Sigh. This is not supposed to happen...
Do you have a build log?
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
Murphy's Laws:
(1) If anything can go wrong, it will.
(2
Package: gksu
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading gksu from 1.3.3-1 to 1.3.2-2 I get only a Segfault when
I start gnome-terminal via gksu -u normal-user gnome-terminal.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unst
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#191189: fixed in grap 1.36-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286911: fixed in grap 1.36-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
tag kernel-source-2.6.8 +pending
thanks
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 02:53:07PM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: critical
> Justification: root security hole
>
> SecurityFocus http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14477 mentions an array index
> b
Hi,
After todays apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and recompiling my kernel
mozilla-firefox works fine again. I have absolutely no clue as to why
mozilla-firefox did segfault.
To summarise my step until the problem magically went away
First mozilla-firefox segfaults, but the following runned fin
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
SecurityFocus http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14477 mentions an array index
buffer overflow.
In short, the suspect it can cause a denial of service attack, but
aren't sure whether or not it allows
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 320258 318363
Bug#318363: allegro-config --libs lists -lXxf86dga
Bug#320258: atanks: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lXxf86dga
Merged 318363 320258.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:11:20PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> reopen 315968
> tags 315968 + sarge
> thanks
>
> I assume you meant to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
Yes, unfortunately I often forget to do that.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Andres Salomon wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:54:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[...]
rmmod usbnet
The model usbnet can not be removed.
Also the process which execute the command can not be finished,it
consume the CPU 99% persistent,over and over.Even I can't use
[...]
If this does
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>Hello,
>I know you are all eager to see a fixed version of VLC in unstable.
> However, there is absolutely nothing I can do until wxwin has finished
> its C++ transition, so please be patient.
>To be kept informed about the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 322235 sid
Bug#322235: most: uninstallable in sid (depends on slang1a-utf8 (> 1.4.9dbs-4)
which is UNAVAILABLE)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stoppi
reassign 322089 openldap2/2.1.30-11,libgnutls-dev/1.2.5-3
thanks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:50:13PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:26:00PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > IOW this is a FTBFS if libgnutls-dev is installed (note that
> > libgnutls-dev pr
Status: All transitionable build-dependencies have been uploaded, but
buildds are still chewing on some of them.
--
Henning Makholm "- Or hast thee (perverted) designs
to attempt (strange, hybrid) procreation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 322236 sid
Bug#322236: fbi: uninstallable in sid (depends on libexif10 which is
UNAVAILABLE)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 322089 openldap2/2.1.30-11,libgnutls-dev/1.2.5-3
Bug#322089: openldap2: Please switch to libgnutls12
Bug reassigned from package `openldap2' to
`openldap2/2.1.30-11,libgnutls-dev/1.2.5-3'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 322233 sid
Bug#322233: oleo: uninstallable in sid (depends on libplot2 which is
UNAVAILABLE)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Falk could you please test new version of asc? According to authors it
> supports powerpc, so maybe support for other archs is better too.
It seems to work as of 1.16.2.0-1. BTW, you should try to fix this:
../../ASCStringHelpers.h: In stati
severity 321435 important
thanks
A workaround has been added to tor so that it does not build those
images on s390, making it build again in sarge. Therefore this bug no
longer is RC, and I downgrade it to important.
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 321435 important
Bug#321435: Unrecoverable error: typecheck in .getdeviceparams on s390
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 322200 sid
Bug#322200: noatun-plugins: depends on package slang1, but package is not
available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297565: fixed in eboard 0.9.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: zoo
Version: 2.10-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Automatic build of zoo_2.10-14 on tanda by sbuild/m68k 42
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0)
[...]
Checking correctness of source dependencies...
Toolchain package versions:
(Also replying to bug page & debian-legal (d-l: please CC me on any replies))
Personally from what I have gathered:
* If texi2html has released the singular images under a special
agreement (from which it seems), then maybe the images should be
released dual-licensed (under GPL & CC), of course u
Package: bidwatcher
Version: 1.3.17-1
Followup-For: Bug #318506
Hi,
this is a quick patch which temporarily fixes the issue. Most information seems
to be parsed as usual again (I guess -- since this is the first time I'm using
this program :)
I haven't done any testing of the bidding function
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:07:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314414: fixed in openjade 1.4devel1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:07:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321543: fixed in openjade 1.4devel1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.6-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
After yesterdays apt-get update && apt-get upgrade cycle, mozilla-firefox
stopped working.
If I execute firefox from a terminal it segfaults, but
Hi,
> The package depends on slang1 which is not available in unstable.
> This renders the package unusable/uninstallable in unstable.
Can't do anything about this until the KDE/gcc4 transition goes through,
I'm afraid.
b.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319305: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: oleo
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
oleo in version 1.99.16-7 which is in sid depends on libplot2
which is UNAVAILABLE, making oleo uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1,
Package: most
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
most in version 4.9.5-1 which is in sid depends on slang1a-utf8
(> 1.4.9dbs-4) which is UNAVAILABLE, making most uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: fbi
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
fbi in version 2.01-1.2 which is in sid depends on libexif10
which is UNAVAILABLE, making fbi uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'ex
Package: xdiskusage
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xdiskusage in version 1.48-5 which is in sid depends on libfltk1.1c102 (>=
1.1.6)
which is UNAVAILABLE, making xdiskusage uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
A
Package: spikeproxy
Version: 1.4.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
When I launch spikeproxy, I have this error:
n# spikeproxy
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "spkproxy.py", line 49, in ?
import spikeProxyUI
File "/usr/share/spikeproxy/spikeProxyUI
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235714: fixed in heroes 0.21-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297314: fixed in heroes 0.21-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:54:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[...]
> >
> > rmmod usbnet
> >
> > The model usbnet can not be removed.
> > Also the process which execute the command can not be finished,it
> > consume the CPU 99% persistent,over and over.Even I can't use
> >
[...]
If this does happen w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 311283 important
Bug#311283: Cannot open .glade files
Severity set to `important'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package destar
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: destar
> tags 321908 pending
Bug#321908: destar: missing dependency on Quixote 1.x
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 321911 pending
Bug#321911: destar: does not work out of the b
Hi Adam (et al.),
Sorry for not responding earlier but I've been travelling and quite
busy and completely forgot about this issue. As I said, I don't know
what the ideal situation is. The nice thing about the transition
package is that it provides some kind of upgrade path: it depends on
the pac
tags 321310 - pending
thanks
Hi,
The package was handed to the pkg-mono group, I can't fix it myself.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Come, your destiny awaits!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 321310 - pending
Bug#321310: f-spot: depends on unavailable libexif10
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:18:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 315968
Bug#315968: kernel: usb-storage not working, system freeze
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 315968 + sarge
Bug#315968: kernel: usb-storage not working, system freeze
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping
Hi Adrian,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:26:00PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> IOW this is a FTBFS if libgnutls-dev is installed (note that
> libgnutls-dev provides libgnutls11-dev)?
Yes, it is. GnuTLS 1.2 seems to break backward compatibility.
Greetings
Torsten
signature.asc
Descrip
reopen 315968
tags 315968 + sarge
thanks
I assume you meant to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:30:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> reopen 315968
> thanks
>
> This bug is still valid for 2.6.8, so lets leave it here for now.
> At the very least we can use it to coodinate known probl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322115 pending
Bug#322115: asterisk: /var/lib/dpkg/info/asterisk.postinst: line 22: adduser:
command not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Package: ocaml-nox
Version: 3.08.3-6
Severity: serious
Filed as RC bug as requested by Sven Luther
I am trying to clean up my unstable chroot, for some reason a few ocaml
packages were still installed.
Reinstalling after a failed purge attempt:
Setting up ocaml-base-nox (3.08.3-6) ...
Setting
Package: gkrellm
Version: 2.2.7-2
Severity: serious
gkrellm has a build dependency on libgnutls11-dev.
libgnutls-dev provides libgnutls11-dev.
With both libgnutls-dev and libssl-dev installed, gkrellm
is linked with OpenSSL.
This can easily lead to the problem described in #309089
on one or mor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322089 serious
Bug#322089: openldap2: Please switch to libgnutls12
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:50:38PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Aug-06 15:41, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: amd64-libs-dev
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > after upgrading to glibc-2.3.5, the gcc-4.0 biarch build fails:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would suggest to drop the current Build-Depends
On 05-Aug-06 15:41, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: amd64-libs-dev
> Severity: serious
>
> after upgrading to glibc-2.3.5, the gcc-4.0 biarch build fails:
Hello,
I would suggest to drop the current Build-Depends of gcc-4.0 on
'amd64-libs-dev' entirely and instead use a 'libc6-i386-dev' package
Package: noatun-plugins
Version: 4:3.3.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package depends on slang1 which is not available in unstable.
This renders the package unusable/uninstallable in unstable.
Perhaps the dependency needs to be updated to libslang1, but I'm not su
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:41:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Kevin Dwyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-23 09:51]:
> > > It seems ebay changes have completely broken bidwatcher :-(
> >
> > Yeah, I can confirm. I was on vacation last week and I'm just catching
> > up on e-mail now. I'll lo
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321882: fixed in childsplay 0.80.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Hello,
I know you are all eager to see a fixed version of VLC in unstable.
However, there is absolutely nothing I can do until wxwin has finished
its C++ transition, so please be patient.
To be kept informed about the wxwin status, please watch the
following URL: http://people.debian.org
Horms wrote:
>tag 321902 +moreinfo
>tag 321902 +upstream
>severity 321902 important
>thanks
>
>On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:30:48PM +0800, Ф Faris Xiao wrote:
>
>
>>Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
>>Version: 2.6.8-16
>>Severity: grave
>>Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>>I has a us
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 317475
Bug#317475: [m68k] ICE: Segmentation fault
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> close 321250
Bug#321250: ragel_4.1-2(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed
* Kevin Dwyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-23 09:51]:
> > It seems ebay changes have completely broken bidwatcher :-(
>
> Yeah, I can confirm. I was on vacation last week and I'm just catching
> up on e-mail now. I'll look at it.
Any update on this?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Clint Adams writes:
> > fakeroot-tcp shows the same behaviour. reverting back to glibc-2.3.2
> > is a workaround.
>
> Does building fakeroot against glibc 2.3.5 change anything?
no, it's not fakeroot, it's make segfaulting ...
# gdb /usr/bin/make
GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software F
merge #316000 #321547
thanks
Chris Hanson schrieb:
> Package: partimage
> Version: 0.6.4-11
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
>
> Please recompile with libslang1-dev to update dependency.
[..]
An updated package which links against libslang2 will be uploaded soon.
Cheers,
Michael
--
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Doing some notfounds for bugs tagged as woody/sarge so they do not show up
> at
> #
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=tag&data=security&archive=no&version=&dist=testing
> notfound 274225 4:2.6.2-3
Bug#274225: Security patch in lat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> retitle 318633 Multiple security problems (CAN-2004-2162 and CAN-2004-2161)
Bug#318633: tutos: Multiple security problems (CAN-2005-2162 and CAN-2005-2161)
Changed Bug title.
>
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign #322166 vlc
Bug#322166: Dependency problem with libwxgtk2.4. Unable to install wxvlc.
Bug reassigned from package `wxvlc' to `vlc'.
> merge #322166 #321461
Bug#321461: vlc is uninstallable
Bug#322166: Dependency problem with libwxgtk2.4. Unabl
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Debian BTS wrote:
Hi,
> Package: pts-tetex-cm-super
> Version: 0.3.3-7
> Severity: grave
>
> The package fails to install with the error:
> ==
> Setting up pts-tetex-cm-super (0.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 307360 - woody
Bug#307360: oops: Format string vulnerability in database auth handling
(CAN-2005-1121)
Tags were: patch security woody
Tags removed: woody
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 308819 - etch
Bug#308819: openmotif: affected by vulnerabilities in libxpm
Tags were: etch sarge woody security patch
Tags removed: etch
> tags 308819 - sarge
Bug#308819: openmot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 307360 - sid
Bug#307360: oops: Format string vulnerability in database auth handling
(CAN-2005-1121)
Tags were: patch security sid woody
Tags removed: sid
>
End of message, stop
Hi,
Reply-To: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Mickael Profeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:48:09 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resen
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Colin Percival wrote:
>>I don't think I need to explain the problem any further...
>
> Nevertheless, maybe you can give me a hint why you obviously don't want
> the text to be part of bsdiff?
I don't like having my work copied without my permission; the fact that
it is a "
speak-freely is not in the debian archive at this point. If someone
wants it back, shouldn't this be a WNPP RRP bug? Cluttering up the list
of security holes in Debian, as this bug does now, is fairly pointless.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Colin Percival wrote:
> If you had bothered to ask for permission, there's a good chance that I
> would have given it, but copying without even asking for permission is
> simply Not Acceptable.
Ack, and as I said, I'm sorry for that, it is my fault. However, do you
insist on removing the text, or
Hi,
It looks like there is no more enigma package in experimental, and a
version higher than the one which FTBFS is in the archive (0.92 vs
0.90-rc1), built on every architecture.
Maybe this bug could/should be closed ?
HTH
Regards,
Regis
--
"While a monkey can be a manager, it takes a human to
Package: localepurge
Version: 0.4.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
localepurge states:
# localepurge(8) uses debconf for storing all its
# configuration. Manual entries to this file will be
# irreversibly lost after upgrade or reinstallation
# of localepurge. Configuration should only be done
#
I just want to let you know that I'm not ignoring this bug. But I'm
waiting on qt-x11-free to do the g++ transition, before I do a new
upload of psi.
Jan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 322131 normal
thanks
Le mardi 09 août 2005 à 15:13 +0300, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov a écrit :
> severity 322131 serious
> thanks
>
> It is FTBFS, so setting severity correctly.
According to http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=pango1.0
it builds without any issue. Where does it FTBFS?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322147 serious
Bug#322147: bsdiff: README violates copyright
Severity set to `serious'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322131 normal
Bug#322131: pango1.0 requires gtk-doc-tools to build
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Package: wxvlc
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Please fix the dependency problem with libwxgtk2.4 package. This package is not
available in unstable release. Available package version is libwxgtk2.4-1 .
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstab
Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:55:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321941: cacti-cactid: SNMP error when upgrading to
libsnmp5 5.2.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 06:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320118: fixed in vifm 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> notfound 318723 2:1.7.10-1
Bug#318723: javascript crasher
Bug marked as not found in version 2:1.7.10-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
> merge 321912 314385
Bug#314385: gworkspace.app: Loader error when launching GWorkspace
Bug#321912: Paje cannot start without resolving the symbol
Bug#320958: rssreader.app: cant start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
> severity 321912 grave
Bug#321912: Paje cannot start without resolving the symbol
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:06:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321625: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321731: fixed in adeos 20050603-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
tag 259939 + pending
thanks
The package was removed from testing due to FTBFS bug due to gcc 4.0
incompatibility.
I've uploaded a fixed version to the 7 days delayed queue on gluck. This
applies the patch available in the bug report and adds two new build
dependencies, libxp-dev and libselinux-de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 259939 + pending
Bug#259939: xonix: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322131 serious
Bug#322131: pango1.0 requires gtk-doc-tools to build
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Package: classpath
Severity: serious
The gcj-3.3 package will vanish soon from the archives. Please use
gcj.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 321902 +moreinfo
tag 321902 +upstream
severity 321902 important
thanks
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:30:48PM +0800, Ф Faris Xiao wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I has a usb cable modem.
> My usb ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I prepared an NMU for this bug with the following changes:
python-crypto (2.0+dp1-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
* NMU to make package installable again
* Added missing build dependency on (versioned) libgmp3-dev, otherwise
the _fastmath mod
Package: mysql-dfsg
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A buffer overflow in user defined functions can be exploited to
possibly execute arbitrary code by user that have been granted the
privilege to create user defined functions. For full details please
see
http://www
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 01:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321834: fixed in twpsk 2.1+2.2beta1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:16:41 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: internal error: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 01:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321836: fixed in twpsk 2.1+2.2beta1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
sean finney wrote:
>i believe that this is actually a bug against the net-snmp libraries
>due to the recent c++ abi change. however, i just so happened to
>rebuild and upload a new version of cacti yesterday that is built
>against the newer version of libsnmp5, could you see if the problem
>goes
Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:39:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319143: Acknowledgement (util-linux: Does not build
correctly with new dpkg)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo