Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:22:01AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 15:32 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Svante, > > Do you still have a copy of the unbootable, yaird-generated initramfs > > available? Can you post it somewhere for download? (Preferably not to the > > bu

Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 01:09 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:22:01AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 15:32 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Hi Svante, > > > > Do you still have a copy of the unbootable, yaird-generated initramfs > > > available? C

Processed: Re: #415668 firebird2.0 FTBFS on s390

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package firebird2.0 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: firebird2.0 > retitle 415668 Please port to s390 Bug#415668: firebird2.0 - FTBFS: error: 'IMPLEMENTATION' was not declared in this scope Changed Bug title to Please port to s390 from firebird2.0 - FTB

Bug#415668: #415668 firebird2.0 FTBFS on s390

package firebird2.0 retitle 415668 Please port to s390 severity 415668 wishlist thanks Hi, Bastian, s390 is currently not supported by upstream. Looking at the place it failed to build, it is a matter of describing the architecture to the build system. I'll talk to upstream and see if they are i

Bug#415579: kernel-patch-openvz: Kernel does not compile

Hi Konstantin On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:39:47PM +0100, Konstantin Seiler wrote: > On Tuesday 20 March 2007 17:02, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > > It looks like you have not enabled CONFIG_VE (perhaps because of enabled > > CONFIG_SECURITY). > > So the way to solve this is disable CONFIG_SECURITY and the

Bug#415681: upgrading postfix from 2.3.7-3 to 2.3.8-2 breaks mail service

Package: postfix Version: 2.3.7-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, after upgrading postfix to 2.3.8-2 this morning, I have noticed that postfix no longer accepts incoming smtp connections. In the log I see this: Mar 21 10:25:12 moto postfix/master[28011]: warning: proc

Bug#415681: I also start to get signal 11 :)

Package: postfix Version: 2.3.8-2 Followup-For: Bug #415681 after upgrade, a see Mar 21 12:37:48 eol postfix/master[25323]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtp pid 25517 killed by signal 11 Mar 21 12:37:48 eol postfix/master[25323]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/smtp: bad command startup -- thrott

Processed: Re: kolab-cyrus-imapd: Corrupt quota files cause data loss

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 411240 important Bug#411240: kolab-cyrus-imapd: Corrupt quota files cause data loss Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#411240: kolab-cyrus-imapd: Corrupt quota files cause data loss

severity 411240 important thanks After a look at the code, I've concluded that this bug does not cause real data loss: lmtpd checks the user quota when verifying the message recipient, so this bug should trigger well before any data is accepted for delivery, and any data loss is the fault of the s

Bug#415681: upgrade breaks postfix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Same here this morning, but compiling postfix from the official sources works for me. Kind regards, - -- Rene Caspari, Systemadministrator epublica GmbH, Gänsemarkt 43, 20354 Hamburg, Tel. +49 (0)40/4109879-0 GF: Heiner Jürgensen, Michael Otto, Norb

Bug#415681: upgrading postfix from 2.3.7-3 to 2.3.8-2 breaks mail service

forcemerge 415681 415670 thanks On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:34:00AM +0100, Nagy Gabor Peter wrote: > Hi, after upgrading postfix to 2.3.8-2 this morning, I have noticed that > postfix no longer accepts incoming smtp connections. > In the log I see this: > Mar 21 10:25:12 moto postfix/master[28011

Processed: notfound 415681 in 2.3.7-3, found 415681 in 2.3.8-2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1 > notfound 415681 2.3.7-3 Bug#415681: upgrading postfix from 2.3.7-3 to 2.3.8-2 breaks mail service Bug marked as not found in version 2.3.7-3. > found 415681 2.3.8-2 Bug#415681: upgra

Bug#415681: I also start to get signal 11 :)

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:41:46PM +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: > after upgrade, a see > Mar 21 12:37:48 eol postfix/master[25323]: warning: process > /usr/lib/postfix/smtp pid 25517 killed by signal 11 > Mar 21 12:37:48 eol postfix/master[25323]: warning: > /usr/lib/postfix/smtp: bad command

Processed: forcibly merging 415681 415670

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1 > forcemerge 415681 415670 Bug#415681: upgrading postfix from 2.3.7-3 to 2.3.8-2 breaks mail service Bug#415670: Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch) Forcibly Merged 415670 415681. >

Bug#414882: zoneminder: syntax error in postinstall

# dpkg --configure -a Setting up zoneminder (1.22.3-4) ... + [ configure = configure ] + [ -z ] /var/lib/dpkg/info/zoneminder.postinst: 1: Syntax error: Bad fd number dpkg: error processing zoneminder (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were enco

Bug#415670: (no subject)

Hello, I dont think it's a config-problem, because after a clean install the problem also appears and I don't know how to fix it! Thanks, Robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#415670: Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch)

I have the same problem. strace reports a problem with a library: [pid 30353] writev(2, [{"smtpd", 5}, {": ", 2}, {"relocation error", 16}, {": ", 2}, {"/usr/lib/libpostfix-tls.so.1", 28}, {": ", 2}, {"symbol SSL_CTX_sess_set_get_cb, "..., 114}, {"", 0}, {"", 0}, {"\n", 1}], 10) = 170 regards,

Bug#415670: (no subject)

Same problem here. Full strace message if it can help : writev(2, [{"smtpd", 5}, {": ", 2}, {"relocation error", 16}, {": ", 2}, {"/usr/lib/libpostfix-tls.so.1", 28}, {": ", 2}, {"symbol SSL_CTX_sess_set_get_cb, version OPENSSL_0.9.8 not defined in file libssl.so.0.9.8 with link time reference

Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:40:15AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > Yes, if you could generate a new initrd for 2.6.18-4-686 on your system > > using yaird, that would be appreciated. If you don't have anywhere that you > > can upload it yourself, then for starters please send the output of zcat >

Bug#415681: Bug#415670: Bug#415681: upgrading postfix from 2.3.7-3 to 2.3.8-2 breaks mail service

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:30:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Do you have TLS enabled for smtpd on this server? The submitter of 415670 > does, and 2.3.8 was a new upstream version mostly for the purpose of fixing > a bug with broken SSL ciphers, so this seems the most likely cause here -- > t

Bug#415681: upgrading postfix from 2.3.7-3 to 2.3.8-2 breaks mail service

On 07-Mar-21 03:30, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:34:00AM +0100, Nagy Gabor Peter wrote: > > > Hi, after upgrading postfix to 2.3.8-2 this morning, I have noticed that > > postfix no longer accepts incoming smtp connections. > > > In the log I see this: > > Mar 21 10:25:12 mo

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:10:46 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > And the answer is, yes, the kernel-patch-adeos generated from the rtai > source only supports kernels up to 2.6.8... And besides, I tried to get 2.6.18 support [1] from upstream for etch, but upstream does not care much [2] about 2.6.18

Bug#415670: marked as done (Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch))

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:17:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415670: Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#415681: marked as done (upgrading postfix from 2.3.7-3 to 2.3.8-2 breaks mail service)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:17:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415670: Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:11:40PM +0100, Malte Cornils wrote: > > And the answer is, yes, the kernel-patch-adeos generated from the rtai > > source only supports kernels up to 2.6.8... > And besides, I tried to get 2.6.18 support [1] from upstream for etch, but > upstream does not care much [2]

Bug#415670: Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch)

Hi, I can confirm that upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8e-4 (unstable) solves the problem. Postfix doesn't even need to be restarted, library changes are picked up immediately. J. -- After the millenium I would tell lies only to those who deserved them. [Agree] [Disagree]

Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 04:01 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:40:15AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: ... > Are you willing to try installing the initramfs you just generated for -4 > and trying to boot with it, to see whether the error is still reproducible > for you? My best

Bug#415670: Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch)

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:26:14PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote: > I can confirm that upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8e-4 (unstable) solves the > problem. Postfix doesn't even need to be restarted, library changes are > picked up immediately. Note that I wouldn't exactly encourage this on an etch system,

Bug#386469: "openbsd-inetd, action "start" failed" when upgrading

Hi Marco, I've prepared an NMU for this issue with the following patch. I think the 'which invoke-rc.d' check is probably unnecessary altogether, because invoke-rc.d has been part of essential since sarge, but it doesn't hurt overly much; anyway, if invoke-rc.d is missing, I haven't bothered call

Processed: found in 1.8.0.9

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 415385 1.8.0.9-1 Bug#415385: xulrunner security bugs Bug marked as found in version 1.8.0.9-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Bug#414660: csound: writes garbage data to terminal, then quits

clone 414660 -1 reopen -1 ! severity -1 normal reassign -1 ftp.debian.org retitle -1 RM: csound [ia64 alpha amd64] -- RoRM; ANAIS thanks ftp team, please remove the csound binary package from unstable on these architectures. The package has been NMUed to drop the 64-bit architectures from the lis

Processed: Re: csound: writes garbage data to terminal, then quits

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 414660 -1 Bug#414660: csound: writes garbage data to terminal, then quits Bug 414660 cloned as bug 415706. > reopen -1 ! Bug#415706: csound: writes garbage data to terminal, then quits 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with

Processed: ldap-account-manager does not escape HTML special chars

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 415379 grave Bug#415379: ldap-account-manager: quoting of user description field broken Severity set to `grave' from `important' > tags 415379 + security Bug#415379: ldap-account-manager: quoting of user description field broken There were no

Bug#415707: It seem that the new libpostfix-tls.so.1 file today don't work correctly whith ssl

Package: postfix Version: 2.3.8-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Good morning, After the posfix package update this morning (before, all was ok ) : It seem that the new libpostfix-tls.so.1 file don't work correctly whith ssl . I' had to replace it whith the old on

Bug#415707: [Bug#415707] It seem that the new libpostfix-tls.so.1 file today don't work correctly whith ssl

P.NORMAND schrieb am Mittwoch, den 21. März 2007: > Package: postfix > Version: 2.3.8-2 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > After the posfix package update this morning (before, all was ok ) : > It seem that the new libpostfix-tls.so.1 file don't work correctly > whith

Bug#415637: gnu-smalltalk_2.3.3-2(experimental/ia64/alkman):

On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 11:36:02PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Heya, Hi Marc, > Building gnu-smalltalk on ia64 failed: > > [...] > | config.status: linking ./src/ia64/ffitarget.h to include/ffitarget.h > | config.status: error: ./src/ia64/ffitarget.h: file not found > | configure: err

Bug#415714: postfix: smtpd exits with status 127

Package: postfix Version: 2.3.8-2 Severity: grave Postfix refuses to handle incoming smtp connections after this morning's upgrade. Reverting to the previous version's package fixes it for now. Mar 21 13:52:43 blackbeard postfix/master[11123]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 16827 ex

Bug#414882: zoneminder: syntax error in postinstall

after replacing #//bin/sh by #/bin/bash in /var/lib/dpkg/info/zoneminder.* I get : Setting up zoneminder (1.22.3-4) ... + '[' configure = configure ']' + '[' -z '' ']' + /etc/init.d/mysql status + '[' 0 '!=' 0 ']' + mysqladmin --defaults-file=/etc/mysql/debian.cnf -f reload + cat /usr/share/zonem

Bug#415637: gnu-smalltalk_2.3.3-2(experimental/ia64/alkman):

>> | config.status: linking ./src/ia64/ffitarget.h to include/ffitarget.h >> | config.status: error: ./src/ia64/ffitarget.h: file not found >> | configure: error: ./configure failed for libffi >> | make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 > > The libffi/src/ia64/ffitarget.h is indeed missing in the sm

Bug#415721: bzr-svn: Requires newer bzr than is available

Package: bzr-svn Version: 0.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Whenever I run bzr now, even for nothing related to svn, I see: Installed bzr version 0.11.0 is too old to be used with bzr-svn 0.2.0. Looks like bzr-svn needs a better dependency. -- System Information: Deb

Bug#415707: TLS stopped

This bug broke my mail system too. :-( TLS stoped working Downgraded back to 2.3.7-3 all works fine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#415727: After upgrading to 2.8.3, Postfix "crashes" on all incoming connections: "warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 12170 exit status 127"

Package: postfix Version: 2.3.7-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading postfix in Debian etch from 2.3.7 to 2.3.8, postfix does not allow any connections to port 25 any more, it simply does not respond. The /var/log/mail.log (and mail.warn and mail.info) are fi

Processed: closing 415387

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > close 415387 1.5.0.10.dfsg1-1 Bug#415387: security issues in icedove 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.5.0.10.d

Bug#415738: [john] FTBFS on mipsel

Package: john Version: 1.6-40.1 Severity: serious Tags: help Three build attempts of my NMU of "john" failed on the rem mipsel buildd: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=john&ver=1.6-40.1&arch=mipsel&file=log However, it has been possible to build this source package (at least on Etch) on m

Bug#415739: echoping is uninstallable

Package: echoping Version: 5.2.0-3 Severity: grave # apt-get install echoping Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some

Bug#415707: old testing version

> This bug broke my mail system too. :-( TLS stoped working > Downgraded back to 2.3.7-3 all works fine Where can one find the old testing version? Thanks, Chris.

Bug#386469: bug not yet fixed. upgrading openbsd-inetd will break all packages updating inetd scripts

Package: openbsd-inetd Version: 0.20050402-5 Followup-For: Bug #386469 It looks like this bug has not yet been fixed. Upgrading openbsd-inetd to my current version is breaking all the other packages that do updates to inetd. Here's a dump of what happens now when running an apt-get install s

Processed: update

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 393373 0.96.1svn12109-1 Bug#393373: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's Bug marked as found in version 0.96.1svn12109-1. > found 393403 2.1.30-13.4 Bug#393403: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's Bug marked as found in ver

Processed: Set version

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 415379 0.4.9-2 Bug#415379: ldap-account-manager: quoting of user description field broken Bug marked as found in version 0.4.9-2. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Processed: Re: Processed: found 415387

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 415387 1.5.0.9.dfsg1-1 Bug#415387: security issues in icedove Bug marked as found in version 1.5.0.9.dfsg1-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#415727: After upgrading to 2.8.3, Postfix "crashes" on all incoming connections: "warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 12170 exit status 127"

forcemerge 415670 415727 -- > After upgrading postfix in Debian etch from 2.3.7 to 2.3.8, postfix does not > allow any connections to port 25 any more, it simply does not > respond. The /var/log/mail.log (and mail.warn and mail.info) are filled with > lines like: See #415670. lamont -- To U

Bug#415670: I had the same problem

I had also the same problem. So I had to downgrade too. I use tls sasl with ldap... postconf: With 2.3.7-3 works perfect. -- \\/// http://linux.oregpreshaz.eu/Thawte O O / http://www.oregpreshaz.eu/ /=uOO(_)OOu==~ WOT | E-

Bug#415738: Acknowledgement ([john] FTBFS on mipsel)

For what it's worth, I have been able to build both john 1.6-40 and 1.6-40.1 with no troubles in the sid chroot of vaughan.debian.org. So I can't reproduce this bug on the only mipsel machine to which I have access. However, I don't intend to upload this package, as it must also be possible to bu

Processed: Re: Bug#415727: After upgrading to 2.8.3, Postfix "crashes" on all incoming connections: "warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 12170 exit status 127"

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 415670 415727 Bug#415670: Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch) Bug#415727: After upgrading to 2.8.3, Postfix "crashes" on all incoming connections: "warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 12170 exit status 127" Bug#415681: upgrading po

Bug#415750: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC

Severity: serious Package: ftpmirror Version: 1.96-2 User: debian-release@lists.debian.org Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc Hi! This source package contains the following files from the IETF under non-free license terms: ftpmirror-1.96/Fan/MD5/rfc1321.txt The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:

Bug#415751: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D

Severity: serious Package: icedove Version: 1.5.0.10.dfsg1-2 User: debian-release@lists.debian.org Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc etch-ignore Hi! This source package contains the following files from the IETF under non-free license terms: icedove-1.5/archives/thunderbird-1.5.0.9-source-dfsg1.tar.bz

Bug#415753: mp3cd: Fails to run with SoX Version >= 13

Package: mp3cd Version: 1.25.3-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable As of version 13, SoX has changed the format of the information sent to stdout. Because of this, mp3cd fails to parse the information and no CD can be burnt. The attached patch should fix this. --

Bug#414893: marked as done (apcalc - FTBFS: error: incompatible types in assignment)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414893: fixed in apcalc 2.12.1.13-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#415046: marked as done (apcalc: FTBFS: Missing build dependency)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415046: fixed in apcalc 2.12.1.13-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#386469: marked as done ("openbsd-inetd, action "start" failed" when upgrading)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386469: fixed in openbsd-inetd 0.20050402-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#415636: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#415636: lyx_1.5.0~beta1-1(experimental/ia64/alkman): Internal boost copy not working on ia64

On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 11:28:27PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Hi Marc, > Package: lyx > Version: 1.5.0~beta1-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: experimental > > Heya, > > Building lyx failed on ia64: [...] > > Is there a reason not to use the packaged boost version? LyX won't build with b

Bug#415707: old testing version

It is still on the public servers, so you can simply download It directly from here: http://gulus.USherbrooke.ca/debian/pool/main/p/postfix/ Then, simply installing the package manually with dpkg should downgrade It automaticaly (add --force-downgrade if It doesn't). Thanks guys for q

Bug#415707: Same here

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just done an upgrade this morning :) And this was not the good time. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGAX9EfP+GwT1GJ3ERAgeOAKCkrh+wIBw2voN5MHD6Uv3RCdNv

Bug#414667: Debdiff

Attached debdiff should fix this. See also Ubuntu bug report https://launchpad.net/bugs/32727 Thank you. diff -Nru ez-ipupdate-3.0.11b8/debian/changelog ez-ipupdate-3.0.11b8/debian/changelog --- ez-ipupdate-3.0.11b8/debian/changelog 2007-03-21 20:39:15.0 +0100 +++ ez-ipupdate-3.0.11

Bug#415751: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:07:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415751: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#415775: apache2: Files served incorrectly after upgrade due to encoding change

Package: apache2 Version: 2.2.3-3.3 Severity: serious Justification: Causes unexpected changes in behavior of websites After upgrading my (home) server from Sarge to Etch I noticed that the word "Privé" on one of my webpages was not served correctly anymore. The default encoding of the system its

Bug#415776: libtext-vfile-asdata-perl: Must depend on libclass-accessor-chained-perl

Package: libtext-vfile-asdata-perl Version: 0.0.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Running the very simple script attached below results in the following: $ ./test-text-vfile-asdata.pl Base class package "Class::Accessor::Chained::Fast" is empty. (Perhaps you need to

Processed: severity of 415725 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1 > # the package is unreleasable in this state, says I :) > severity 415725 serious Bug#415725: samba: When upgrading from sarge to etch spurious warning about chaining passwd backends

Bug#415707: marked as done (It seem that the new libpostfix-tls.so.1 file today don't work correctly whith ssl)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:37:50 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415707: It seem that the new libpostfix-tls.so.1 file today don't work correctly whith ssl has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#414667: marked as done (ez-ipupdate: Does not start anymore)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414667: fixed in ez-ipupdate 3.0.11b8-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#415714: marked as done (postfix: smtpd exits with status 127)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:37:50 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415707: It seem that the new libpostfix-tls.so.1 file today don't work correctly whith ssl has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

Hi, On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:24:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Edelhard, do you have any objection to dropping this package from testing > immediately given the lack of support for linux 2.6.18? no, just drop it and i'll try to get it into lenny as suggested. I hope we have more luck with

Bug#415725: marked as done (samba: When upgrading from sarge to etch spurious warning about chaining passwd backends)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:02:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415725: fixed in samba 3.0.24-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: severity 316389 grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 316389 grave Bug#316389: Please add the transactions patch to db4.2 Severity set to `grave' from `wishlist' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Bug#415579: kernel-patch-openvz: Kernel does not compile

On Wednesday 21 March 2007 10:31, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi Konstantin > > The new Kernel just went up and seems to be running fine. > You are aware that there are precompiled kernels available? Just > want to check why you want a special version of the kernel. Well, there is no openVZ-kernel in D

Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:44:01PM +0100, Edelhard Becker wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:24:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Edelhard, do you have any objection to dropping this package from testing > > immediately given the lack of support for linux 2.6.18? > no, just drop it and i'll

Bug#411727: uswsusp.conf properly configured by 0.3~cvs20060928-7, but warning is displayed.

Package: uswsusp Followup-For: Bug #411727 Hello, Thank you for the fix you have submitted. Laptop users (including me) will be happy to have hibernation working out of the box. However, (sorry for that "however" ;) i have tested 0.3~cvs20060928-7 under d-i (by switching to console during i

Bug#332782: Please explain the etch-ignore tag

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:01:22 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:32:54AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > Hi, could you please explain why this bug has been granted an > > etch-ignore tag? > > Why is it "not meaningfully an RC bug for etch"? > > > Is Debian going to have a re

Bug#414929: could you try this patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Just a tired and blind attempt at this bug. Could you patch the init script with the attached pacth and see if it works? - -- Regards, EddyP = "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstei

Bug#332782: Please explain the etch-ignore tag

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:49:49AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > Second, you've already cited, from > > http://www.debian.org/doc/docpolicy, a statement of intent that the > > release notes will be released under a DFSG-free license; and we have > > no reason to believe that the copyright holder

Bug#414882: zoneminder: syntax error in postinstall

Thanks for the output. I've found a "stupid bash-ism" in the postinstall script (the checking if mysql is started). This should be fixed and out in a day or two. Thanks again. -- Peter Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#414929: could you try this patch

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Eddy Petri??or wrote: > Just a tired and blind attempt at this bug. > Could you patch the init script with the attached pacth and see if > it works? --oknodo in stop is never acceptable, it is NOT OK if the daemon is there and we don't stop it. Thanks for the effort, anyway.

Bug#414929: could you try this patch

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:10:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Eddy Petri??or wrote: > > Just a tired and blind attempt at this bug. > > Could you patch the init script with the attached pacth and see if > > it works? > --oknodo in stop is never acceptable, it

Bug#406426: marked as done (texlive-publishers: siam publishing macros are not free)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:47:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#406426: fixed in texlive-base 2007-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#414929: timidity can't be removed/purged/upgraded

BTW, @ -52,8 +52,8 @@ ;; stop) echo -n "Stopping $DESC: " - if start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --pidfile ${PIDFILE} \ - --exec ${DAEMON} --retry 10 ; then + if start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --pidfile ${PIDFILE} \ + --exec ${DAEMON} --si

Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:26:40PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 04:01 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:40:15AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > ... > > Are you willing to try installing the initramfs you just generated for -4 > > and trying to boot w

Processed: these seem bugs of experimental, not of etch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 399892 + experimental Bug#399892: nepenthes_0.2.0-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to use static library compiled without -fPIC There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental > tags 414120 + experimental Bug#414120: The remove of nepenthes 0.

Bug#415579: kernel-patch-openvz: Kernel does not compile

Hi On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:48:07PM +0100, Konstantin Seiler wrote: > On Wednesday 21 March 2007 10:31, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hi Konstantin > > > The new Kernel just went up and seems to be running fine. > > You are aware that there are precompiled kernels available? Just > > want to check wh

Processed: Re: Bug#414227: gcc-4.2: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 414227 important Bug#414227: gcc-4.2: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Bug#414227: gcc-4.2: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory

severity 414227 important thanks Brian M. Carlson writes: > Package: gcc-4.2 > Version: 4.2-20070307-1 > Severity: grave > > When I try to run gcc-4.2, it says: > gcc-4.2: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory > > Needless to say, a compiler that doesn't compile is rather

Bug#409785: scala: FTBFS: concurrent is not a member of java.util

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, > [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/scala-2.3.2/simpbuild/dbc > [starr] Compiling 65 source files to /tmp/buildd/scala-2.3.2/simpbuild/dbc > [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/scala-2.3.2/simpbuild/actors > [starr] Compiling 19 source

Bug#414842: #401916

On Thu, March 22, 2007 7:42, Gordon Farquharson said: > Do you know if your patch [1] you posted to #401916 is going to make > it into etch? That patch really belongs to #414842 since it is a change to udev's scripts. I do expect that a version of udev which fixes #414842 will make it into Etch s