Bug#415670: Postfix error

Hi, I can confirm best solution, at the moment, is to upgrade OpenSSL packages from "unstable" repository, using "apt-pinning" or a different way. I've update it and now totally works fine. Best Regards. Fabrizio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#404148: i'm not convinced release notes are enough

tags 404148 patch thanks On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 01:24:30AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > First of all,.. there is still no other solution than iommu=soft (at > least as of my knowledge) and we had even someone on the bugreport at > bugzilla.kernel.org who claimed that _only_ iommu=soft

Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 20:30 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:26:40PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: .. > Ok. First, would it be possible for you to reproduce /all/ the kernel > output prior to this boot failure (or at least, all that's visible on the > screen at the point of

Bug#415670: Postfix error

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:11:37AM +0100, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: > I can confirm best solution, at the moment, is to upgrade OpenSSL > packages from "unstable" repository, using "apt-pinning" or a different > way. > I've update it and now totally works fine. No, the best solution at the moment

Bug#415636: Fixed upstream

Fixed upstream: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17506 Georg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#414660: csound: writes garbage data to terminal, then quits

Sorry, there was a small bug in this patch -- when listing out the architectures where csound is supported, I accidentally left ppc64 and s390x in the list, even though these are 64-bit architectures. They're not likely to ever see this package built, so it's not a major issue for Debian, but if t

Bug#411727: uswsusp.conf properly configured by 0.3~cvs20060928-7, but warning is displayed.

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:27:27 +0100 Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: uswsusp > Followup-For: Bug #411727 > > > Hello, > > Thank you for the fix you have submitted. Laptop users (including me) will be > happy to > have hibernation working out of the box. > > However, (sorry

Processed: Re: Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 412799 important Bug#412799: Linux-image-2.6-18-686 does not boot! Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#412799: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot

severity 412799 important thanks On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 06:43:35AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 20:30 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:26:40PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > ... > > Second, if you can email me the broken initramfs image, I can pu

Processed: Re: Bug#404148: i'm not convinced release notes are enough

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 404148 patch Bug#404148: kernel: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives // memory hole mapping related bug?! There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: bug 415788: postfix smtpd segfault

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 415788 grave Bug#415788: postfix smtpd segfaults in TLS mode Severity set to `grave' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Processed: Re: postfix smtpd segfaults in TLS mode

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 415670 415788 Bug#415670: Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch) Bug#415788: postfix smtpd segfaults in TLS mode Bug#415681: upgrading postfix from 2.3.7-3 to 2.3.8-2 breaks mail service Bug#415727: After upgrading to 2.8.3, Postfix "crashes"

Bug#415670: postfix 2.3.8-2 broken my server

I have two server upgrade to 2.3.8-2. They have exactly same configuration except mail name etc. But the em64t box is working but 686 one doesn't. Hope this may help. -- Best regards, Zhijun(Jam), GUO [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#415233: gpgme1.0: FTBFS: Can't find GNU Pth

Hi José Carlos, FWIW I'm not content with the implemented solution as far as inclusion in etch is concerned. Previous versions of the package clearly did not need libpth20, the new version does and the effect on the package's behavior as a result of this new library dep seem to be unknown. The p

Bug#414842: #401916

On Mar 22, David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do expect that a version of udev which fixes #414842 will make it into > Etch since #414842 is RC and the release managers seemed to agree when I I will upload a new package in one or two days. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: D

Bug#414832: diff for 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.1 NMU

Hi, Attached is the diff for my ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.1 NMU. @the release team: please unblock ktorrent as it fixes an RC bug. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.o

Processed: update

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 400340 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's Bug#400340: Contains non-free files. Changed Bug title to Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's from Contains non-free files.. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)

Bug#414830: marked as done (Security issues with ktorrent. Fixed on 2.1.2.)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414832: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#414830: marked as done (Security issues with ktorrent. Fixed on 2.1.2.)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414830: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#414832: marked as done (ktorrent: security vulnerabilities fixed in newer upstream)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414830: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#414832: marked as done (ktorrent: security vulnerabilities fixed in newer upstream)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414832: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#332782: Please explain the etch-ignore tag

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:49:49AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > - once a consensus is reached there, contact individual contributors > > to the release notes requesting a license grant > > Where can I find a comprehensive list of individual contributors > (whose contribution is creative enough

Bug#400340: Bug#415751: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D

Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > why do you post dupes? > > there already is #400340 which is still open. If I missed the point, > reopen or let me know. Hi! Is #400340 really open? It is listed under 'Resolved bugs' on the tracker? http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#415670: Postfix error

For sure. But actually, for example, the "it.debian.org" repository is not yet updated, so alternatively you can use the solution I said before. (or get the new postfix packages from one updated repository and install it) > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:11:37AM +0100, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: > >> I

Bug#414929: could you try this patch

On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > That's not what --oknodo means. Please see the manpage; --oknodo is exactly > what's wanted here. Was start-stop-daemon fixed, then? In the past --oknodo behaved differently, which is the reason for the ammount of code in amavisd-new to make sure "not

Bug#404148: i'm not convinced release notes are enough

Steve Langasek wrote: >> In all doing respect, I think that it's a much greater risk to not use >> iommu=soft per default than doing so. Even if we imagine that there >> would by systems that don't work with the sw-iommu it's likely that >> they simply break (at boot time). And then the affecte

Bug#415776: pending

Sorry about that, I'll upload a fixed package tonight. Thanks for spotting it. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpNUt0TroEiD.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: severity of 415670 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 415670 important Bug#415670: Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch) Bug#415681: upgrading postfix from 2.3.7-3 to 2.3.8-2 breaks mail service Bug#415727: After upgrading to 2.8.3, Postfix "crashes" on all incoming connections: "warning: process

Bug#415117: [pkg-horde] Bug#415117: imp4: XSS vulnerability in search screen and thread view

> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Interesting! Will you create a fix for this? I took from the diff between imp-h3-4.1.4-rc1 and imp-h3-4.1.4 a working patch to fix the XSS vulnerability. I'm not really sure if I should submit a patch that would work against imp4_4.1.3-2 (in etch) o

Bug#415739: marked as done (echoping is uninstallable)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415739: fixed in echoping 5.2.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#415117: [pkg-horde] Bug#415117: imp4: XSS vulnerability in search screen and thread view

On Thursday 22 March 2007 13:07, Marcos Marado wrote: > > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Interesting! Will you create a fix for this? > > I took from the diff between imp-h3-4.1.4-rc1 and imp-h3-4.1.4 a working > patch to fix the XSS vulnerability. I'm not really sure if I should

Bug#316389: [Pkg-db-devel] Bug#316389: Please apply this patch

> The bug listed here incorrectly links to my site. It should have linked to > the official BDB site, as this bug is from the BDB folks themselves. > > > > In particular, this is patch #5. It is *require

Processed: bdb patches for openldap

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 316389 -1 Bug#316389: Please add the transactions patch to db4.2 Bug 316389 cloned as bug 415840. > retitle -1 vendor patch #5 is necessary for OpenLDAP Bug#415840: Please add the transactions patch to db4.2 Changed Bug title to vendor patch #5 i

Bug#316389: marked as done (Please add the transactions patch to db4.2)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:37:00 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line patch no longer claimed to be needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#415233: gpgme1.0: FTBFS: Can't find GNU Pth

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:13:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi José Carlos, > > FWIW I'm not content with the implemented solution as far as inclusion in > etch is concerned. Previous versions of the package clearly did not need > libpth20, the new version does and the effect on the package

Bug#414832: diff for 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.2 NMU

Hi, Attached is the diff for my ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.2 NMU. This one is without touching the build-system (no quilt dependency). @the RM: please unblock this one that is less intrusive. @the maintainer: you can keep the 2.1 NMU in your packaging the 2.2 is IMHO gross, but the previous o

Bug#395897: marked as done (FTBFS: now: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#395897: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#414830: marked as done (Security issues with ktorrent. Fixed on 2.1.2.)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414830: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#414832: marked as done (ktorrent: security vulnerabilities fixed in newer upstream)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414830: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#357096: marked as done (FTBFS with G++ 4.1: misc errors)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#357096: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#414832: marked as done (ktorrent: security vulnerabilities fixed in newer upstream)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414832: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#349983: marked as done (ktorrent: [m68k] FTBFS: autotools)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#349983: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#414830: marked as done (Security issues with ktorrent. Fixed on 2.1.2.)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414832: fixed in ktorrent 2.0.3+dfsg1-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#415852: x11-common: List of package files missing

Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.1.0-15 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I couldn't install x11-common due error: (Polish): brak listy plikow pakietu 'x11-common' (English - my translation): the file list of package 'x11-common' missing -- System Information: Debian Releas

Processed: reopen 390369

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 390369 Bug#390369: nbsmtp: Doesn't provide working /usr/sbin/sendmail as an MTA should 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not cha

Bug#390369: nbsmtp: Doesn't provide working /usr/sbin/sendmail as an MTA should

ding message via /usr/sbin/sendmail... /usr/sbin/sendmail: invalid option -- o Usage: /usr/sbin/sendmail -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] -h relayhost [OPTIONS] (use -H for help) Original write failed, wrote bug report to /tmp/reportbug-konqueror-20070322-26169-wVqWeM I dont't know what the -o option i

Bug#390369: nbsmtp: Doesn't provide working /usr/sbin/sendmail as an MTA should

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 17:24 +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > I have reopened this bug because, as the original submitter wrote, > nbsmtp does not work with reportbug: Furthermore since I installed nbsmtp I did not receive any e-mail from cron, which is a big problem. -- Laurent Bonnaud. http://

Bug#415852: x11-common: List of package files missing

tags 415852 moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 17:12:39 +0100, Wojciech Zareba wrote: > I couldn't install x11-common due error: > (Polish): brak listy plikow pakietu 'x11-common' > (English - my translation): the file list of package 'x11-common' > missing > Hi, Please prov

Processed: Re: Bug#415852: x11-common: List of package files missing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 415852 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#415852: x11-common: List of package files missing There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Processed: severity of 415745 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1 > severity 415745 serious Bug#415745: chown: `zabbix': invalid user Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Processed: reopening 415745

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1 > reopen 415745 Bug#415745: chown: `zabbix': invalid user 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.

Bug#415745: marked as done (chown: `zabbix': invalid user)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415745: fixed in zabbix 1:1.1.4-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#415860: openoffice.org: Writer does not close its files properly

Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-6 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Scenario 1: 1. Open/create a document 2. Save as Word 3. Close the document 4. Try to copy the document from a Mac (through Samba) 5. The Mac copies some part of the file, then errors out w

Bug#415379: marked as done (ldap-account-manager: quoting of user description field broken)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415379: fixed in ldap-account-manager 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#415861: CVE-2007-0537: khtml/konqueror title XSS vulnerability

Package: konqueror Version: 4:3.5.6.dfsg.1-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, here is the problem: http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20070206-1.txt The problem is also probably present in the KDE versions in sid and etch. -- System Information: Debi

Bug#415864: aic7xxx: aic7892(B): BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0

Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system + netinstall iso lo, well, ive several live cd systems < 2.6.19.5i386 that oops and hang boot in aic7xxx init, only one booting here is knoppix 5.2, the latest unofficial debi

Bug#415865: asterisk_1:1.4.2~dfsg-1(experimental/ia64/alkman): FTBFS: Missing dep on autoconf

Package: asterisk Version: 1:1.4.2~dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Heya, | Automatic build of asterisk_1:1.4.2~dfsg-1 on alkman by sbuild/ia64 98-farm | Build started at 20070320-2350 | ** [...] | Checking c

Bug#415867: coq_8.1+dfsg-1(experimental/ia64/alkman): FTBFS: Expects files that get lost while building

Package: coq Version: 8.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental | Automatic build of coq_8.1+dfsg-1 on alkman by sbuild/ia64 98-farm | Build started at 20070316-1946 | ** [...] | OCAMLOPT -a -o lib/lib.cmxa [...]

Processed: severity of 415864 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > severity 415864 normal Bug#415864: aic7xxx: aic7892(B): BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0 Severity set to `normal' from `critical' > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#415868: gdal_1.4.0-1(experimental/amd64/xenophanes): FTBFS: jasper/jas_tmr.h: No such file or directory

Package: gdal Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental | Automatic build of gdal_1.4.0-1 on xenophanes by sbuild/amd64 98-farm | Build started at 20070312-0010 | ** [...] | Get:13 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.

Bug#415860: openoffice.org: Writer does not close its files properly

tag 415860 + moreinfo thanks [ please wrap your lines sensefully ] Ambrose Li wrote: > Package: openoffice.org > Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-6 > Severity: grave > Justification: causes non-serious data loss hmmm Don't think so, see below > Scenario 1: > 1. Open/create a document > 2. Save as Word

Bug#415874: matplotlib_0.90.0-1(experimental/amd64/xenophanes): FTBFS: gtk/gtk.h: No such file or directory

Package: matplotlib Version: 0.90.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental | Automatic build of matplotlib_0.90.0-1 on xenophanes by sbuild/amd64 98-farm | Build started at 20070322-1753 | ** [...] | building

Bug#415876: ruby-yarv_0.4.1-1(experimental/ia64/alkman): FTBFS: 'ucontext_t' undeclared (first use in this function)

Package: ruby-yarv Version: 0.4.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental | Automatic build of ruby-yarv_0.4.1-1 on alkman by sbuild/ia64 98-farm | Build started at 20070322-1802 | ** [...] | cc -g -Wall -O2

Bug#316389: [Pkg-db-devel] Bug#316389: Please apply this patch

--On Thursday, March 22, 2007 10:15 AM -0400 Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The bug listed here incorrectly links to my site. It should have linked to the official BDB site, as this bug is from the BDB folks themselves.

Bug#415877: evolution-data-server_1.8.2-1(experimental/ia64/alkman): FTBFS: gtk-doc: Running scanner libebook-scan - Scan failed

Package: evolution-data-server Version: 1.8.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental | Automatic build of evolution-data-server_1.8.2-1 on alkman by sbuild/ia64 98-farm | Build started at 20070322-1804 | ** [...] | gtk

Processed: tagging 415776

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > tags 415776 + pending Bug#415776: libtext-vfile-asdata-perl: Must depend on libclass-accessor-chained-perl There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping pro

Bug#415878: Xserver crashes since update from 1:7.1.0-12 to 1:7.1.0-15 with the nvidia driver

Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.1.0-15 Severity: critical Hello, since I upgraded xserver-xorg from 1:7.1.0-12 to 1:7.1.0-15 the X-server crashes on startup (from Xorg.0.log): [...] (II) Initializing extension GLX Backtrace: 0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x6d) [0x4802ed] 1: /lib/libc.so.6 [0x3

Bug#403116: libinstrudeo: FTBFS: usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libftgl.a(FTFont.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `vtable for FTFont' can not be used when making a

found 403116 0.1.4-3 thanks Hi, It seems this is back in 0.1.4-3. 0.1.4-2+b1 build earlier this month didn't have the problem and still showed this during configure: checking for main in -lftgl_pic... yes And it also linked to it. Now it's showing: checking for main in -lftgl... yes And also

Processed: libinstrudeo: FTBFS: usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libftgl.a(FTFont.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `vtable for FTFont' can not be used when making a

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 403116 0.1.4-3 Bug#403116: libinstrudeo: FTBFS: usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libftgl.a(FTFont.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `vtable for FTFont' can not be used when making a Bug marked as found in version 0.1.4-3. > thanks Stopping processing her

Bug#415879: libinstrudeo_0.1.4-3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib

Package: libinstrudeo Version: 0.1.4-3 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of libinstrudeo_0.1.4-3 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 98 > Build started at 20070322-0321 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > B

Bug#415776: marked as done (libtext-vfile-asdata-perl: Must depend on libclass-accessor-chained-perl)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415776: fixed in libtext-vfile-asdata-perl 0.0.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Re: Bug#415860: openoffice.org: Writer does not close its files properly

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 415860 + moreinfo Bug#415860: openoffice.org: Writer does not close its files properly There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#392472: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Glib::FileError'

Hello, I have a same problem. This due to the absence of the /usr/share/pixmaps/gnome-logo-icon-transparent.png icon You can get this icon in source package http://downloads.sourceforge.net/parchive/gpar2-0.3.tar.gz?modtime=1141153935&big_mirror=0 Regards, -- Nicolas Joseph Responsable de l

Bug#415878: Xserver crashes since update from 1:7.1.0-12 to 1:7.1.0-15 with the nvidia driver

severity 415878 important tags 415878 moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 19:56:03 +0100, Daniel Schröter wrote: > Package: xserver-xorg > Version: 1:7.1.0-15 > Severity: critical > > Hello, > > since I upgraded xserver-xorg from 1:7.1.0-12 to 1:7.1.0-15 the X-server > crashe

Bug#415885: zeroc-ice_3.2.0-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib

Package: zeroc-ice Version: 3.2.0-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of zeroc-ice_3.2.0-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98 > Build started at 20070322-1933 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-D

Bug#415886: zeroc-icee_1.1.0-8(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib

Package: zeroc-icee Version: 1.1.0-8 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of zeroc-icee_1.1.0-8 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 98 > Build started at 20070322-1336 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-D

Processed: tagging 390369

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1 > tags 390369 - unreproducible Bug#390369: nbsmtp: Doesn't provide working /usr/sbin/sendmail as an MTA should Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible > End of message,

Bug#415861: CVE-2007-0537: khtml/konqueror title XSS vulnerability

#wonder if I get this right reassign 415861 kdelibs4c2a found 415861 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 notfound 415861 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6 found 415861 4:3.5.6.r1.dfsg.1-1 notfound 415861 4:3.5.6.r1.dfsg.1-2 notfound 409868 4:3.5.6.r1.dfsg.1-2 forcemerge 415864 409868 thanks > > The problem is also probably presen

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#415861: CVE-2007-0537: khtml/konqueror title XSS vulnerability

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > #wonder if I get this right > reassign 415861 kdelibs4c2a Bug#415861: CVE-2007-0537: khtml/konqueror title XSS vulnerability Bug reassigned from package `konqueror' to `kdelibs4c2a'. > found 415861 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 Bug#415861: CVE-2007-0537: khtml/kon

Bug#332782: Please explain the etch-ignore tag

On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:21:10 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:49:49AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > > This is effectively a clarical error > > > What do you mean by "clarical"? I'm sorry to ask, but I am not an > > English native speaker and no dictionary could h

Processed: Re: Bug#415861: CVE-2007-0537: khtml/konqueror title XSS vulnerability

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > #trying again > close 415861 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6 Bug#415861: CVE-2007-0537: khtml/konqueror title XSS vulnerability 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6, send any further

Processed: Raising severity to release-critical

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 401758 critical Bug#401758: leaks file descriptors (connections to the LDAP server) Severity set to `critical' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#415840: marked as done (vendor patch #5 is necessary for OpenLDAP)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415840: fixed in db4.2 4.2.52+dfsg-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#390369: -o is not one option

it is a series of options from ssmtps "sendmail" manpage Most sendmail options are irrelevent to sSMTP. Those marked ``ignored'' or ``default'' have no effect on mail transfer. Those marked ``unsup- ported'' are fatal errors. Those marked ``simulated'' are not errors,

Bug#415898: DoS: mysqld dies with BOOLEAN full text search

Package: mysql-server-5.0 Version: 5.0.32-7etch1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole It's the thir time the server dies, it happened twice with previous version in Etch and it just happened again with the current one, which I thought solved the problem. The server d

Bug#415898: DoS: mysqld dies with BOOLEAN full text search

tags 415898 + moreinfo Hello Ricardo On 2007-03-22 Ricardo Galli wrote: > The server dies with the SELECT query shown below. The three times > occured right after a WHERE MATCH () AGAINST ('"word"' IN BOOLEAN MODE) > where " were used and the word's first character was an utf-8 accented > char.

Processed: Re: Bug#415878: Xserver crashes since update from 1:7.1.0-12 to 1:7.1.0-15 with the nvidia driver

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 415878 important Bug#415878: Xserver crashes since update from 1:7.1.0-12 to 1:7.1.0-15 with the nvidia driver Severity set to `important' from `critical' > tags 415878 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#415878: Xserver crashes since update from 1:7

Processed: severity of 415852 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1 > severity 415852 normal Bug#415852: x11-common: List of package files missing Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#415898: DoS: mysqld dies with BOOLEAN full text search

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 415898 + moreinfo Bug#415898: DoS: mysqld dies with BOOLEAN full text search Tags were: security Tags added: moreinfo > Hello Ricardo Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > On 2007-03-22 Ricardo Galli wrote: Unknown command or malfo

Bug#415902: rhapsody: One vulnerability per IRC command

Package: rhapsody Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Rhapsody has format string and buffer overflow vulnerabilities in almost every IRC command it supports: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/463092/100/0/threaded Given that it includes so many "Secure

Bug#332782: Please explain the etch-ignore tag

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:12:54PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > I suppose I can find the source here[4], but I would need confirmation > before going on and possibly dig into the *wrong* source!! ;-) > Even better: could you please suggest a command-line that I can use > to checkout the source?

Bug#415898: DoS: mysqld dies with BOOLEAN full text search

On Thursday 22 March 2007 22:49:38 Christian Hammers wrote: > tags 415898 + moreinfo > > Hello Ricardo > > On 2007-03-22 Ricardo Galli wrote: > > The server dies with the SELECT query shown below. The three times > > occured right after a WHERE MATCH () AGAINST ('"word"' IN BOOLEAN MODE) > > wher

Processed: severity of 415860 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1 > # eh, is this even a bug in a Debian package? > severity 415860 important Bug#415860: openoffice.org: Writer does not close its files properly Severity set to `important' from `grave'

Bug#332782: Please explain the etch-ignore tag

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:24:33PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > Yes: > $ grep author release-notes.ent,v en/release-notes.en.sgml,v | >awk '{print $4}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n > [ slightly edited, for clarity ] > 73 fjp - Frans Pop > 43 jfs - Javier Fe

Bug#332782: Please explain the etch-ignore tag

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:12:54PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > I would suggest also checking the cvs log for the repository. > Well, I've just noticed that there's no link to the _Release Notes_ > source from the dedicated page[3]. > This should be fixed as well, I think. > [3] http://www.d

Bug#332782: Please explain the etch-ignore tag

On Thursday 22 March 2007 23:24, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > $ grep author release-notes.ent,v en/release-notes.en.sgml,v | >awk '{print $4}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n > [ slightly edited, for clarity ] > 73 fjp - Frans Pop > 43 jfs - Javier Fernandez-Sanguino

Processed: Re: Bug#414929: could you try this patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 414929 patch Bug#414929: timidity can't be removed/purged/upgraded Tags were: confirmed Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#414929: could you try this patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 414929 patch thanks Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:10:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Eddy Petri??or wrote: >>> Just a tired and blind attempt at this bug. >>> Could you patch the init s

Bug#332782: Please explain the etch-ignore tag

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:45:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:24:33PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña > wrote: > > Yes: > > $ grep author release-notes.ent,v en/release-notes.en.sgml,v | > >awk '{print $4}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n > > That won't be co

Processed: Re: Bug#375077 closed by Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#375077: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-4)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 375077 251-7.4 Bug#375077: udevd: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server -> boot fails Bug#375215: libnss-ldap hangs udev at startup Bug#391167: libnss-ldap: can't boot since 251-5.2 upgrade Bug marked as found in version 251-7.4. > thanks Stopp

  1   2   >