Bug#324026: patch from CVS

tags 324026 +sid,patch thanks homie Hi, Here's a patch that I stole from ffmpeg CVS that appears to fix things. However, the build of VLC (which is what I did this for) is still broken in different ways: /usr/bin/ld:

Processed: patch from CVS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 324026 +sid,patch Bug#324026: ffmpeg: FTBFS on amd64: Error: `(%rdi,%esi)' is not a valid base/index expression There were no tags set. Tags added: sid, patch thanks homie Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#327459: marked as done (happy: FTBFS: configure: cannot find DocBook XSL stylesheets)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:49:42 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#327459: rekall build failure has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#318590: Versioned symbols?

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Domenico Andreoli wrote: Why would it need versioned symbols? The whole point of the different .so names would be so that _either one_ of the libs could be used, both would _never_ be used at the same time as it would be pointless. never? libA uses curl+openssl, libB

Processed: bug triage

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 327380 8.0.1-1 Bug#327380: libpq-dev: missing depends on libssl-dev Bug marked as found in version 8.0.1-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k

Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Script started on Mon Sep 12 08:22:21 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /home/wouter~$ cat foo.c int main() { ; return 0; } [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo Segmentation fault

Bug#321789: firefox: undefined symbol: XineramaIsActive

severity 321789 normal thanks * Julien Lemoine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi Eric, * Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-23 01:17:05 -0400]: debsums on libxinerama1 is ok. ldd -d -r on firefox-bin show undefined ref : undefined symbol: NS_NewUnionEnumerator

Processed: Re: Bug#321789: firefox: undefined symbol: XineramaIsActive

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 321789 normal Bug#321789: firefox: undefined symbol: XineramaIsActive Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Re: Bug#327741: Acknowledgement (tetex-optional: undistributable files included in package)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 327741 tetex-extra Bug#327741: tetex-optional: undistributable files included in package Warning: Unknown package 'tetex-optional' Bug reassigned from package `tetex-optional' to `tetex-extra'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#327780: Too hasty

reassign 327780 binutils found 327780 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 thanks Sorry, I was a bit too hasty. Current gcc is quite some time in the archive already, so it's unlikely it's at fault. Binutils, OTOH, has seen a recent upload. Downgrading it to the previous version indeed fixes the segfault issues.

Bug#325285: stable is still vulnerable

This is just a note to check that stable is still vulnerable to the exploits fixed in -2. I have added a found tag to this bug for sarge's version - if that is wrong, pleae remove it and chastise me appropriately :) Take care, --

Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k

reassign 327780 m68k thanks that's unreproducible on crest/sid, although I can reproduce it on another machine with the very same versions of gcc-4.0 and libc6. So why not file it for libc6? The point of reassigning the report to an unknown package is to ask, if it's time to drop m68k from the

Processed: tagging for sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 325285 1.5-1 Bug#325285: gallery: XSS in EXIF tag handling Bug marked as found in version 1.5-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Re: Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 327780 m68k Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k Warning: Unknown package 'm68k' Bug reassigned from package `binutils' to `m68k'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0

severity 322723 important thanks there's a workaround, and gcc-3.4 is known to work as well. Is there any reason to use gcc-4.0 for kernel builds on all architectures? Frans Pop writes: I've reassigned this bug from the kernel to gcc-4.0 as we feel that the solution chosen in the kernel

Bug#327727: SqWebMail HTML Emails Script Insertion Vulnerability [CAN-2005-2769]

On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 14:18:11 -0400 Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: sqwebmail Severity: serious Version: 0.47-8 Tags: security Another cross site scripting bug has been found in sqwebmail. Note that this is different from #327181. Yes, #327181 is the more advanced one.

Bug#327780: Too hasty

reassign 327780 binutils thanks anyway, the question for m68k support is still valid. Wouter Verhelst writes: reassign 327780 binutils found 327780 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 thanks Sorry, I was a bit too hasty. Current gcc is quite some time in the archive already, so it's unlikely it's at

Processed: reassign 327780 to binutils

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5 reassign 327780 binutils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k Bug reassigned from package `binutils' to `binutils'. End of message, stopping

Processed: Re: Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 322723 important Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Re: Bug#327780: Too hasty

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 327780 binutils Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k Warning: Unknown package 'm68k' Bug reassigned from package `m68k' to `binutils'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#318590: Two names

On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: We've already identified that the CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION option is of negligible importance to Debian, and does not (from my POV) appear to warrant a separate soname. You couldn't find any debian-provided package that uses the option, but that

Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:28:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: that's unreproducible on crest/sid, although I can reproduce it on another machine with the very same versions of gcc-4.0 and libc6. So why not file it for libc6? What cpu type is that other machine? I assume that ska is a 040?

Bug#327787: bubblemon: depends on libgtop2-2 on alpha, mips, mipsel

Package: bubblemon Version: 2.0.4-2 Severity: grave The latest version of bubblemon was uploaded in the middle of an ABI transition for libgtop2, which means that the bubblemon package depends on libgtop2-5 on 8 of 11 architectures, and on libgtop2-2 on alpha, mips, and mipsel. This makes the

Bug#325785: Is this in stable as well?

Hello Fabio, Is this bug also presentin the version in stable? I assume so, but have not had time to check yet. If so, is an upload pending? Thanks, -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | :

Bug#327659: libxml2: 2.6.21-1 breaks xsltproc

Hi, as we don't seem to have the problem, I suggest you try to build the source package on http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libx/libxml2/ (Version 2.6.21). On a first glance, this are the files that were changed in the .diff.gz: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ zgrep -E ^\+\+\+\

Bug#327788: aspell-bn fails to install

Package: aspell-bn Version: 0.60.0.01.1.1-4 Severity: serious Preparing to replace aspell-bn 0.60.0.01.1.1-4 (using .../aspell-bn_0.60.0.01.1.1-4_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement aspell-bn ... Setting up aspell-bn (0.60.0.01.1.1-4) ... aspell-autobuildhash: processing: bn [bn] Error: The file

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 327162 + help Bug#327162: FTBFS: Too few arguments to chmod Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: help tags 327162 + sid Bug#327162: FTBFS: Too few arguments to chmod Tags were: help moreinfo Tags added: sid tags 327162 - moreinfo Bug#327162: FTBFS:

Bug#323739: FTBFS: Invalid lvalues used in increments

Hi, I've done an NMU; patch attached. Thanks, Matej diff -u mit-scheme-7.7.90/debian/changelog mit-scheme-7.7.90/debian/changelog --- mit-scheme-7.7.90/debian/changelog +++ mit-scheme-7.7.90/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +mit-scheme (7.7.90-5.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU during BSP.

Bug#327662: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned?

2005-09-11 (日) の 16:46 +0200 に Frank Lichtenheld さんは書きました: Package: dedit Version: 0.6.2.3 Severity: serious Hi. During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in testing

Processed: Tagging

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 323730 + confirmed upstream etch pending Bug#323730: FTBFS: Cannot find HTML documentation Tags were: patch Tags added: confirmed, upstream, etch, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#327107: marked as done (php5-snmp: not installable in sid)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 01:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327107: fixed in php5 5.0.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#327229: gcc-4.0: hppa: causes build failure with -O2

severity 327229 important tags 327229 + upstream tags 327229 + fixed-upstream thanks current workaround is to lower the optimization level to -O1, works with current gcc-snapshot. Gerrit Pape writes: Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-6 Severity: serious Hi, looks like Debian's gcc-4.0

Processed: Re: Bug#327229: gcc-4.0: hppa: causes build failure with -O2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 327229 important Bug#327229: gcc-4.0: hppa: causes build failure with -O2 Severity set to `important'. tags 327229 + upstream Bug#327229: gcc-4.0: hppa: causes build failure with -O2 There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream tags 327229

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mit-scheme 7.7.90-5.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 323739 + fixed Bug#323739: FTBFS: Invalid lvalues used in increments Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#323730: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot find HTML documentation)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 01:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323730: fixed in mailcrypt 3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Document sysvinit bug precense

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 300963 2.84-1 Bug#300963: Use linprocfs for /proc (on GNU/kFreeBSD) Bug marked as found in version 2.84-1. found 325933 2.84-1 Bug#325933: initscripts: Please add init.d dependency information Bug marked as found in version 2.84-1. found

Bug#327797: bins: contains paths from the build process

Package: bins Version: 1.1.29-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, the bins script file contains paths from the build process making it unusable because it cannot find its styles etc and therefore does not work: ~# grep tbm /usr/bin/bins my $localePath =

Bug#323725: FTBFS: Double free or corruption

Hi, I've done an NMU; patch attached. Thanks, Matej --- netmrg-0.18.2/debian/changelog +++ netmrg-0.18.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +netmrg (0.18.2-10.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * NMU during BSP. + * var/lib/rrd/zero.xml: Update for rrdtool 1.2. Closes: #323725. + * Link against

Bug#327736: lablgl: FTBFS on m68k, ocamlmktop crashes at exit

reassign 327736 tk8.4 thanks skaller wrote: On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 21:36 +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: [...] I'm a bit lost now and I have no idea of what to look for. If someone has an idea of something to try, I can use my account on the m68k. Yup. I think the bug is in the Tk build, it

Bug#327797: bins: contains paths from the build process

* Adam Lackorzynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-12 11:28]: It looks like this is a design issue in install.sh which always prepends DESTDIR instead of only doing so when operating on files and not when replacing paths in the binaries. That's possible since I made some changes to install.sh

Processed: Re: Bug#327736: lablgl: FTBFS on m68k, ocamlmktop crashes at exit

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 327736 tk8.4 Bug#327736: lablgl: FTBFS on m68k, ocamlmktop crashes at exit Bug reassigned from package `lablgl' to `tk8.4'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Fixed in upload of rhythmbox 0.9.0-2 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327460 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#327460: rhythmbox: Missing dependacy on libtotem-plparser0 Tags were: pending experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#327799: hpiod and hpssd pidfiles

Package: initng Version: 0.1.8-1 Severity: grave Pid files for hpiod and hpssd are wrong, please change them from: /var/run/hpiod.pid /var/run/hpssd.pid to the correct ones: /var/run/hplip/hpiod.pid /var/run/hplip/hpssd.pid Regards, -- .`. Matteo Croce [EMAIL PROTECTED] : : :proud

Bug#325785: Is this in stable as well?

This one time, at band camp, Fabio Tranchitella said: Il giorno lun, 12/09/2005 alle 09.12 +0100, Stephen Gran ha scritto: Hello Fabio, Is this bug also presentin the version in stable? I assume so, but have not had time to check yet. If so, is an upload pending? Hi Stephen, the

Bug#320336: NMU for tcm?

Hi, Mind if I do an NMU for tcm? Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327459: [xml/sgml-pkgs] xsltproc oddness

On which arch did you test that ? Mike On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:07:00AM +0100, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just had a quick look at this. This is reproducible for me (note the changing result): $ dchroot Executing shell in 'unstable' chroot. $ xsltproc /html/docbook.xsl

Processed: recommends are severity: important, not grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 327145 important Bug#327145: gnome-desktop-environment: unsatisfiable dependencies Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#325785: Is this in stable as well?

Il giorno lun, 12/09/2005 alle 10.51 +0100, Stephen Gran ha scritto: That's #322423, while this is #325785. I see that #322423 is fixed in stable. You are right, I've checked the wrong bug report. Bug #325785 wasn't in stable package at all. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318590: curl situation is intolerable

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 03:03:02AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: will libcurl3 with versioned symbols break existing packages linked to it? It will not. good It would be best to coordinate with upstream to get symbol

Bug#327804: Acknowledgement (gnugk - fails to install)

reassign 327804 adduser found 327804 3.67.0 thanks This is an adduser or passwd bug. It fails if nscd is running. Bastian -- It is more rational to sacrifice one life than six. -- Spock, The Galileo Seven, stardate 2822.3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#327804: Acknowledgement (gnugk - fails to install)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 327804 important Bug#327804: gnugk - fails to install Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#327804: Acknowledgement (gnugk - fails to install)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 327804 adduser Bug#327804: gnugk - fails to install Bug reassigned from package `gnugk' to `adduser'. found 327804 3.67.0 Bug#327804: gnugk - fails to install Bug marked as found in version 3.67.0. thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#322500: libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change

On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote: Hi Steve, The bug log at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1256697group_id=12694atid=112694 shows that upstream has issued an official update for the soname of libsnmp, available in patch form at

Bug#322500: libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 07:28:28PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote: The bug log at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1256697group_id=12694atid=112694 shows that upstream has issued an official update for the

Bug#327818: sbcl: fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 17942(tid 16384): (­ûç¿ç¿ç¿ç¿ç¿ç¿ç¿è¿ (NOT installable, either)

Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.3.72-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ sbcl fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 20139(tid 16384): (­ûç¿ç¿ç¿ç¿ç¿ç¿ç¿è¿ $ /usr/bin/sbcl --core /usr/lib/sbcl/sbcl-dist.core \ --sysinit /etc/sbcl.rc --userinit /dev/null \ --load

Bug#327459: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#327459: rekall build failure

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 07:49:41AM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Version: 1.1.15-1 On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:32:47PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI, the package rekall also fails to build on several architectures in a manner strikingly similar to the

Bug#327459: [xml/sgml-pkgs] xsltproc oddness

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On which arch did you test that ? x86. Thanks Ian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327659: libxml2: 2.6.21-1 breaks xsltproc

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:08:04AM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote: as we don't seem to have the problem, I suggest you try to build the source package on http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libx/libxml2/ (Version 2.6.21). I've reviewed the diffs between the unpacked source trees of the

Bug#327802: marked as done (mozilla-firefox: Buffer overflow published on security-protocols.com)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:24:28 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327802: mozilla-firefox: Buffer overflow published on security-protocols.com has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#225704: FW: What were you saying about...

Good afternoon 225795, Eli Aa6 sole mate 4 you nearbye http://www.whitewitness.com/extra/lovegirls1/ A flip_top is lqinsert mfal but prodicted what meregalli, innmnk not aegithognathism.lt;brgt; When charreton sort_of, dusek snickdrawing is not callat nvmk but a clayborn hylozoic frobenius arises

Bug#302431: xmms-crossfade: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'monitor_win' follows non-static declaration

On Sun, 8 May 2005 00:47:43 +0200, Martin Waitz wrote: an NMU on this package would be appreciated as my laptop is currently broken and I would not have the possibility to test the package after applying the patch. Just uploaded, please find attached the build log from my machine (i386). I

Bug#304167: xml-soap: FTBFS: Build-Depends on 'libgnumail-java' needed

The attached patch makes xml-soap build on current unstable. The patch does the following: * replace Build-Depends on libservlet2.2-java by libservlet2.3-java * add Build-Depends on libgnumail-java * use j2sdk1.4 instead of j2sdk1.3 * use standard JAVA_HOME directory names from java-package *

Bug#327459: [xml/sgml-pkgs] xsltproc oddness

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:32:20PM +0100, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On which arch did you test that ? x86. O_o I always get 4 and don't see how it could be otherwise reading the code... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#327659: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#327659: libxml2: 2.6.21-1 breaks xsltproc

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:28:36PM +0100, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:08:04AM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote: as we don't seem to have the problem, I suggest you try to build the source package on http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libx/libxml2/

Bug#327363: marked as done (gtalk: ships etalk-specific files)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 05:17:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327363: fixed in gtalk 0.99.10-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xmms-crossfade 0.3.5-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 302431 + fixed Bug#302431: xmms-crossfade: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'monitor_win' follows non-static declaration Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#325563: Bug#325564: Processed: tagging 325564

clone 325564 -1 reassign -1 python2.3-dev thanks On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:41:31PM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't see any reason to work around plenty of packages when this is for sure an important toolchain bug which cannot be delayed for long

Bug#327802: mozilla-firefox: Buffer overflow published on security-protocols.com

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:24:28PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Version: 1.0.6-5 Version: 1.4.99+1.5beta1-2 Please do not file duplicates. This is the same as #327452, and has already been taken a care of. Sorry about that. #327452 was not in the BTS when I filed the bug on friday evening, but

Processed: Re: Bug#325563: Bug#325564: Processed: tagging 325564

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 325564 -1 Bug#325564: soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k Bug 325564 cloned as bug 327835. reassign -1 python2.3-dev Bug#327835: soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k Bug reassigned from package `soya' to

Bug#327838: FTBFS: ICE on arm/hppa/m68k

Package: ecos Severity: serious Your package FTBFS due to an internal compiler error (like the arts' one) on arm/hppa and m68k. You should build depend on gcc3.4 on these architectures and adjust debian/rules accordingly (see arts for an example). Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#320336: NMU for tcm?

Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Mind if I do an NMU for tcm? Of course not. I'm trying to get it building with gcc 4.0 before upload. Did you have sucess? -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN:

Bug#327362: Bug#320336: NMU for tcm?

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:10:38AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mind if I do an NMU for tcm? Of course not. I'm sorry, did you mean of course I don't mind or of course I do? I'm trying to get it building with gcc 4.0 before upload. Did you have

Bug#321816: More complete patch

Hi, http://err.no/patches/siege_2.61-1_2.61-1ubuntu1_etc_siegerc_ftbfs.diff contains a more complete patch which adds a /etc/siege/siegerc which is installed by default, but using ~/.siegerc if that exists. (The patch contains a fair amount of auto*, but I found no way to avoid that. :-( ) --

Bug#327843: kwifimanager: applet crashes with new libiw28

Package: kwifimanager Version: 4:3.4.2-2 Severity: serious - Forwarded message from Jan De Luyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Jan De Luyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 07:27:56 +0200 Subject: [3.4.2] kwifimanager causes kicker crash X-Mailing-List:

Bug#302431: xmms-crossfade: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'monitor_win' follows non-static declaration

hoi :) On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:09:48PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: Just uploaded, please find attached the build log from my machine (i386). I tested and found no regression in functionality. thanks a lot! -- Martin Waitz signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#320336: NMU for tcm?

Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:10:38AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mind if I do an NMU for tcm? Of course not. I'm sorry, did you mean of course I don't mind or of course I do? I'm trying to get it building with

Bug#326567: celestia: package has unmet dependencies

Hi On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:22:11PM +1000, James Ring wrote: Should these dependencies be changed to kdelibs4c2 and libqt3-mt instead? The dependencies are calculated automatically, so this problem will be fixed after the upload of a new release (which will happen soon). Best regards and

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 326716 325208 Bug#325208: celestia has spurious build-dependency on libgnomeuimm2.0-dev Bug#326716: celestia: FTBFS: Build-Depends cannot be satisfied because the package libgnomeuimm2.0-dev cannot be found Merged 325208 326716. tags 326716

Bug#327855: sylpheed: Subscribe to Newsgroups overwrites current subscriptions

Package: sylpheed Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss When I choose Subscribe to Newsgroup on a NNTP account: after making my choices, the entire list of subscribed groups is deleted and replaced with the new selection. This makes it impossible to add one

Bug#327857: sylpheed: Subscribe to Newsgroups overwrites current subscriptions

Package: sylpheed Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss When I choose Subscribe to Newsgroup on a NNTP account: after making my choices, the entire list of subscribed groups is deleted and replaced with the new selection. This makes it impossible to add one

Bug#320336: NMU for tcm?

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:43:51AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Go ahead :-) Thanks, patch attached. Matej diff -u tcm-2.20+TSQD/debian/changelog tcm-2.20+TSQD/debian/changelog --- tcm-2.20+TSQD/debian/changelog +++ tcm-2.20+TSQD/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +tcm (2.20+TSQD-1.1) unstable;

Bug#327162: FTBFS: Too few arguments to chmod

On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:16:23 +0200 Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:56:48 +0200 Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:40:37 -0700 Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: courier Version: 0.47-8 Severity: serious

Bug#327626: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?

Yes, it probably should be. upstream is dead, there are better alternatives now. These include python-psycopg and sql-relay. Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/11/2005 09:20:07 AM: Package: zope-popyda Version: 2.0.8-3 Severity: serious Hi, During the Debian QA

Bug#327650: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?

Agreed on all accounts, this package should be removed. Should I file a bug myself for its removal? On Dom, 2005-09-11 at 16:25 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Package: icukrell Version: 2.0.0pre0.1-2 Severity: serious snip After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will

Bug#327760: missing dependency on gconf2

tags 327760 + confirmed pending thanks On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 01:01:16 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Setting up libgsf-1 (1.12.3-1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgsf-1.postinst: line 9: gconftool-2: command not found Fixed in my tree; will upload a fix later. Ray -- I'd rather not work with

Processed: Solution found

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 327162 - help Bug#327162: FTBFS: Too few arguments to chmod Tags were: sid help Tags removed: help tags 327162 + pending Bug#327162: FTBFS: Too few arguments to chmod Tags were: sid Tags added: pending -- Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: Re: Bug#327760: missing dependency on gconf2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 327760 + confirmed pending Bug#327760: missing dependency on gconf2 Tags were: experimental Tags added: confirmed, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Fixed in NMU of tcm 2.20+TSQD-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 320336 + fixed Bug#320336: tcm: preview does not work anymore Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 327362 + fixed Bug#327362: tcm: FTBFS: 'MainWindow' has not been declared Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here.

Bug#327639: kexec-tools: FTBFS: ./configure: Permission denied

On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 16:07 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: kexec-tools Version: 1.101-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: ./configure --sbindir=/sbin --mandir=/usr/share/man --datadir=/usr/share make: execvp: ./configure: Permission

Bug#327162: marked as done (FTBFS: Too few arguments to chmod)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327162: fixed in courier 0.47-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#327181: marked as done (SqWebMail Conditional Comments Script Insertion Vulnerability)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327181: fixed in courier 0.47-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#327727: marked as done (SqWebMail HTML Emails Script Insertion Vulnerability [CAN-2005-2769])

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327727: fixed in courier 0.47-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#327626: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?

severity 327626 normal reassign 327626 ftp.debian.org retitle 327626 RM: zope-popyda -- RoM and RoQA; old, rc-buggy and superseeded thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, it probably should be. upstream is dead, there are better alternatives now. These include python-psycopg and sql-relay.

Bug#327650: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?

severity 327650 normal reassign 327650 ftp.debian.org retitle 327650 RM: icukrell -- RoM and RoQA; old, rc-buggy and superseeded thanks Leo \Costela\ Antunes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Agreed on all accounts, this package should be removed. Should I file a bug myself for its removal? No, that's

Processed: Re: Bug#327626: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 327626 normal Bug#327626: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Severity set to `normal'. reassign 327626 ftp.debian.org Bug#327626: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package

Processed: Re: Bug#327650: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 327650 normal Bug#327650: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Severity set to `normal'. reassign 327650 ftp.debian.org Bug#327650: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package

Bug#327870: kernel-patch-grsecurity2: New glibc packages break compatibility with grsec

Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Grsec patch is incompatible with glibc post-v.2.3.2. More info: http://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?t=1152 http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/08/msg00747.html -- System Information: Debian

Bug#327662: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned?

reassign 327662 ftp.debian.org retitle 327662 RM: dedit -- RoM and RoQA; old, rc-buggy and unmaintained severity 327662 normal thanks On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 05:32:17PM +0900, Takuo KITAME wrote: 2005-09-11 (日) の 16:46 +0200 に Frank Lichtenheld さんは書きました: Your package did show up on this list

Processed: Re: Bug#327662: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 327662 ftp.debian.org Bug#327662: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `dedit' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 327662 RM: dedit -- RoM and RoQA; old, rc-buggy and unmaintained Bug#327662: very old

Bug#310669: marked as done (krusader: [m68k, mipsel] FTBFS: autoconf: command not found)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:32:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#310669: fixed in krusader 1.60.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

  1   2   3   >