Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-3
Severity: grave
The situation I got into was in process of upgrading libc6 and libc6-i686 from
version 2.6.1-5 to 2.7-3. New libc6 was already unpacked and libc6-i686 was
yet of old version. After that the system became totally unusable. Every exec
ended up with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 450711 fails to start with can't initialize DKIM library
Bug#450711: dkim-filter(2.3.2.dfsg-1) fails to start with settings that works
with version2.0.2.dfsg-1. Only message is in syslog dkim-filter[26391]: can't
initialize DKIM library..
Hi Jos,
I've been unable to make heads or tails of this issue, so I'd like you
to try with the 2.4.0 package I've just rolled. I'm uploading it
tonight, but I can send you an i386 deb out-of-band if you'd like to try
before it hits the mirrors. Just let me know.
Also, do you mind if I attach the
Am Mittwoch, den 05.12.2007, 17:46 -0500 schrieb Anuradha Weeraman:
Hi Sebastian,
Any ideas on what we can do about this?
That's actually a very good question... I really can't rename the ncc
binary as it is used by quite a few build scripts and changing it would
mean that we diverge with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 450711 2.3.2.dfsg-1
Bug#450711: fails to start with can't initialize DKIM library
Bug marked as found in version 2.3.2.dfsg-1.
notfound 450711 2.0.2.dfsg-1
Bug#450711: fails to start with can't initialize DKIM library
Bug no longer marked as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
forcemerge 454266 454557
Bug#454266: upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable
Bug#454557: libc6: before upgrade must uninstall libc6-i686 first
Forcibly Merged 454266 454557.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 445475 pending
Bug#445475: CVE-2007-5198: Buffer overflow in the redir function in check_http.c
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: pending
tags 447639 pending
Bug number 447639 not found. (Is it archived?)
tags 448372 pending
Bug#448372:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:13:44AM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
Cutter does not work as described; it always reports No matching
connections found. Here is a repeatable example [...]
Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
I am not able to reproduce it. Does cutter still behave like this if
you try it now?
I
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453941: fixed in jakarta-log4j 1.2.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi,
this bug has been reported upstream in gnome bugzilla
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501830
Guus, it would be cool if you could adopt forwarding bugs to the
proper locations instead of non-public (non-list) E-Mail adresses.
That way everyone gets to see the state of upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
forwarded 443561 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501830
Bug#443561: off_t size changed causing ABI breakage, but ABI was not bumped
Forwarded-to-address changed from Jeffrey
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
forwarded 454536 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502003
Bug#454536: fails to parse email
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 20:50 -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
My chain of events:
- Upgrade cli-common from 0.4.9 to 0.5.0, and libmono-addins{,-gui}2.0-cil
from 0.2-4 to 0.3~svn.r90520-1.
cli-common 0.5.0 does not fix the issue
- Upgrade cli-common from 0.5.0 to 0.5.2.
Doesn't doesnt help, as the
Hi again,
With my account finally created, I uploaded a new release of Tellico to
the archive. According to Robby, there should be a fix for this crash in
it.
Could you please test if it is the case, so I can close this bug ?
Thanks for your help,
Regis
On Tue, November 6, 2007 10:23,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 443561 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111511
Bug#443561: off_t size changed causing ABI breakage, but ABI was not bumped
Forwarded-to-address changed from
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501830 to
forwarded 443561 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111511
thanks
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:12:12AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
this bug has been reported upstream in gnome bugzilla
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501830
Guus, it would be cool if you could adopt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 443561 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501830
Bug#443561: off_t size changed causing ABI breakage, but ABI was not bumped
Forwarded-to-address changed from
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111511 to
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#441520: fixed in netatalk 2.0.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Mike,
please send send me the 2.4.0 deb. I wil try is asap.
It's oke to attach the config and trace files, but please remove any
privacy related info, like the domainname, from the files.
I don't want to increase the spam to this domain.
Keep up the good work
Jos
Mike Markley schreef:
Hi
| Hi again,
|
| With my account finally created, I uploaded a new release of Tellico to
| the archive. According to Robby, there should be a fix for this crash in
| it.
|
| Could you please test if it is the case, so I can close this bug ?
|
| Thanks for your help,
|
| Regis
Hi Regis,
I did
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:47:05 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 2.2.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:47:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452142: fixed in gconfmm2.6 2.20.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:47:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452131: fixed in libgnomemm2.6 2.20.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:32:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452135: fixed in glibmm2.4 2.14.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:18:39 - (GMT)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#449527: Crash by using internet search
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:17:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452138: fixed in gnome-vfsmm2.6 2.20.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:17:09 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452157: fixed in libgnomecanvasmm2.6 2.20.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452161: fixed in libglademm2.4 2.6.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:17:16 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#450453: fixed in xgraph 12.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:02:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452158: fixed in libgnomeuimm2.6 2.20.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:13:06AM +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote:
My solution/workaround:
Run dpkg-reconfigure on all three packages: libmono-addins2.0-cil,
libmono-addins-gui2.0-cil, and tomboy.
tomyboy doesn't need to be re-configured, libmono-addins0.2-cil _and_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
severity 453948 grave
Bug#453948: gnome-btdownload: missing dependency on python-notify
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:51:15 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453756: git-core should depend on curl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 06:05 -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
tomyboy doesn't need to be re-configured, libmono-addins0.2-cil _and_
libmono-addins-gui2.0-cil is sufficient.
Well, I read the postinst script of tomboy and didn't see anything
relevant either, but that's my experience and I'm just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 445475 pending
Bug#445475: CVE-2007-5198: Buffer overflow in the redir function in check_http.c
Tags were: pending patch security
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#454464: fixed in libaqbanking 2.3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#454445: fixed in libaqbanking 2.3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#454464: fixed in libaqbanking 2.3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#454445: fixed in libaqbanking 2.3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: nice
Version: 0.9.13-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
Setting up nice (0.9.13-2) ...
install/nice: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs21
Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/nice/nice-mode.elc
Wrote
Today, on unstable/amd64:
$ LANG=C sudo apt-get install swfdec-mozilla
returns:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
swfdec-mozilla: Depends: libswfdec-0.5-4 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
Package libswfdec0.5-2 is available though. On i386, swfdec-mozilla
depends on
What do you think about using latest stable srtp version (1.4.4) instead
of current CVS which is buggy?
The test suite in srtp 1.4.4 succeeds, but crashes in CVS HEAD, when run
on x86.
Mikael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: cyrus-imapd-2.3
Version: 2.3.8-13
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
The configure script in the package is broken; it is supposed
to find the most recent version of libdb but starts checking
for version 4.4 which has been succeeded by 4.5 (which is
Package: audacity
Version: 1.3.3-1+b1
Severity: serious
Hi!
While using audacity, I find that it crashes every time I try to open
any Preference dialog box. (Like Edit-Preferences). Please find
attached a log of the dump I've been able to get.
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 454610 audacity -- crashes whenever Edit-Preferences is chosen.
Bug#454610: audacity -- crashed whenever Edit-Preferences is chosen.
Changed Bug title to `audacity -- crashes whenever Edit-Preferences is
chosen.' from `audacity -- crashed
Hi,
sorry, I missed to reply.
I followed your advice and now it looks so:
un aqbanking-qt-wizard keine (keine
Beschreibung vorhanden)
ii aqbanking-tool 2.2.3-3 basic command
line homebanking utility
ii aqbanking16-qt-wizard2.2.3-3
Package: erlang
Version: 1:12.b.0-dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source. Looks like a missing -fPIC
somewhere to me.
| Automatic build of erlang_1:12.b.0-dfsg-1 on digitalis by sbuild/alpha 98-farm
| Build started at 20071206-1343
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 437838 454609
Bug#437838: cyrus-imapd-2.3: Daemons/tools die due to Berkeley DB version
mismatch
Bug#454609: cyrus-imapd-2.3: software compiled against libdb 4.5, linked
against libdb 4.4
Merged 437838 454609.
tags 454609 -patch
Bug#454609:
merge 437838 454609
tags 454609 -patch
tags 437838 -patch
Thanks for this. However the issue is more complex than your patch would
indicate.
Ondrej: you said you had a fix prepared in #437838. Did you ever commit
this? I don't see it in SVN logs.
I'm really sorry for the state of the cyrus
On Thursday 06 December 2007 17:15:40 Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Package: audacity
Version: 1.3.3-1+b1
Severity: serious
Hi!
While using audacity, I find that it crashes every time I try to open
any Preference dialog box. (Like Edit-Preferences). Please find
attached a log of the dump I've been
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:10:58PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 03:45:08PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
Samba 3.0.14a-3sarge10 still has the same problem as reported for
3.0.14a-3sarge9: some directories and files aren't shown in the
windows explorer.
This
Your message dated Thu, 6 Dec 2007 23:03:08 +0530
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#454610: audacity -- crashed whenever Edit-Preferences is
chosen.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: gksu
Version: 2.0.0-5
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
Hello,
Since today, when I run gksu as a normal user (not root), it doesn't ask for
the root password. An empty window opens. Nothing is written inside it, aside
Do not show that message again (I'm
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007, Nicolas wrote:
Since today, when I run gksu as a normal user (not root), it doesn't ask for
the root password. An empty window opens. Nothing is written inside it, aside
Do not show that message again (I'm translating the message to English for
the bug report).
Do you
Sudo is installed :
# dpkg -l | grep sudo
ii libgksu1.2-01.3.8-1
library providing su and sudo functionality
ii libgksu2-0 2.0.5-1
library providing su and sudo functionality
ii sudo
Additionnal test :
$ whoami
normal_non_root_user
$ su
Mot de passe :
# whoami
root
# echo test root_test_file
# chmod 600 root_test_file
# ls -l root_test_file
-rw--- 1 root root 5 2007-12-06 19:26 root_test_file
# exit
$ whoami
normal_non_root_user
$ more root_test_file
root_test_file:
Can you please upload the fix for other architectures than amd64 as
well ? Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M... Just rebooted my xx-uptime days computer, and then the gksu
window appears normally.
As regards to the password not requested, perhaps was it in cache ?
Nicolas
--
~~
~ BOYCOTT SUSE NOVELL (C)(TM)(R) MICRO$OFT ~
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 454624 normal
Bug#454624: gksu doesn't ask for a password and runs apps as root
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
retitle 454624 french translation of the 'will not ask for password' is broken
Bug#454624: gksu doesn't ask for a
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:49:43PM +0100, Nicolas wrote:
M... Just rebooted my xx-uptime days computer, and then the gksu
window appears normally.
As regards to the password not requested, perhaps was it in cache ?
gksu, when used with the su backend, will have checkboxes to make it
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders system (mostly) unusable
Hi, I upgraded libc6 to 2.7-3 using apt-get on a system running kernel
2.6.9 with SMP (unfortunately I don't have the option of changing this
kernel, it's provided by my colo provider), and dpkg crashed
On 12/6/07, Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your package failed to build from source. Looks like a missing -fPIC
somewhere to me.
I already know that. It also failed to build on amd64 and ia64 due to
the same reason. The bug will be fixed in the next upload.
--
Sergei Golovan
Package: brasero
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: grave
I tried 3 different blank disc. Brasero didn't see any of them.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 454638 + wontfix
Bug#454638: libc6 unusable on kernel 2.6.9 due to opendir/O_CLOEXEC problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
Severity 454638 normal
Bug#454638: libc6 unusable on kernel 2.6.9 due to opendir/O_CLOEXEC problems
Severity
tag 454638 + wontfix
Severity 454638 normal
thanks
On jeu, déc 06, 2007 at 07:42:17 +, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders system (mostly) unusable
Nope, that breaks _your_ system, sorry for that, but Debian never
released a 2.6.9,
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:24:06 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#454502: gajim fails when it tries to create log database
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 454625 serious
Bug#454625: openoffice.org-base-core: Replaces field is missing the epoch
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
tag 454625 + pending
Bug#454625: openoffice.org-base-core: Replaces field is missing the epoch
There were no tags
This grave bug has now been opened for several months.
Any news?
trang should now be rebuilt against libgcj8-1.
--
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic /
Thomas Guebels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you please upload the fix for other architectures than amd64 as
well ? Thanks.
That's the job of the auto-builders. They should upload binary
packages for the other architectures soon.
Regards,
Joel
--
Joel Rosdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key BB845E97;
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#425702: fixed in mpc123 0.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Subject: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686: locks up or crashes, errors in tg3, psmouse
and usb (2.6.22-2 worked fine)
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686
Version: 2.6.22-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Upgrading from kernel
You are correct, the bug is fixed for me. Thank you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Is there any progress on this issue ?
I packaged JOGL for Debian and would like to see it in Debian.
However, JOGL has the same files as mesa (translated to Java) under the
same license (SGI free license B).
Does anyone tried to contact the upstream ?
Cheers,
Sylvestre
signature.asc
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.90a
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Attempting to install busybox-static when initramfs-tools is installed
results in an uninstall of initramfs-tools, and, consequently, the
Debian kernel package.
Obviously busybox-static (vs.
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.25
Severity: critical
Note: reported against the current version of dpkg,
but applies equally to all versions up to the present
time.
MD5 checksums are not secure. A recently discovered
mathematical technique allows *ANY* document containing a
few attacker-chosen
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#436401: fixed in gcc-h8300-hms 1:3.4.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 454666 apt
Bug#454666: MD5 signatures provide no security
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `apt'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
reassign 454666 apt
thanks
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:33:06PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exploitation of this flaw would allow an attacker to
substitute arbitrary code for any legitimate Debian package
using a man in the middle attack undetected whenever a
user is installing new
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:02:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#393368: fixed in evolution-exchange 2.12.2.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:52:55PM +0100, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Subject: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686: locks up or crashes, errors in tg3,
psmouse and usb (2.6.22-2 worked fine)
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686
Version: 2.6.22-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
2.6.23
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453796: fixed in usplash 0.5.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453847: fixed in usplash 0.5.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Followup-For: Bug #451348
Package: gnash-tools
Version: 0.8.1~rc.070818-2
The libgnashserver-0.8.1.so file comes on the gnash-common package and
gnash-tools doesn't depends on that package. Please fix this so the
package can enter testing.
Thanks.
Ernesto
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Your message dated Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#448372: fixed in nagios-plugins 1.4.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#445475: fixed in nagios-plugins 1.4.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Thanks very much for this bugreport. I just installed it on my system
and it works:
$ wajig install python-scipy
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
python-profiler
The following NEW packages will be installed:
Thanks for the bug report. We are working on exactly this problem,
and it seems we finally made a progress, python-numpy got built on many
architectures now:
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=python-numpy
Once python-numpy gets to unstable on most of the architectures, we'll
fix the rest.
Your message dated Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453924: fixed in lzma 4.43-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:03:33AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Thanks for the bug report. We are working on exactly this problem,
and it seems we finally made a progress, python-numpy got built on many
architectures now:
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=python-numpy
Once python-numpy
Quoting Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
reassign 454666 apt
thanks
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:33:06PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exploitation of this flaw would allow an attacker to
substitute arbitrary code for any legitimate Debian package
using a man in the middle attack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 454666 normal
Bug#454666: MD5 signatures provide no security
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:02:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#448139: fixed in cfengine2 2.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#444538: fixed in evolution-jescs 2.12.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
severity 454666 normal
thanks
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In particular, it is now computationally feasible for
a single attacker with a desktop machine to modify any
executable of his or her choosing to have any desired
MD5 checksum.
Ray, Debian is not Slashdot. I
94 matches
Mail list logo
