Processed: your mail

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 313457 http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/06/msg00220.html Bug#313457: gnome-cpufreq-applet: package includes patches, but doesn't actually use them Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://lists.debian.org/debian-

Bug#314174: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#314174: Quanta Unstable and unmaintained)

2005-06-14 Thread Paul
I raised this bug because there had been nothing added to the other bug, I think I have been patient by waiting 120 days before raising this bug, after all the first bug had nothing added to it. If you had included your reply to this bug in that other bug then we all would have known that

Bug#314174: marked as done (Quanta Unstable and unmaintained)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:12:48 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314174: Quanta Unstable and unmaintained has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#314174: Quanta Unstable and unmaintained

2005-06-14 Thread Paul
Package: Quanta Version: 3.3.2-6 Severity: Critical This package has been broken for too many months, it crashes far too often and there is nothing been done about resolving problems with it, is anyone going to do something about it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Bug#245703: marked as done (libpam-cracklib should depend on wordlist package)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:33:54 -0400 (EDT) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed with release of sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#312821: marked as done (Configuration is world-readable)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:17:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312821: fixed in webcalendar 0.9.45-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#312140: Bug #312140 - xwatch: segmentation fault

2005-06-14 Thread browaeys . alban
Thank you for the full debugging trace . It looks like there is a problem with a file: > #1 0x0804a330 in addline (buf=0xb3c0 "Couldn't find color > #00 > in RGB database /usr/share/xwatch/rgb.txt", colindex=0) could you sent /usr/share/xwatch/rgb.txt ? Also do you see "Couldn't find

Bug#312525: Bug #312525 - xmms-jack depends on xmms-dev

2005-06-14 Thread browaeys . alban
This is a followup for your report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=312525 Could you send the output of : $ ldd /usr/lib/xmms/Output/libjackout.so at least the version available on i386 does not depends on xmms-dev to run (though it fails latter ). I use xmms-jackasyn in the mea

Bug#313643: Bug #313643 - evolution: Evolution crashes after upgrading to 2.2.2-4

2005-06-14 Thread browaeys . alban
Your bug report : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=313643 shows: QPixmap: Invalid pixmap parameters QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap QPainter::setPen: Will be reset by begin() QPainter::setBrush: Will be reset by begin() QPainter::setBrush: Will be reset by begin() QPaint

Bug#313615: could an apache module be gpl ?

2005-06-14 Thread browaeys . alban
This bug report raised the issue : http://bugs.debian.org/313615 of an apache module (libapache-mod-security) being gpl while using apache licenced headers . I have checked the module source and it does not ship with its own version of the apache headers. It seems to me this is not an issue as

Bug#312140: Bug #312140 - xwatch: segmentation fault

2005-06-14 Thread Ben Hay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for the full debugging trace . It looks like there is a problem with a file: #1 0x0804a330 in addline (buf=0xb3c0 "Couldn't find color #00 in RGB database /usr/share/xwatch/rgb.txt", colindex=0) could you sent /usr/share/xwatch/rgb.txt ?

Bug#309089: marked as done (gkrellm is under GPL and is linked with openssl)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:42:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line changes merged in 2.2.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#312406: Think this is related

2005-06-14 Thread Jim Wiggs
Folks, I just discovered this bug report at bugs.debian.org. Sunday night I did an apt-get upgrade; apt-get dist-upgrade on my Sid box. Gnome is now utterly and completely broken. It starts up, and the gnome-panel application begins to crash and restart repeatedly, popping up the "App has

Bug#314166: drsync: no support of non-ascii (localized) characters with --state-file

2005-06-14 Thread Oliver Jusinger
Package: drsync Version: 0.4.3-6 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Tags: l10n *** Please type your report below this line *** -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell:

Bug#312847: python-pgsql upload pending

2005-06-14 Thread Ben Burton
tags 312847 + pending tags 311328 + pending thanks mate Hi. Just a note that fixes for these bugs are ready to go, and will be uploaded once libpq4 has fixed its unix socket locations (#313602). b. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Processed: python-pgsql upload pending

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 312847 + pending Bug#312847: python-pgsql: Can't connect to UNIX socket with postgresql-7.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 311328 + pending Bug#311328: python-pgsql: Parsing of float values is not locale agnostic Tags were: pat

Processed: tagging 313546

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 313546 sid Bug#313546: bash: FTBFS with new dpkg There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#314157: does not work in d-i anymore

2005-06-14 Thread Joey Hess
Package: debootstrap Version: 0.3.1 Severity: grave /target/debootstrap # cat debootstrap.log local: 352: apt-utils: bad variable name /target/debootstrap # -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Archit

Bug#314156: util-vserver: ftbfs [sparc] error: conflicting types for `syscall'

2005-06-14 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.207-8 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source util-vserver failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder: creating src/vhashify depbase=`echo vserver-start/main.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`; \ if diet

Bug#313557: Not installable: dependency libnautilus2-2 has renamed to libnautilus-extension1

2005-06-14 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 10:43 -0700, Emil Soleyman-Zomalan a écrit : > Is this needed or even necessary? A Conflict is not correct, the packages don't have common files and can be installed together. Cheers, Sebastien Bacher

Bug#312847: More on unix socket problem

2005-06-14 Thread Ben Burton
Hi, Just a note for the BTS: the libpq4 rebuild does not fix this problem for me. Moreover, #313507 and #313602 suggest that I am not alone. It appears that the postgresql maintainer will be fixing this problem in libpq4 shortly, so watch this space. b. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Bug#175604: cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils

2005-06-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello Steve, Now that you mention it, no, it's not part of sarge but is still part of woody (since it works there). Too bad, it was a neat compiler. Thanks. On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 21:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Since the cxx package is now unusable with current binutils, is t

Bug#313067: Bug #313067 - defoma: Defoma prevents ghostscript from rendering fonts properly

2005-06-14 Thread Alban Browaeys
This is followup for your report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=313067 The report looks like an issue with fonts not providing the "best" alias to gs. Would you mind reporting against the packages with "bogus" hints ? Sorry i cannot make up a fix , as i learned defoma framewor

Bug#313650: marked as done (brightside: Uninstallable due to removed libwnck4 and doesn't build with libwnck > 2.10)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:17:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313650: fixed in brightside 1.3.2-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#313605: Resolving these bugs ...

2005-06-14 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:29:22PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: Until your package is ready to provide md5sum itself, we need something to make sure it's there -- we can't have a system without it. The diversion has been working for the last six months, and seems to have not upset anybody.

Processed: tagging 313652

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 313652 sid Bug#313652: devilspie: Uninstallable due to removed libwnck4 and doesn't build with libwnck > 2.10 Tags were: patch Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping proces

Processed: tagging 313650

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 313650 sid Bug#313650: brightside: Uninstallable due to removed libwnck4 and doesn't build with libwnck > 2.10 Tags were: patch Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping proce

Processed: tagging 313643

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 313643 sid Bug#313643: evolution: Evolution crashes after upgrading to 2.2.2-4 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contac

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#312213: initrd-tools: patch fixes other modules too

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 312213 important Bug#312213: initrd-tools: excessive amount of modules included in initrd Severity set to `important'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#313652: devilspie: Uninstallable due to removed libwnck4 and doesn't build with libwnck > 2.10

2005-06-14 Thread Heikki Henriksen
Package: devilspie Version: 0.8-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: 2. libwnck4 is removed from the archives, and hence renders devilspie uninstallable. In addition the program needs to be updated to comply with the api-changes in libwnck > 2.10. See attached patch for this. cheers,

Bug#313644: zope2.7: Local security bug

2005-06-14 Thread martin f krafft
tags 313644 + patch security severity 313644 important thanks Please try this patch: --- /usr/lib/zope2.7/bin/mkzopeinstance.py.orig 2005-06-14 22:28:04.538426375 +0200 +++ /usr/lib/zope2.7/bin/mkzopeinstance.py 2005-06-14 22:23:28.145889036 +0200 @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ print 'User/passw

Bug#313650: brightside: Uninstallable due to removed libwnck4 and doesn't build with libwnck > 2.10

2005-06-14 Thread Heikki Henriksen
Package: brightside Version: 1.3.2-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: 2. libwnck4 is removed from the archives, and hence renders brightside uninstallable. In addition the program needs to be updated to comply with the api-changes in libwnck > 2.10. See attached patch for this. chee

Processed: Re: Bug#313644: zope2.7: Local security bug

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 313644 + patch security Bug#313644: zope2.7: Local security bug There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, security > severity 313644 important Bug#313644: zope2.7: Local security bug Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here

Bug#313605: Resolving these bugs ...

2005-06-14 Thread Scott James Remnant
Clearly we're not getting anywhere by filing bugs on each other's packages and trading well-judged insults ... Something has to provide /usr/bin/md5sum, your package (coreutils) has the best implementation of that. If you also want to provide /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils, that's your call. Until yo

Bug#313605: dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion

2005-06-14 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 15:28 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:19:20PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > >On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:57 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > >> dpkg has made the md5sum.textutils binary from the coreutils binary > >> unavailable in its original path.

Bug#313644: zope2.7: Local security bug

2005-06-14 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
Package: zope2.7 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole uvw.ru:[/home/dimka]# umask 022 uvw.ru:[/home/dimka]# mkzope2.7instance ... [skipped] ... Directory: /tmp/testmkzope ... [skipped] uvw.ru:[/home/dimka]# ls -lR /tmp/testmkzope|grep inituser -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40 2005-06-

Bug#313608: marked as done (libpq3: looks for server socket in /tmp)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:37:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313608: fixed in postgresql-7.4 1:7.4.8-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#313643: evolution: Evolution crashes after upgrading to 2.2.2-4

2005-06-14 Thread Tamas Nagy
Package: evolution Version: 2.2.2-4 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Evolution crashes every time after upgrading. Even after reboot... es menu class init adding hook target 'source' (evolution:8948): camel-WARNING **: Invalid root: '/home/tamas/.evolution/mail/local/O

Bug#313605: dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion

2005-06-14 Thread Michael Stone
reopen 313605 thanks On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:19:20PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:57 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: dpkg has made the md5sum.textutils binary from the coreutils binary unavailable in its original path. A package must not remove files from another p

Processed: Re: Bug#313605: dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 313605 Bug#313605: dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#273377: marked as done (webmin: Static SSL cert/key pair)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:59:47 -0400 (EDT) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing bugs against webmin 0.94 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#313475: marked as done (gksu: FTBFS due to error in build-depends)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:02:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313475: fixed in gksu 1.2.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: tagging 313452, tagging 313453, tagging 313454

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 313452 pending Bug#313452: package is empty There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 313453 pending Bug#313453: does not depend on libecpg5 (package missing?) There we

Bug#313557: Not installable: dependency libnautilus2-2 has renamed to libnautilus-extension1

2005-06-14 Thread Emil Soleyman-Zomalan
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 19:15 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 07:51 -0700, Emil Soleyman-Zomalan a écrit : > > > Do you think it's a good time to make Totem conflict with nautilus-media > > in the near future? > > Why do you want to put a Conflict on totem? Sebastien, The

Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4

2005-06-14 Thread Sjoerd Simons
reassign 313219 glibc tag 313219 +fixed-in-experimental thanks, On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:11:39PM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:24:11AM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote: > > > I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e. > > > > > > gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_

Processed: Re: Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 313219 glibc Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4 Bug reassigned from package `gnome-vfs2' to `glibc'. > tag 313219 +fixed-in-experimental Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Lin

Bug#313557: Not installable: dependency libnautilus2-2 has renamed to libnautilus-extension1

2005-06-14 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 07:51 -0700, Emil Soleyman-Zomalan a écrit : > Do you think it's a good time to make Totem conflict with nautilus-media > in the near future? Why do you want to put a Conflict on totem? Cheers, Sebastien Bacher

Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4

2005-06-14 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:24:11AM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote: > > I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e. > > > > gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 a.c > Look further, I think /usr/include/features.h gives some hints: > > # ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 > extern int

Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4

2005-06-14 Thread Ivan Wong
> I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e. > > gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 a.c Look further, I think /usr/include/features.h gives some hints: # ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 extern int posix_fadvise (int __fd, __off_t __offset, __off_t __len,

Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4

2005-06-14 Thread Ivan Wong
> Right, very interesting.. Thanks for you debugging efforts! Lemme see if i can > trace this back to the real cause :) I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e. gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 a.c and it crashes. Cheers, -- Ivan, Wong Yat Cheung <[EMAIL PR

Processed: Re: Bug#313064: bglibs: FTBFS: Segmentation fault during install.

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 313064 upstream Bug#313064: bglibs: FTBFS: Segmentation fault during install. Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to upstream. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4

2005-06-14 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:48:38AM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote: > Hi, > > Odd, when creating a simple sample program that calls posix_fadvise it works > > fine on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. > Attached please find the source of my testing program. In fact, it > actually does: > > int main() > { >

Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4

2005-06-14 Thread Ivan Wong
Hi, > Odd, when creating a simple sample program that calls posix_fadvise it works > fine on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. Attached please find the source of my testing program. In fact, it actually does: int main() { int fd; fd = open("a.c", 0); posix_fadvise (fd, 0, 0, POSIX

Bug#313615: License conflict makes binary undistributable

2005-06-14 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Package: libapache-mod-security Severity: grave Justification: GPL conflicts with APL and makes binary undistributable Version: 1.8.7-1 According to http://packages.debian.org/stable/web/libapache2-mod-security the copyright file contains BSD style license. However the LICENSE file clearly contai

Bug#313608: libpq3: looks for server socket in /tmp

2005-06-14 Thread Florian Weimer
Package: libpq3 Version: 7.4.8-8 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole This version of libpq3 looks for the server socket in /tmp, breaking existing configurations and introducing a security problem. $ strings -a /usr/lib/libpq.so.3 | grep tmp SSL_CTX_set_verify_depth S

Bug#313605: marked as done (dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:19:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313605: dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#312821: Configuration is world-readable

2005-06-14 Thread Jerome Warnier
Le lundi 13 juin 2005 à 13:57 -0400, Tim Peeler a écrit : > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 03:03:17PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 ? 16:20 -0400, Tim Peeler a ?crit : > > > Could you double-check that version? Version 0.9.45-4 fixes this bug. > > I'm positively sure about the

Bug#313605: dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion

2005-06-14 Thread Michael Stone
Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.9 Severity: serious dpkg has made the md5sum.textutils binary from the coreutils binary unavailable in its original path. A package must not remove files from another package. dpkg did this by placing a local diversion. This local diversion does not (by definition) have

Bug#313557: Not installable: dependency libnautilus2-2 has renamed to libnautilus-extension1

2005-06-14 Thread Emil Soleyman-Zomalan
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 14:07 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 13:10 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > > > The package is removed when dist-upgrading. The solution is just depending > > on libnautilus-extension1 instead of libnautilus2-2. > > That doesn't work, these are not the

Bug#313375: khelpcenter: missing Depends: htdig

2005-06-14 Thread Christopher Martin
severity 313375 important stop On June 13, 2005 12:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > So I tried the deb and yes it seems that creating the index is comletely > broken. At least: khelpcenter tries to resolve all the help://XXX URL's > via normal DNS, which is wrong, IMHO. I'll add another comment to the

Processed: Re: Bug#313375: khelpcenter: missing Depends: htdig

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 313375 important Bug#313375: khelpcenter: missing Depends: htdig Severity set to `important'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4

2005-06-14 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 08:05:52PM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote: > I have got a more or less the same BT, just that it's nautuils that crashes on > gnome boot. > libgnomevfs2-dbg doesn't help much in providing the debugging symbols of > libfile.so (where the crash starts). I apt-get source, compiled with

Bug#313557: Not installable: dependency libnautilus2-2 has renamed to libnautilus-extension1

2005-06-14 Thread Luk Claes
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 13:10 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > > > The package is removed when dist-upgrading. The solution is just depending > > on libnautilus-extension1 instead of libnautilus2-2. > > That doesn't work, these are not the same libraries.

Processed: Re: Bug#312213: initrd-tools: patch fixes other modules too

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 312213 critical Bug#312213: initrd-tools: excessive amount of modules included in initrd Severity set to `critical'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#301459: marked as done (gnome-menus: conflict with kdelibs-data)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:35:27 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gnome-menus: conflict with kdelibs-data has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4

2005-06-14 Thread Ivan Wong
Package: libgnomevfs2-common Version: 2.10.1-4 Followup-For: Bug #313219 I have got a more or less the same BT, just that it's nautuils that crashes on gnome boot. libgnomevfs2-dbg doesn't help much in providing the debugging symbols of libfile.so (where the crash starts). I apt-get source, compi

Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 14 June 2005 at 12:25, Santiago Vila wrote: | On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Chris Lawrence wrote: | | > On 6/13/05, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > > So I will back this out as far as the Depends goes, but keep the | > > Build-Depends. | > > | > > I also reassign this back from r-base

Bug#313557: Not installable: dependency libnautilus2-2 has renamed to libnautilus-extension1

2005-06-14 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 13:10 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > The package is removed when dist-upgrading. The solution is just depending > on libnautilus-extension1 instead of libnautilus2-2. That doesn't work, these are not the same libraries. nautilus-media is deprecated with GNOME 2.10 and should

Bug#312058: ttf-larabie-uncommon patch for grave bug

2005-06-14 Thread Paul Wise
> Why a predepends? Predepends are a special thing. Since it is in > postinst, a Depends: should suffice. You are correct (I was not aware of the difference). -- bye, pabs http://pabs.zip.to signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#302269: marked as done (fontconfig: Segmentation fault with certain bdf fonts)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302269: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#251473: marked as done (libfreetype6: 2.1.7-2 is not binary compatible with 2.0.9-1)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#251473: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#226380: marked as done (freetype: segfaults with printing/previewing on non-empty document)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#226380: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#225119: marked as done ([regression from 2.1.5-3] segfaults with printing/previewing on powerpc)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#221597: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#278675: debget: relies on outdated archive structure

2005-06-14 Thread Roderick Schertler
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:48:17 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Are you still interested in maintaining debget? Is the patch supplied by > Alexis to fix this RC bug satisfactory? I really would like to get it fixed (I've been missing it more and more lately), but I'm afraid the p

Bug#313557: Not installable: dependency libnautilus2-2 has renamed to libnautilus-extension1

2005-06-14 Thread Luk Claes
Package: nautilus-media Version: 0.8.1-2 Severity: grave Tags: unstable The package is removed when dist-upgrading. The solution is just depending on libnautilus-extension1 instead of libnautilus2-2. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Bug#221597: marked as done (abiword-gnome: abiword crashes on printing)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#221597: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#249443: marked as done (libfreetype6: Upstream 2.1.8 fixes bugs that make gpdf/ipe)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249443: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#293638: marked as done (gnofin_0.8.4-2.1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with broken libtool.m4)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:55:56 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#278547: marked as done (yh is unsuitable for release)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:57:17 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#240155: marked as done (mconfig(mips/unstable): FTBFS: assigns value to a const)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:56:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#274499: marked as done (FTBFS on mips/mipsel: outdated config.guess/config.sub)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:55:56 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#313094: shared libraries, bug 313094

2005-06-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:28:57PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > Very recently somebody filled a bug against on of my packages, > #313094. > In brief, the library soname changed without me realizing it, and the > package made in into the sarge release before anyone noticed. This > means that > a) (ol

Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-14 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Chris Lawrence wrote: > On 6/13/05, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I will back this out as far as the Depends goes, but keep the > > Build-Depends. > > > > I also reassign this back from r-base-dev. > > > > Chris: You should adjust the offending package

Processed: your mail

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 308362 Bug number 308362 not found. > severity 308362 serious Bug number 308362 not found. > tag 308362 sarge Bug number 308362 not found. > severity 313457 serious Bug#313457: gnome-cpufreq-applet: package includes patches, but doesn't actua

Bug#311364: marked as done (muine: wrong libdbus-cil build-dep)

2005-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:05:30 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311364: Acknowledgement (muine: wrong libdbus-cil build-dep) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#313546: bash: FTBFS with new dpkg

2005-06-14 Thread Andrew Stribblehill
Package: bash Version: 3.0-10 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi. I recently upgraded to dpkg 1.13.9 and it appears that your debian/rules line: ARCH:= $(shell dpkg --print-gnu-build-architecture) is failing due to the --print-gnu-build-architect

Bug#313094: shared libraries, bug 313094

2005-06-14 Thread Brian May
Hello, Very recently somebody filled a bug against on of my packages, #313094. In brief, the library soname changed without me realizing it, and the package made in into the sarge release before anyone noticed. This means that a) (old) packages that linked with the old library won't work with th

Bug#311912: f-spot local copy somewhere?

2005-06-14 Thread Ondrej Sury
Hi Andrew, I tried installing f-spot on clean system (pbuilder environment) and it runs without problems. Could you check f-spot in clean GNOME environment: 1. create test user on your system 2. log-in as test user 3. run f-spot If it helps then send me /tmp/f-spot.strace.txt file created by ru

Bug#313537: qpopper-drac: Failed to create /var/spool/pop/* with uid **, gid ** Change permissions.

2005-06-14 Thread Tashiro AKIRA
Package: qpopper-drac Version: 4.0.5-4sarge1 Severity: critical After I installed qpopper-drac on my sarge sever to use pop-before-smtp, I tried to fecth mail with Mozilla Thunderbird. Thunderbird showed following message. > Failed to create /var/spool/pop/.username.pop with uid **, gid ** > Cha