Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 316942 + fixed
Bug#316942: greenwich: lost dependencies
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
-
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 01:47:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318560: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 07:00:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line seems to be building correctly now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
* Vincent Lefevre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 7.3
>
> There seem to be very important incompatibilities between
> mozilla-firefox 1.0.5-1 (to which I've just upgraded) and
> mozilla-tabextensions 1.14.20050519
tags 300699 -patch
thanks
This patch no longer appears to be sufficient to fix the alex build failure.
After applying it, I get this error:
==fptools== /usr/bin/make boot -wr;
in /home/devel/release/alex-2.0/alex/templates
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 31 aspell: FTBFS: Old gettext.m4 macros
Bug#31: aspell: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Old gettext.m4 macros
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Hi Thimo,
I have prepared an NMU for this bug, based on Andreas's patch. The diff is
attached, and the NMU will be uploaded shortly.
It looks to me like this bug really points to a need for this code to be
refactored so that the game's variables *don't* overlap those from the
shared library, but
Package: piuparts
Severity: serious
Version: 0.7-1
>From my pbuilder build log:
...
/usr/bin/make prefix=debian/tmp/usr install
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/piuparts-0.7'
docbook2x-man piuparts.docbook
make[1]: docbook2x-man: Command not found
make[1]: *** [piuparts.1] Error 127
make[
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 285058 + fixed
Bug#285058: ace-of-penguins: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of
'table_width' follows non-static declaration
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 318692 sid
Bug#318692: xlibs-dev: compat package doesn't depend on libs formerly in
xlibs-static-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processi
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:32:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316093: fixed in ncurses 5.4-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On 13 July 2005 at 21:21, Chris Lawrence wrote:
| On 7/13/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > NMUs for these issues are encouraged, but there are complications to
| > uploading right now because xorg-x11 isn't built on all architectures.
| > Waiting a couple of days for that to be so
Package: xlibs-dev
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
The current version of xlibs-dev is not fully backwards-compatible with
previous versions built from xfree86, because in the xorg tree a number of
packages have been split out of the xlibs-static-dev package, e.g.,
libxxf86vm-dev. Packa
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:17:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318199: fixed in rpy 0.4.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: libhoard
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.4
The libhoard package contains a libhoard.so file which is *not* a symlink to
libhoard.so.*. This violates all the rules governing shared library
packaging; it makes it impossible to properly support installation of
mul
Package: gcl
Version: 2.6.6-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
The gcl binary package depends on "binutils-dev (>= 2.15-5),
binutils-dev (<= 2.15-999)", and as a result is now uninstallable in
unstable where binutils is at version 2.16.1-2. This prevents binutils
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:02:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285475: fixed in asclock 2.0.12-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: fox
Version: 1.0.52-2
Severity: serious
Rezound has been rebuilt against libfox1.2 after sarge's release, so the fox
package (libfox1.0) has no reverse-dependencies in the archive in either
testing or unstable. Unless you know of some other reason why this package
is still needed, I beli
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:02:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318527: fixed in atanks 1.1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
reassign 318665 kde-i18n-fr
Sorry made a typo in the package name
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:02:58 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318558: fixed in scheme48 1.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: fox1.2
Version: 1.2.13-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch fixed
Hi Torsten,
Under the 0-day NMU policy for the C++ ABI transition, I have prepared an
NMU for fox1.2, since there are other packages in the archive that are
waiting on this library before they can transition to g++ 4.0. The
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 05:13:59PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 juillet 2005 à 10:03 +0200, Robert Jordens a écrit :
> > Hello!
> >
> > [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > On second thought this probably requires NUMing mpich as well, as the
> > > mpich version seem
reopen 234863
tags 234863 +sarge
thanks
Hola Helge Kreutzmann!
> Hello,
> I have no idea why you are so keen to close these bugs. Woody is
> supported (at least security wise) for well into next year,
Well, my idea was to only close non-security bugs.
Because woody is not supported for non-sec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 288770 + fixed
Bug#288770: abcmidi: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): unrecognized command line option
"-Wformat-non-literal"
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 234863
Bug#234863: evolution: The mail component eats memory till swap is gone then
crashes
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 234863 +sarge
Bug#234863: evolution: The mail component eats memory till swap is gone then
crashes
Tags we
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.3
There seem to be very important incompatibilities between
mozilla-firefox 1.0.5-1 (to which I've just upgraded) and
mozilla-tabextensions 1.14.2005051901-1.
I've done some tests with a new profile, trying it wit
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:55:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The amd64 autobuilder built parted 1.6.23-1, so this is
probably fixed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:45:58PM +0200, daniel poelzleithner wrote:
> Package: gtktalog
> Version: 1:1.0.4-2
Is this the version that is segfaulting or -3 ?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Package: kde-i18-fr
Version: 4:3.4.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package currently in experimental is almost empty.
kde-i18n-fr_3.3.2-2_all.deb 16248 KB14.04.2005
kde-i18n-fr_3.4.1-1_all.deb 1240 KB 13.07.2005
-- System Information:
Deb
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 09:23:15PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 09:43:33AM +0200, Debian User wrote:
> > Package: zaptel
> > Version: 1:1.0.9-3
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > This package does not install ztcfg, ztmonitor, ztspeed,
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:47:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318575: fixed in zaptel 1:1.0.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hello,
Can you please test if parted 1.6.23-1 did (or not) close this bug ? I think i
(or the autobuilders to some degree), built it with gcc-4.0, not sure about
the amd64 autobuilder though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
tags 318575 pending
thanks
On Saturday 16 July 2005 17:43, Debian User wrote:
> This package does not install ztcfg, ztmonitor, ztspeed, zttest
> , zttool. At least, not here it did not.
You are quite right. I deleted debian/zaptel.install. Fixed in the next
upload.
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/s
Package: quanta
Version: 1:3.3.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
The justification for grave bug is more accurately described as "causes
data loss, and is only recoverable from backup medium". reportbug didn't offer
an accurate classification.
Aftermath: (some files
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:47:44PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 05:27:33PM +0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> > According to http://secunia.com/advisories/16040:
>
> Some investigation on it:
> There is a tempfile procedure available in tcllib, one could either
> use that or co
On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 11:31 -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:21:58PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [...]
> > OK, so my question is, should I go back to testing. (Sorry to be
> > offtopic for aspell, but the subject came up here). I've only gone from
> > stable to testing to
Package: gtktalog
Version: 1:1.0.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
gtktalog segfaults right from the start. I'm not sure if it's really gtktalog
which
is broken, but i didn't notice any other gnome programs not working.
#0 0xb7dda13b in gdk_imlib_pixmap_foreign_new ()
reopen 318558
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:17:42PM -0400, Debian Installer wrote:
>
> Accepted:
> scheme48_1.3-2.diff.gz
> to pool/main/s/scheme48/scheme48_1.3-2.diff.gz
> scheme48_1.3-2.dsc
> to pool/main/s/scheme48/scheme48_1.3-2.dsc
> Closing bugs: 318558
This release tries to f
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:17:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318558: fixed in scheme48 1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 318558
Bug#318558: scheme48: FTBFS: Tries to run scheme48 within package build
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 282744 + fixed
Bug#282744: netkit-base: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: invalid lvalue in assignment
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
tags 318558 +pending
thanks for your bug report,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 09:51:56PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: scheme48
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1.3-1
> make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/scheme48-1.3'
> cd . && \
> scheme48 -a batch /bin/sh: scheme48: command not foun
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 318290 + sarge
Bug#318290: libapache2-request-perl: Upload is broken. Only one upload can be
retrieved
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 09:51:08PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Is this the architecture of the host where you tested this? Register names
> are certainly architecture-specific, and given that liboil has built before
> on all architectures, I'm sure the source code deals with them on a
> per-arc
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 04:04:51PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: inetutils
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> When building 'inetutils' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
> I get the following error:
Sorry for the delay, somehow the mainteinance of inetutils sliped from
our hands. I'll be u
Hi,
I'm just CCing Matthias Klose because I'm unsure if this is a problem
in gcc-4.0.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:29:25PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: arj
> Version: 3.10.21-4
> Severity: serious
>
> arj fails to build from source with the following error message:
>
> > ./linux-gnu/en/rs/
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 09:43:33AM +0200, Debian User wrote:
> Package: zaptel
> Version: 1:1.0.9-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This package does not install ztcfg, ztmonitor, ztspeed, zttest
> , zttool. At least, not here it did not.
The list of files in the
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:18:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318566: fixed in wdiff 0.5-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:21:58PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
[...]
> OK, so my question is, should I go back to testing. (Sorry to be
> offtopic for aspell, but the subject came up here). I've only gone from
> stable to testing to unstable. Never the reverse. How safe is that?
It depends on th
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:33:36 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309819: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.95.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:36:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318557: fixed in recode 3.6-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On 16 Jul 2005 12:25:17 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> > - Works with tla 1.3.1 and newer. closes: #318220.
>
> With tla from unstable, I still get :
>
> [2005-Jul-16 12:22:03] executing: 'tla' '--version'
> [2005-Jul-16 12:22:03] Unexpected 'tla --version' output
>
> ii archzoom 0.5
Package: tutos
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Multiple security problems have been reported on TUTOS, including SQL
injection and cross-site-scripting. Please see
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/375757
for details. All issues seem to be fixed in current CVS
* Walter Hofmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 06:04:43PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Walter Hofmann wrote:
> > > I get this error message since my last dist-upgrade of sid:
> > >
> > > slrn: error while loading shared libraries: libopencdk.so.8:
> > > cannot open shared object file:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 318527 + pending
Bug#318527: FTBFS: Ambiguous calls of abs(double)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 290061 + pending
Bug#290061: atanks-data: Improper copyright file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message,
Hello,
I have no idea why you are so keen to close these bugs. Woody is
supported (at least security wise) for well into next year, and people
might still run into these issues. It is even good if they are still
in the BTS, because then you can tell them: solved already in Sarge,
did you not check
I am working on fixing the "' is/uses anonymous type"
problems. Please do not upload without coordinating with me; I have a
bunch of other pacthes that should go in.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:47:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316836: fixed in xpdf 3.00-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: desktop-file-utils
Version: 0.10-1
Followup-For: Bug #318089
It seems I had caused the problem myself... :-/ By copying .bashrc from
another installation, XDG_DATA_DIR was set to something the package
obviously didn't like.
Sorry for the fuzz...
Cheers,
Tom
-- System Information:
Debia
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2005 à 10:03 +0200, Robert Jordens a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > On second thought this probably requires NUMing mpich as well, as the
> > mpich version seems to be statically linked to libpmpich++. I'll see if
> > I have time for thes
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:32:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318327: fixed in affix 2.1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:32:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318328: fixed in affix 2.1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: dash
Version: 0.5.2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Fails to build from source
Hello,
dash FTBFS on amd64, alpha and ia64, see attached buildd log.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
--- Begin Message ---
Automatic build of dash_0.5.2-6 on athlon.lowpingbastards.de by sbuild/
I have uploaded an NMU to DELAYED/2-day to fix this RC bug. The diff
for this upload follows. Please apply the diff and acknowledge it in
your next maintainer upload.
The upload also fixes some other build failures with text2html, and
updates the Standards-Version to 3.6.2.
Regards,
Roger
di
Package: smpeg
Version: 0.4.5+cvs20030824-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch fixed
Under the 0-day NMU policy for the C++ ABI transition, I have prepared an
NMU for smpeg, a C++ library which needs to be rebuilt so that a number of
other C++-based packages can transition to g++ 4.0. The diff for t
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du samedi 16 juillet 2005, vers
13:00, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> [2005-Jul-16 12:22:03] executing: 'tla' '--version'
>> [2005-Jul-16 12:22:03] Unexpected 'tla --version' output
> Does it work if you upgarde libarch-perl to 0.5.0+patch-169-1
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 05:00:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318422: latest sid update breaks slrn
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 06:04:43PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> severity 318422 grave
> thanks
>
> * Walter Hofmann wrote:
> > I get this error message since my last dist-upgrade of sid:
> >
> > slrn: error while loading shared libraries: libopencdk.so.8: cannot
> > open shared object file:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 318586 + fixed
Bug#318586: libsdl1.2-dev: depends on libglu1-xorg-dev on architectures where
it hasn't been built!
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 318292 important
Bug#318292: zlib1g: ICE on m68k
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Fair enough.
Thanks for that update.
Caveman
On 7/16/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:57:22PM +1000, Caveman wrote:
> > Its been 9 days since this bug was first listed. Whats the trouble
> > with getting it fixed?
> > I would have thought this would be
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: recode
> Version: 3.6-10
> Severity: serious
I am *well* aware of this, as there has been a discussion about these
bugs in debial-devel. It is really so much difficult to post a single
message to d-d-a, wait a week and only then to submit the
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:44:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: libsdl1.2-dev
> Version: 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
> The current version of libsdl1.2-dev depends on libglu1-xorg-dev, even
> though libsdl1.2 doesn't have any build-dependencies on GL-relat
> With tla from unstable, I still get :
>
> [2005-Jul-16 12:22:03] executing: 'tla' '--version'
> [2005-Jul-16 12:22:03] Unexpected 'tla --version' output
Does it work if you upgarde libarch-perl to 0.5.0+patch-169-1 ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 06:47:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286428: fixed in ifmail 2.14tx8.10-19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: libsdl1.2-dev
Version: 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
The current version of libsdl1.2-dev depends on libglu1-xorg-dev, even
though libsdl1.2 doesn't have any build-dependencies on GL-related
packages. There is now a libsdl1.2-dev package on sparc with this
build-
tag 317861 patch
thanks
The attached patch fixes this bug. OK to commit?
--
Matt
Index: keyboard.h
===
--- keyboard.h (revision 0)
+++ keyboard.h (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+/* Macro definitions from . */
+#define MAX_NR_KEYM
On Saturday 16 July 2005 05:18, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: libxbox
> Severity: serious
> Version: 0.1-1
>
> From my build log:
>
> ...
> rm -f libxbox.so libxbox.so.* *.o test
> gcc -g -O2 -shared -fPIC -Wall -Werror -D_REENTRANT -I include -c -o
> libxbox-i2c.o libxbox-i2c.c cc1: warnings
reopen #318220
thanks
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du jeudi 14 juillet 2005, vers 12:18,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) disait:
> - Works with tla 1.3.1 and newer. closes: #318220.
With tla from unstable, I still get :
[2005-Jul-16 12:22:03] executing: 'tla' '--version'
[20
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 317861 patch
Bug#317861: Do not include in loadkeys.y
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen #318220
Bug#318220: archzoom: Does not work with newer version of tla
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
On Jul 16, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is my system hosed if I reboot? Is your logic that my system is hosed
> anyway, therefore upgrading does no additional harm?
Yes (at the next reboot udev would disable itself, but this is not
supposed to totally kill your system).
I have a fix
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 06:03:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318562: fixed in tinc 1.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:08:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reopen 318572
> thanks
>
> > Ok, should go whenever new libwxgtk2.4 will enter sid...
>
> No, there won't *be* another libwxgtk2.4 package in sid: libwxgtk2.4 is a
> C++ library, which means it must be renamed as part of the ABI tr
reassign 317861 kbd-chooser
retitle 317861 Do not include in loadkeys.y
thanks
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 09:46:11PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 08:37:20AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > loadkeys.y should inline the macro definitions that it needs from
> > instead of rem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 317861 kbd-chooser
Bug#317861: conflicting definitions of P_ALL, P_PID, and P_PGID
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `kbd-chooser'.
> retitle 317861 Do not include in loadkeys.y
Bug#317861: conflicting definitions of P_ALL, P_PID, an
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 03:13:15PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: db4.1
> Severity: serious
> Version: 4.1.25-18
> >From my pbuilder build log:
> ...
> -> Considering gcj (>= 3:3.2.2-0) [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386]
>-> Trying gcj
> -> Considering libgcj4-dev [!hppa !mips !mi
reopen 318572
thanks
> Ok, should go whenever new libwxgtk2.4 will enter sid...
No, there won't *be* another libwxgtk2.4 package in sid: libwxgtk2.4 is a
C++ library, which means it must be renamed as part of the ABI transition.
This bug isn't fixed until libwxgtk2.4c2 is in unstable, and amule i
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:51:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318355: fixed in poker-network 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 318572
Bug#318572: amule is no more installable
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:37:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318572: Acknowledgement (amule is no more installable)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 318575 sid
Bug#318575: zaptel: this package does not install ztcfg, ztmonitor, ztspeed,
zttest, zttool.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping proce
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:57:22PM +1000, Caveman wrote:
> Its been 9 days since this bug was first listed. Whats the trouble
> with getting it fixed?
> I would have thought this would be a rather major program that the
> maintainer would have wanted to fix quickly.
> But we don't seem to have had
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 318558 - sid
Bug#318558: scheme48: FTBFS: Tries to run scheme48 within package build
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 318558 sid
Bug#318558: scheme48: FTBFS: Tries to run scheme48 within package build
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
On 2005-07-15 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Attached you find a merged patch addressing these issues:
[...]
Hello,
Darn, there is one thing I forgot: Due to the xlibs-static-dev changes
you'll need to build-depend on libxinerama-dev.
cu andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
reopen 318061
tag 318061 sarge
thanks
>* New upstream release, fixes security issues. (Closes: #318061)
Bug is still present in sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: zaptel
Version: 1:1.0.9-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package does not install ztcfg, ztmonitor, ztspeed, zttest
, zttool. At least, not here it did not.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers oldstable
APT policy: (500,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 318061
Bug#318061: mozilla-firefox: version 1.0.5 fixes several security bugs
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tag 318061 sarge
Bug#318061: mozilla-firefox: version 1.0.5 fixes several security bugs
Tags were: security
Tags added: sarge
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
