Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, I can only confirm this problem. However I really fail to see why
> this should be release critical. One may certainly tag it as "important"
> but I somewhat object to it being "grave".
It makes the font ugly to the point of unreadability when u
Thomas Wana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Geoff Crompton wrote:
> >This bug has been closed for unstable (see bug 350964) with the 4.6
> >upload, but will it be fixed for sarge?
> >
>
> Joey: I sent you a patch for that, but it seems you didn't
> include this in scponly-4.0sarge1. We also had no discussion
>
(removing debian-boot)
> [IMHO the most reliable way to test the 'line spacing' issue is to use
> Openoffice 2.0; just select some text, and change the font between e.g.
> Times New Roman and Freeserif.]
Hmmm, doing so gives me what is probably this line spacing problem. A
random text switched f
Hi,
Geoff Crompton wrote:
This bug has been closed for unstable (see bug 350964) with the 4.6
upload, but will it be fixed for sarge?
Joey: I sent you a patch for that, but it seems you didn't
include this in scponly-4.0sarge1. We also had no discussion
about wether to include it or not. Plea
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 12:08:50PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Version: 0.8.7-1
>> Automatic build of libpolyxmass_0.8.7-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85
> [...]
>> s390-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libpolyxmass\"
>> -I/usr/include -I.. -I. -I../intl -I/usr/include/gl
Joost asked about permissions on various directories. That led me to
the real problem: I had accidentally put the archives in
/var/lib/mailman/mailman/archives, not /var/lib/mailman/archives.
Fixing that fixed everything.
Sorry to bother you. Please close the bug.
--
Carl Fink
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297917 = wontfix
Bug#297917: eterm: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
There were no tags set.
Tags set to: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:47:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libast: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:44:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line eterm: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:46:27 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libast: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 287376 = wontfix
Bug#287376: libast: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags set to: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297917 = wontfilx
Unknown tag/s: wontfilx.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 352037 passwd
Bug#352037: heartbeat - uninstallable in buildd context
Bug reassigned from package `adduser' to `passwd'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
reassign 352037 passwd
thanks
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 12:56:53PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:46:54AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > Automatic build of evms_2.5.4-6 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
> > > [...]
> > > > Selecting previously deselected package heartbeat.
Package: gnomesword
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I type:
gnomesword2
I see:
Initiating GNOME session handler
and then a popup that says
The Application "gnomesword2" has quit unexpectedly.
with two buttons: Restart Application and Close.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package gaim
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gaim
> tags 350071 +patch
Bug#350071: Gaim in Sarge appears to be vulnerable to CVE-2005-2369
Tags were: sarge security
Tags added: patch
> tags 323706 +patch
Bug#323706: gaim: CAN-2005-2103, CAN-2005-2102,
package gaim
tags 350071 +patch
tags 323706 +patch
thanks
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Security Team,
There is a planned release of gaim 1.5.0 this Thursday. It will fix
three security issues:
1. CAN-2005-2370
The gadu-gadu protocol plugin. There was a memory alignment bug that
apparently can not b
This bug has been closed for unstable (see bug 350964) with the 4.6
upload, but will it be fixed for sarge?
--
Geoff Crompton
Debian System Administrator
Strategic Data
+61 3 9340 9000
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:16:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line included in last upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:16:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line included in last upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
The fix as of now, if you're running sarge, is basically to get the gaim
backport from backports.org. The security team was aware of this issue
months ago, so it's up to them to release fixed packages.
Geoff Crompton wrote:
Just wondering if their will be a fix for this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Just wondering if their will be a fix for this?
--
Geoff Crompton
Debian System Administrator
Strategic Data
+61 3 9340 9000
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libpng
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
As seen on http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16626, there is a buffer overflow.
Redhat have a patch available at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179455
However security focus lists versions 1.0.16, 1.0.17, 1.2
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:39:23PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Let us try to avoid generic discussions that are not related to star.
> Show me the exact art of the DSFG that you believe is incompatible with
> the CDDL and explain why exactly you believe that this part of the DSFG
> is incomp
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:18:50PM -, Pawel Wiecek wrote:
> Well, what sort of reacion do you expect?
A sign that you are reading the bug report, which wasn't obvious to me.
Something along the lines of "I agree / I disagree / I don't know" would be nice
as well. After all, it might be poss
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # please just ask the release team if you need an RC bug ignored for
> # testing. :)
> tags 349316 -etch
Bug#349316: kaddressbook: Looses all kontacts when shutting down
Tags were: etch
Tags removed: etch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:26:16PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> I have added the suggested workaround
> Defaults env_check = HOME
> to my sudoers, yet 'sudo env' shows that HOME is not preserved.
AIUI, you must set env_reset before setting env_check; this is a bug in the
security patch that
On Feb 14, Mike Crowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't think this issue is limited to network devices.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 01:46:30PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> You are showing some totally unrelated issue which is obviously a
> bug in lvm2.
I admit that the log excerpt I provided was
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:40:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Josh Triplett wrote:
> No spacing problems either with this version or with the current version
> in Debian.
>
> - Josh Triplett
Interesting .. I have spacing problems (line spacing, and, with Freemono
when printed by means of Mozilla/xprint, also character spacing) both
with this version and wi
Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to convert a tiff file to PDF using tiff2pdf
> which is part of libtill-tools. It segfaults and I could
> never get it to work. If needed I can provide the tiff
> file I used as input if that can can help.
Yes, please provide the
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 20:29 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Note: the CDDL clearly is a license that follows the rules from Debian.
See, that's exactly the point. I believe otherwise; so it isn't clear to
me, at least with a choice of venue.
> If you believe otherwise, tell me exactly _
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:30:20PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2006 at 17:54:24 +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:42:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Package: mldonkey
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Justification: no lon
On Feb 14, Mike Crowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've attached two separate logs - one from a successful boot and one
> from a failed boot. It hope it is clear that these two logs show sata,
> megaraid, aic79xx and USB modules scanning for devices in a different
> order. This means that on some
Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you believe otherwise, tell me exactly _what_ you don't like and _why_
> > the
> > CDDL is not following Debians rules.
>
> Quite simple: I want to be able to set up a server, putting "main" into
> sources.list and not having to wonder wether I just
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:07:07PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 01:25 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > > It seems that you did not understand the Debian rules.
> > Well, I believe I understand them quite well. OTOH, I don't consider
> > this problem to be about
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:43:16PM +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> On Feb 14, Mike Crowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I don't think this issue is limited to network devices.
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 01:46:30PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > You are showing some totally unrelated issue which is ob
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:48:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332726: fixed in xsp 1.1.13-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Martin,
Martin Schulze wrote:
> +- SoryBy => 'Age', #
> Owner|CustomerID|State|Ticket|Queue|Priority|Age
> ++ SortBy => 'Age', #
> Owner|CustomerID|State|Ticket|Queue|Priority|Age
>
> Could you... err... explain the change?
I have obviously missed that change. I do
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 22:24 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Well, then you obviously need to remove _all_ GPL packets as any
> person could sue you anywhere in the world because of the _missing_
> choice of venue.
If I am not doing business there and can still be sued *without* having
agre
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 282843 + fixed
Bug#282843: u++ spews warnings about use of tmpname
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 328037 + fixed
Bug#328037: FTBFS: No rule to make target linux-gnu-i386
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 345004 + fix
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:48:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346755: fixed in x2x 1.27.svn.20060214-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:47:34 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352787: fixed in dh-buildinfo 0.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:47:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352654: fixed in grub 0.97-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi all,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 05:33:36PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I just built a new upstream version of ttf-freefont. As Konstantinos
> is mostly away currently, I wanted to give a try for getting a new
> version in as the graphical installer could benefit it.
very appreciated: thank
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:47:32 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352867: fixed in db1-compat 2.1.3-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Christian Perrier wrote:
> I just built a new upstream version of ttf-freefont. As Konstantinos
> is mostly away currently, I wanted to give a try for getting a new
> version in as the graphical installer could benefit it.
>
> I am not at all a font guy...I just took some time to build this new
>
tags + patch
thanks
Hi Marco,
We've done a debugging session today involving Otavio Salvadore (who also
saw the issue), maks and myself.
There are two possible solutions, both involving modifications in
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev.
1) revert inclusion of *_id scripts
Commenting ou
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: simpletal
> Version: 4.1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> the package should not depend on itself, please fix.
It doesn't depend on itself, the unpatched version of setup.py
modified sys.path and imported simpletal from lib/. However,
I accidently forgot to remove the im
On Feb 14, Mike Crowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This means that on some boots the boot disk on megaraid is sda and
>> on others it's sdb.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:12:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> It will happen among devices handled by different drivers.
> The solution is to use the /dev
Let us try to avoid generic discussions that are not related to star.
Show me the exact art of the DSFG that you believe is incompatible with
the CDDL and explain why exactly you believe that this part of the DSFG
is incompatible with the CDDL.
As it seems that most people do not know the text,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:04:51PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Are you going to be able to do an upload to fix this and #169830 soon?
> If not, I'll try to do an NMU (putting it in the DELAY queue).
I'm pretty sure everyone is looking forward to dropping this package
completely for etch. The o
On Feb 14, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've done a debugging session today involving Otavio Salvadore (who also
> saw the issue), maks and myself.
>
> There are two possible solutions, both involving modifications in
> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev.
>
> 1) revert inclusion o
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:17:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352826: fixed in simpletal 4.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:16:49PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:04:51PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
> > Are you going to be able to do an upload to fix this and #169830 soon?
> > If not, I'll try to do an NMU (putting it in the DELAY queue).
>
> I'm pretty sure ever
Package: db1-compat
Version: 2.1.3-8
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: FTBFS
"fakeroot debian/rules binary" (or debuild binary) fails as the
binary-arch target does not depend on the build target.
Trivial patch: add this dependency!
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:27:38 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line New upload.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:27:38 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line New upload.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
"Pawel Wiecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 14, 4:28pm, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > OTOH, I seriously wonder why the maintainer didn't react on this one,
> > one way or another.
>
> Well, what sort of reacion do you expect? I'm about to upload 1.5a56 with some
> bugfixes backported from curren
On Feb 14, 4:28pm, Thomas Weber wrote:
> OTOH, I seriously wonder why the maintainer didn't react on this one,
> one way or another.
Well, what sort of reacion do you expect? I'm about to upload 1.5a56 with some
bugfixes backported from current deb version.
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wie
Package: vnc4server
Version: 4.1.1+X4.3.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
when trying to start x0vncserver or x0vnc4server i get:
Tue Feb 14 15:08:09 2006
main:XTest extension present - version 2.2
main:Listening on port 5900
main:select: Inv
Hi DB maints!
Are you going to be able to do an upload to fix this and #169830 soon?
If not, I'll try to do an NMU (putting it in the DELAY queue).
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry about this, I just thought libsysfs2 was already on unstable and that
I was late about the libsysfs2 transition already as we had talked about a
shorter timeframe, so I didn't check to make sure libsysfs2 was there.
Anyway, Martin is about to upload libsysfs2 this week (around tomorrow) or
s
ii apt 0.6.42.1 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii apt-utils 0.6.42.1 APT utility programs
W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: Les
signatures suivantes n'ont pas pu Ítre vÈrifiÈes car la clÈ publique
n'est pas disponible†: NO_PUBKEY 010908312D
230C5F
W: Vous pouvez
Le lundi 13 février 2006 à 15:26 +1300, Andrew Mitchell a écrit :
> It would be appreciated if you could give the debug output I requested,
> by using mono --debug.
mono --debug /usr/lib/f-spot/f-spot.exe
Starting new FSpot server
Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object referen
Package: lme4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
lme4 0.995.2-1 is failing to build (at least) on amd64, ia64, alpha, hppa and
powerpc. It has an error, and a warning:
[...]
* checking for file 'lme4/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
* this is package 'lme4' version '0.995-2'
* c
Package: libtiff-tools
Version: 3.8.0-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
I am trying to convert a tiff file to PDF using tiff2pdf
which is part of libtill-tools. It segfaults and I could
never get it to work. If needed I can provide the tiff
file I used as input if that can can help.
Thanks
Ramakrishnan
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 349316 etch
Bug#349316: kaddressbook: Looses all kontacts when shutting down
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It sounds as if you definitely don't understand the legal background.
>
> Huh? *You* were talking about the Debian rules, now you are switching to
> legal backgrounds? Could you please decide what you want?
You did start this discussion. I only try to e
Hi Loïc,
a fix for this package is really needed:
# apt-get install libosgcal-dev libosgcal0
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribu
Package: thuban
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
$ thuban
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/thuban", line 20, in ?
import Thuban.UI.main
File "/usr/lib/thuban/Thuban/UI/main.py", line 18, in ?
from appl
I just built a new upstream version of ttf-freefont. As Konstantinos
is mostly away currently, I wanted to give a try for getting a new
version in as the graphical installer could benefit it.
I am not at all a font guy...I just took some time to build this new
version.
Can people who experienced
Package: abuse
Version: 1:0.7.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have installed and run abuse as usual at an i386 (the bug occurs at
amd64). In the game I cannot climb any ladders. The character climbs
to the top of each one of them and when he is just about to get o
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 16:07 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 01:25 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > > It seems that you did not understand the Debian rules.
> >
> > Well, I believe I understand them quite well. OTO
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 352228 unreproducible
Bug#352228: dovecot-common: Overwrites config files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 352228 normal
Bug#352228: dovecot-common: Overwrites config files
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping p
tag 352228 unreproducible
severity 352228 normal
thanks
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Hans Fugal wrote:
/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf and /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf
I'm sorry I see absolutely no way dpkg could have just decided to
overwrite your config. You must have some setting somewhere that tel
Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 01:25 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > It seems that you did not understand the Debian rules.
>
> Well, I believe I understand them quite well. OTOH, I don't consider
> this problem to be about my understanding, so let's drop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 352782 + pending
Bug#352782: ezmlm-browse: FTBFS with new make
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 at 20:56 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Hans Fugal wrote:
>
> >The entire config was rewritten with the default, and my config was
> >moved to dovecot.conf.dpkg-old. I know debian conffiles are supposed to
> >keep
> >changes, and that's why I filed a bug
Package: simpletal
Version: 4.1-2
Severity: serious
the package should not depend on itself, please fix.
dpatch apply-all
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules update-config
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/packages/u/py/d/simpletal-4.1'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `update-config'.
make[1]: Leaving
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 349316 4:3.4.3-1
Bug#349316: kaddressbook: Looses all kontacts when shutting down
Bug marked as found in version 4:3.4.3-1.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 01:33, Adam Porter wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 11:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > found 350851 4:3.4.2-2
>
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104956
>
> At the bottom it says that it's also in KMail-1.9.1/KDE-3.5.0. Should it
> be marked found there
On Tue, Jan 3, 2006 at 17:54:24 +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:42:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Package: mldonkey
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: no longer builds from source
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the build fails when building mlnet with wh
On Feb 14, Mike Crowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this issue is limited to network devices.
You are showing some totally unrelated issue which is obviously a bug in
lvm2.
> The machine is running sarge/amd64 with 2.6.15 kernel and associated
> dependencies from backports.org:
Then
Package: bzflag
Version: 2.0.4.20051017-0.1
Followup-For: Bug #323815
I have this problem on amd64; I cannot rebuild the package here with or
without the -m64 flags since I get the following error:
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.a(glxcmds.o): In function `glXGetMscRateOML':
undefined reference to `XF86VidM
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package couriergraph
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: couriergraph
> reopen 352785
Bug#352785: couriergraph: FTBFS: can't parse dependency
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:11:11AM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> >Package: cyrus-imapd-2.2
> >Version: 2.2.12-3
> >Severity: serious
> >Justification: no longer builds from source
> >
> >Automatic build of cyrus-imapd-2.2_2.2.12-3 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 85
>
package couriergraph
reopen 352785
thanks
I just got independent confirmation of this bug from Myon on #debian-bugs.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Package: cyrus-imapd-2.2
Version: 2.2.12-3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Automatic build of cyrus-imapd-2.2_2.2.12-3 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 85
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.68)
I don't think this issue is limited to network devices.
I have a machine with onboard SCSI, SATA and RAID on a separate
card. Even though the onboard SCSI and SATA have no drives connected
the machine fails to boot and drops me at a busybox shell prompt
inside the initrd:
Begin: Mounting root fil
Hi,
I really would appreciate a recent xen3 debian package as well, so I am
willing to help as good as I can to get this on track. I have created an
alioth account for me (called: "tha-guest") and will subscribe to the
mailinglists to keep me up to date.
As Saku already said, I have already wo
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 12:09:43AM +1300, Matt Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a NMU patch to fix this bug as a part of the T & S
> portion of my NM application.
Thanks for doing this.
> Additionally the running function never succeeded because portreserve
> doesn't create a pid file. T
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.4a-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
All normal sized characters (i.e. the default in buffers) are displayed
as boxes. Some other font sizes/faces seems to work, like the startup
screen and the menu. But these look blocky and ugly, and the menu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 352103 + patch
Bug#352103: portreserve: init script does not work
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Hi,
I have prepared a NMU patch to fix this bug as a part of the T & S
portion of my NM application.
As described in the original problem report there were several fairly
trivial fixes required to to the init script.
1) Incorrect test when checking for valid service files - fixed by using
-z n
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:47:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343788: fixed in packagesearch 2.0.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
rpc2-tools is also required.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: coda-client
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
rvm-tools is required to build
Ben Eastep
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Arc
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:17:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352158: fixed in heartbeat-2 2.0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:17:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352027: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
