On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:58:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:37:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 16:35]:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Package: freebsd5-buildutils
Version: 5.3+2-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 300848
Bug#300848: doesn't work anymore: fatal error
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
tags 300848 -sid
Bug#300848: doesn't work anymore: fatal error
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid
tags 300848 +sarge
Bug#300848: doesn't work anymore:
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:17:25 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#303085: fixed in gnumeric 1.4.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 04:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Package: openmsx
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
openmsx depends on libgcc1 (= 1:4.0) which is NOT in sid.
Please build it using gcc 3.4 in a sid chroot.
This is really strange, as I build it in a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags #303130 moreinfo
Bug#303130: exim4-daemon-heavy: exim4 forgets emails in
/var/spool/exim4/scan, leaving emails undelivered without notice
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
severity #303130 normal
Bug#303130: exim4-daemon-heavy: exim4
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:12:21 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301792: sbcl contains file also in package sbcl-common
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:23:58AM +0200, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 04:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Package: openmsx
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
openmsx depends on libgcc1 (= 1:4.0) which is NOT in sid.
Please build it
Package: samba
Version: 2.2.3a-14.2
Followup-For: Bug #302378
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mail 2.6.3-oo-server #4 Wed Feb 18 12:01:50 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages samba depends on:
ii debconf 1.2.35
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 303085
Bug#303085: Brown paper bag bugs
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
retitle 303085 [Fixed in sid] Brown paper bag bugs
Bug#303085: Brown paper bag bugs
Changed Bug title.
tags 303085 - sid
Bug#303085: [Fixed in sid] Brown paper bag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 272206 normal
Bug#272206: apt-proxy - supports keep-alive on http 1.0 requests
Severity set to `normal'.
retitle 272206 apt-proxy - keep-alive behaviour broken if pipeling is enabled
Bug#272206: apt-proxy - supports keep-alive on http 1.0
Subject: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/file.c:534!
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686
Version: 2.6.10-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
*** Please type your report below this line ***
When the following occurs:
Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
merge 303079 303072
Bug#303072: cegui-mk2: FTBFS: missing autoconf macros
Bug#303079: cegui-mk2: FTBFS: configure:20130: error: possibly undefined macro:
AC_ARG_ENABLE
Merged 303072
Package: kbugbuster
Version: 4:3.3.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
package is uninstallable: it depends on libkcal1, which does not exists
(it may have been renamed to libkcal2a which is installed on my system?)
Of course this breaks kdesdk and in turn kde-devel.
I would like to add some more information that might be helpful:
After installing the latest unstable ifupdown 0.6.5 this morning my
hotplugged devices won't start at boot time anymore. Even though it is
possible to start the interface from the console:
orthanc ~ # ifup -vvv eth0=hotplug
Running
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 10:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:23:58AM +0200, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 04:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Package: openmsx
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
openmsx depends
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Daniel, bug, *!
I built junit today with the new gjdoc (0.7.2-2) and it worked without
modification.
I think this bug can be closed.
Hi, sorry to take so long to reply. It looks like junit does build
fine for me, and I see the bug has been
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:36:07 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line egtk: New version supersedes NMU fix
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libgnumail-java
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0-4
From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
gnumail:
[javac] Compiling 115 source files to
/tmp/buildd/libgnumail-java-1.0/classes
...
[javac] Found 1 semantic error compiling
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 291250
Bug#291250: CAN-2005-0064: Arbitrary code execution in pdftohtml
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Hi,
snip
All of the autobuilders will build against unstable, not against testing.
If you do this to an arch: any package during a library transition, you
will get skewed dependencies. You may also upload a package that fails to
build on all architectures in unstable, without noticing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301891 - security
Bug#301891: bandersnatch-frontend: config file should be in /etc
Tags were: security
Tags removed: security
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 302154 ftp.debian.org
Bug#302154: fnfx_0.3-5: Please request the removal of unsupported binary
packages
Bug reassigned from package `fnfx' to `ftp.debian.org'.
retitle 302154 RM: fnfx [!i386] -- RoM: tool specific to i386 laptop models
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 302599 sarge-ignore
Bug#302599: documentation is not DFSG-free
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
I'm still working on this bug, the problem is that I don't get the latest
userland utilities to compile with the latest patch I provided too so until
I don't get around to fix this there will be no rsbac-admin packages in
Debian. This makes the kernel-patch package rather useless as RSBAC goes,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:15:28PM +0200, Martin-ric Racine wrote:
When trying to build on powerpc, I got the following failure:
../../src/nano.h:90:20: config.h: Tiedostoa tai hakemistoa ei ole
../../src/nano.h:94:18: glib.h: Tiedostoa tai hakemistoa ei ole
Hmm, how come config.h doesn't
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.6.5
Severity: serious
Hi,
I just updated ifupdown and the update fails with
Setting up ifupdown (0.6.5) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/ifupdown ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/ifupdown-clean ...
ln: `/etc/network/run':
Package: njbtools
Severity: grave
Version: 0.0.1-1
Tags: sid
frobnitz:/var/cache/pbuildd# apt-get -s install njbtools
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are
reassign 302154 ftp.debian.org
retitle 302154 RM: fnfx [!i386] -- RoM: tool specific to i386 laptop models
severity 302154 normal
thanks
Hmm, I think the package changelog and description speak for themselves:
fnfx (0.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Changed target architectures in control file.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 300848 + help
Bug#300848: doesn't work anymore: fatal error
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: help
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
tags 302599 sarge-ignore
thanks
Hi Frank,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:45:06AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
There's one more small point, the license of the documentation. The info
files currently don't permit modification,
Since there were similar problems all over the source and we talked
Package: kpdf
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
Dear KDE maintainers,
the security fix for CAN-2005-0064 was derived from xpdf 3.00-12, which
in fact turned out to be incomplete wrt to a missing range check in XRef.cc.
Attached you can find
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:48:11 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301333: fixed in php4-rrdtool 1.04-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 303237 serious
Bug#303237: clamsmtp: bashism in init.d
Severity set to `serious'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
tags 303237 pending
quit
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:54:17PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
[root olympe] /etc/init.d/clamsmtp restart
/etc/init.d/clamsmtp: 46: Syntax error: ( unexpected
seems to be some useless ()
Partially correct. The function keyword is a bashism. Fixed pending
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #299486
well, i could also crash after mozilla-firefox-gnome-support was removed;
i also noted apt-cache crashed during the removal:
$ sudo dpkg --purge mozilla-firefox-gnome-support
(Reading database ... 131490 files and directories
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 299702 Hugs98-2005 should not go into sarge yet
Bug#299702: Hugs98-2005 should not go into sarge yet
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: binstats
Version: 1.08-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
$ binstats
Usage: mktemp [-V] | [-dqtu] [-p prefix] [template]
/usr/bin/binstats: Cannot create temporary directory!
This bug is also in sarge.
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.1.svn20050314-1
Severity: grave
Hello, Sam. Since the update to testing in vlc I am unable to use SAP
interface, thus rendering vlc unusable for me, as I work on a native
multicast environment (one of the european NRENs, RedIRIS). Under the GUI,
SAP does not
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
In the elif line, this must be $USE_PPP, of course.
Good one.
This looks like it may be _the_ bug...
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
I'm a bit busy with all sorts of things (e.g. new upstream rsync this
Package: openmsx
Version: 0.5.0-10
Severity: serious
Your package is failing to build. This is the error I get:
Probing target system...
Found libraries:
libpng: no
libxml2: no
OpenGL: no
SDL: no
SDL_image: no
TCL: no
zlib:
ahum, sorry, forgot about my last two posts, the various crashes
i experimented only happened on a house compiled 2.6.11.3, on
which i experienced other weird errors. rebooting on 2.6.9 i
could not crash firefox anymore.
cheers, piem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:29:48 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#268995: fixed in gtkhtml 1.1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 18:34, Frank Küster wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
Indeed. Great. Thanks!
The overwwrites local config part is way
Hi,
I assume you are not using i386? The problem is that currently other
architectures are not working yet, I am preparing a new upload which fixes
this.
Greetings, Joost Damad
--
The planet Andete is infamous for it's killer edible poets.
roses are red | violets are blue | all of my base |
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 291386 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#291386: creates initrd that cannot use lvm 2 volumes if both lvm2 and lvm10
are installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Hi,
This seems to be caused by a missing build dependency on ccache.
P.S.: actually it isn't using ccache, I admit the output is confusing; this is
fixed in pending 0.5.1 version.
PS: I think installing to /opt isn't a good thing.
This is also not the actualy place it is using, it is just
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: wwwoffle: Overwrites local configuration upon upgrade
Package: wwwoffle
Version: 2.8e-1
Severity: serious
I have prepared a patch for an NMU, or for adoption by Paul. This patch
is not yet finished and does not yet address all issues (see
excerpts from the buildd log.
| Automatic build of gcompris_6.5.2-1 on zeus by sbuild/m68k 27
| Build started at 20050405-0939
| **
[...]
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: libgnomeui
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 303262 Please detail SAP behaviour change
Bug#303262: SAP does not work in new version.
Changed Bug title.
severity 303262 normal
Bug#303262: Please detail SAP behaviour change
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Jordi Mallach wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:15:28PM +0200, Martin-�ric Racine wrote:
When trying to build on powerpc, I got the following failure:
../../src/nano.h:90:20: config.h: Tiedostoa tai hakemistoa ei ole
../../src/nano.h:94:18: glib.h: Tiedostoa tai
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.77
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental patch
It's not exactly a patch, just the regular expression I've found to work
with libc6 2.3.4:
sed -n 's/.*\(=\)\?[[:blank:]]\+\(\/[^[:blank:]]*\).*/\2/p'
See bug #301455
(Please note that I didn't read mail while I wrote some to this bug, and
now I'm starting to answer from the first mail I got. No offense
intended, but I might not yet know some things you said in later
mails).
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:21, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following code is AFAICS not conditional upon first installation,
thus overriding a local admin who has intentionally removed the link.
Line 257:
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 20:21, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:04:08PM +0200, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
Hi,
I assume you are not using i386? The problem is that currently other
architectures are not working yet, I am preparing a new upload which
fixes this.
No, it has
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:21:24 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299486: kernel related crashes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 302684 ifupdown hook script results in double address assignments; it
should be removed
Bug#302684: Limit families/methods for which zeroconf is called?
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Tue, Apr 05, 2005:
Matt Brubeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, today's upload of sgml2x didn't fix the problem.
I didn't have any problem building the latest sgml2x in a chroot. What
was the exact error?
As I said in the original bug
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:21:24PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Paul Brossier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ahum, sorry, forgot about my last two posts, the various crashes
i experimented only happened on a house compiled 2.6.11.3, on
which i experienced other weird errors. rebooting on 2.6.9
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 299486
Bug#299486: Mozilla-firefox: firefox crashes
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.6.4-4.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upgrade to 0.6.5 causes device not found message on ifup.
/var/log/syslog and /etc/network/interfaces below
Apr 5 18:28:51 localhost ifplugd.hotplug[3904]: Stopping ifplugd for
eth1
Apr 5 18:28:52
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:48:47 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#291250: fixed in pdftohtml 0.36-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 303062 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi Sean,
snip
checking tcpd.h usability... yes
checking tcpd.h presence... yes
checking for tcpd.h... yes
checking for TCP wrappers library -lwrap... no
checking for yp_get_default_domain... no
checking for yp_get_default_domain in -lnsl... yes
George Cristian Birzan wrote:
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.77
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental patch
It's not exactly a patch, just the regular expression I've found to work
with libc6 2.3.4:
sed -n 's/.*\(=\)\?[[:blank:]]\+\(\/[^[:blank:]]*\).*/\2/p'
Something like '[:blank:]'
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:48:37 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
On April 5, 2005 11:27, Thomas Labourdette wrote:
Package: kleopatra
Version: 4:3.3.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I select Configurer Kleopatra ... in configuration menu, the
application crash with this message :
KCrash: Application 'kleopatra'
hi jochen,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:38:36PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
configure: error: Asked to use libwrap but I couldn't find it.
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
Please check if your libwrap0-dev package is broken on your system
somehow. Do you have a possibility to try building
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:43:54PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
This bug is currently present in sarge.
No, it is not. Versions of polygen in sarge works correctly with the
ocaml version in sarge (just tried on an up-to-date testing machine).
More exactly, there are at least two cases where
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 303304 sid
Bug#303304: libapache2-request-perl: Dies complaining uploads cannot be
disabled(parser not found)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping
Hi Greg,
Apologies for the dormancy on this bug; yours is one of several RC bugs on
initrd-tools that have been long in the resolving, so it's not just you...
FWIW. :)
You mentioned being able to get access to this machine for debugging. Is
that still a possibility?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
70 matches
Mail list logo