 SSL shared libraries
> ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.
assuan.so.0: undefined
> symbol: gpg_err_set_errno
>
> So I've got my environment fixed to avoid this problem now. I'm still a
> bit curious as to what might be going wrong here.
>
> -Carl
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t-4-based PIN or pass-phrase
> entr
>
> Versions of packages gnupg-agent recommends:
> ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP
> rep
> ii gnupg2 2.0.14-2 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP
> rep
>
> gnupg-agent suggests no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
u automake1.12-1.12.6/debian/changelog
> automake1.12-1.12.6/debian/changelog
> --- automake1.12-1.12.6/debian/changelog 2012-12-25 22:49:08.0
> +
> +++ automake1.12-1.12.6/debian/changelog 2013-06-05 12:24:30.0
> +0100
> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +automa
I did not look deeply but something in either your build or
dh_autoreconf is setting -Werror on the automake invocation, which is
not the default. I don't believe this is a bug in automake.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.0.20-1
Severity: wishlist
Needs libgpg-error 1.11.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.10-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en
t; This has already been reported upstream, but it would be nice to ship a
> proofread and finally complete version in the upcoming Wheezy
> (translations are still granted a freeze exception).
>
> Thanks in advance.
Hi David,
Sorry I didn't get this into the release. Did this upd
gv2 into its own package so this should be pretty
straightforward to do for gnupg/gnupg2 and gpgv/gpgv2.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Control: tags -1 + patch
Attached is a patch to remove to fix this issue.
* Eric Dorland (e...@debian.org) wrote:
> Source: centerim
> Version: 4.22.10-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
>
> As documented in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/201
Control: tags -1 + patch
Attached is a patch to fix this bug.
* Eric Dorland (e...@debian.org) wrote:
> Source: t-code
> Version: 2:2.3.1-3.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
>
> As documented in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg
Control: tags -1 + patch
Attached is a patch that fixes this problem.
* Eric Dorland (e...@debian.org) wrote:
> Source: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.6ds1-25
> Severity: wishlist
> Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
>
> As documented in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/201
Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.0.21-2
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Fixed in 2.0.22.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTY
/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin"
> dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package automake1.13
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version 1:1.13.3-1
> dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Eric Dorland
> dpkg-source --before-build automake1.13-1.13.3
> dpkg
Source: centerim
Version: 4.22.10-2
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) of
Source: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.6ds1-25
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more)
Source: t-code
Version: 2:2.3.1-3.1
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) of
Source: amule-emc
Version: 0.5.2-2
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) of
Source: baycomusb
Version: 0.10-12.1
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) o
Source: agg
Version: 2.5+dfsg1-8
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) of th
Source: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.8.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) of
Source: black-box
Version: 1.4.8-2
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) of
Source: anon-proxy
Version: 00.05.38+20081230-2.1
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on on
Source: am-utils
Version: 6.2+rc20110530-3
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or m
Source: cairo-ocaml
Version: 1:1.2.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more)
Source: compiz-fusion-bcop
Version: 0.8.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or
Source: cwiid
Version: 0.6.00+svn201-3
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more)
Source: console-data
Version: 2:1.12-2
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more)
Source: ecl
Version: 11.1.1+dfsg1-2
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) of
Source: curl
Version: 7.32.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) of thes
Source: ccd2iso
Version: 0.3-3
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: automake-cleanup-2013
As documented in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01459.html, I will be
removing automake1.4, automake1.9 and automake1.10 from the archive.
Your package has a build dependency on one (or more) of thes
1001 - 1100 of 2088 matches
Mail list logo
