Bug#341606: marked as done (cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:37:31 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341606: cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#328170: Does "--nowrapper" help?

I'm having similar problems with apt-build from unstable. If I do not use "--nowrapper", I get segfaults in make like this: checking dependency style of i486-linux-gnu-g++... ./configure: line 4135: 19100 Segmentation fault ${MAKE-make} -s -f confmf >/dev/null 2>&1 In this case, line 4135

Bug#340079: insecure tempfiles

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:01:32PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 03:01:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:13:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > However I am not sure this is a security bug: > > > The original script create a file named tem

Processed: Re: Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 344046 Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure Disconnected #344046 from all other report(s). > reassign 344046 make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `m

Bug#339263: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339263: fixed in sigcperl 0.2.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:42:40AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 22:15, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > > > Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not > > > > > like to see enter testing a

Bug#336582: phpbb2: New round of security issues

Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:49 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > You didn't mention CVE-2005-3417. Is the version in sarge not vulnerable > > to it? Or did you miss it? Or did you just didn't document this? > > This has been fixed but indeed isn't documented in the changelo

Processed: Fixed in NMU of icon 9.4.2-2.4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 322972 + fixed Bug#322972: icon: ftbfs [sparc] Tests failed: ilib sorting table Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#294520: QTParted 0.4.5-1 still does it!

I just noticed that QTParted 0.4.5-1 (listed as v0.4.5-cvs in the program) still does it. I've attached a screenshot of QTParted, and the output of fdisk and partman on the same disk. I also attached a screenshot of QTParted 0.4.4 from Knoppix 3.7; you can see a lot of extraneous stuff, but th

Processed: bug is not grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 262627 normal Bug#262627: invoke-rc.d should be used Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databas

Processed: 336710 patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Tags 336710 patch Bug#336710: Removes /dev/null if build with root privileges There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thank Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#336710: 336710 patch

Tags 336710 patch thank Here's the patch implementing the proposed solution, Regards, diff -Nru procps-3.2.6/debian/patches/00list procps-3.2.6.patched/debian/patches/00list --- procps-3.2.6/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-20 03:00:14.0 +0100 +++ procps-3.2.6.patched/debian/patches/00list

Bug#343914: marked as done (mldonkey: FTBFS: build-depends on removed package libgd2-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:47:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343914: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#262627: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#344089: testsuite failure with experimental upgrade

another failure happens with 262627 where inetd is started within chroot. It should be fixed on inetd side. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 22:15, Steve Langasek a écrit : > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > > Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not > > > > like to see enter testing at all. > > > > > > Current testing has an RC security bug. If those issue

Bug#343874: marked as done (camomile - FTBFS: no: Command not found)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343874: fixed in camomile 0.6.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#343408: marked as done (ocaml-benchmark: ftbfs [sparc] ocamlfind: command not found)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343408: fixed in ocaml-benchmark 0.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#343873: marked as done (cameleon - FTBFS: /bin/sh: no: command not found)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:47:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343873: fixed in cameleon 1.9.9.cvs20051129-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#343360: marked as done (cameleon: missing build-dep on imagemagick)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:47:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343360: fixed in cameleon 1.9.9.cvs20051129-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: inetd hangs pbuilder update

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 262627 grave Bug#262627: invoke-rc.d should be used Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#342328: marked as done (ace: ftbfs [sparc] error: 'struct termios' has no member named 'c_ispeed')

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342328: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#340103: marked as done (ocamlodbc - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:50 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340103: fixed in ocamlodbc 2.10-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#339142: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339142: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#338435: marked as done (ocaml 3.09.0 should not enter testing without our consent)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:46 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338435: fixed in ocaml 3.09.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#336020: marked as done (ace - FTBFS: error: request for member `hash' in `t', which is of non-class type `const long unsigned int')

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336020: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#334944: marked as done (liboil: FTBFS on powerpc)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:18:20 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334944: fixed in liboil 0.3.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#324271: marked as done (ace: FTBFS: undefined reference to `std::basic_ofstream >::basic_ofstream(char const*, std::_Ios_Openmode)@@GLIBCXX_3.4')

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324271: fixed in ace 5.4.7-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processed: Fixed in NMU of apt-move 4.2.24-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 339024 + fixed Bug#339024: apt-move: complains about EOF on /tmp/MOVE_xxx/movefiles-fifo1 Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 341234 + fixed Bug#341234: New dash 0.5.3-1 breaks apt-move Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping proce

Bug#341606: cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, if there are no objections, I will upload an NMU tomorrow for this bug (just a recompile, no changes). Regards, Bastian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozd

Bug#343978: vlc: segfault on launch/fopen

I installed vlc 0.8.4 from source, but I was receiving the following errors, which I was unable to resolve: [0286] main video output warning: late picture skipped (4094055) [0285] main audio output warning: PTS is out of range (646837), dropping buffer [0285] main audio output warning:

Processed: fix severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 344041 normal Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not like to > > > see enter testing at all. > > Current testing has an RC security bug. If those issues you mention > > are also RC, I suggest you document them in the BTS

Bug#307299: Perl taint problem confirmed here too

Hi, I have the same exact problem reported originally by Tristan back in May. I have done some tests with Perl on this machine and have found that Perl _always_ runs in taint mode no matter who is the owner and regardless if the -T is explicit or not. Here are the sample programs and results: Tes

Processed: downgrade

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #330191 important Bug#330191: klibc: ftbfs [sparc] redefinition of 'struct __new_sigaction' Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#343978: vlc: segfault on launch/fopen

Hello, Could you please launch vlc with -vvv and give the log output so we can get an idea where it crashes ? Did you install a custom VLC ? If you did, please uninstall and remove its modules. Thanks, -- Clément Stenac

Processed: Re: Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 344046 gcc-4.0 Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Bug reassigned from package `make' to `gcc-4.0'. > severity 344046 grave Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k Severity set to `grave'. > severity 344041 grave Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency fail

Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k

reassign 344046 gcc-4.0 severity 344046 grave severity 344041 grave merge 344041 344046 thanks Hi, If this is a bug in gcc-4.0, and it causes other packages to have FTBS bugs, then we should fix gcc. manoj -- Newton's Little-Known Seventh Law: A bird in the hand is safer than

Bug#343921: bandwidthd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed package libgd2-dev

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:23:28PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: bandwidthd > Version: 2.0.1+cvs20050208-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > > This package fails to build from source on the autobuilders because it > build-depends as a first alternative t

Processed: severity of 343909 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > severity 343909 serious Bug#343909: update error with amule-common_2.0.3-4+b1_i386.deb (--unpack)  Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#344068: lacks dependency on ucf

Package: mambo Version: 4.5.1.3-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package uninstallable Mambo's postinst uses ucf, but mambo does not depend on ucf. This makes the postinst fail if ucf is not installed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT p

Bug#344067: libsysfs-dev: static library in /lib

Package: libsysfs-dev Version: 1.3.0-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1 libsysfs.a is in /lib; static libraries belong in /usr/lib, as they're not needed to boot the system. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architectur

Bug#343712: marked as done (gcl: FTBFS: ./configure: line 2413: syntax error near unexpected token `(')

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:59:34 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed with gcl_2.6.7-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#343872: marked as done (gcl - FTBFS. error: '_mcount' undeclared here (not in a function))

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:59:34 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed with gcl_2.6.7-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#343998: Patch

I found that anjuta Version: 2.0.1-2 has the same bug because both anjuta-encodings.c are basically the same. I notice this bug when libgtk was updated to version 2.8.9-2 I think this is because in version 2.8 gtk triggers a "changed" signal on the selection object of the treeview when setting th

Processed: Fixed in NMU of teg 0.11.1-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 313853 + fixed Bug#313853: teg: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: fixed > tag 326290 + fixed Bug#326290: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag

Bug#335997: marked as done (flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335997: fixed in flyspray 0.9.8-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 17:02, Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 16:54, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : > > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:47 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll > > > enter etch in 10 days from now. > > > > Great,

Bug#321207: [trang ftbfs] Re: now builds on my sparc pbuilder

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 01:36:43 -0700 > trang now builds on my sparc pbuilder. This implies that > either the build dependancies are insufficiently versioned, > or that a bug in one or more of the build dependa

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 16:54, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:47 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter > > etch in 10 days from now. > > Great, my interest is that the problem is addressed in the best way > possib

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:47 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter etch > in 10 days from now. Great, my interest is that the problem is addressed in the best way possible :) What about stable, do you want to prepare new updated package

Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k

Package: make Version: 3.80+3.81.b4-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Recent versions of make fail to build from source on m68k. This is due to a gcc-4.0 bug (debian #344041). As a workaround variable.c can be compiled with -O1. Here are selected excer

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 16:42, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:26 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > > Multiple Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilties have been found in > > > > Flyspray. Have a look at > > > > http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2005/10/flyspray-bug-killer-multipl > > >

Bug#340851: autogen also FTBFS on i386 now

Daniel Schepler wrote: Just a quick note that I've been able to reproduce the failure on the license.test test on an i386 system as well, so it's apparently not alpha-specific. I just ran pbuilder on the 1:5.7.3-1 source package twice in a row, and it failed both times. Another quick note

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:26 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > Multiple Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilties have been found in > > > Flyspray. Have a look at > > > http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2005/10/flyspray-bug-killer-multiple-va > > >riable.html for more details. This has been assigned CVE-2005

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 13:41, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : > close 335997 0.9.8-4 > tags 335997 patch > thanks > > > Multiple Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilties have been found in > > Flyspray. Have a look at > > http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2005/10/flyspray-bug-killer-multiple-va > >riable.html for

Bug#344034: sudo stopped being able to authenticate after upgrade

Package: sudo Version: 1.6.8p9-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrade, sudo fails to authenticate in the same setup where it had being working before. sudo logs this to syslog: Dec 19 11:50:01 localhost sudo: maxy : pam_authenticate: Authentication service c

Bug#340079: insecure tempfiles

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 03:01:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:13:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > However I am not sure this is a security bug: > > The original script create a file named tempfile in the current > > directory, not int /tmp. > > > Would you consi

Bug#344032: bbdb: File error: "Cannot open load file", "bbdb-autoloads"

Package: bbdb Version: 2.35.cvs20040528-1 Severity: grave Hello! Since the latest emacs-snapshot upgrade, I cannot use bbdb anymore: = gismo:~# emacs21 -nw Loading 20apel (source)...done Loading 20gnus-init (source)...done Loading 50auctex (source)...done Loading 50autoconf (source)...done

Bug#344029: libmail-audit-perl: insecure /tmp handling

Package: libmail-audit-perl Version: 2.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: Etch RC policy The Mail::Audit module logs by default to my $logfile = "/tmp/".getpwuid($>)."-audit.log"; if logging is turned on (the loglevel parameter to new()) and no logfile is explicitly specified. The module wil

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 15:04 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Thijs Kinkhorst: > > > For the testing (etch) and unstable distribution (sid) this problem has > > been fixed in version 0.9.8-5. > > > close 335997 0.9.8-4 > > -4 or -5? The changelog for -4 lists the fix ("* Branch pull from upstrea

Bug#329197: marked as done (postgresql-7.4: fails with SIGBUS on mips)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:02:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329197: fixed in postgresql-7.4 1:7.4.10-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

* Thijs Kinkhorst: > For the testing (etch) and unstable distribution (sid) this problem has > been fixed in version 0.9.8-5. > close 335997 0.9.8-4 -4 or -5? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341773: marked as done (segfaults (!) when processing previously valid group files)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:47:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341773: fixed in libnss-db 2.2.3pre1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: tagging 342583, tagging 342740

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > tags 342583 pending Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific. Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: pending > tags 342740 pending Bug#342740: mis

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 13:41 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > For stable: > I've extracted the right patch from the unstable version (which has been > present without any bugreports since the end of October), and that is > attached. I've also prepared updated packages here: > http://www.a-eskwadraat.

Processed: Re: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 335997 0.9.8-4 Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.9.8-4, send any further explanations to Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECT

Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities

close 335997 0.9.8-4 tags 335997 patch thanks > Multiple Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilties have been found in > Flyspray. Have a look at > http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2005/10/flyspray-bug-killer-multiple-variable.html > for more details. This has been assigned CVE-2005-3334, please mention so i

Bug#342545: Processed: Wow, that was retarded of bts

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:46:09PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote: > >> reassign 342545 libgcc2 4.0.2-5 > > Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails > > Warning: Unknown package '4.0.2-5' > > Bug reassigned from package `4.0.2-5' to `libgcc2'. > Could you maybe summarize what the actual bug is and why it'

Bug#338435: status of the ocaml 3.09.0 migration ...

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:32:40AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:46:14AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > 04:24 < vorlon> hey all. Where are we on being able to close bug #338435? > > 04:25 < vorlon> it turns out KDE needs ocaml to be pushed first, because > > abiword-p

Bug#343833: marked as done (Uploaders: field broken)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:32:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343833: fixed in xfce4-icon-theme 4.2.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: found 343861 in 0.2.36-1, notfound 343861 in 0.2.36-1ubuntu5

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > found 343861 0.2.36-1 Bug#343861: esound: breaks since ALSA 1.0.10 transition; fixed by Ubuntu patches Bug marked as found in version 0.2.36-1. > # version numbers are not decorativ

Bug#338435: status of the ocaml 3.09.0 migration ...

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:46:14AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > 04:24 < vorlon> hey all. Where are we on being able to close bug #338435? > 04:25 < vorlon> it turns out KDE needs ocaml to be pushed first, because > abiword-plugins uses gtkmathview and abiword and koffice both depend on > libwpd. >

Bug#342931: marked as done (doesn't work on alpha)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342931: fixed in klibc 1.1.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#343998: Anjuta 1.2.4-1+b1 crashes when anjuta is launched

Package: anjuta Version: 1.2.4-1+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When Anjuta is launched, it crashes. This is a 'backtracing' via gdb: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 46912586773776 (LWP 13238)] 0x0045ccbf in anjuta_enco

Bug#343992: marked as done (rapple: not installable in sid)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:24:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343992: rapple: not installable in sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#343533: marked as done (pyrex generates invalid code (gcc-4.0))

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:17:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343533: fixed in pyrex 0.9.3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#306184: aegis - FTBFS

reopen 306184 found 306184 4.21-1 thanks There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of aegis_4.21-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \ > test/00/t0095a.sh test/00/t0095a.ES > aedist: aegis --new-change

Processed: aegis - FTBFS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 306184 Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test Bug reopened, originator not changed. > found 306184 4.21-1 Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test Bug marked as found in version 4.21-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#343996: phat - FTBFS: missing build dependencies

Package: phat Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of phat_0.3.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev [...] > checki

Processed: Wow, that was retarded of bts

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # I swear, I typed it right on my end. :P > reassign 342545 libgcc2 4.0.2-5 Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails Warning: Unknown package '4.0.2-5' Bug reassigned from package `4.0.2-5' to `libgcc2'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please c

Processed: Correct submitter address

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 343989 Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#343989: tcl8.4: FTBFS: Syntax error in configure Changed Bug submitter from Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#340851: autogen also FTBFS on i386 now

Just a quick note that I've been able to reproduce the failure on the license.test test on an i386 system as well, so it's apparently not alpha-specific. I just ran pbuilder on the 1:5.7.3-1 source package twice in a row, and it failed both times. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Processed: reassign 341675 to cppunit, reassign 342545 to 4.0.2-5, reassign 2 to 4.0.2-5

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > # whoops, reassign the right one > reassign 341675 cppunit 1.10.2-5 Bug#341675: cppunit: FTBFS on hppa Bug reassigned from package `libgcc2' to `cppunit'. > reassign 342545 4.0.2-5

Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package

Patricio Rojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All solved... upon reinstallation of kcontrol, /etc/hotplug became a > directory, and now there is no conflict with libsane. Probably it was > left there from some old and faulty upgrade or something... Good. I have a machine here with KDE installed, and

Bug#343992: rapple: not installable in sid

Package: rapple Version: 1.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, rapple needs to be updated to depend on a newer libtidy version: # apt-get install rapple Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean

Bug#343991: python2.3-utidylib: not installable in sid

Package: python2.3-utidylib Version: 0.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, python2.3-utidylib needs to be updated to depend on a newer libtidy version: # apt-get install python2.3-utidylib Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages c

Processed: Re: qt-x11-free build fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 341675 libgcc2 4.0.2-5 Bug#341675: cppunit: FTBFS on hppa Bug reassigned from package `cppunit' to `libgcc2'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

reassign 341675 libgcc2 4.0.2-5 thanks On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug > > #326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc

Bug#343990: tix: FTBFS: Syntax error in configure

Package: tix Severity: serious Version: 8.4-2 >From my build log: ... checking for building with threads... yes checking how to build libraries... static checking if 64bit support is enabled... no checking if 64bit Sparc VIS support is requested... no checking system version (for dynamic loading)

Bug#343989: tcl8.4: FTBFS: Syntax error in configure

Package: tcl8.4 Version: 8.4.11-1 Severity: serious >From my build log: ... checking for connect... yes checking for gethostbyname... yes checking how to build libraries... shared checking for ranlib... ranlib checking if 64bit support is requested... yes checking if 64bit Sparc VIS support is re

Bug#343981: marked as done (libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:41:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#337870: FTBFS (alpha): conflicting types for 'strlen'

Hi, On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Attached please find two patches. [...] Thanks for the patches. Hopefully, I should have my computers out of storage (following a job and house move) in the next few weeks, so I'll be able to clear this (and other) bugs then. Cheers, Phil.

Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package

All solved... upon reinstallation of kcontrol, /etc/hotplug became a directory, and now there is no conflict with libsane. Probably it was left there from some old and faulty upgrade or something... Thanks! On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 09:13 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Patricio Rojo <[EMAIL

Bug#336582: phpbb2: New round of security issues

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:49 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > You didn't mention CVE-2005-3417. Is the version in sarge not vulnerable > to it? Or did you miss it? Or did you just didn't document this? This has been fixed but indeed isn't documented in the changelog. The fact is that CVE-2005-341{

Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package

Patricio Rojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nop, there is /etc/hotplug.d/ directory but /etc/hotplug is actually > an empty file! Maybe this bug should be forwarded to kcontrol so that > they remove it from their package? OK, please : - remove the file - apt-get install --reinstall kcontrol I

Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package

Hi, Nop, there is /etc/hotplug.d/ directory but /etc/hotplug is actually an empty file! Maybe this bug should be forwarded to kcontrol so that they remove it from their package? Pato On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:50 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Patricio Rojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Bug#343981: libsane: Trying to overwrite file from other package

Patricio Rojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsane_1.0.17-1_i386.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/etc/hotplug', which is also in package kcontrol > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Is /etc/hotplug a directory

Bug#336582: phpbb2: New round of security issues

You didn't mention CVE-2005-3417. Is the version in sarge not vulnerable to it? Or did you miss it? Or did you just didn't document this? Regards, Joey -- Open source is important from a technical angle. -- Linus Torvalds -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w