Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 22:10:03 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
This filesystem is absolutely correct, yet the fsck.vfat tries to fix
it. If I let fsck.vfat fix the filesystem, all files residing after
certain treshold in the file system are truncated and shown as lost
chunks. It seams that something is wrong with maximum sector
calculation.
This is with dosfs
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:10:42AM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> I used to use phpWiki on Debian, and I'm wondering exactly what minor
> bugs make it unreleasable.
> Could you detail, or better, submit bugreports?
#243466. Beyond that, I get the feeling from the upstream mailing list
(phpwiki-ta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> severity 283024 important
Bug#283024: nhc98: build error on m68k
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 283024 - sid
Bug#283024: nhc98: build error on m68k
Tags were: sid
Tags removed:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 300424 + fixed
Bug#300424: gthumb: FTBFS: wrong version of automake
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:47:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295306: fixed in uw-imap 7:2002edebian1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:47:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301213: fixed in uw-imap 7:2002edebian1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301519 +patch
Bug#301519: giftui: FTBFS: ui_transfer.c:321: error:
`GtkCellRendererProgressColor' undeclared
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
On Sunday 27 March 2005 12:03, Kyuma Ohta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using selinux for debian .
> At kernel 2.6.11.*,kernel accepts to execute programs,
> boot up is okay.
> But, kernel 2.6.12-rc1, after loading policy,all programs
> can't start excepts sysvinit (and bash?),can't login.
> I
tag +patch
thanks
Hi,
After a couple of minutes investigating, I realized that, for some strange
reason, upstream wants to use their own version of a GTK 2.0 header file, as
Kurt points out.
It seems to be a modified version of the header file, with some new
definitions (like "GtkCellRende
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300424 patch
Bug#300424: gthumb: FTBFS: wrong version of automake
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 301600 important
Bug#301600: Can't login at 2.6.12-rc1
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
Package: selinux-policy-default
Version: 1.18-1
Severity: grave
Arch: i386
Tags: sid
I'm using selinux for debian .
At kernel 2.6.11.*,kernel accepts to execute programs,
boot up is okay.
But, kernel 2.6.12-rc1, after loading policy,all programs
can't start excepts sysvinit (and bash?),can't logi
Package: bootcd
Version: 2.47
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Note that I have previously successfully created working
CDs using bootcd on this installation; the following started
happening after an apt-get upgrade a couple of weeks ago.
When the created ISO is booted, it
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:19:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301589: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:02:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301584: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: gnome-spell
Version: N/A; reported 2005-03-27
Followup-For: Bug #231483
Sorry but, this reporting seems completely wrong.
aspell package is regolary in woody (and, also in sarge and sid):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy aspell
aspell:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 0.33.7.1.1-9
tags 301590 sid pending
priority 301590 important
thanks
I am downloading priority because the package builds fine with other
kernels Debian ships. See #294174 for the release manager explaining how
this kind of bug is not Release Critical.
--
.''`. sleep: command not found
:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301590 sid pending
Bug#301590: lirc-modules-source: does not accept kernel source
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid, pending
> priority 301590 important
Bug#301590: lirc-modules-source: does not accept kernel source
Severity set to `importan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 301513 sid
Bug#301513: sslwrap: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues: WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is
needed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing her
tags 301589 pending
thanks
OMG, thanks for reporting this... upload is on the way!
--
.''`. sleep: command not found
: :' :
`. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.10 Ext3)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
--
To UNSUBSCRI
>Thank you for reporting bug. I've posted bug report to gcc bugzilla
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18922
-- Additional Comment #3 From Andrew Pinski 2004-12-10 13:27
[reply] ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18384 ***
__
This is caused by the Makefile.in in the package being out-of-date relative
to the configure.in and aclocal.m4 files that are patched in the Debian
diff. This package needs to be repacked with freshly-generated aclocal.m4
and Makefile.in files, to get them in sync and prevent this problem in the
f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301513 serious
Bug#301513: sslwrap: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues: WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is
needed
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301589 pending
Bug#301589: liblircclient-dev: conflict with libirclient (library)
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301589 sid
Bug#301589: liblircclient-dev: conflict with libirclient (library)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Well i cannot help much about the bug , else the posix standard
online spec is there :
http://www.posix.com/posix.html (faq and permanent link)
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/toc.htm (current
version)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.7.1pre2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
the packages does not automaticly build with linux 2.6.11
I have the source of my current kernel in /usr/src/linux, but after
configuring lirc-modules-source, he complains
/usr/src/l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 299605 important
Bug#299605: libapache-mod-php4 crashes in __kernel_vsyscall
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 299605 moreinfo
Bug#299605: libapache-mod-php4 crashes in __
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-03-2005 00:34, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 12:30:19AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>On 27-03-2005 00:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:43:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>
To keep the
Package: liblircclient-dev
Version: 0.7.1pre2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is a strange conflict (it is the library itself ...)
Unpacking replacement liblircclient-dev ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/liblircclient-dev_0.7.1pre2-3_i386.deb
(--u
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301584 sid
Bug#301584: libgcj-dev: Uninstallable: Bad dependency
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
I demand that Jonas Smedegaard may or may not have written...
> On 26-03-2005 23:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[snip patch]
>> I really don't like diabling the "set -e" completely. Is the problem not
>> with the grep lines only?
>> To keep the code compact I'd just append this to the grep lines:
>
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 12:30:19AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 27-03-2005 00:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:43:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >>To keep the code compact I'd just append this to the grep lines:
> >> || true if [ $? \< 2 ]
> >>Do you see a
Package: libgcj-dev
Severity: grave
Version: 4:3.3.5-2
Tags: patch
The libgcj-dev package added in today's gcc-defaults upload is
uninstallable since it Depends on `libgcj4-dev (>= 4:3.3.5-2)', but
the actual current version of libgcj4-dev is 1:3.3.5-12. I've
attached a patch which fixes the depe
* sabato 26 marzo 2005, alle 15:21, Steve Langasek scrive:
> I think you really want a Replaces here, not a Conflicts.
Sorry, my bad.
I've correct my control file with
Replaces: gnome-pim-conduits
Eventually NMU will be correct.
Thank you.
--
Maurizio - Tannoiser -
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:55 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:55 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:16:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299168: fixed in python-mysqldb 1.2.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-03-2005 00:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:43:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>On 26-03-2005 14:37, Darren Salt wrote:
>
>
>>>--- uw-imap-2002edebian1.orig/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
>>>+++ uw-imap-2002edebian1/debia
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:31:00PM +0100, Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) wrote:
> Package: gnome-pim
> Followup-For: Bug #247192
> Because seems that gnome-pim include now old gnome-pim-conduits
> (disappeared from archive), here is a little patch to fix the RC bug.
> --- debian/control.orig 2005-03-
severity 300278 important
thanks
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 09:34:13AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:26:41AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I'm not convinced that this is actually a bug in defoma; the trouble is that
> > the failure happens in the fontconfig *pre*rm script
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 300278 important
Bug#300278: defoma: debhelper files fail if defoma is removed before package
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301576 sid
Bug#301576: needs to conflict with wx2.5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-03-2005 23:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 26-03-2005 14:37, Darren Salt wrote:
>
>
>>>--- uw-imap-2002edebian1.orig/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
>>>+++ uw-imap-2002edebian1/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
>>>@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>
>>>-set -e
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-03-2005 14:37, Darren Salt wrote:
> --- uw-imap-2002edebian1.orig/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
> +++ uw-imap-2002edebian1/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
> @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
> #!/bin/sh
>
> -set -e
> -
> PROGRAM=uw-imapd
>
> MY_FILE=/var/cache/${PROGRAM
Package: python-4suite
Version: 0.99cvs20041008-5
Severity: grave
The output pretty much says it all:
Setting up python-4suite-doc (0.99cvs20041008-5) ...
cannot create dhelp file '/usr/share/doc/python-4suite-doc/html/.dhelp': No
such file or directory
dpkg: error processing python-4suite-doc (
Package: libwxgtk2.4-python
Version: 2.4.2.6
Severity: serious
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/helpviewer', which is also in package
wxpython2.5.3
either wx2.4 needs to conflict with wx2.5, vice versa,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-03-2005 14:37, Darren Salt wrote:
> I'm seeing exactly the same problem here. The "you already have..." message
> isn't the problem - it's the previous line about the pre-installation script.
> This is caused by there being no imap line in inetd
Package: python-4suite
Version: 0.99cvs20041008-5
Severity: grave
The output pretty much says it all:
Setting up python-4suite-doc (0.99cvs20041008-5) ...
cannot create dhelp file '/usr/share/doc/python-4suite-doc/html/.dhelp': No
such file or directory
dpkg: error processing python-4suite-doc (
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:51:31 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300874: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:51:31 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301039: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
reassign 301560 mdadm
thanks
On Mar 26, Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fix to #294968 moves the original /dev directory from a safe spot
> outside of the udev /dev tree to a .static dir inside the udev tree,
> only accessable to root. Unfortunately, many programs (such as mdadm)
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 301560 mdadm
Bug#301560: mounts original /dev under udev /dev: breaks raid systems (others?)
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `mdadm'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi
|
| do you think such a configuration layer should depends on every
| database interface ?
|
| Wouldn't it be cleaner to have the package using dbconfig depends
| on the database it can work with and have test in dbconfig t
Package: udev
Version: 0.054-3
Severity: grave
The fix to #294968 moves the original /dev directory from a safe spot
outside of the udev /dev tree to a .static dir inside the udev tree,
only accessable to root. Unfortunately, many programs (such as mdadm)
that use device nodes often directly scan
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:32:46 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301550: fixed in sgcontrol 0.3cvs-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi
do you think such a configuration layer should depends on every
database interface ?
Wouldn't it be cleaner to have the package using dbconfig depends
on the database it can work with and have test in dbconfig to
only show option regarding installed databases (or databases
detectable via the a
This one time, at band camp, Chad Walstrom said:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Arturas Slajus wrote:
> > Installing clamsmtp on sarge throws up error as /var/lib/ucf/cache
> > isn't there and there is nobody to create it. That renders package
> > uninstallable.
>
> I am unable to rep
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:3.4.0-0pre2
Severity: critical
Tags: experimental
Justification: breaks the whole system
I have been using kde 3.4 for a couple of weeks now. I have just done an
aptitude
update today, although I am not 100% sure whether this package got updated in
this
update (last
Package: sgcontrol
Version: 0.3cvs-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to build 'sgcontrol', I get the following error:
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --host=x86_64-linux --build=x86_64-linux
--prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --i
Hi
Could you confirm that the "ucf" pacakge is not installed on your
box.
$ dpkg -l ucf
A workaround would be to install it before retrying to
install/upgrade clamsmtp. Please test ucf before.
Maye clamsmtp use ucf but miss a dependency on it.
Cheers
Alban
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:00:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-snapshot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reopen 301038
Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 301038 sarge
Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup
Tags were: confirmed
Tags
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:17:41 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299455: fixed in svn-workbench 1.1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301531 normal
Bug#301531: xscreensaver: Hyperball causes system crash
Severity set to `normal'.
> severity normal 301531
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
* Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Until now, I could reproduce this bug on kernel 2.6.8 and 2.6.11. It
> > seems independant from the desktop/window manager (tried under
> > Gnome, XFce)
> > Step 1: Start xscreensaver-demo
> > Step 2: choose Hyperball, click on preview
> >
> > After a whil
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Tomas,
You contacted me a while back about the roleplaying package, which I
have set to ITA. Your last comment on bug 246486 was that fixing it
and bringing it up to date would be the be difficult, and perhaps the
package should just be removed.
I think that's a good a
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:26:41AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm not convinced that this is actually a bug in defoma; the trouble is that
> the failure happens in the fontconfig *pre*rm script, and fontconfig depends
> on defoma -- so how is it possible that defoma's files have been removed
>
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Dimitri Chausson wrote:
> Package: xscreensaver
> Version: 4.16-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Until now, I could reproduce this bug on kernel 2.6.8 and 2.6.11. It
> seems independant from the desktop/window manager (tr
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Arturas Slajus wrote:
> Installing clamsmtp on sarge throws up error as /var/lib/ucf/cache
> isn't there and there is nobody to create it. That renders package
> uninstallable.
I am unable to reproduce this error. This is very strange, indeed. I
cannot s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 301494 + upstream
Bug#301494: linphone and linphonec segfault on startup
Tags were: sid
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
severity 301489 normal
thanks
Kyle McMartin writes:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 2 drives.
>
>
> I'm not really sure what to say. None of that code has been modified in
> any of the hppa patches.
>
Package: xscreensaver
Version: 4.16-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Until now, I could reproduce this bug on kernel 2.6.8 and 2.6.11. It
seems independant from the desktop/window manager (tried under Gnome,
XFce)
Step 1: Start xscreensaver-demo
Step 2: choose Hyperball,
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:32:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295902: fixed in socketapi 1.3.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 2 drives.
I'm not really sure what to say. None of that code has been modified in
any of the hppa patches.
Are you sure the device labels are correct? mdadm shows /dev/md0 s
tag 255339 pending
thanks
Hi,
an up-to-date version of kernel-patch-fwanalog is available [0].
The new version will close these bugs, but before the upload I would
like to coordinate with Stefano Melchior, who wants to take care of this
package [1].
ciao,
ema
[0] http://people.debian
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:32:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300928: fixed in socketapi 1.3.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301489 normal
Bug#301489: kernel is unable to mount file system on raid0 device
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 255339 pending
Bug#255339: kernel-patch-debianlogo: Would like an updated version for 2.4.26
and 2.6.6
Tags were: patch
Bug#277308: kernel-patch-debianlogo: support for newer versions of kernel 2.4.x
and 2.6.x
Bug#280154: kernel-patch-debianlogo:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301333 pending
Bug#301333: php4-rrdtool: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:04:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#223188: NMU Patch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 285046 serious
Bug#285046: wmkbd: FTBFS: g++ internal compiler error
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Package: giftui
Verison: 0.4.1-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
if i386-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DXTHREADS
-I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301494 sid
Bug#301494: linphone and linphonec segfault on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 301213 ipop3: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails (grep)
Bug#301213: ipopd: Upgrading to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails "You already have
/etc/ssl/certs/ipop3d.pem"
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 301213 uw-imapd,ipopd
Bug#301213: ipop3: upgrade to 7:
Package: clamsmtp
Version: 1.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Installing clamsmtp on sarge throws up error as /var/lib/ucf/cache isn't
there and there is nobody to create it. That renders package
uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers t
Package: gnome-pim
Followup-For: Bug #247192
Hello.
Because seems that gnome-pim include now old gnome-pim-conduits
(disappeared from archive), here is a little patch to fix the RC bug.
--- debian/control.orig 2005-03-26 14:10:35.178294248 +0100
+++ debian/control 2005-03-26 14:11:51.86563
Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hi,
Dino Puller wrote:
Package: linphone
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
linphone and linphonec segfault on startup
Argl. Could you please send me a stack trace to see where the problem
is? You can do that by:
% gdb linphone
(gdb) r
[
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301511 patch
Bug#301511: sysklogd: hangs the whole system
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.12
> tags 247192 + patch
Bug#247192: gnome-pim: uninstallable due to conflict with gnome-pim-conduits
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:29:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #298930,
regarding tulip: contains non-free fonts
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) David Auber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(NB: If you are a syst
Package: sysklogd
Version: 1.4.1-16
Severity: grave
Justification: breaks the whole system
References:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/26/37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103392
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/21/208
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/2/17
Syslogd can hang if do
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301508 + sid
Bug#301508: cantlr: Depends on libgcc1 from experimental.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 04:31:03 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ntp broken after update (segmentation fault)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: mdadm
Version: 1.9.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #294404
Hello,
I've been trying to setup md-raid on a system using udev and ran
across the problem described in this bug. AFAICS udev won't
create device nodes as long as there is no device initialized in
the kernel. OTOH mdadm insists on having
Package: cantlr
Version: 2.7.5-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems cantlr was build using the libgcc1 from experimental:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
cantlr: Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0) but 1:3.4.3-12 is to be installed
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 07:17:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301038: fixed in imagefs 1.03-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 282873 pending
Bug#282873: nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc
Tags were: sarge
Bug#289150: nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, sto
Package: bcel, ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
Hi,
The bcel_5.1.orig.tar.gz seems to be missing from the archive.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
