Bug#411922: FW: libpam-ldap upgrade breaks pam_ldap.conf and can't login

Il giorno mer, 21/02/2007 alle 16.23 -0500, Jamie ffolliott ha scritto: > Package: libpam-ldap > Version: 180-1.6 > > 3rd report - can we please get an acknowledgement from somebody? > > The package is still broken in how it handles existing settings upon > upgrades, and these settings are critic

Bug#412055: strigi-daemon: segmentation fault

Package: strigi-daemon Version: 0.3.11-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I see the segmentation fault in strigi as soon as I start the indexing. Probably some libraries are missing. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.strigi $ strigidaemon 2007-02-23 07:30:43,212 [3078698688] WARN Daemo

Bug#412054: strigi-daemon: segmentation fault

Package: strigi-daemon Version: 0.3.11-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I see the segmentation fault in strigi as soon as I start the indexing. Probably some libraries are missing. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.strigi $ strigidaemon 2007-02-23 07:30:43,212 [3078698688] WARN Daemo

Processed: Re: Bug#412045: Problem when Installing mysql-server-5.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 412045 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug#412045: Problem when Installing mysql-server-5.0 There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Bug#412045: Problem when Installing mysql-server-5.0

tags 412045 + unreproducible moreinfo stop Hello Mr. Systemadministrator :) On 2007-02-23 System Administrator wrote: > At first mysql-server-5.0 unable to start, then I purge mysql-server-5.0 > and reinstall back. Now I am having this problem where, this package > cannot be installed Can you sh

Processed: Re: Problem when Installing mysql-server-5.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 412045 serious Bug#412045: Problem when Installing mysql-server-5.0 Severity set to `serious' from `critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#412045: Problem when Installing mysql-server-5.0

severity 412045 serious thanks System Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: mysql-server-5.0 > Version: 5.0.32-6 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system >From your description, it rather seems as if only the package cannot be installed or configured, and this

Bug#411980: marked as done (Please build against unstable libc6)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:26:30 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line eclipse and experimental libc6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#411988: marked as done (libswt3.2-gtk-jni 3.2.1-5 depends on libc6 (>= 2.5) and is uninstallable)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:26:30 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line eclipse and experimental libc6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#411988: marked as done (libswt3.2-gtk-jni 3.2.1-5 depends on libc6 (>= 2.5) and is uninstallable)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:26:30 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line eclipse and experimental libc6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#411980: marked as done (Please build against unstable libc6)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:26:30 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line eclipse and experimental libc6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 405900 -1 Bug#405900: swf-player: should be updated for iceape/iceweasel Bug 405900 cloned as bug 412047. > reopen -1 Bug#412047: swf-player: should be updated for iceape/iceweasel 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;

Bug#412045: Problem when Installing mysql-server-5.0

Package: mysql-server-5.0 Version: 5.0.32-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system At first mysql-server-5.0 unable to start, then I purge mysql-server-5.0 and reinstall back. Now I am having this problem where, this package cannot be installed -- System Information: Debian Re

Bug#405900: marked as done (swf-player: should be updated for iceape/iceweasel)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Feb 2007 02:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#405900: fixed in swfdec0.3 0.3.6-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#411652: closed by John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#411652: fixed in bacula 1.38.11-8)

On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:17:15PM +0100, nb wrote: > Hi, > > It still doesn't work for me. Take a look at this : Fixed packages have not yet hit your mirror. Since I uploaded on amd64, give it 24-48 hours. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Processed: found 411113 in 0.5.0-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > found 43 0.5.0-1 Bug#43: ogre: FTBFS: cannot allocate an object of abstract type 'CEGUI::OgreCEGUITexture' Bug marked as found in version 0.5.0-1. > End of message, stopping

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package libpam-ldap Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libpam-ldap > forcemerge 385950 386077 Bug#385950: libpam-ldap: Broken regexp in postinst script Bug#386077: libpam-ldap: postinst a bit borked; perl search/replace have '/', recommend using '|' or ot

Bug#411078: license.terms for utils/base64/base64.tcl not included

On Fri, Feb 16, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > Er, what? "the authors hereby grant permission to use, copy, modify, > distribute, and license" doesn't grant to amsn the right to modify? > > Yes, there is a missing license statement, and that is a serious bug. But I > don't understand the claim th

Bug#411113: ogre: FTBFS: cannot allocate an object of abstract type 'CEGUI::OgreCEGUITexture'

reassign 43 cegui-mk2 thanks This bug is a result of a change between cegui-mk2 0.4 and 0.5 which is both source- and binary-incompatible. No doubt there are others. Such incom

Processed: Re: ogre: FTBFS: cannot allocate an object of abstract type 'CEGUI::OgreCEGUITexture'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 43 cegui-mk2 Bug#43: ogre: FTBFS: cannot allocate an object of abstract type 'CEGUI::OgreCEGUITexture' Bug reassigned from package `ogre' to `cegui-mk2'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Bug#401393: marked as done (Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#403222: fixed in lilo 1:22.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#380552: a possible medium term soloution

On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:52:38PM +, you wrote: I think that may be a reasonable thing to do here. The reasonable thing would have been to not bitch about the binary upload. Mike Stone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Bug#403222: marked as done ([etch] lilo: fails to write the boot information (LVM system))

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401393: fixed in lilo 1:22.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#401393: marked as done (Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401393: fixed in lilo 1:22.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#403222: marked as done ([etch] lilo: fails to write the boot information (LVM system))

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#403222: fixed in lilo 1:22.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 405900 patch Bug#405900: swf-player: should be updated for iceape/iceweasel There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Bug#405900: swf-player: should be updated for iceape/iceweasel

swf-player is using the Netscape Plugin API, which does *not* require linking against any Mozilla libraries. It only requires the header files from one of the -dev packages. Therefore I believe the following patch: --- plugin/Makefile.am~ 2006-01-09 20:33:42.0 + +++ plugin/Makefile.a

Bug#412021: marked as done (grub fails to cope with '/boot' on different partition to '/')

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:55:30 -0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#412021: grub fails to cope with '/boot' on different partition to '/' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#380552: a possible medium term soloution

"peter green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > would it be possible to reduce the test to only cause a warning until > it is worked out what about the build environment is causing the false > positive? I think that may be a reasonable thing to do here. This test is trying to check that "pwd" can read

Bug#412021: grub fails to cope with '/boot' on different partition to '/'

On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 09:23:22AM +1100, Jason Thomas wrote: > Your changing (hd0,?) in the wrong place. Look a little higher up in > the menu.lst file. > > The entries you are changing are regenerated every time update-grub is > run. Arggh! You are quite right... I needed to change: # groot=(h

Bug#412021: grub fails to cope with '/boot' on different partition to '/'

Your changing (hd0,?) in the wrong place. Look a little higher up in the menu.lst file. The entries you are changing are regenerated every time update-grub is run. On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:28:13PM +, Bernard Boudet wrote: > Package: grub > Version: 0.97-23 > Severity: critical > Justificat

Bug#410859: marked as done (liboil0.3: wrongly assumes that all Intel chips support CP14 timestamp)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#410859: fixed in liboil 0.3.10-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#411652: closed by John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#411652: fixed in bacula 1.38.11-8)

Hi, It still doesn't work for me. Take a look at this : colibri:~# apt-get install bacula-common bacula-sd Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the un

Bug#410838: marked as done (FTBFS: Could not find module `MissingH.Path')

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#410838: fixed in darcs-buildpackage 0.5.11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#412021: grub fails to cope with '/boot' on different partition to '/'

Package: grub Version: 0.97-23 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system My /boot partition is on /dev/hda11, so in menu.lst it says: root (hd0,11) update-grub trashes that and resets each case to: root (hd0,0) This happens whenever a new kernel is installed and it leaves the sy

Bug#410859: liboil0.3: wrongly assumes that all Intel chips support CP14 timestamp

This was already fixed upstream on 1st January (http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/liboil/liboil/liboil/liboilcpu.c?r1=1.36&r2=1.37) so I'm going to apply that change and upload: --- liboilcpu.c 2006/11/06 02:04:58 1.36 +++ liboilcpu.c 2007/01/01 09:33:33 1.37 @@ -615,15 +615,17 @@ /* arm

Bug#412003: FTBFS (alpha): DEFINEMACRO: max. 61 arguments supported, not 1

Dear Falk Hueffner, you wrote: > > Package: yodl > Version: 2.10-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source Brrr... Sounds ominous. Especially since the 2.04a *did* build on Alpha. I looked at the logs, and did notice some unexpected and possibly serious warnings, which

Processed: setting package to zd1211-firmware, tagging 363271, tagging 383604, tagging 411912

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > package zd1211-firmware Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zd1211-firmware > tags 363271 + pending Bug#363271: zd1211-firmware: new upstream version available There were no tags set. Tag

Processed: severity of 400477 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > severity 400477 important Bug#400477: sky2 module (patch available) Severity set to `important' from `critical' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#409685: marked as done (FTBFS: Could not find module `MissingH.GetOpt')

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:17:01 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409685: fixed in arch2darcs 1.0.9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#376812: -fno-strict-aliasing didn't work

On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 05:18:46AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hey, > > On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 22:05:01 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > I rebuilt the package using -fno-strict-aliasing and -g (which took > > quite some time), and ran it inside an etch chroot on a sarge box; the > > kernel was a

Bug#410463: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#410463: octave2.9-forge: FTBFS: error: invalid matrix index = 1

* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-21 22:46]: > Although this bug does not concern the versions of the packages now in > testing (octave2.9_2.9.9-7 and octave2.9-forge_2006.07.09+dfsg1-7), I > understand that it would be good to have the version in testing also fixed. > > > So eith

Processed: Only half-fixed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 411537 -1 Bug#411537: texlive-extra-utils: Installs /usr/bin/dvidvi, which is also in package dvidvi Bug 411537 cloned as bug 411969. > found -1 2005.dfsg.2-12 Bug#411969: texlive-extra-utils: Installs /usr/bin/dvidvi, which is also in package

Bug#411537: Only half-fixed: platex is still a problem

# copy of a mail already sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which is down until # tomorrow morning) clone 411537 -1 found -1 2005.dfsg.2-12 retitle -1 installs /usr/bin/platex, which is also in package ptex-bin thanks As indicated in the bug log, there's one more problem to solve. We're not there yet, b

Bug#410859: liboil0.3: wrongly assumes that all Intel chips support CP14 timestamp

I think all XScale processors have CP14 timestamp (see ) but it's in register 1, not register 0. The original report is right in that StrongArm processors do not have a CP14. Therefore the following *should* work: --- liboil-0.3.

Bug#411975: file conflicts between libdballe-dev and other liballe-* packages

Package: libdballe-dev, libdballef-dev, libdballe-db-dev, libdballe-msg-dev Severity: serious Justification: file conflicts, policy violation hi, both libdballe-dev and libdballef-dev do ship `/usr/lib/libdballef.a' amongst other files but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail on installa

Bug#411961: marked as done (watchdog: wd_keepalive uses /KA_PIDFILE as pidfile)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#411961: fixed in watchdog 5.3.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#411818: openafs-modules-source: Fails to compile/install on 2.6.8.3-mckinley-smp (ia64): linux/modversions.h

Ippokratis Pandis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, it looks like the problem is specific to ia64 with 2.6 kernel. It wouldn't surprise me too much if the ia64 port has bit-rotted a little. I'm not sure how many people are using that architecture with AFS. Thank you for the additional informat

Bug#411978: libnss-mdns: Should be in /lib

Package: libnss-mdns Version: 0.9-0.1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Hi, When /usr is not mounted and libnss-mdns is installed hostname lookups will fail because lib_mdns* is in /usr/lib instead of /lib. Apart from the more obvious things like nfs-mounting /us

Bug#388616: Making mediawiki FHS compliant (was: Upgrade)

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:54:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> To me that looks a bit more complicated than one would like, but still >> quite manageable, and acceptable for fixing a RC bug in etch. > >> What do you think? > > It's at least an order of

Bug#410463: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#410463: octave2.9-forge: FTBFS: error: invalid matrix index = 1

On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-21 15:23]: > > > Package: octave2.9 > > reassign 410463 octave2.9-forge > > thanks > > > > Am Samstag, den 10.02.2007, 21:38 +0100 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > > > error: invalid matrix inde

Bug#411988: libswt3.2-gtk-jni 3.2.1-5 depends on libc6 (>= 2.5) and is uninstallable

Package: libswt3.2-gtk-jni Version: 3.2.1-5 Severity: serious The following packages are BROKEN: libswt3.2-gtk-jni The following packages will be upgraded: eclipse eclipse-jdt eclipse-jdt-gcj eclipse-pde eclipse-pde-gcj eclipse-platform eclipse-platform-gcj eclipse-rcp eclipse-rcp-gcj ecli

Processed: tagging 411944

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > tags 411944 + upstream confirmed Bug#411944: CVE-2007-1006: format string overflows Tags were: fixed-upstream patch security Tags added: upstream, confirmed > End of message, stoppin

Processed: Re: Bug#411975: file conflicts between libdballe-dev and other liballe-* packages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 411975 libdballe-dev,libdballef-dev Bug#411975: file conflicts between libdballe-dev and other liballe-* packages Warning: Unknown package 'libdballef-dev' Warning: Unknown package 'libdballe-db-dev' Warning: Unknown package 'libdballe-msg-dev'

Bug#410463: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#410463: octave2.9-forge: FTBFS: error: invalid matrix index = 1

* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-22 18:36]: > I don't understand what the problem is getting the new version into > testing thru unstable. octave2.9 2.9.9-8 is already approved by the > release team to go to testing, but it being blocked by the RC bug > (#411863). There is no reason to

Bug#409681: marked as done (Broken depends on non-existing package)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409681: fixed in missingh 0.18.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: forcibly merging 411988 411980

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > forcemerge 411988 411980 Bug#411988: libswt3.2-gtk-jni 3.2.1-5 depends on libc6 (>= 2.5) and is uninstallable Bug#411980: Please build against unstable libc6 Forcibly Merged 411980 4

Bug#411978: libnss-mdns: Should be in /lib

tag 411978 + pending stop (Fix uploaded to DELAYED/2 this afternoon.) -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#412003: FTBFS (alpha): DEFINEMACRO: max. 61 arguments supported, not 1

Package: yodl Version: 2.10-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source yodl does not build on Alpha: [...] ./build manual mkdir -p html latex pdf ps txt /tmp/yodl-2.10/src/bin/yodl -D XXMACROPATH=. -I .:/tmp/yodl-2.10/macros/yodl -o out html manual Yodl2html 2.10 std.html

Processed: Re: Bug#411978: libnss-mdns: Should be in /lib

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 411978 + pending Bug#411978: libnss-mdns: Should be in /lib There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#362588: marked as done (dvifb: does not respond to pressed keys or mouse)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:32:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362588: fixed in tmview 1:01.03-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#411961: watchdog: wd_keepalive uses /KA_PIDFILE as pidfile

On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 08:49:16AM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > since 5.3-1 wd_keepalive stores it's pid in /KA_PIDFILE and not in > /var/run/wd_keepalive.pid anymore. This breaks the wd_keepalive > init-script. Yes, I know. This is a stupid bug that occured during upstream release. I'm

Bug#411652: marked as done (bacula-sd: fails to install - dependency problem)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#411652: fixed in bacula 1.38.11-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#409687: marked as done (FTBFS: Could not find module `MissingH.Logging.Logger':)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409687: fixed in srcinst 0.8.7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#400477: [critical] sky2 patch is applied?

Package: linux-2.6 Severity: critical Tags: patch I don't see patch about "Yukon FE ram buffer initialization" (sky2 module) in Debian Kernel changelog: Please, this patch[1] is very important and is present in stable