Your message dated Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:32:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317181: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
Version: 2.4.27-10
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Jul 6 08:25:45 swr999 kernel: kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:144!
Jul 6 08:25:45 swr999 kernel: invalid operand:
Jul 6 08:25:45 swr999 kernel: CPU:0
Jul 6 08:25:45 swr999 ker
Package: kmail
Version: 3.3.2-3
I just (8:30 p.m. CST 7 July 2005) did an aptitude update and aptitude
upgrade, and now kmail won't start. If I attempt to run Kmail from the
command line I get the single error message "Segmentation fault". The weird
part is that I'm writing this message from
Your message dated Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:10:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317076: FTBFS: Unbound variable &parse-error?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: ethereal
Version: 0.10.11-1
Followup-For: Bug #316650
Through KDE's "GTK Styles and Fonts" settings, Ethereal (and other GTK
apps) were set to use the Cursor font. Changing the font resulted in
Ethereal working again.
I have not extensively tested this, so there may be other font settin
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jul 2005 01:24:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jul 2005 01:24:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
severity 317365 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
I am not sure I can follow what the object of this report is,
and I certainly do not see why a serious priority is justified. What
exactly is the potential for litigation here in policy? The bug
number referenced offers no further explanations eith
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 317365 wishlist
Bug#317365: ..debian policy advice on the GPL etc as licenses or contracts,
_should_ be in 2.1 and 12.5, is not.
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jul 2005 01:39:55 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317365: ..debian policy advice on the GPL etc as licenses
or contracts, _should_ be in 2.1 and 12.5, is not.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Since gcc-4.0.0 is the compiler for debian unstable on powerpc, it looks like
glibc-2.3.5 is a Build-Depend.
in glibc-2.3.5 IXDR_PUT_LONG has been redefined as follows
#define IXDR_PUT_INT32(buf, v) (*(buf)++ = (int32_t)htonl((uint32_t)(v)))
#define IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, v) ((long)IXDR_PUT_INT32(bu
Did some testing using this simple program.
#include
#include
#include
int main() {
register int32_t *buf=buf;
int i;
IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, i);
}
gcc-3.3.6 on i386 just gives a warning.
i386$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-7)
i386$ gcc spike.c
spike.c: In function `m
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: ..long term litigation hazard.
...subject 'n justification 'n bug#317359 tells the story,
further discussion can be found on Groklaw and likely d-legal
too, the GPL is a license because it gives a permission to do
someth
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 317359 important
Bug#317359: kde: ..3'rd "Help"->"About $KDE-app" tab calls the GPL "License
Agreement", ie; a contract.
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 315643 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#315643: please enable build for amd64
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 316059 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#316059: does not find libstdc++6 (missing depenency / broken RPATH)
Tags were: pe
Package: kdebase
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Justification: no longer builds from source
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/rte/projects/debian/kdebase-3.4.1/./kioslave/nfs
-I../.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/sasl -DQT_
Package: kde
Version: all
Severity: serious
Justification: ..bug filed on debian-policy, _should_ be in 2.1 and 12.5, is
not.
...summarian conclusion: Just remove "Agreement" from those tabs, leave
"License" on them. ;o)
...subject 'n justification tells the story, further discussion can be
fo
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:23:03PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> retitle 317332 udev 0.060-1 should be used with a >= 2.6.12 kernel
> thanks
> On Jul 07, Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Justification: breaks the whole system, will break upgrades from sarge
> Not really.
> > According to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 317332 sid
Bug#317332: udev 0.060-1 should be used with a >= 2.6.12 kernel
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.2-3
Followup-For: Bug #317098
I too can confirm this error, downgrading to
4:3.3.2-6.1 lets kmail work but Konqueror is
still broken.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:30:14AM +0200, tony mancill wrote:
> I have tagged this bug unreproducible. I did a fresh install of sarge
> and the apt-get -f dist-upgrade to sid and was not able to reproduce
> this problem.
>
> I did find some other problems related to -xrm
> 'XTerm.VT100.allowSendE
retitle 317332 udev 0.060-1 should be used with a >= 2.6.12 kernel
thanks
On Jul 07, Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justification: breaks the whole system, will break upgrades from sarge
Not really.
> According to the NEWS entry provided in the udev 0.060-1 package itself,
> this versio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 317332 udev 0.060-1 should be used with a >= 2.6.12 kernel
Bug#317332: udev 0.060-1 NOT COMPATIBLE with ANY sarge or released kernels
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Package: udev
Version: 0.060-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system, will break upgrades from sarge
According to the NEWS entry provided in the udev 0.060-1 package itself,
this version of udev is NOT COMPATIBLE with any kernel version prior to
2.6.12.
Kernel 2.6.12 has NOT Y
Your message dated Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:47:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in last release ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:32:40 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317263: fixed in egroupware 1.0.0.007-3.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:42:41 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in binary-only MU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 17:41:25 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:06:58PM +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
> > Package: openssh-server
> > Version: 1:4.1p1-5
> > Followup-For: Bug #314289
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > While ssh server invokes PAM for service "sshd", the provided PAM config
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:06:58PM +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
> Package: openssh-server
> Version: 1:4.1p1-5
> Followup-For: Bug #314289
> Tags: patch
>
> While ssh server invokes PAM for service "sshd", the provided PAM config
> is /etc/pam.d/ssh.
This is a different bug which only exists in 1:4.1p
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:4.1p1-5
Followup-For: Bug #314289
Tags: patch
While ssh server invokes PAM for service "sshd", the provided PAM config
is /etc/pam.d/ssh. So PAM does NOT load it, and depending on level of
paranoia of the default setting either authenticates the user or not.
Lin
Package: firebird2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS Policy 4.2
firebird no longer compiles in sid, most likely because of
the gcc4 migration. since libfirebird2-classic is a build depency
of qt-x11-free, this is a major gcc4 migration blocker.
make[4]: Entering directory `/tmp/firebird2-1.
Hi,
> I believe you have to blame libgnomecanvas2-0 and
> libgnomecanvas2-common. I'll downgrade and try again.
Operation successful. I downgraded to version 2.8.0-1 and Evolution
works again.
Holger
--
Mein Vater erklärt mir jeden Sonntag unsere neun Planeten.
signature.asc
Description: Dig
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:33:32PM +0200, Thomas Quas wrote:
> After upgrading the system to this morning (7-Jul-2005) during which the
> system upgraded some GNOME libs (sorry, forgot which ones), Evo won't start
> any longer.
I can confirm this and add some information. My aptitude log for
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:30:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 06:44:52PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> > Hmm. The latest build on arm and m68k seems to have picked up the old
> > libjack. Latest build attempts on s390, sparc, and hppa failed
> > because of missing libj
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:38:42PM +0200, Laradji nacer wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-15
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The install script does not install /etc/init.d/proftpd
Are you sure? I just looked:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_co
severity 317282 normal
tags 317282 + unreproducible
tags 317282 + moreinfo
thanks
Please, do not presume your problem is a general one without verification.
Of course it installs perfectly in a fresh install on sarge (just
verified to be sure, but it's a quite macroscopic issue to be never
pointe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 317282 normal
Bug#317282: proftpd: no init script
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 317282 + unreproducible
Bug#317282: proftpd: no init script
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> tags 317282 + moreinfo
Bug#317282: proftpd: no
Package: evolution
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading the system to this morning (7-Jul-2005) during which the
system upgraded some GNOME libs (sorry, forgot which ones), Evo won't start
any longer.
See gdb output:
$ gdb evolution
GNU gdb 6.3-
Hi Steve
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 at 03:57:26 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
>Ok, I've pushed a package out to http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/f2c/ which
>should be fixed. Do you want to give it a try and let me know if there are
>any problems?
This package works just fine on the Woody system I teste
Package: proftpd
Version: 1.2.10-15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The install script does not install /etc/init.d/proftpd
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Hi, all!
I downgraded kdelibs4 (and consequently kdelibs kdelibs-bin) and now it works
fine.
A. Denisjuk.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juan,
Can you please explain what you mean by "file collision"?
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package libnet1.
(Reading database ... 183901 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libnet1 (from .../libnet1_1.1.2.1-2_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously de
AIUI, this bug is the same as bug #234787. Is that correct? If so, this
bug is now sarge-only. Are there any plans to apply that fix for sarge?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 315886 important
thanks
Doesn't sound to me like this bug makes the package mostly unusable; it
sounds like there's a specific operation that's unusable.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 315886 important
Bug#315886: elinks: "core dump" while sorting thru bookmarks' saved snapshots
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Thu, 7 Jul 2005 02:11:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian-keyring: Do not install / upgrade as of relative pathes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
I can't seem to reproduce this bug with an etch system (or at least, it
takes a very long time testing mirrors -- hours -- before it segfaults).
Is this bug actually confirmed?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.2-3
Followup-For: Bug #317098
Same problem here. Backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1208117184 (LWP 2910)]
0x43fe11db in QString::QString () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x43fe11db in QString::QStrin
Kmail simply segfaults no matter what I do. It just dies right away when I
attempt to start it. This happened (and keeps happening) after I did an
apt-get update && apt-get upgrade && apt-get dist-upgrade yesterday. Please
fix this as soon as possible.
Sincerely Yours
Allman
--
Balazs Halasy
Sy
Package: egroupware
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
egroupware ships a local copy of the vulnerable XMLRPC code, as discovered
by GulfTech Security Research. The new upstream release 1.0.0.007-3 fixes
this issue.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debi
Your message dated Thu, 07 Jul 2005 03:32:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317160: fixed in cdebootstrap 0.3.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 10:21:36PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
> A new release of jack-audio-connection-kit (0.100.0-2) has been uploaded
> to Debian unstable. The old library libjack0.80.0-0 (and
> libjack0.80.0-dev) have been removed and replaced with libjack0.100.0-0
> and libjack0.100.0-dev si
Your message dated Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:06:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:12:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:13:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 317160 pending
Bug#317160: cdebootstrap: Fails with new apt
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
reopen 316963
thanks
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:03:14AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> The report that you've posted against the bug shows it to be a network rela=
> ted=20
> issue and has nothing to do with clamAV. I, myself am using clam and have n=
> o=20
> problems such.
Network i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reopen 316963
Bug#316963: clamav-freshclam - fails to upgrade with timeout
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
58 matches
Mail list logo
