Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 290826 important
Bug#290826: postfix: Upgrade from Postfix 2.1.4-5 to 2.1.5-4 fails
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
severity 290826 important
thanks
Jean-Philippe,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 07:21:42AM +0100, Jean-Philippe wrote:
> At 19:39 16/01/2005 -0800, you wrote:
> >Can you confirm the value of "postconf alias_database" on your system?
> I confirm the value of "postconf alias_database" was indeed
> "hash:
Bug acknowledged. This should be fixed by the pending 2.0.3 upload.
Primoz Bratanic wrote:
Package: dbmail-pgsql
Version: 1.2.11
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
In pgsql/dbauthpgsql.c escaping is not consistent. Sometimes username and
other user supplied values are
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 10:48:39PM +0100, Thomas Schmidt wrote:
>
> I also think that it would be the best to just keep the user, because
> other packages will use it too (vdradmin and some plugins).
The user, if created by the package, should be removed. If other packages
depend on it, they sh
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
> Pulling for now seems indeed the best option. I'm closing the #290145
> report with suggested patch; it's obviously not what's needed.
>
> Based on reading of mkinitrd, the extension scripts are invoked as
> the very last ac
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:59:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing dup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Hello Sean
On 2005-01-16 sean finney wrote:
> i haven't heard back from christian yet whether or not he'd accept the
> patch changeset that fixes the bug or wants to wait until the next
> version of mysql-server comes out, but our response will largely depend
> on that.
The patch was accepted and
Package: postfix
Version: 2.1.4-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On a uptodate Sarge box, the upgrade failed like this. Seems NOT to be the
same problem as described in bug #290826
tex-mail:/etc# apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... D
Hello,
an application should not be able to crash X. Most likly this is a bug
in the X Server you use. Please provide the following:
The last entries in /var/log/XFree86*, your X configuration and a
lspci run (as root) and any information you can provide besides this
about your XFree86-configurati
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 02:17:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > Package: kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc
> > Version: 2.6.9-4
> > Followup-For: Bug #284952
> >
> > The USB block device is known to be experimental and buggy.
> > CONFIG_BLK_D
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 04:17:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289940: fixed in gnome-pilot-conduits 2.0.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 04:17:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289949: fixed in arson 0.9.8beta2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: python2.3-libplot
Version: 1.0.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upon "import libplot" the following traceback is printed:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/libplot.py", line 21, in ?
from _li
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 02:17:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> I thought it already was marked as n.
> Does anyone have an objection to making this so?
No, please turn it off. I hadn't realized it's turned on either.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 04:47:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283268: fixed in spfmilter 1.99+0.95-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 290340 boost: upgrading from 1.31.0 to 1.32.0 makes disappear some
> files
Bug#290340: [libboost-thread-dev] Missing header files
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 06:02:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278190: fixed in xtrlock 2.0-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 06:02:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278190: fixed in xtrlock 2.0-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> The USB block device is known to be experimental and buggy.
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB=m should be set to 'n'.
>
> Since the ub modules takes preference of the old, though working
> usb-storage, hotplug loads ub. Blacklisting ub doesn't
Package: alsa-base
Version: 1.0.7-2
Severity: grave
After an apt-get update, alsa-base is kept back. Trying to install it
manually yields the following error:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
alsa-base: Depends: alsa-utils (> 1.0.7-2) but 1.0.7-2 is to be
installed
It seems t
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 06:47:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288150: fixed in multipath-tools 0.4.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:02:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289835: fixed in honeyd 1.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On 17.01.05 Charles Henderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: nautilus
> Version: 2.9.2-0ubuntu1
> Severity: serious
>
That version does not exist neither in unstable nor in testing.
> Strangely, nautilus appears to open a different connection for
> every file in a samba directory when bro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 290841 important
Bug#290841: nautilus opens connections for each file on a samba share
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> alsa-base: Depends: alsa-utils (> 1.0.7-2) but 1.0.7-2 is to be
> installed
Thanks for the report.
alsa-utils 1.0.8-1 didn't make it into sid last night even though alsa-base
1.0.8-1 did.
The result is that alsa-base 1.0.8-1 is uninstalla
severity 290841 important
thanks
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2005 à 23:07 -0600, Charles Henderson a écrit :
> Package: nautilus
> Version: 2.9.2-0ubuntu1
what about 2.8 which is shipped in Debian ?
> Strangely, nautilus appears to open a different connection for every
> file in a samba directory wh
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:23:47 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#283145: fixed]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package prozilla
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: prozilla
> tag 271736 pending
Bug#271736: Error in the comment on ftp.h
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tag 284117 pending
Bug#284117: remotely exploitable buffer overflow (CAN-2004-1120)
T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> clone 241112 -1
Bug#241112: Please remove distributed-net-pproxy.
Bug 241112 cloned as bug 290890.
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug#290890: Please remove distributed-net-pproxy.
Bug r
Package: libhttpfetcher-dev
Version: 1.0.1-1.1
Severity: serious
This package does not supply /usr/lib/libhttp_fetcher.so, violating
Policy section 8.4. Since the .so symlink is not present, static
linking is performed. Users building programs against this library end
up with an binary containin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 290302
Bug#290302: nfs-common: depends on libnfsidmap1 which isn't installable
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Igmar Palsenberg <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
> thanks
St
hi christian,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:36:32AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> On 2005-01-16 sean finney wrote:
> > i haven't heard back from christian yet whether or not he'd accept the
> > patch changeset that fixes the bug or wants to wait until the next
> > version of mysql-server comes ou
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:09:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.19.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Helge Kreutzmann escribió:
Hello,
an application should not be able to crash X. Most likly this is a bug
in the X Server you use. Please provide the following:
The last entries in /var/log/XFree86*, your X configuration and a
lspci run (as root) and any information you can provide besides this
abou
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> forwarded 290733 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290733: torsmo: Floating point exception
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
End of message, stopping proces
Package: rsync
Version: 2.6.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
A cron job currently runs an automatic backup each night from the remote file
server (running rsyncd under inetd) to the backup server which runs the
following script without error:
#!/bin/bash
# This scr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 290733 upstream
Bug#290733: torsmo: Floating point exception
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Just for references, this issue has been assigned CAN-2005-0079.
A Debian advisory will follow.
Regards,
Joey
--
MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
reopen 287043
tags = security,woody
thanks
Hello,
you mention two CAN-numbers when closing this bug,
CAN-2004-1284 (which this bug report was about) and
CAN-2004-0991
Both are *not* listed in
http://www.debian.org/security/nonvulns-woody
and they are both not mentioned in the changelog of mpg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 287043
Bug#287043: CAN-2004-1284 Buffer overflow in the find_next_file function
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags = security,woody
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: gdm
Version: 2.6.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
GDM manages a few dozens of thin clients. After a variable time (few days), it
stops working - clients start X server without getting any
login screen. Gdm must be restarted (or even -KILLed) (shooting down
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 278191
Bug#278191: xtrlock unlocks upon very long input
Bug#278190: xtrlock unlocks upon very long input
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tag 278191 woody
Bug#278191: xtrlock unlocks upon very long input
Tags were: patch confirmed securit
reopen 278191
tag 278191 woody
thanks
Correct?
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 06:39:34PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Just for references, this issue has been assigned CAN-2005-0079.
> A Debian advisory will follow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> reopen 278191
> tag 278191 woody
> thanks
>
> Correct?
In generall yes and only if the security team is contacted in parallel,
but please close them as I surely forget this.
Regards,
Joey
--
MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle
Please al
Bug#278191: CAN-2005-0079: authentication bypass via integer overflow
Its not an integer overflow, btw, though its not really a buffer
overflow either; its an set-an-arbitrary-byte-of-memory-to-zero bug.
Justin
On Mon, Jan 17,
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Bug#278191: CAN-2005-0079: authentication bypass via integer overflow
>
>
> Its not an integer overflow, btw, though its not really a buffer
> overflow either; its an set-an-arbitrary-byte-of-memory-to-zer
Hi,
> ERROR: module is read only
quick question, are the permissions correct on the other end?
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 290772 libc6
Bug#290772: FTBFS on arm: Running ldd on fet binary fails
Bug reassigned from package `fet' to `libc6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
reassign 290772 libc6
thanks
At the end of the build log i see fet is being built.
Looks the same as the sparc ldd bug, but that could be just a coincidence.
Radu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I haven't isolated the bug or anything more beyond knowing that it
>crashed my X. If this bug report is not particularly useful, please
>feel free to trash it. I apologise if I'm wasting your time. Thanks
>much,
X crash are due to X drivers bugs. Could you try with the current
release of xserver
Tags: patch
The following patch fixes the problem.
Tom
--- debian/libhttpfetcher-dev.files.orig 2005-01-17 21:59:05.0
+0100
+++ debian/libhttpfetcher-dev.files2005-01-17 21:57:25.0 +0100
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
usr/share/doc/*
usr/lib/lib*.a
usr/share/man/man3/*
+usr/lib/lib*.
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:57:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Done today
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 290891 + patch
Bug#290891: does not supply /usr/lib/libhttp_fetcher.so
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
On (17/01/05 21:45), Thomas Wana wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >ERROR: module is read only
>
> quick question, are the permissions correct on the other end?
Hi Tom
I believe so:
$ ls -l /root/venus
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2005-01-03 09:46 backup
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...str
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> tags 290891 patch
Bug#290891: does not supply /usr/lib/libhttp_fetcher.so
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 289702 patch
Bug#289702: menu: Non-executable update-menus breaks woody ghostview postrm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
tags 289702 patch
thanks
Attached is a patch that adds a wrapper around update-menus so that it
is always executable. The wrapper checks for the existence
for /etc/menu/unconfigured, preinst creates it, postinst removes it and
runs update-menus. This should fix the bug, I think. Also, eventually i
Could you revisit this amavis bug?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=230113
I was wondering if it was still present in the current version. Also,
did you use "mail from: address" or "mail from:address". RFCs say the
former is wrong.
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Package: cfengine2
Version: 2.1.10-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I run cfagent on the client or the server it won't run unless I
copy the cfagent.conf over by hand. It should work with just the
update.conf in place.
I emailed the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email list and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 290337 normal
Bug#290337: abort on start
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Em Qui, 2005-01-13 Ãs 16:57 +, ROBERTOJIMENOCA escreveu:
> I'm using latest unstable 2005-01-13
> with gtk+ and glib 2.6.1-1 and python_2.3.4-5 and python-gtk2_2.4.1-2
Hey,
GTK+/Glib 2.6.x are not yet on unstable, and maybe the problem is
related to them, as I can't reproduce the problem with
Package: libgcj6-dev
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
[ sorry, LANG="de_DE" ]
Entpacke libgcj6-dev (aus .../libgcj6-dev_4.0-0pre4_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von
/var/cache/apt/archives/libgcj6-dev_4.0-0pre4_i386.deb (--unpack):
versuche »/usr/lib/libgcj.a« zu überschreiben, w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> retitle 246443 boot-floppies: Fails to advise admin of kernel vulnerabilities
Bug#246443: boot-floppies: There is no indice *bf kernel has security issues
Changed Bug title.
>
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> retitle 237422 Various security related bugs are unfixed in Debian stable
Bug#237422: Various security realated Bugs are unfixed in debian stable
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> retitle 237422 Various security realated Bugs are unfixed in debian stable
Bug#237422: Various security related bugs are unfixed in Debian stable
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> tags 290047 confirmed
Bug#290047: linux-wlan-ng: insecure /tmp usage
Tags were: security
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> retitle 273826 Horgand freeze the system when run
Bug#273826: Horgand freeze the system when runned
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
> tags 242281 + pending
Bug#242281: Please convert mush to source-only package because of licence
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:18:06PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> tags 289702 patch
> thanks
>
> Attached is a patch that adds a wrapper around update-menus so that it
> is always executable. The wrapper checks for the existence
> for /etc/menu/unconfigured, preinst creates it, postinst removes it
Package: sffview
Version: 0.3-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
g++ -O2 -g -c `wx-config --cflags` -o sffview.o sffview.cpp
In file included from sffview.cpp:36:
common.h:36:37: boost/filesystem/path.hpp: No such file or directory
sffview.cpp: In
Package: proxycheck
Version: 0.49a-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I can't find any way to run this utility without causing it to segfault.
Example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/bin/proxycheck -d 127.0.0.1:80 -c chat 127.0.0.1
Segmentation fault
gdb produces a 1451-line b
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.33-2
Priority: grave
Tags: security sid sarge
Hi, I've found unsafe uses of /tmp in some of Apache's scripts in the
source, one of this (check_forensic) is installed in Debian's apache-utils
package and IMHO should be fixed. They are rather low risk, but I have to
s
Hi Jeff,
I agree, it crashes:)
Check the manpage, though. In particular, try
proxycheck -d localhost:25 -c chat::greething 127.0.0.1
Hopefully the maintainer will implement better input checking..
Cheers,
Justin
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 06:58:55PM -0500, Jeff Bonham wrote:
> Package: proxyc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 290943 important
Bug#290943: cfengine2: cfagent won't run without the cfagent.conf already there.
Severity set to `important'.
> The package is still usable provided you're already using it.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
severity 290943 important
The package is still usable provided you're already using it.
--
Andrew Stribblehill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems programmer, IT Service, University of Durham, England
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Package: tclmagick
Version: 0.44-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of tclmagick_0.44-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050118-0009
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 289025 debmirror needs a NEWS file
Bug#289025: gpg checking stuff breaks working mirror
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Package: xscreensaver-gl
Version: 4.16-1
Followup-For: Bug #290809
I also get this error.In the screensaver preferences for XScreensaver, if I
choose GLKnots as the screensaver, I am returned
to the GDM login prompt.I'm using the nVidia drivers, with the lines in
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4 being:
(II
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:03:51PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > The USB block device is known to be experimental and buggy.
> > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB=m should be set to 'n'.
> >
> > Since the ub modules takes preference of the
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:56:51PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:03:51PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > > The USB block device is known to be experimental and buggy.
> > > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB=m should be set
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:59:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:56:51PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:03:51PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > > > The USB block device is known
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:13:57PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:59:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:56:51PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:03:51PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 12:33:48PM +0100,
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 12:56 +0900, Horms wrote:
> Also, sould I go through and fix the config
> in svn, even though I can't build for any of these
> architectures?
Horms - in general you are welcome to modify the ia64 configs; though
you can also just dup a bug & I can handle it before my next upl
Package: retchmail
Severity: grave
libwvstreams3 seems to have disappeared from Debian unstable, but
retchmail still depends on it instead of libwvstreams4:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install retchmail
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not b
[thanks for the 5.0.3 patch Marga]
Just an update re. less-insecure tempfiles ..
In the upstream GRASS 5.7 CVS[*] pretty much everything in the scripts/
directory now uses g.tempfile. C modules are next. I am not sure what to
do with the init scripts & libs where the GRASS tempfile fn's may not
85 matches
Mail list logo
