Hi,
linuxsampler has been FTBFS since its first upload, is now
uninstallable, and requires a rebuild against the latest g++.
Matt, are you still interested in maintaining this package? and libgig?
if not, i would be interested to adopt them.
cheers, piem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
forwarded 317863
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=13825
thanks
I've submitted this bug to the upstream bug tracker.
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 317863
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=13825
Bug#317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318758: fixed in gnome-blog 0.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
In case anyone wants a trivial illustration of the ucontext
non-constant array bound error, just run gcc -c on this file:
#include
int main()
{
return 0;
}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: freeglut
Followup-For: Bug #296242
This package now FTBFS on i386 with the same error. Alternative patch
below.
diff -u clean/freeglut_callbacks.c ./freeglut_callbacks.c
--- clean/freeglut_callbacks.c 2004-03-30 09:37:27.0 +0100
+++ ./freeglut_callbacks.c 2005-07-16 11:30:
Package: gnome-blog
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
gnome-blog requires the gnome.applet python class. This class has been
moved from python-gnome2 to python-gnome2-extras. Upgrading python-gnome2
removes gnome.applet, which causes gnome-blog to fail.
Sugg
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:33:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317861: fixed in kbd-chooser 1.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 7.0.25-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After xfree upgrade to xorg flashplugin-nonfree stoped to work.
flashplugin-nonfree works after package downgrade from xserver-xorg
6.8.2.dfsg.1-2 to xserver-xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14.
-- System I
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 04:01:19PM +0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matt Kraai wrote:
> > tag 317861 patch
> > thanks
> >
> > The attached patch fixes this bug. OK to commit?
>
> If that's the best way, please go ahead. We need to get the package
> building again.
OK, done.
--
Matt
signature.asc
D
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 02:12:26PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2005-07-17 12:09:46 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > If i got it correctly, this bug got introduced because of the changes to
> > the security model for XUL applications... so, for once, we can't really
> > blam
Matt Kraai wrote:
> tag 317861 patch
> thanks
>
> The attached patch fixes this bug. OK to commit?
If that's the best way, please go ahead. We need to get the package
building again.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
> "test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/append_header.t
> t/auto_search.t t/body.t t/cache.t t/complex_expression.t t/count.t t/date.t
> t/date_manip.t t/header.t t/help.t t/ignore_signatures.t
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 08:17:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258927: fixed in ixbiff 0.03d
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 08:17:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318554: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.4-3+2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 309819
Bug#309819: gtk-gnutella: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: vmsg.c:1189: error: duplicate
case value
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 08:40:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Steve
> * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix.
> * Fix broken cast of a function pointer to an int, which is incorrect
> on 64-bit platforms and now causes build failures with gcc 4.0, and
> is a bit silly when %p exists
Hi Enrique,
You said 11 months ago that you would "wait a few days" for KDE 3.3 before
uploading a fix for this bug. Since then, the bug has become RC. :) I hope
you haven't forgotten about it?
Obviously, there's no way to upload a fix for it until KDE has been rebuilt
with gcc-4.0.
Thanks,
--
Package: gnomemeeting
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: grave
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-100-amd64-k8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMA
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 144670 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#144670: locales: please add alias "breton" for br_FR
Tags were: l10n wontfix patch
Bug#185991: locales: /etc/locale.alias should include "bulgarian"
Bug#298784: /etc/locale.alias should be removed
Tags added: fixed
On 2005-07-17 12:09:46 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> If i got it correctly, this bug got introduced because of the changes to
> the security model for XUL applications... so, for once, we can't really
> blame the "it should have been a bug-fix release only", since it is what
> it was, except that sec
Hi Anibal,
Have you had a chance to look at this bug? Any thoughts on how to solve it?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I have uploaded an NMU to DELAYED/2-day to fix this RC bug. The diff
> for this upload follows. Please apply the diff and acknowledge it in
> your next maintainer upload.
>
> The upload also fixes some other build failures with text2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 318714 kdelibs4
Bug#318714: k3b is no more installable
Bug reassigned from package `k3b' to `kdelibs4'.
> severity 318714 grave
Bug#318714: k3b is no more installable
Severi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> retitle 318677 RM: fox -- RoM; obsolete library version
Bug#318677: fox: unused library in testing/unstable
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:02:10AM +0100, Edd Dumbill wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 00:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > This has been fixed in upstream's CVS and will be in the next release.
> > That was five months ago, and gcc-4.0 is now the default compiler in etch.
> > When could we expe
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 07:47:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316022: fixed in tint 0.03b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 07:32:31 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287660: fixed in modemp3d 0.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hello Mark,
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:58:18AM +0100, Mark Baker wrote:
> It is built to depend on the same version as the library that's built at
> the same time. I therefore uploaded library and -dev packages of 4.5-1.2
> together, and of 5.0-1 together. If somehow 5.0 of the library had got
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 285095 + fixed
Bug#285095: am-utils: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'mboxfile'
follows non-static declaration
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Hi Daniel
Thanks a lot for reporting this bug and even more so for pointing out
the solution as well. ;-)
With the attached patch which is a much stripped down version of what's
in #294474, mindi-busybox compiles fine with gcc-4.0.
Best regards
Andree
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 21:25 -0700, Daniel S
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 07:17:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297962: fixed in splat 1.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libpcre3-dev: Depends: libpcre3 (= 4.5-1.2) but 5.0-1 is to be installed
E: Broken packages
It is built to depend on the same version as the library that's built at
the same time. I therefore uploaded library and -dev p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 318551 + pending patch
Bug#318551: mindi-busybox: FTBFS: Conflicting types for 'build_bl_tree'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>>Package: gtktalog
>>Version: 1:1.0.4-2
>
> Is this the version that is segfaulting or -3 ?
I just tested again, both do. I also tested another machine with a
little outdated testing with the same crash on startup. The only
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:58:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318725: libpcre3-dev: Cannot be installed (wrong
dependency)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 12:33:12PM +0200, Daniel Poelzleithner wrote:
> > Is this the version that is segfaulting or -3 ?
>
> I just tested again, both do. I also tested another machine with a
> little outdated testing with the same crash on startup. The only thing
> which appears is the splashscr
Package: avrdude
Version: 4.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
As reported on debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org, avrdude FTBFS
with the new texi2html
Patch attached
Run autotools after applying
--- avrdude-4.4.0.orig/doc/Makefile.am
+++ avrdude-4.4.0/doc/Mak
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:33:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Under the 0-day NMU policy for the C++ ABI transition, I have prepared an
> NMU for fox1.2, since there are other packages in the archive that are
> waiting on this library before they can transition to g++ 4.0. The diff for
> thi
Package: mozilla-thunderbird
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Thunderbird 1.0.5 fixes these nine security issues, some of which
are classified as critical by the Mozilla developers:
CAN-2005-2270: Code execution through shared function objects
CAN-2005-2269: XHTML
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 00:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Edd,
>
> > This has been fixed in upstream's CVS and will be in the next release.
>
> That was five months ago, and gcc-4.0 is now the default compiler in etch.
> When could we expect this new upstream release to be uploaded to Debian?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:37:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Rezound has been rebuilt against libfox1.2 after sarge's release, so the fox
> package (libfox1.0) has no reverse-dependencies in the archive in either
> testing or unstable. Unless you know of some other reason why this package
>
Package: mozilla-browser
Version: 2:1.7.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
I've successfully crashed this version of mozilla using the proof of
concept exploits linked to from
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=112008299210033&w=2
mozilla-firefox 1.0.5-1 doesn't crash.
This is CAN-2005-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 318677 ftp.debian.org
Bug#318677: fox: unused library in testing/unstable
Bug reassigned from package `fox' to `ftp.debian.org'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:28:56AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2005-07-17 11:10:40 +0300, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > On 2005-07-17 Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It's not entirely clear, are you saying that you only have these
> > > problems with mozilla-t
Package: libpcre3-dev
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge
(This has been reproduced on an i386 sarge changeroot)
I wanted to rebuild arson which in turn need kdelibs4-dev which in
turn needs libpcre3-dev which cannot be installed:
remaxp:~# env LANG=C apt-get install libpcre3-dev
Reading Package Lists...
The Mozilla vulnerabilities have been assigned these CVE ids:
CAN-2005-2270: Code execution through shared function objects
CAN-2005-2269: XHTML node spoofing
CAN-2005-2268: Javascript prompt origin spoofing
CAN-2005-2266: Same origin violation: frame calling top.focus()
CAN-2005-2265: Possible ex
Hi,
I've missing to tell you that the problem depends on the package
kdelibs4 who can't be installed 'couse the package libaspell15 is nomore
installable.
The command "apt-get install kdelibs4" return the following reply:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kdelibs4: Depends: liba
On 2005-07-17 11:10:40 +0300, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2005-07-17 Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's not entirely clear, are you saying that you only have these
> > problems with mozilla-tabextensions?
On my side, I've noticed problems with mozilla-tabextensions only.
I don't know
Package: k3b
Version: 0.12.1-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
There's a problem with dependencies:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
k3b: Depends: k3blibs (>= 0.12.1) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: kdelibs4 (>= 4:3.3.2-6.1) but it
On 2005-07-17 Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Vincent Lefevre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Package: mozilla-firefox
> > Version: 1.0.5-1
[...]
> > There seem to be very important incompatibilities between
> > mozilla-firefox 1.0.5-1 (to which I've just upgraded) and
> > mozilla-tabex
retitle 318710 icheck: structural alignment is arch-dep in canonical form
thanks
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 09:34:32AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Your package is failing to build on all 64 arches with the following
> error:
> Differences in canonify output
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> struct foo;
> # 1 "t/
Hello,
On 05-Jul-16 23:50, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can you please test if parted 1.6.23-1 did (or not) close this bug ? I think i
> (or the autobuilders to some degree), built it with gcc-4.0, not sure about
> the amd64 autobuilder though.
I still get the following error with parted 1.6.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 318710 icheck: structural alignment is arch-dep in canonical form
Bug#318710: icheck: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: tests failed
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Hi Edd,
> This has been fixed in upstream's CVS and will be in the next release.
That was five months ago, and gcc-4.0 is now the default compiler in etch.
When could we expect this new upstream release to be uploaded to Debian?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
De
Package: gandalf
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all 64 arches with the following
error:
../libtool --mode=compile gcc -I../.. -g -O2 -Wall -c image_pyramid.c -o
image_pyramid_rl.o
rm -f .libs/image_pyramid_rl.lo
gcc -I../.. -g -O2 -Wall -c imag
Package: icheck
Version: 0.9.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all 64 arches with the following
error:
Differences in canonify output
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
struct foo;
# 1 "t/02_struct/source/bar.c"
-struct __attribute__((aligned(4))) foo
+struct __attribute__((a
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 02:47:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300080: fixed in inetutils 2:1.4.2+20040207-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 07:42:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of greenwich 0.8.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
59 matches
Mail list logo
