merge 384146 386833
tags 384146 patch
tags 386833 patch
thanks for all the fish
---
Attached is a patch which gets the package building again.
Basically I split the ENUM_DEFINITION macro into a ENUM_DEFINITION_BEGIN
and a ENUM_DEFINITION_END so that the enums can be defined by the _BEGIN
and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 384146 386833
Bug#384146: plptools: FTBFS (amd64): conflicting declaration 'typedef long long
unsigned int u_int64_t'
Bug#386833: plptools: FTBFS (i386/gcc-4.1) bad
Merged 384146 386833.
tags 384146 patch
Bug#384146: plptools: FTBFS (amd64):
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46
Severity: grave
#_ aptitude -u
... upgrade ...
#_ aptitude -vvv upgrade
Reading package lists... Error!
E: Unable to parse package file /var/lib/dpkg/status (1)
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
Reading package lists... Error!
E:
Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: teapop-mysql
Version: 0.3.7-4.1+b1
Severity: serious
Hello Nick,
There is an error when attempting to purge teapop-mysql:
Removing teapop-mysql ...
Purging configuration files for teapop-mysql ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/teapop-mysql.postrm: line 28:
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:32:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#387798: fixed in sg3-utils 1.21-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:22:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:12:42PM -0400, H. S. wrote:
(here is the bug again here for geda-gschem, instead of for geda)
Thanks. geda-gschem 20060906 should be in etch in a day or two.
Not if this RC bug is open, it won't be.
tags 388521 + confirmed, pending
thanks.
Thanks for the report. There is a fix in SVN and an upload is supposed
to happen soon.
Ciao
~marco
signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 345931 + patch
Bug#345931: System fails to boot after updating boot sector from grub
interactive shell
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tags 345931 + patch
thanks
In my previous response, I missed this post to this bug list.
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Marc Fargas wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Surely this is still a bug in the grub shell for failing to notice that it
had rendered the system unbootable?
Grub
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 388125 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8392
Bug#388125: osgcal FTBFS (sparc): bus error in xvfb
Forwarded-to-address changed from
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2006-September/018251.html to
Package: ldap-account-manager
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Today, after I upgrade my etch, the ldap-account-manager is unusable. When I
open http://127.0.0.1/lam; in the web browser, I can not get correct web page
and get some warning message, as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 388521 + confirmed, pending
Bug#388521: libnotify-dev: Missing depedancies on libgtk2.0-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, pending
thanks.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Thanks for the report. There is
Package: findimagedupes
Version: 0.2-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
mkdir -p ./tmp
chmod 755 findimagedupes_tmp
./findimagedupes_tmp
Can't locate Image/Magick.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl
/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5
severity 386845 important
tag 386845 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 03:50:18PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
Package: python-support
Version: 0.4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.8
python-support installst private modules that should be installed into
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 386845 important
Bug#386845: python-support fails to remove modules from /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
tag 386845 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#386845: python-support fails to remove modules from
Package: libclass-dbi-perl
Version: 3.0.14-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
/usr/bin/make test
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libclass-dbi-perl-3.0.14'
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t
reassign 388695 geda-symbols
thanks
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:50:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:22:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:12:42PM -0400, H. S. wrote:
(here is the bug again here for geda-gschem, instead of for geda)
Hi,
I think perhaps the information lies in handling UTF-8:
==
#_ sed -n 's/^\([^ ]*\):.*/\1/p' /var/lib/dpkg/stat-old | sort -u
Architecture
Bugs
Conffiles
Config-Version
Conflicts
Depends
Description
Enhances
Essential
Hi,
The patched 2.6.8 version has hit debian unstable yesterday. It did
build fine on ppc, great. Though, a user reported that when launching
electricsheep (on ppc), he got the following error:
$ electricsheep
X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
Major
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.39-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
CC prof_err.c
LD e2fsck.shared
CP e2fsck
LD e2fsck.static
/usr/lib/libselinux.a(setrans_client.o): In function
`fini_context_translations':
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 388695 geda-symbols
Bug#388695: geda-gschem: Probably parenthesis mismatch in errors in gschem
Bug reassigned from package `geda-gschem' to `geda-symbols'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 386882 grave
Bug#386882: kphotoalbum: Depends on libexiv2 v. 0.10
Bug#386855: kphotoalbum should depend on libexiv2 (0.10)
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
severity 386855 grave
Bug#386855: kphotoalbum should depend on libexiv2 (0.10)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 388289 serious
Bug#388289: zope-cmfplone: Please deploy anti-link-spam patch as a matter of
urgency
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Hi Bill,
That's fixed in cvs right now, but cvs needs a little more work to get
it happy with Life in Today's World. The kernel has moved about a bit
since I last hacked on this. Are you actually using it, or just qa
checking? Either way, I'll try to find time to kick it into shape for
an
Steve Langasek wrote:
If the maintainer hasn't responded in a week or two, this bug could be
reassigned to ftp.debian.org and turned into a removal request.
Dropping pth as a whole would break a number of packages that depend on the
traditional libpth interface.
Just wait.. I'll upload this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
reopen 388322
Bug#388322: python-logilab-common: sarge to etch upgrade fails
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:45:58PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
People running mailman on sarge on i386 are recommended to recompile
the package or install the future security update 2.1.5-8sarge3.
I meant the future security update 2.1.5-8sarge5.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:17:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388719: fixed in findimagedupes 0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 388557 + confirmed
Bug#388557: mono-gac: uninstallable on ia64, dependency on libc6 is incorrect
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tags 388557 + confirmed
thanks
This is a bug caused by dh_clideps from the cli-common package, only
Mono is currently effected because the new version of cli-common wasn't
released yet.
A fix is in the way...
After a short discussion on #debian-devel Steve agreed that a dependency
on libc6 |
Package: xfonts
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After a dist-upgrade, font rendering is borked in xorg. Sorry if it's
not the good package, i have no idea what package this is related to. It
breaks display of gnome application, kde application, firefox,
thunderbird. IT
Package: rdoc1.8
Version: 1.8.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
If requirering 'rdoc/usage', a NameError (uninitialized constant RI::Paths) is
thrown due to missing
require 'rdoc/ri/ri_paths' statement in ri_options.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 388734 xfonts-base
Bug#388734: xfonts: after a dist-upgrade, the font system is broken, fonts
display erraticly
Warning: Unknown package 'xfonts'
Bug reassigned from package `xfonts' to `xfonts-base'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:32:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#386855: fixed in kphotoalbum 2.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 346736 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#346736: gpsim-lcd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
tag 387779 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#387779: ITA: gpsim-lcd -- LCD module for gpsim
There
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#385834: fixed in kcheckgmail 0.5.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:32:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#386855: fixed in kphotoalbum 2.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: zaptel-source
Version: 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just rebuilt modules for the latest kernel (2.6.17-2) and some modules are
missing,
wct4xxp.ko is one of those.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 334350 1.2.1-2
Bug#334350: flexbackup: CVE-2005-4802: default config insecure temporary file
creation
Bug marked as found in version 1.2.1-2.
close 334350 1.2.1-3
Bug#334350: flexbackup: CVE-2005-4802: default config insecure temporary file
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 01:25:01AM +0200, Jan Wagemakers wrote:
Normally picprog use the RDTSC instruction on x86_64/i386 platforms. By
disabling this, picprog makes use of the delay-routines for platforms that
don't have this RDTSC instruction.
This should be done regardless of platform;
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 01:29:28PM +0200, Alessandro Polverini wrote:
Package: zaptel-source
Version: 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just rebuilt modules for the latest kernel (2.6.17-2) and some modules are
missing,
wct4xxp.ko is one of those.
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:48:06 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388649: Probably parenthesis mismatch in errors in geda
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: ftp.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #367267
Hello,
The packages are still not in the right places, couldn't something like
a move by hand be done? In order to have my local mirror synced I have
to ignore errors (debmirror) which I don't really like.
I wonder if this would affect the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 341172 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#341172: Please port to the experimental pilot-link 0.12 API
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
tag 384280 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#384280: evolution: implicit pointer conversion
Tags were:
Package: krb5-kdc
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Hello Sam,
There is an error when attempting to purge krb5-kdc:
Removing krb5-kdc ...
Purging configuration files for krb5-kdc ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/krb5-kdc.postrm: line 3: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No
such file or directory
Package: phpsysinfo
Version: 2.5.1-3
Severity: serious
Hello Frederik,
There is an error when attempting to purge phpsysinfo:
Removing phpsysinfo ...
Purging configuration files for phpsysinfo ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/phpsysinfo.postrm: line 12: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule:
No such file
Package: postgrey
Version: 1.27-1
Severity: serious
Hello Adrian,
There is an error when attempting to purge postgrey:
Removing postgrey ...
Purging configuration files for postgrey ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/postgrey.postrm: line 26: ucf: command not found
dpkg: error processing postgrey
Package: fonty
Version: 1.0-22
Severity: serious
Hello Piotr,
There is an error when attempting to purge fonty:
Removing fonty ...
Purging configuration files for fonty ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/fonty.postrm: line 10: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No
such file or directory
dpkg: error
tags 388691 moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:36:24PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote:
The copyright file for ibm-3270 says:
Copyrights on x3270 are a work in progress and any assistance
in clarifying them would be appreciated.
but there's no active bug about some issues.
So it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 375830 8.28.8-1
Bug#375830: occasionally misdetects PCI-Express card for PCI and dies before DRI
Bug marked as found in version 8.28.8-1.
severity 375830 serious
Bug#375830: occasionally misdetects PCI-Express card for PCI and dies before DRI
Package: shfs-utils
Version: 0.35-6
Severity: serious
Hello Eduard,
There is an error when attempting to purge shfs-utils:
Removing shfs-utils ...
Purging configuration files for shfs-utils ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/shfs-utils.postrm: line 2:
/usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 388691 moreinfo
Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Package: netenv
Version: 0.94.3-17
Severity: serious
Hello Frank,
There is an error when attempting to purge netenv:
Removing netenv ...
Purging configuration files for netenv ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/netenv.postrm: line 20: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No
such file or directory
dpkg:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 387790 serious
Bug#387790: fillets-ng-data: broken symlinks
Severity set to `serious' from `minor'
tags 387790 +pending
Bug#387790: fillets-ng-data: broken symlinks
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks lars
Unknown command or
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:29:33PM +0930, Ron wrote:
Hi Bill,
That's fixed in cvs right now, but cvs needs a little more work to get
it happy with Life in Today's World. The kernel has moved about a bit
since I last hacked on this. Are you actually using it, or just qa
checking? Either
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:56:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Cloning this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Troy Heber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's not an optimization bug, compiling O0 does not help. We know that
lt-fs-base-test 2, creates and closes a new db, it then creates a new
fs object and tries to re-open the db. The call to apr_hash_get
returns NULL, so it's not finding the object in the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 387185 upstream
Bug#387185: picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
thanks bts
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:32:14 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#387249: fixed in camstream 0.26.3+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Jaakko,
I have recently received this bug-report about picprog (Debian).
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=387185
Let me summerize what we have found so far.
- When asking around various people have confirmed that picprog fails on the
64-bit amd64 platform.
- Altering the
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:02:43 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#387663: fixed in pygopherd 2.0.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:32:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388222: fixed in bacula 1.38.11-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:32:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388220: fixed in bacula 1.38.11-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
pe, 2006-09-22 kello 16:34 +0200, Alexander Schmehl kirjoitti:
* Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060916 20:01]:
Severity: minor
Hmmm... shouldn't broken symlinks due to missing dependencies be release
critical? Most likely they will render the package unusable, won't
they?
Possibly
Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to
distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? The only thing I could find
is:
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons.html
which says Mozilla Firefox and the Firefox logo are trademarks of The
Mozilla Foundation. Usage
Charles Fry schrieb:
Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to
distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? The only thing I could find
is:
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons.html
which says Mozilla Firefox and the Firefox logo are trademarks of The
Mozilla
Package: htmldoc-common
Version: 1.8.27-1
Severity: serious
Preparing to replace htmldoc-common 1.8.26-1 (using
.../htmldoc-common_1.8.27-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement htmldoc-common ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/htmldoc-common_1.8.27-1_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to
Package: xlibmesa-dri
Version: 1:7.1.0-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
An upgrade from xorg 7.0 to xorg 7.1 causes 3d stop working with savage
dri driver (with a mobile Prosavage KN133 twister).
glxinfo report direct rendering=yes but glxgears and any other opengl
How are you,
Royal has receiieved your filled app.
Mitch shall then Re-confirm yo ur data .
http://AE0F4B.ssr.be
For melissa groeber
and your past Track Record is not an iss ue.
All H 0me E quitytypes have been aprroveed for you melissa
groeber
Best Regards,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
severity 388776 serious
Bug#388776: xserver-xorg-input-wacom: Source package fails to compile
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
End of message, stopping processing here.
reopen 388489
thanks
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :
retitle -1 libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf
There is no need for such a file. ld.so natively
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 388489
Bug#388489: libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
I ran into this too. I ran update-fmtutil (as root) and re-reran the
dist-upgrade. The problem remains.
I'm not sure if this is the requested test, but it was my best
interpretation of it. I can provide the details that others have, if
that might be helpful.
I think I can leave things in this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
reassign 388811 mesa
Bug#388811: xlibmesa-dri: upgrade to xorg 7.1 causes savage opengl stop working
Bug reassigned from package `xlibmesa-dri' to `mesa'.
severity 388811 important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 388784 pending
Bug#388784: krb5-kdc: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
--- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Particularly, public use needs clarification:
Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research
Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332.
All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants public
use of this software.
Neither I nor the ftp-team see a problem with that.
Hello!
Here is an improved variant of patch. It allows system administrator
to configure RLIMIT_RTPRIO RLIMIT_NICE via rt_priority and nice
entries in /etc/security/limits.conf
Best regards,
Alexei.
--
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
Index:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote:
--- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Particularly, public use needs clarification:
Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research
Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332.
All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants public
use of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
retitle 385296 broken with ssl on amd64
Bug#385296: tries to shutdown invalid file descriptor on amd64
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Package: sysv-rc-bootsplash
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
sysv-rc-bootsplash's postinst uses patch to modify /etc/init.d/rc and
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions. This means that the
changes are lost if sysv-rc or initramfs-tools is upgraded, that the
maintainer scripts fail if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 379724 wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found
Bug#379724: cbmlink: FTBFS: bashisms
Changed Bug title.
severity 379724 serious
Bug#379724: wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
thanks
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 387996 pending
Bug#387996: subversion: [m68k] fix for the failing ruby tests
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.28.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I updated Today my Debian unstable, it updated the Xorg-sevrver
too. But It also remove fglrx-driver. So now I must use the xorg radeon
driver instead of the ati One
-- System Information:
On 21/09/06, Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libclass-dbi-perl
Version: 3.0.14-1
Severity: serious
[ FTBFS]
Thanks for the bug report, I was not previously aware of the problem.
This appears to be caused by a bug introduced into libdbd-sqlite3-perl
version 1.13. If you
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:22:11 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Package: xmms2
Version: 0.2DrFeelgood-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello!
I've just installed xmms2 and other dependencies + some other plugins
(smb, wma).
Now i'am trying to launch xmms2
antono[23:57]~
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:34:00AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
tag 341172 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#341172: Please port to the experimental pilot-link 0.12 API
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
Did you not understand that this version of pilot-link is now in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 379724 patch
Bug#379724: wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
usertag 379724 supplied-patch
Bug#379724: wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now:
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:47:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388214: fixed in cacti 0.8.6h-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tags 379724 patch
usertag 379724 supplied-patch
thanks
Hi,
I have prepared a simple patch for the FTFBS which is attached. As I am
no DD yet, I can not do the actual NMU. Marga would you like to do the
actual upload?
Greetings Arjan
Changelog of my NMU:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Set
On 09/22/06 16:32, Philip Martin wrote:
The first time the breakpoint is reached it's from the
svn_test__create_fs line, the second time it's from the
svn_fs_open_berkeley line. The key has the same value in each case,
and the second time that value is present in the cache, so the hash
[sent also to debian-legal for advice]
--- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote:
--- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Particularly, public use needs clarification:
Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research
--- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[public use]
Your reading of this clause is not the plain English reading of it.
public use does not mean use in public, in means use by the
public -- i.e., use by anyone.
I don't know if it is clear enough, at least for a non-native English
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 388646 important
Bug#388646: cpad-kernel-source: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
severity 388155 important
Bug#388155: cyrus21-common: purging the package fails (require debconf)
Troy Heber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In any case, this looks like the culprit.
Agreed, I've cc'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] The C implementation of apr_atomic_cas
on the 0.9.x branch is broken on ia64, and probably any other 64 bit
platform that uses the same code. For the full story see:
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:07:21 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closed in new version of lme4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:02:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388031: fixed in radeontool 1.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Philip or Troy - would you care to prepare and test the backport to ensure
we can commit this for the next 0.9 release, coming within days?
Bill
Philip Martin wrote:
Troy Heber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In any case, this looks like the culprit.
Agreed, I've cc'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] The C
reopen 388489
severity wishlist
thanks
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
reopen 388489
thanks
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :
retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 388489
Bug#388489: libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
severity wishlist
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo