Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-20 Thread David Kuehling
Neil == Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: A version mismatch will occur exacty when a mirror update ocurred in between the download of sources.bz2 and packages.bz2. You want to tell me that this is not possible, however your description of the process makes it look like it is

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-17 Thread David Kuehling
Neil == Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: Could you have a look at the current SVN revision and let me know how that matches your tests? I just tested with r8024 and it now seems to correctly retrieve all source packages (i.e. the files in the retainsources directory now pass the

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:22:25 +0200 David Kuehling dvdkh...@gmx.de wrote: That's exactly the problem: inconsistent versions in the archive or archive updates while multistrap runs. That sounds like a broken archive. I haven't implemented the versioned source call - I remain unconvinced

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-16 Thread David Kuehling
Neil == Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: Thought I'd just point out where my paranoia about proper source version matching comes from: * we're using architecture powerpcspe from debian-ports. debian-ports doesn't carry sources, and is out of sync with normal debian mirrors,

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:22:21 +0200 David Kuehling dvdkh...@gmx.de wrote: Neil == Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: Thought I'd just point out where my paranoia about proper source version matching comes from: * we're using architecture powerpcspe from debian-ports. debian-ports

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-15 Thread David Kuehling
Neil == Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: On Wed, 18 May 2011 15:09:44 +0200 David Kuehling dvdkh...@gmx.de wrote: the attached patch (mostly) fixes bug #627179 [1]. Patch is against multistrap SVN head [2]. The patch looks interesting but incomplete and possibly misleading. I

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-15 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:49:50 +0200 David Kuehling dvdkh...@gmx.de wrote: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: On Wed, 18 May 2011 15:09:44 +0200 David Kuehling dvdkh...@gmx.de wrote: Think about this more carefully. The situation is that multistrap is stateless and something can

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-15 Thread David Kuehling
Neil == Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: Error handling is the main reason. Unpacking might fail, the archives might be the only source of data. Could you have a look at the current SVN revision and let me know how that matches your tests? I'm going to have a look at it and test

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-11 Thread Neil Williams
tag 627179 + moreinfo tag 627179 - patch quit On Wed, 18 May 2011 15:09:44 +0200 David Kuehling dvdkh...@gmx.de wrote: the attached patch (mostly) fixes bug #627179 [1]. Patch is against multistrap SVN head [2]. The patch looks interesting but incomplete and possibly misleading. The patch

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-05-18 Thread David Kuehling
Package: multistrap Severity: normal looks like multistrap 2.1.13 (from svn) is incapable of downloading source for some packages. For example source-code for bash is missing when used with Ubuntu Lucid repositories. The problem seems to be caused by multistrap querying the 'Source' field of