Hi,
On Montag, 27. Dezember 2010, p...@alioth.debian.org wrote:
trunk/src/debian-edu-config/share/ltsp/plugins/ltsp-build-client/Debian-cus
tom/099-mount-cdrom Modified:
Log:
Add workaround for bug #606313, while it isn't fixed in the
ltsp-server package.
why is 606313 not assigned to the
Hi,
now that we are at the beginning of a new release cycle, it would probably a
good moment to fix 560038: please make validating signatures the default,
if /usr/share/keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg is available.
IOW: debootstrap doesn't check signatures on packages by default...
Hi,
On Samstag, 5. März 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
I think it should be used, but IMO it should become cdn.debian._org_
first, at least for stable. For sid and testing it's ok without
debian.org but a stable install should fetch things from .org.
That doesn't seem to be that easy, as
Package: roundup
Version: 1.4.15-3
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge due to a
command not found. According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends
being available
Package: olvwm
Version: 4.4.3.2p1.4-25.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per
definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a
release, thus the
Hi,
On Montag, 7. März 2011, Etienne Millon wrote:
I'm interested in maintaining the package. However this would be my
first python package, so I may do a few policy mistakes at first :)
What is the correct way to take over the package ? Only change the
Maintainer field and add a new
just a forward from
http://lists.debian.org/20110218204927.GA28750@flashgordon
On Freitag, 18. Februar 2011, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:18:05PM +0100, Christian Kuelker wrote:
On 02/15/2011 07:31 PM, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
I think the best way to do the
Package: iportuguese
Version: 20110301-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per
definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a
release, thus the
Hi Toni,
On Montag, 7. März 2011, Toni Mueller wrote:
thanks for the heads-up. The command that is not being found, though,
is deluser (part of the adduser package). The respective course of
action in other packages seems to be to leave the user entry in
/etc/passwd behind, instead of trying
Hi Mike,
thanks for filing a bug report! :-)
On Dienstag, 8. März 2011, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Severity: minor
if this were/is really a bug, it would actually be a serious one. (Failing to
install a package is a serious problem with that package, Debian must not
release this as stable..)/mentor
Package: debdelta
Version: 0.41
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left owned and
unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8
and 10.7.3:
Hi,
On Dienstag, 8. März 2011, Mike Gabriel wrote:
when using GDM (desktop=gnome) the minimal uidNumber to be usable with GDM
should be 500. This has to be tweaked by debian-edu-config on Debian Edu
blended systems.
I dont think this is the right fix for this. IMO we should provide a
Hi,
On Dienstag, 8. März 2011, Mike Gabriel wrote:
If someone decides to build up a Skolelinux network based on GNOME
(desktop=gnome) there should be a SL workstation (or tjener with additional
Workstation role) that allows graphical logon as root (to get the LDAP
administration started in a
On Mittwoch, 9. März 2011, David Prévot wrote:
http://www.debian.org/CD/live/ and
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-live/ have also recently been added
(and are in actively maintained by Ben Armstrong), thus closing, thanks
for the follow up.
Yay! Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: This is
Package: pcscd
Version: 1.7.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to install. As per
definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a
release, thus the severity.
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 10. März 2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
passwd is not 'Essential: yes', so you'd still need to depend on it.
But it's required and afaik for all practical purposes that's the same as
essential. Try apt-get remove passwd.
Depending on adduser is probably the more correct fix
reassign 617694 linux-2.6
tags 617694 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
we need more information to process this bug report, please run reportbug -N
617694 and send the information to this bug report.
Thanks,
Holger
On Donnerstag, 10. März 2011, reydecopas wrote:
Package: general
Severity:
Hi Ian,
from your dmesg output I cannot see if you have exactly the same radeon as my
R51 has (ATI Radeon RV250), but take a look at #595124 and see if the
workaround (disabling agpmode) also works for you.
Also, did you report 617709 in error? It looks like a clone of 617708.
cheers,
Package: live-config
Version: 3.0~a16-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m15.3s DEBUG: Starting command:
['chroot',
On Freitag, 11. März 2011, Daniel Baumann wrote:
fixed in git.
thanks!
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Samstag, 12. März 2011, Michael Goetze wrote:
IMHO the correct solution to this bug is to ensure that all errors are
sent to STDERR and all non-errors to STDOUT. Then folks running fai
softupdate from cron can redirect STDOUT to /dev/null without missing
errors.
that would be lovely,
Package: s5
Version: 1.1.dfsg.2-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
severity 608451 serious
thanks
Hi,
On Dienstag, 11. Januar 2011, Russ Allbery wrote:
The debconf question is priority: high and defaults to true.
eeek!
On Dienstag, 11. Januar 2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
However, the squeeze RC policy says [1]
Packages must not modify other
Hi,
I can confirm that adding the right ServerAlias directive to the cupsd.conf
from lenny made cupsd work on Squeeze.
Maybe something for the release notes?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
package: munin
version: 1.4.5-3
severity: wishlist
Hi,
cgi-graphing is not enabled out of the box and needs some manual steps to
work, some of which are not or under documented.
This is a rough howto:
in /etc/apache2/sites-available/ add:
Alias /munin /var/cache/munin/www
tags 573750 + pending
tags 351436 + pending
tags 596026 + pending
tags 592842 + pending
tags 609241 + pending
tags 553528 + pending
tags 601200 + pending
thanks
Hi,
I've just manually checked the trac tickets for all bugs
tagged fixed-upstream and these are the ones also fixed in the 1.4
reassign 609939 installation-reports
severity 609939 normal
thanks
On Freitag, 14. Januar 2011, root wrote:
Package: base
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.7
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2011, Holger Levsen wrote:
then run:
a2enmod cgi
/etc/init.d/apache2 force-reload
this also needs:
a2enmod fastcgi
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Daniel,
On Montag, 17. Januar 2011, Daniel Hahler wrote:
Please configure the df plugin to use user root, otherwise it might
fail when something is mounted to a place not accessible by the regular
user.
Sure, but that's hardly the default case, /root/.dotfiles is quite unusual,
isn't it?
Package: infon-server
Version: 0~r198-3+b1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
package: release-notes
x-debbugs-cc: mu...@packages.debian.org
Hi,
for squeeze, the default location for the generated web content of munin has
been changed from /var/www/munin to /var/cache/munin/www and
therefore /etc/munin/munin.conf needs to be adapted on upgrades, if it has
been changed
Hi Osamu,
On Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2011, Osamu Aoki wrote:
to something along:
| In most cases, packages should upgrade smoothly between lenny and
| squeeze. There are a small number of cases where some intervention may
| be required, either before or during the upgrade; these are detailed
severity 505841 normal
severity 505841 moreinfo
reassign hibernate
thanks
Hi Deniz,
On Sunday 16 November 2008 04:11, Deniz Akcal wrote:
My swapfile doesn't automatically swap itself on at boot but I manually
swapped it on and then attempted to hibernate my computer and it doesn't
work.
Hi,
the following is needed to make the plugin work:
/etc/munin/plugin-conf.d/munin-node
+
+[ejabberd]
+user root
+
the following is needed to make the plugin work better:
/usr/share/munin/plugins/ejabberd
-ejabberdctl connected-users-number
+#ejabberdctl connected-users-number
+ejabberdctl
tags 506688 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Josue,
On Sunday 23 November 2008 18:56, Josue Abarca wrote:
Please include the sources[0] of the fonts in the package.
Uhm, why? The source package has the sources...
Please explain why this should be done, else I'll close this bug.
regards,
Holger
tags 506688 -moreinfo
severity 506688 serious
thanks
Hi Josue,
On Monday 24 November 2008 15:13, Josue Abarca wrote:
The source package[2] contains *.ttf files only, but at the home
page, the upstrimer[0] provides *.sfd files as the source of the
fonts, and the makefile to build them.
Ok,
hehe, thanks, Dato.
pgpjwoHYLBnRE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 07:35, Christian Perrier wrote:
I think we should report the lack of source as a bug against the
upstream tarballs, in upstream's BTS.
I agree.
Speaking of which, is there a recommended/standard way to document the
location of the upstream BT, just like
reassign 506977 release.debian.org
thanks
On Thursday 27 November 2008 12:05, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
What is the correct way to remove packages from (old)stable? Should I
file a bug report against ftp.debian.org or is it done by the SRM?
That's SRM stuff, so you need to file the bug
Hi Caius,
thanks for maintaining ttf-liberation!
looking at https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/browser/trunk I saw you
did the last commits in ttf-liberations svn, and your email address is the
only one listed in AUTHORS, that's why I ask you about this Debian bug.
Hi,
On Friday 28 November 2008 08:38, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-28 06:38]:
It's created; it'll be fully usable after the next archive sync
(though you can assign bugs to it now if you want.)
I think something went wrong. It doesn't yet
Hi Caius,
On Friday 28 November 2008 06:08, Caius kaio Chance wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.0
4.92.src.tar.gz
Ah. Those three little letters, src :) That tgz looks very good, thanks.
BTW: http://bugs.debian.org/506469 is about an ugly greek
Hi Caius,
On Friday 28 November 2008 13:50, Caius Chance wrote:
Please kindly submit through http://bugzilla.redhat.com . Thank you very
much.
Will do, thanks.
regards,
Holger
pgpedMvHhnUqT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Nikos,
I submitted your bug to fedoras bugzilla, as this is where ttf-liberation is
developed.
On Friday 28 November 2008 20:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-28 14:39:58 EDT
--- Created an attachment (id=325034)
--
Hi,
as a html doesnt really show, how it looks, here we go...
regards,
Holger
attachment: fedora-473481-debian-506469.png
pgpoX5KlgxegZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
severity 485233 serious
thanks
Hi,
On Thursday 20 November 2008 20:13, Luke Faraone wrote:
sugar-calculate-activity
sugar-chat-activity
sugar-memorize-activity
sugar-pippy-activity
sugar-web-activity
In my opinion this bugs severity should be raised to serious (as it makes
each package
Hi Luke,
On Saturday 29 November 2008 01:42, Luke Faraone wrote:
As I've said, it's been fixed in those packages, we're just awaiting a
release.
Moreover, the fix was made to the older upstream version in git,
so new-upstream-version isn't a problem, we just need a @debian to upload.
the
Hi Nicolas,
On Saturday 29 November 2008 07:15, Nicholas Breen wrote:
Conventionally, packages using fontconfig install their configuration
files to /etc/fonts/conf.avail and then symlink them into ../conf.d (see
/etc/fonts/conf.d/README .) ttf-liberation installs its file directly
into
Hi,
On Saturday 29 November 2008 03:06, Luke Faraone wrote:
As I said, this is not a new upstream version, but rather a packaging fix
that fixes a release critical (to the package) bug.
Is it a packaging fix for 0.81 or 0.82?
There isn't a bug in sugar itself; these are all in its various
Hi,
On Saturday 29 November 2008 15:23, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
you might want to remove the logging.info() calls as they are not there for
mount_proc for example
or maybe better: make them logging.debug() calls and add them for mount_proc
as well? what do you think?
regards,
package: package.qa.debian.org
severity: wishlist
Hi,
currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address listed
in
maintainers and to those subscribed to the PTS. IMO they also should be send
to the addresses in Uploaders:. Please do so.
regards,
Holger
Hi,
On Saturday 29 November 2008 22:50, Russ Allbery wrote:
This does the wrong thing if the maintainer is a mailing list and
Uploaders are the people who do the uploads, doesn't it?
No, it doesn't.
I generally want
to get such mail only once, via the mailing list.
I prefer duplicate
Hi,
On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:20, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Why? Uploaders are probably subscribed to the PTS, *or* the maintainer
is a mailing list.
not always.
regards,
Holger
pgpUv7EVTKP8Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:45, Adeodato Simó wrote:
(One could say that they should receive the mail nevertheless because
they've put their name in the control file. That's a valid point of
view, but that's not the status quo, and it's debatable whether it
should be that way, because
# justification: makes the packages unusable
severity 485233 serious
clone 485233 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5
reassign 485233 sugar-calculate-activity
reassign -1 sugar-chat-activity
reassign -2 sugar-journal-activity
reassign -3 sugar-pippy-activity
reassign -4 sugar-sharingtest-activity
reassign -5
Hi,
On Montag, 25. Januar 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The code for task selection have been moved to debian-edu and tasksel
tests, so the laptop-detect check is no longer used in
debian-edu-install.
so the code to detect laptops is now part of the debian-edu package or not?
cheers,
Hi,
going through the list of RC bugs in squeeze, I noticed #560778:
---
From: Ron r...@debian.org
To: Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: apt-listchanges: depends on things in optional,
which depend on things in
Package: slurm-llnl-slurmdbd
Version: 2.1.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
User: initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: incorrect-dependency
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install due to
Hi,
On Dienstag, 26. Januar 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
All in all (and unless I've missed something), the choice seems to be
relatively self contained. We would just need to promote to standard
python-support and python-apt.
python-apt in lenny and squeeze still depend on lsb-release,
Hi,
On Dienstag, 26. Januar 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
Not really, because everyone will re-enable it anyway.
I think your definition of everyone is flawed. I assume at least 98% of the
users not knowing about sysrq and I'd expect the same percentage to think
that it's not possible to kill
Hi Petter,
On Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The Debian Edu configuration is broken.
How? This is the complete Debian Edu configuration for Munin, and
/var/www/munin is not mentioned anywhere.
grepping for munin in svn/trunk/debian-edu-config gave me this:
Hi,
this bug came recently to my attention. It's fixed in squeeze and sid, and
also on backports.org for lenny, but not for lenny proper. And it can cause
the installation of the munin-node package fail under certain circumstances.
The patch is clear and has been tested well, so I think it
package: debian-edu-doc
Hi,
ext_static.ldif is not included in the package, so it's only available at
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Documentation/Lenny/HowTo/NetworkClients?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=ext_static.ldif
but not offline.
Maybe it should be moved to examples of another
On Freitag, 29. Januar 2010, Thomas Lange wrote:
I close this bug, since this feature will not be the default in FAI.
sigh.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: usb-modeswitch
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because
it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a replaces
relation.
See
Hi OdyX,
On Samstag, 30. Januar 2010, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
this had already been reported as #567438, which has been corrected in
1.1.0-2, uploaded yesterday evening:
So I am simply marking this bug as -done with the uploaded version.
Great, thanks sorry for the noise! :-)
cheers,
package: munin-node
version: 1.4.3-1
Hi,
the amavis plugin doesn't work:
# munin-run amavis
Usage: mktemp [-V] | [-dqtu] [-p prefix] [template]
virus.value U
spam_maybe.value U
spam_sure.value U
total.value U
There is a related trac ticket about this:
http://munin-monitoring.org/ticket/502
Hi Adam,
On Dienstag, 17. November 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I've just had a look through the bug log for #533652 (from which this
bug against release.debian.org was cloned) and it's unclear to me
whether this is a request to remove the current package from Lenny or
update it;
Well, it
Hi,
On Montag, 30. November 2009, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Should we remove Alpha section from this list? Someone who knows this for
sure, please respond.
I would rather suggest to keep the section and mention (there) that there are
no alpha porters and thus the port is becoming unmaintained and is
package: man-db
x-debbugs-cc: debian...@lists.debian.org, debian-pol...@lists.debian.org
On Sonntag, 29. November 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
It makes sense for mandb to observe that a hierarchy of manual pages has
gone away entirely (e.g. no more /usr/share/man/pt) and remove the
corresponding
On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
the Alpha port has actually already been dropped:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg0.html
thats exactly why I wrote what I wrote
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Tollef,
On Montag, 30. November 2009, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Some daemon-shipping packages fail to remove when the daemon has been
stopped before the package is removed. It would be useful if piuparts
could see that the package installed shipped a daemon and make an extra
test where the
Hi Gregor,
thanks for your bugreport!
On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009, gregor herrmann wrote:
Preparing to replace munin-node 1.2.6-17 (using
.../munin-node_1.4.0-1_all.deb) ... Stopping Munin-Node: done.
Unpacking replacement munin-node ...
dpkg: error processing
package: dhcp3-server-ldap
version: 3.1.1-6+lenny3
severity: important
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Debian Edu now uses dhcp3-server-ldap and several people have reported that
the server dies after a few hours of usage. Unfortunatly there is nothing in
the logs indicating why.
tags 557520 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009, Tom Feiner wrote:
I'm not sure how to continue with this bug without a way to reproduce it.
Lets keep it open for now until some new info be available.
Yup, thats the way to go. After some time it's also reasonable to
Hi Gregor,
On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009, gregor herrmann wrote:
Usually a Replaces: should be enough, i.e. in munin-node's debian
control a Replaces: munin-plugins-extra.
the problem is that munin-plugins-extra still is there. or isnt that a problem
to make munin-node replace it anyway...?
severity 559190 normal
tags 559190 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
thanks for the bug report, even though I've tagged it wontfix :-D
On Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009, Helmut Grohne wrote:
The df and df_inode plugins lost all history about filesystems on lvm
since upgrading to 1.4.0-1. The source of this
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
If the daemon is set to auto-start, it will be started, or are you
diverting invoke-rc.d/configuring policy-rc.d to never start daemons?
yup, that's what we do.
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
tags 559062 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009, gregor herrmann wrote:
AFAIK Replaces: means only package foo may overwrite files in package
bar.
Thanks, fixed in svn now.
[piuparts]
/me has added this comment deliberately :)
:)
I'll test this properly before the next
tags 559048 + wontfix
thanks
Hi Krzysztof,
I think your patch is not suitable as a general patch, it just duplicates code
to achieve a result which also can be achieved by using -m and specifying the
components there. Do you agree? If so, I'd like to close this bug.
cheers,
Holger
reopen 558819
thanks
On Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2009, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
It would then probably be useful to make the policy-rc.d setup so that
it allows stopping, but not starting to ensure that the init script's
stop action can complete successfully even when the daemon isn't running.
Hi,
I'd suggest to keep the code at
http://alioth.debian.org/projects/collab-maint/
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi José,
On Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009, José Luis Tallón wrote:
There hasn't been much interest from other parties, and I haven't had
the time to finish the ITP yet -- fixing bugs in other packages comes
first.
This said, if anybody really does want to take over packaging, please
feel free
tags 559449 + confirmed
thanks
Hi Patrick,
thanks for your bugreport with patch!
On Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
I'd like to use piuparts but neither with creating a new chroot on every
run, nor by unpacking a tarball on every run, but with LVM snapshots.
There is a
tags 559449 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Could you also please provide a patch for piuparts.1.txt? ;-) Extra bonus
points for a debian/changelog entry ;-)
See new attached patch.
Thank you, applied to svn :)
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Hi,
munin.conf from 1.4.1 includes these lines:
# Make graphs show values per minute instead of per second
#graph_period minute
Does that really work now? I see http://munin.projects.linpro.no/ticket/5 has
been changed to Milestone 1.6 :-)
(Debians #464880 is about the same issue.)
regards,
Hi,
I'm removing the fixed-upstream tag, as Stig has reopened the Debian bug
later... someone please reopen the upstream ticket, I've lost my trac
password... ;-)
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
according to http://munin.projects.linpro.no/ticket/686 this was fixed in the
munin 1.3.x series, which has become 1.4.x now. 1.4.1-1 is in Debian sid, can
you please test if this really fixes your issues?
Thanks,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Hi Patrick,
On Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
if a package uses ucf it will be reported as buggy, because
the purge test purges all depends (including ucf) and the package
is therefore unable to unregister its configuration files from ucf.
This will leave changed files
Hi,
read http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi/HowToUsertagAndUsercategory
:-)
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
I'd like to use categories like on bugs.debian.org/qa.debian.org for
bugs.debian.org/piuparts.debian.org but I just don't know how... can someone
please give a quick howto or pointer until this bug is finally fixed for
good? ;-)
Thanks,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is
tags 559624 + confirmed pending
# this is a known issue and shall be fixed in 1.4.2
thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
tags 559674 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
thank you for your bug report. Debian-exim should probably be replaced
with adm.
/var/log/mail.log is group adm.
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Patrick,
On Montag, 7. Dezember 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Exactly. But I'm not talking about *purging* /ucf/, I'm talking about
removing ucf and purging a package that depends on ucf. I have a different
opinion (although it seems the majority of people think I'm confused ;)
about
Hi,
On Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2009, Arthur de Jong wrote:
I brought up bug #552433 here earlier [0] and have been in contact with
the security team about this but haven't had a definite answer from them
whether they want (or don't want) to issue an advisory for this.
I'm now convinced this is
tags 447214 - patch
thanks
Hi,
On Dienstag, 21. April 2009, chaica wrote:
Here is a patch to implement a retry on apt-get actions.
With --retry you can specify how many times you want to retry.
with this patch, all external commands (like debeootstrap or whatever) are
retried. I think this
Hi,
On Freitag, 24. Juli 2009, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Maybe we could add a debconf prompt on purge to clear all grub2 files
from /boot/grub.
I think that would be sensible, then openldap packages do the same. (ask to
purge the ldap database on purge and default to no.)
I dont think this
tags 506481 -patch +moreinfo
retitle 506481 wrong cpu optimisation, please specify more info
thanks
Hi Mark,
as I understand it, this bug report of yours is a bit useless atm, as it
specifies a workaround for a non-existing (general) problem, while there is
no indication which packages
package: typo3-src
severity: wishlist
Hi,
http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/typo3-src.html says A new upstream version is
available: 4.3.0alpha3, you should consider packaging it. while
4.3.0~alpha3-1 is in experimental. This is because the watchfile is broken
and needs mangling of the upstream
tags 538970 +pending
tags 538972 +pending
thanks
On Dienstag, 28. Juli 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
One string remains fuzzy. It is apparently made of parts that should have
been splitted byt the build system.
yes. (or needs to be updated manually).
Also, I don't find anything named
1001 - 1100 of 6829 matches
Mail list logo
