Bug#341338: Cannot install synaptic on Debian Sid

Package: synaptic Version: 0.57.5.1 Followup-For: Bug #341338 synaptic now have unresolvable dependencies: synaptic: Függ ettől: libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.8.0) de csak 2.6.10-2 telepíthető Függ ettől: libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.10.1) de csak 1.8.2-3 telepíthető Text is in Hungarian, but this is

Bug#340900: Missing README.Debian file

Package: horde3 Version: 3.0.4-4sarge2 Severity: normal Hi On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:51:05PM +, Graham Seaman wrote: > Martin Lohmeier wrote > > >Graham, there need to be something wrong with your setup. I updated from > >kronolith1 a few month ago and never had problems with it. And since

Bug#340900: kronolith: saves but does not display events

Hello On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:03:24PM +, Graham Seaman wrote: > Martin Lohmeier wrote: > > >Graham Seaman wrote: > > > > > > > >>What's the best way to go from here? Do I need to start installing > >>packages from testing? I've had a look, and appear to have the usual > >>cascade of depen

Bug#341355: cannot start udevd

Package: udev Version: 0.076-3 Severity: grave Setting up udev (0.076-3) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/udev ... Installing new version of config file /etc/udev/udev.rules ... Installing new version of config file /etc/udev/devfs.rules ... Installing new version of config fi

Processed: Re: Bug#341286: mismatch between the kernel used by installer and included in the archive

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 341286 installation-reports Bug#341286: mismatch between the kernel used by installer and included in the archive Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `installation-reports'. > severity 341286 normal Bug#341286: mismatch between the

Bug#341286: mismatch between the kernel used by installer and included in the archive

reassign 341286 installation-reports severity 341286 normal tags 341286 - d-i sid thanks On Tuesday 29 November 2005 22:07, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote: > 1. put cd-rom '20051128 "sid" - fsn.hu unofficial i386 Binary-1' in > drive Please let us know the full URL including filename of the image you use

Bug#340273: adesklets: links to libfreetype6, which is going away

Hi Steve, I'm afraid that applying this patch upstream *does* have a portability impact; the patch will do the right thing on systems that use the GNU linker or a linker with similar features, but there are other Unices that don't support dynamic linking or whose library format doesn't store dep

Bug#341347: aptitude: fails to start: symbol lookup error "_Z14ReadConfigFileR13ConfigurationSsbj"

Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.0-3experimental2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When trying to run aptitude: $ sudo aptitude aptitude: symbol lookup error: aptitude: undefined symbol: _Z14ReadConfigFileR13ConfigurationSsbj There are reports (#321651, #321673) of a

Bug#341251: marked as done (kdissert needs rebuild against kdelibs4c2a)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:58:53 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341251: kdissert needs rebuild against kdelibs4c2a has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#338900: marked as done (reportbug: smtp connection direct to master.debian.org is fails)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:47:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338900: fixed in reportbug 3.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#323556: marked as done (bittorrent-gui: not installable: depends on wrong version of wxPython)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:17:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323556: fixed in bittorrent 3.4.2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: tag 335137 pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 335137 pending Bug#335137: removal of automake1.6 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#341324: marked as done (php4-apd incorrect zend engine version)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341324: fixed in php4-apd 0.4p2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#341337: marked as done (Easytag dependency issue)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:47:01 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341337: Easytag dependency issue has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: unblock 314309 with 314385, block 341309 with 314385, merging 340878 314385

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > unblock 314309 with 314385 Bug#314309: Vim does not recognize .plx as perl script Was blocked by: 314385 320958 321646 321912 329223 337143 Blocking bugs removed: 314385, 320958, 32164

Bug#341341: iripdb: please rebuild against libid3-3.8.3c2a

Package: iripdb Version: 0.1.3b-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid The iripdb package currently depends on libid3-3.8.3c2, which has been removed in favor of libid3-3.8.3c2a for the latest C++ ABI transition. Because this package has previously been binNMUed using the old versioning scheme, it is not pos

Bug#340851: 5.7.3 fixed two license test bugs

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:07:39AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 09:12:31AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote: > >> > It also fails with autogen 1:5.7.2-1 from sid: > >> > > >> > [EMAIL > >> > PROTECTED]:/var/cache/pbuilder/build/5817/tm

Processed: block 341309 with 340878, merging 340878 314385

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > block 341309 with 340878 Bug#341309: aclock.app: does not start Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 340878 > merge 340878 314385 Bug#314385: gworkspace.app: Loader error

Processed: Re: Bug#341332: libiiimp1: fails to install

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 341332 minor Bug#341332: libiiimp1: fails to install Severity set to `minor'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- T

Bug#341332: libiiimp1: fails to install

severity 341332 minor thanks On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:59:05AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Package: libiiimp1 > Version: 12.3.91-0.1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > When installing: >(Reading database ... 155154 files and directories currently installed.) >

Bug#339700: marked as done (database schemas should not be in /usr/share/doc)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339700: fixed in phpbb2 2.0.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#336582: marked as done (New round of security issues)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336587: fixed in phpbb2 2.0.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#336587: marked as done (phpbb2: phpbb 2.0.18 released with lots of security fixes)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336587: fixed in phpbb2 2.0.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#336587: marked as done (phpbb2: phpbb 2.0.18 released with lots of security fixes)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336582: fixed in phpbb2 2.0.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#336582: marked as done (New round of security issues)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336582: fixed in phpbb2 2.0.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: severity of 341317 is important, tagging 341317

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > severity 341317 important Bug#341317: blosxom: running gives internal server error Severity set to `important'. > tags 341317 moreinfo Bug#341317: blosxom: running gives internal serv

Bug#341324: php4-apd incorrect zend engine version

Hi Rory, > That certainly makes sense. I can't see on > http://pecl.php.net/package/apd if there are any useful changes with > regard to php4 though; looks like php5 and 64bit changes have been the > recent concerns. Yes, that seems to be the case. I'm doing a new package using the 0.4p2 source

Bug#333768: pls reduce severity; pls test with 0.43

A "grave" bug is one serious enough to prevent the release of the package. The description of this priority (in bug-maint-info.txt) does mention "data loss" as a possible justification for marking a bug as grave, but the data loss described in this bug report (qualified as "minor" in the submitter

Bug#341338: synaptic: latest i386 upload is uninstallable due to dependency on experimental GTK

Package: synaptic Version: 0.57.6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable 0.57.6's i386 build was uploaded by the maintainer and depends on a GTK version greater than sid's (libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.8.0)). The sparc build has libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.6.0) so this seems to be due to a bad build e

Bug#317469: marked as done (libgtkmm2.0-1c102: Uninstallable. Depends on package that isn't available in unstable.)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:53:39 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libgtkmm2.0-1c102: Uninstallable. Depends on package that isn't available in unstable. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processed: tagging 314385, tagging 340878, unblock 340878 with 314385, block 314309 with 314385 ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > tags 314385 - fixed Bug#314385: gworkspace.app: Loader error when launching GWorkspace Tags were: fixed Bug#320958: rssreader.app: cant start Bug#321646: terminal: crashes on startup B

Bug#341337: Easytag dependency issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: easytag Version: 1.99.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Easytag currently depends on libid3-3.8.3c2. It should depend on libid3-3.8.3c2a. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unst

Bug#340273: adesklets: links to libfreetype6, which is going away

Hi Sylvain, On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:02:26PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > thanks for taking the time to go through these autotools scripts; since > it doesn't seem to break anything on any of my systems, your patch is now > included upstream[1] -- expect a new packaged adesklets release

Bug#341324: php4-apd incorrect zend engine version

Hi Rory, > I did something desperately crude after downloading the source package > -- I just replaced all the references to the 2002 install location > and replaced it with the 20050606 date (as in /usr/lib/php4/20050606/). > Amazingly, after building, it works! Yep, that's basically what I've b

Bug#338899: marked as done (ghemical: ppc ghemical 1.90-2 segmentaion fault)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:02:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338899: fixed in ghemical 1.91-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#341324: php4-apd incorrect zend engine version

Hi Jonathan On 30/11/05, Jonathan Oxer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I can't find many reports on this on the net; and messing around with > > symlinks in /usr/share/php4/ has been singularly unsuccessful. > > I've been trying to build a later version of APD against PHP4 but so > far I've been

Bug#341332: libiiimp1: fails to install

Package: libiiimp1 Version: 12.3.91-0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When installing: (Reading database ... 155154 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libiiimp1 (from .../libiiimp1_12.3.91-0.1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/

Bug#341324: php4-apd incorrect zend engine version

Hi Rory, > I can't find many reports on this on the net; and messing around with > symlinks in /usr/share/php4/ has been singularly unsuccessful. I've been trying to build a later version of APD against PHP4 but so far I've been unsuccessful, so I'm working backwards through the versions to get a

Bug#340225: marked as done (fatal: PAM: pam_setcred(): Error in service module)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:52:21 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340225: fatal: PAM: pam_setcred(): Error in service module has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#341324: php4-apd incorrect zend engine version

Package: php4-apd Version: 0.4p2-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi. After installing php4-apd and checking all is right in the php.ini file, restarting the apache server gives the following report: Starting apache 1.3 web server...Advanced PHP Debugger (APD) requires Z

Bug#339218: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:00:50 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339218: fixed in libqalculate 0.9.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#339170: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:56:31 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339170: fixed in gfccore 2.3.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: (no subject)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 328086 +pending Bug#328086: libpanelappletmm2.6: Please undergo c++ 'c2' transition There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admi

Bug#341305: severity

severity 341305 normal -- *--* Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *--* Voice: 425.739.4247 *--* Fax: 425.827.9577 *--* HTTP://the-penguin.otak.com/~lawrence -- - - - - - - O t a k i n c . - - - - - signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#341305: evolution-exchange-storage crashes constantly

Jason Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Subject: evolution-exchange-storage crashes constantly > Package: evolution-exchange > Version: 2.2.3-4 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > When using evolution with an exchange backend, I constantly receive the > message 'The

Bug#341317: blosxom: running gives internal server error

Package: blosxom Version: 2.0-13 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages blosxom depends on: ii debconf

Bug#341056: marked as done (broken dependency in sid)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:50:48 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341056: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#339193: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:51:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339193: fixed in libaqbanking 1.6.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#316030: marked as done (SystemError: dynamic module not initalized correctky)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:50:47 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316030: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#328588: marked as done (libglademm2.3: FTBFS on s390/experimental)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:58:55 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328588: libglademm2.3: FTBFS on s390/experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Fixed in NMU of exiv2 0.7-9.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 339163 + fixed Bug#339163: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#339290: problem with fpdownload.macromedia.com

Hi, thanks for maintaining this package. the problem with fpdownload.macromedia.com is, that it doesn't provide gpg-md5sum.txt, so checking for updates is not trivial. I just uploaded a modified version of your package to ubuntu (multiverse), which uses fpdownload.macromedia.com and sets @forc

Processed: Fixed in NMU of eris 1.3.8-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 339162 + fixed Bug#339162: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#339245: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:31:00 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339245: fixed in orbit2cpp 1.3.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#339206: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:26:56 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339206: fixed in libglademm2.4 2.6.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#339232: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:23:30 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339232: fixed in mpqc 2.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#339207: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:30:02 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339207: fixed in libgnomecanvasmm2.6 2.10.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#339152: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:30:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339152: fixed in gnome-vfsmm2.6 2.10.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#339204: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:27:56 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339204: fixed in libghemical 1.91-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#326354: marked as done (please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:17:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326354: fixed in gnuchess 5.07-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: woops, yet more fixup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297295 +pending Bug#297295: yafray: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'yafray::point3d_t*' to 'int' loses precision Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > retitle 297295 FTBFS gcc-4.0 on 64 bit platforms (AMD64/Alpha) Bug#297295: yafray: FTBFS (am

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libtunepimp 0.3.0-9.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 339223 + fixed Bug#339223: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#341311: c2hs: ftbfs [sparc] make[3]: *** [Errors.o] Bus error

Package: c2hs Version: 0.13.6-4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source c2hs failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. make -C errors/ -w `/usr/bin/basename errors/Errors.o` make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/c2hs-0.13.6/base/errors' /usr/bi

Bug#336582: Upgrade

Hi, Could you upgrade quickly? This bug is open for 29 days and involve security problems... http://www.debian.org/security/index.en.html 1st paragraph? :p Thanks Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#341312: pugs: ftbfs [sparc] Setup: waitForProcess: interrupted

Package: pugs Version: 6.2.10-4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source The pugs build timed out on a sparc buildd: Chasing modules from: Pugs,Pugs.AST,Pugs.AST.Internals,Pugs.AST.Pad,Pugs.AST.Pos,Pugs.AST.Prag,Pugs.AST.SIO,Pugs.AST.Scope,Pugs.Bind,Pugs.CodeGen,Pugs.CodeGen.

Bug#328418: marked as done (evolution 2.4 uninstalable due to missing packages)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:02:59 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line evolution 2.4 uninstalable due to missing packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Processed: fixup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297295 -fixed +pending Unknown tag/s: +pending. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstrea

Processed: Re: Bug#341172: [Evolution] Bug#341172: evolution experimental fails to build from source

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 341172 + patch Bug#341172: evolution experimental fails to build from source Tags were: experimental Tags added: patch > severity 341172 wishlist Bug#341172: evolution experimental fails to build from source Severity set to `wishlist'. > retitle

Bug#341172: [Evolution] Bug#341172: evolution experimental fails to build from source

tags 341172 + patch severity 341172 wishlist retitle 341172 Please port to the experimental pilot-link 0.12 API thanks On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Scott Anderson wrote: > I'll try downgrading pilot-link to unstable. > # apt-cache policy pilot-link > Installed: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3 Yes, it's the prob

Bug#329080: This bug may be fixed

This bug may be fixed by upstream changes in the newly uploaded 0.0.8. Please test it once it becomes available for your platform. -- -><- Nick Rusnov -><- http://nick.industrialmeats.com -><- [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#297295: regression

I uploaded a new version of yafray which appears to still have this bug (see for example the Alpha build log). I will shortly upload a version with the patch applied. -- -><- Nick Rusnov -><- http://nick.industrialmeats.com -><- [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#341309: aclock.app: does not start

Package: aclock.app Version: 0.2.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable AClock terminates with the following error message: 2005-11-30 00:05:08.000 AClock[7445] Warning - mouse/pointer seems to have more than 5 buttons - just using one to five /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Applic

Bug#341305: evolution-exchange-storage crashes constantly

Subject: evolution-exchange-storage crashes constantly Package: evolution-exchange Version: 2.2.3-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When using evolution with an exchange backend, I constantly receive the message 'The Application "evolution-exchange-storage" has quit unexp

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnustep-back 0.9.5-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 314385 + fixed Bug#314385: gworkspace.app: Loader error when launching GWorkspace There were no tags set. Bug#320958: rssreader.app: cant start Bug#321646: terminal: crashes on startup Bug#321912: Paje cannot start without resolving the symbol Bug#3

Bug#341172: [Evolution] Bug#341172: evolution experimental fails to build from source

--- Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Scott Anderson wrote: > > I'm attaching the build log again. > > That one is *very* different. I didn't see the same errors in the > first log you sent. > > Configure says you're missing iconv development files, which are in

Bug#340900: kronolith: saves but does not display events

Martin Lohmeier wrote: Graham Seaman wrote: What's the best way to go from here? Do I need to start installing packages from testing? I've had a look, and appear to have the usual cascade of dependencies (testing version of pear, etc), which will effectively convert my system from stable to

Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt

Somehow this mail was lost between gmail and my local machine. I found your mail from BTS web and writing you from my gmail web site. On 11/28/05, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you provide a source package for testing?  I currently can't accessthe CVS, it seems. Sure.  (CVS is at SF.N

Bug#341297: file name conflict with bitscope package

Package: xoscope Version: 1.12-1 Severity: serious This package installs a file /usr/bin/bitscope, which is also installed by package bitscope. This is not allowed by the release policy, and you will have to rename the file. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers t

Bug#266039: marked as done (genext2fs - generates completely broken images on s390)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:48:02 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ack NMU (genext2fs - generates completely broken images on s390) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Processed: (no subject)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 339245 +pending Bug#339245: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 269815 +pending Bug#269815: liborbit2cpp9: CosNaming shared library missing There were no tags set. Tag

Processed: Re: Bug#340151: maxima: fail to start

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 340151 unreproducible Bug#340151: maxima: fail to start There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debi

Processed: Severity change

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 334460 normal Bug#334460: imms: 100% CPU Usage Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -

Processed: tagging 335148

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > tags 335148 + patch Bug#335148: removal of automake1.6 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#340273: adesklets: links to libfreetype6, which is going away

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Steve, thanks for taking the time to go through these autotools scripts; since it doesn't seem to break anything on any of my systems, your patch is now included upstream[1] -- expect a new packaged adesklets release before December the 14th in

Bug#335148: Patch for this bug

Seeing that no one appears to be working on this package, here's a patch for this bug. If no one objects, I'll upload this in a week or so. diff -u xbsql-0.11/debian/control xbsql-0.11/debian/control --- xbsql-0.11/debian/control +++ xbsql-0.11/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: libs Prior

Bug#340151: maxima: fail to start

tags 340151 unreproducible thanks Have rebuilt bot gcl and maxima in the standard fashion in sid chroot on bruckner, and cannot reproduce this. May I please suggest requeueing first gcl and then maxima on this arch. Take care, Jean-Paul Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: maxima >

Bug#334460: imms: 100% CPU Usage

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:51:58PM -0600, Hans Fugal wrote: > When enabling IMMS, or starting XMMS with IMMS enabled, XMMS' process > uses 100% CPU and the GUI locks up. (The current song if any plays to > completion.) > > Nothing happens if there is nothing in the playlist, but adding a song > to

Bug#341291: abakus needs rebuild against kdelibs4c2a

Package: abakus Version: 0.90-4 Severity: serious Hi The package needs to be rebuild against the new kdelibs4-dev so that the dependency against kdelibs4c2 changes to kdelibs4c2a. (This is because of the libstdc++ allocation transition). Greetings Peter -- System Information: Debian Release: tes

Bug#341290: uninstallable in unstable: please port to ocaml 3.09

Package: libdbi-ocaml-dev Severity: grave ocamldbi is currently uninstallable in unstable, porting the package to ocaml 3.09 is needed. Cheers. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i68

Bug#341286: mismatch between the kernel used by installer and included in the archive

Package: installation Severity: grave Tags: d-i, sid Here's the total log of installation: 1. put cd-rom '20051128 "sid" - fsn.hu unofficial i386 Binary-1' in drive 2. boot 3. Press enter to take default install options 4. Choose "English" 5. Choose "United States" 6. Choose "American Engli

Bug#341172: [Evolution] Bug#341172: evolution experimental fails to build from source

(BTW, my build log which I'm diffing with yours is available from: .) -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS!When do we want it? BRAINS!"

Bug#341172: [Evolution] Bug#341172: evolution experimental fails to build from source

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Scott Anderson wrote: > I'm attaching the build log again. That one is *very* different. I didn't see the same errors in the first log you sent. Configure says you're missing iconv development files, which are in libc6-dev. (It also says you don't have jw installed, wh

Processed: Re: Bug#338215: maxima_5.9.2-2_hppa: FTBFS: ./maxima: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 338215 unreproducible Bug#338215: maxima_5.9.2-2_hppa: FTBFS: ./maxima: No such file or directory Tags were: sid Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system a

Bug#338215: maxima_5.9.2-2_hppa: FTBFS: ./maxima: No such file or directory

tags 338215 unreproducible thanks Greetings! Have rebuilt both gcl and maxima on paer and cannot reproduce this behavior. May I please suggest that both gcl and then maxima be requeued on this arch. Take care, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: maxima > Severity:

Bug#326354: Intent to NMU on 11/30

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:39:42PM -0700, Lukas Geyer wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 06:20:08PM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > > given that this bug is RC for two weeks now while a trivial fix is > > available I intent to NMU on Wednesday, the 30th, using the attached > > patch and uploading to DE

Bug#339166: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

Steve, Thanks for the NMU. Silke is no longer maintaining this package and the DebianGIS group is waiting for people to step to the plate for group maintenance. This patch and NMU are appreciated. Please go ahead. Thanks, Steve On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 05:42 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > tags 3391

Bug#326354: Intent to NMU on 11/30

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 06:20:08PM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > Dear maintainer, > > given that this bug is RC for two weeks now while a trivial fix is > available I intent to NMU on Wednesday, the 30th, using the attached > patch and uploading to DELAYED/7-day. > > Cheers, > Flo Dear Flo, sor

Bug#317435: NMU

Hi, I intent to NMU this package soon to integrate these patches in order to have the image in testing one day. Please tell me if you wish me not to do so. Cheers, Samuel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 341228 mazeofgalious: patent infringement Bug#341228: mazeofgalious: copyright infringement Warning: Unknown package 'mazeofgalious' Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debi

Bug#329087: marked as done (kernel-patch-vserver: be able to do chroot escape)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:47:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329087: fixed in kernel-patch-vserver 2.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

  1   2   >