severity 404739 important
thanks
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:07:45AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Sorry, what's the rationale of this bug being marked as 'grave'?
If I understand Russ correctly, I believe it would be that this
problem makes the package unusable for amd64 users. That seems
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 365465 - sid
Bug#365465: gaphor: contains zope files already in python2.4-zopeinterface
Tags were: sid confirmed
Tags removed: sid
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tags 365465 - sid
thanks
* 2007-01-09 06:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:12:33PM +0100, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Well, #365465 is still marked as found in gaphor/0.8.1-5 (the actual
version in testing and unstable), and for this reason the bug is still
considered
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 404739 important
Bug#404739: gss: FTBFS on amd64: segmentation fault.
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
reassign 40 rails
found 40 1.1.6-1
retitle 40 rails should conflict with libdevel-logger-ruby1.8
severity 40 serious
thanks
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 07:52:22PM -0200, Filipe wrote:
Package: libruby1.8
Version: 1.8.5-4
Severity: critical
When upgrading from sarge to etch, the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 40 rails
Bug#40: libruby1.8 should replaces/provides/conflicts with
libdevel-logger-ruby1.8
Bug reassigned from package `libruby1.8' to `rails'.
found 40 1.1.6-1
Bug#40: libruby1.8 should replaces/provides/conflicts with
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:05:30 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line dmidecode_2.8-3(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: 64-bit issues?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: slapd
Version: 2.3.30-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
Doing aptitude upgrade slapd produces the following output, without
any questions:
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/slapd ...
Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.conf in /var/backups/slapd-2.3.29-1...
On Jan 08, Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't test on real hardware, but the patch from my previous looks fine
and builds on ia64 (and sparc and i386 too, and even on mips which is
not in the supported architecture list in debian/control). So here's the
full NMU patch.
Feel free to
Ana Guerrero schrieb:
So, you do not use kmail anymore, go to the kde bugzilla and see people
is still suffering this bug in kubuntu and decide to re-open this bug
in the Debian BTS?
No, I'm still subscribed to the relevant bugreports in the KDE bugzilla
(since I myself suffered from this bug)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xserver-xorg, installation-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: fails a successful install on a new system
Peter Mattern wrote:
Within the last months I could install several different etch-Versions
(beta, RC1) on both a desktop system
tags 401660 patch
thanks
Given this bug's apparent RC status, we still need a fix for exiv2 0.10 for
etch.
I believe I've isolated the relevant fix for this bug based on the upstream
0.12 changelog. Gregor, could you check whether the attached patch, applied
to exiv2 0.10, fixes the crash for
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2007 03:29:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406177: probably a general problem concerning latest
X-Version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 401660 patch
Bug#401660: Image with corrupted metadata crashes Exiv2
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2007 03:38:37 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406173: slapd upgrade alters configuration files without
asking for permission
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:24:00 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line RC bug #395034 fixable by amd64 binNMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
close 350851 4:3.5.5-1
thanks
Hi Bastian,
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:12:17PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
reopen 350851
thanks
Hi,
I know this mail sucks (like this whole bug) but looking at the relevant
KDE bugreport, I really doubt that this bug is fixed.
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:38:44 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402509: binNMU request Re: Bug#402509: twinkle crash on
call end
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: gnugk
Version: 2:2.2.5-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
Setting up gnugk (2.2.5-2) ...
update-rc.d: error: codenumber must be a number between 0 and 99
usage: update-rc.d [-n] [-f] basename remove
update-rc.d [-n] basename
Package: mozilla-mplayer
Version: 3.31+main-1
Severity: grave
Tags: etch
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
The package iceweasel is not present in Etch, but mozilla-mplayer
depends on iceweasel without the old name firefox, thus not making it
possible to install the plugin over
(CC list trimmed to those relevant to the bug)
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 02:03:53PM +0100, Pim van Pelt wrote:
Hoi,
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:13:13AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
|| So I'd say releasing it in main is still an option, *if* someone were
|| interested in a targetted fix and
Hi Adam,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:18:25AM -0600, Adam Porter wrote:
So, you do not use kmail anymore, go to the kde bugzilla and see people
is still suffering this bug in kubuntu and decide to re-open this bug
in the Debian BTS?
The commit that should fix this bug was not committed
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:44:48 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Hi, I've install the new package menu today (2007-01-09 09:46 -0500)
on two computers (x86,AMD64) and everything work fine right now. No
more lock.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:44:32 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406194: fixed in gnugk 2:2.2.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:43:33 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line should be fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:32:23AM +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
| (CC list trimmed to those relevant to the bug)
I've bounced this to Jeroen, who has better judgment on these
things than I do.
--
-- - -- - -+- - -- - --
Pim van Pelt Email: [EMAIL
Sam Morris escribió:
Package: seahorse
Version: 0.9.7-1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Viewing the properties of a third-party key causes this message to be
printed to the console:
(seahorse:28865): Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading icon: Failed to open file
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 12:49 +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
Anyway, this is strange, as the lack of an icon is only a
Gtk-WARNING, not an error.
Could you please check what happens if you make a link in
/usr/share/pixmaps/seahorse/22x22/seahorse-sign.png to
Hi Loic,
Am Dienstag, den 02.01.2007, 14:25 +0100 schrieb Loïc Minier:
While it is not recommended to use nss-mdns on a network with a .local
TLD, it should disable itself automatically. However, I just noticed I
broke the Depends: of libnss-mdns in my NMU: could you please install
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 23612)]
0xb7236991 in select () from /usr/lib/debug/libc.so.6
(gdb) info threads
2 Thread 32769 (LWP 23640) 0xb7234539 in *__GI___poll (fds=0xb7299ff4,
nfds=1, timeout=2000) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:86
*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
package libnss-mdns nss-mdns
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: nss-mdns libnss-mdns
tags 404266 + pending
Bug#404266: smbclient: nmbclient segfaults when asked to lookup a name through
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#404534: fixed in nss-mdns 0.9-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#405327: fixed in nss-mdns 0.9-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Luc,
I tested what you have suggested to no avail. As I edited nsswitch.conf
I just edited
#hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4
hosts: files dns
and vice versa
elara:/home/mschmitt# dpkg -l|grep avahi
ii avahi-daemon 0.6.16-1
Avah i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
package libnss-mdns nss-mdns
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: nss-mdns libnss-mdns
tags 404266 + pending
Bug#404266: smbclient: nmbclient segfaults when asked to lookup a name through
Tags 399569 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The initscript should create this pid file.
Here a patch:)
Regards
Laurent Bigonville
diff -ru nfs-utils-1.0.10.orig/debian/nfs-common.init nfs-utils-1.0.10/debian/nfs-common.init
--- nfs-utils-1.0.10.orig/debian/nfs-common.init 2007-01-09 18:44:03.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tags 399569 + patch
Bug#399569: nfs-common: Can't mount nfs4 trees due to idmapd error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 03:26 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Package: libpfm3
Severity: serious
Version: 3.2.060926-1
Hi,
this package is unnecessary, as libpfm3-3.2 has entered the archive, and
there are no reverse dependencies anymore.
Cheers,
Andi
Thanks for the bug report. According
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Just wanted to say the patch was eventually committed to gnome svn [1]:
i tried a backport to our 2.8.20 but was unable to due to that complex
set of patches already present :(
Would be possible building an experimental 2-8-20 udeb with this
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:06:06PM +0100, Pim van Pelt wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:32:23AM +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
| | (CC list trimmed to those relevant to the bug)
| I've bounced this to Jeroen, who has better judgment on these
| things than I do.
Jeroen suggests that he has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 405941 experimental
Bug#405941: gnome-power-manager has dependency against libdbus-1-2 (should be
libdbus-1-3)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Hi,
RC bug #395034 complains about python-4suite-{rdf|xml} being uninstallable
because they both contain the same file and -rdf depends on -xml.
I did some research and discovered that this only affects the amd64
packages in the archive. Other arches are not affected.
I rebuilt the amd64
Hi
The removal of this package breaks the preview feature in xemacs21,
which brings its own autex
(/usr/share/xemacs21/xemacs-packages/lisp/auctex in
xemacs21-basesupport) but not including preview-latex.
Until preview-latex is not included into the xemacs auctex the package
should stay.
CCing Frank Küster and the tex team.
* Hendrik Naumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-09 18:50]:
Hi
The removal of this package breaks the preview feature in xemacs21,
which brings its own autex
(/usr/share/xemacs21/xemacs-packages/lisp/auctex in
xemacs21-basesupport) but not including
severity 406195 wishlist
thanks
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Eddy =?UTF-8?Q?Petri=C5=9For ?= wrote:
The package iceweasel is not present in Etch, but mozilla-mplayer
depends on iceweasel without the old name firefox, thus not making it
possible to install the plugin over firefox.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 406195 wishlist
Bug#406195: mozilla-mplayer: [Etch]Can't install for firefox (which is still
the package in Etch)
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:28:11 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#399702: fwatch: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address 0008
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Samuel Mimram schrieb:
Hi spiralvoice,
As you already told us, the tool mldonkey_users that we used in Debian
is not anymore compatible with the new users.ini format. It would take
me some time to adapt the mldonkey_users script and anyway this is not a
good solution to duplicate the code.
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CCing Frank Küster and the tex team.
Cc'ing Davide in addition, he's the auctex maintainer.
* Hendrik Naumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-09 18:50]:
Hi
The removal of this package breaks the preview feature in xemacs21,
which brings its own autex
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:24:55PM +0100, Pim van Pelt wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:06:06PM +0100, Pim van Pelt wrote:
|| On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:32:23AM +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
| || (CC list trimmed to those relevant to the bug)
|| I've bounced this to Jeroen, who has better
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Just wanted to say the patch was eventually committed to gnome svn [1]:
i tried a backport to our 2.8.20 but was unable to due to that complex
set of patches already present :(
Would be possible building an experimental 2-8-20
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying kmail today I lost all of my inbox folder on one of my
accounts. Reading all my mail offline sounded different...
kmail behaves very strange. I set up two dimap folders one month ago,
but
On 10/01/07, Sean Lowry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
i was wondering if i could get hold of either the mod-auth-mysql debian
package or the source.
I assume you mean my patched version.
The package and the patches for the source are attached.
You'll need to apply both patches to the
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:36:16 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in 2:1.0.4+svn26-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:02:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402509: fixed in twinkle 1:0.9-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package libsoup
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
# remote status report for
No joy...
[...]
(Reading database ... 204808 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libboost-test-dev 1.33.1-9 (using
.../libboost-test-dev_1.33.1-10_powerpc.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libboost-test-dev ...
Preparing to replace libboost-test1.33.1 1.33.1-9 (using
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 395034
Bug#395034: python-4suite-rdf: file conflict with python-4suite-xml
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Damn! Was so hoping the problem would be fixed. I assume I really did
get the right version of boost, and I upgraded everything that had to
be upgraded? Did I accidently miss anything?
Yes, monotone itself -- the code in question, like much of Boost, is
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 03:34:42AM +0100, Stegozor wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 04:19:15AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Package: xtel
Version: 3.3.0-5.4
Severity: serious
This should rather be removed entirely:
- Last maintainer upload in 2003
Indeed, I
package grace6
found 314923 5.99.1+dev4-3
thanks
Hello,
I get this exact error message after installing grace6 on my system.
strace output suggests the reason is that it fails to open
/usr/share/grace6/fonts/type1/LinLibertine-2.1.0.pfb, which is a
broken symlink to
Aaron == Aaron M Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aaron Yes, monotone itself -- the code in question, like much of
Aaron Boost, is inlined. Please try again with monotone 0.31-4,
Aaron which addresses an unrelated issue but conveniently uses a
Aaron fixed version of Boost.
0.31-4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package grace6
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: grace6
found 314923 5.99.1+dev4-3
Bug#314923: grace6: xmgrace exits with Broken or incomplete installation -
read the FAQ!
Bug#334019: grace: fails immediately with error Broken or incomplete
Caspar Bothmer wrote:
Hendrik-Jan Heins wrote:
| But I can't reproduce the problem you had.
I am not surprised. Still I have a mailbox whose very first mail got
partially overwritten by another mail.
Perhaps only mail index files are corrupted? Try something
like:
mkdir backup mv *.msf
tags 395034 +patch
Thankyou
According to packages.debian.org, every arch except i386 has
this bug.
The bug is really that install_text is being run which puts
stuff in /usr/share/doc/4Suite.
i386 build doesn't even have this directory.
Well, hurd-i386 doesn't have it either...
I don't know
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 395034 +patch
Bug#395034: python-4suite-rdf: file conflict with python-4suite-xml
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
Thankyou
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#395268: fixed in libmail-mbox-messageparser-perl 1.4005-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jacek Kawa wrote:
| Caspar Bothmer wrote:
|I am not surprised. Still I have a mailbox whose very first mail got
|partially overwritten by another mail.
| Perhaps only mail index files are corrupted? Try something
| like:
No, it's the mailbox
Eric wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 03:34:42AM +0100, Stegozor wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 04:19:15AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Package: xtel
Version: 3.3.0-5.4
Severity: serious
Sorry for the lack of support of this package. I'm really too busy for
months
tags 395034 -patch
Thankyou
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 01:36:20PM +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
According to packages.debian.org, every arch except i386 has
this bug.
The bug is really that install_text is being run which puts
stuff in /usr/share/doc/4Suite.
Actually, the bug is just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 395034 -patch
Bug#395034: python-4suite-rdf: file conflict with python-4suite-xml
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
Thankyou
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Please change this to severity normal or perhaps important.
Official description of severity levels
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
says:
grave
makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes
data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the
I tried to reproduce on an hppa system running latest etch bits:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux hppa 2.6.18-3-parisc #1 Mon Dec 4 09:17:59 MST 2006 parisc
GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat t.c
int
main(int argc,char * argv[]) {return system(argv[1]);}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cc -g t.c -o t
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:06:40 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line not reproducible on hppa either
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: beryl-settings
Version: 0.1.5+svn20070107-r2459+imudebian0
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Starting 'beryl-settings' fails with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/beryl-settings, line 2, in ?
import berylsettings
ImportError: No
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package openoffice.org
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
# remote status report
reopen 395034
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Scheduled on the autobuilder. No further action should be required for
resolving this bug, closing accordingly.
Thanks, but the rebuilt packages have the same problem,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:29:09PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
reopen 395034
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Scheduled on the autobuilder. No further action should be required for
resolving this bug, closing
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:17:57 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406287: beryl-settings: Latest SVN package breaks on
'import berylsettings'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
I'll call your attention again with the bug you reported at
http://bugs.debian.org/401010
Can you try to find out whether this is the same bug as
http://bugs.debian.org/278702 and http://bugs.debian.org/ ? See also
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/274070
If you can, also try to answer the questions I
I agree. We will fix this in the next release.
On 1/4/07, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
severity 404303 serious
thanks
~# dpkg -L splashy|grep ^/share
/share
/share/splashy
/share/splashy/schemas
/share/splashy/schemas/splashy
/share/splashy/schemas/splashy/schemas
libnss-ldap.patch2:
If you use that patch, please add the attached fr.po file in
debian/po/
fr.po
Description: application/gettext
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 350595 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The following patch fixes the FTBFS on mips and should on m68k too. But,
I don't have any m68k machine to test on.
Note that I am actually not very familiar with fpu_control.h. But the
comments near the #define's seem to indicate that this is the correct
way to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 350595 + patch
Bug#350595: gerris_0.6.0-3(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi,
elfsh FTBFS on s390 (bug #381621) and (bug #381334). But, also actually
on all non-i386 architectures because it includes i386-specific asm
code. People tried to make it work on amd64 in #381320, but ended up
with the same conclusion than me. For the record, previous upstream
(0.51) built on
87 matches
Mail list logo
