Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

On 19/12/07 at 13:59 +1100, Niv Sardi wrote: > At 01:46 on Dec 19 2007, Lucas Nussbaum said : > > > clone 444715 -1 > > reassign -1 wnpp > > severity -1 normal > > retitle -1 O: skippy -- full-screen X11 task/window switcher, similar to OSX > > Expose > > thanks > > > > Hi, > > > > Since the

Bug#457014: ocaml-nox: Bad permissions on ocamldoc-api-ref-config

tags 457014 + confirmed thanks On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 11:52:11PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote: > /bin/sh: line 2: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ocamldoc-api-ref-config: Permission > denied > make: *** [build/libcryptgps-ocaml-dev] Error 126 > dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error e

Processed: Re: Bug#457014: ocaml-nox: Bad permissions on ocamldoc-api-ref-config

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 457014 + confirmed Bug#457014: ocaml-nox: Bad permissions on ocamldoc-api-ref-config There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#457027: debian-builder script tries to remove all packages in the system if started without arguments

Package: debian-builder Version: 1.7 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: causes non-serious data loss The script uses %INSTALLED hash table to track the packages which was installed on the system when script was started. Problem is, it fills this table only when buildPackage() function cal

Processed: Re: Bug#457020: hal exits with Rule is NULL on jump

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 457020 grave Bug#457020: hal exits with Rule is NULL on jump Severity set to `grave' from `critical' > severity 457017 grave Bug#457017: hal exits with Rule is NULL on jump Severity set to `grave' from `critical' > merge 457017 457020 456890

Bug#457020: hal exits with Rule is NULL on jump

severity 457020 grave severity 457017 grave merge 457017 457020 456890 456314 retitle 456314 hal exits with Rule is NULL on jump thanks Indraneel Majumdar schrieb: > Package: hal > Version: 0.5.10-4 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software > Known bug. Merging it to existi

Bug#457020: hal exits with Rule is NULL on jump

Package: hal Version: 0.5.10-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software This is on a fujitsu a3130 laptop. Works fine on both my desktops with all sorts of questionable hardware. I upgraded today after about a month and hal broke. dpkg fails to configure hal. Here are the last

Bug#457018: Can not be installed on latest OpenOffice.org

Package: openoffice.org-voikko Version: 2.1-1 Severity: grave This software an not be installed, because latest version of openoffice.org-core is 2.3.1-2 and it conflicts with openoffice.org-core version 1:2.3.0.dfsg.1 or higher. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers te

Bug#457017: hal exits with Rule is NULL on jump

Package: hal Version: 0.5.10-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software This is on a fujitsu a3130 laptop. Works fine on both my desktops with all sorts of questionable hardware. I upgraded today after about a month and hal broke. Here are the last 20 lines of strace with verb

Processed: Re: Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 453242 important Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

severity 453242 important thanks While this bug is rather severe, it evidently hasn't caused problems so far (I guess not many people have been running GNUstep on Opeterons, since nobody's reported a bug yet). The proper fix (for now, until ffcall gets fixed) seems to be to use libffi instead of

Bug#451458: marked as done (plopfolio.app: FTBFS: Could not find /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#451458: fixed in plopfolio.app 0.1.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#450461: marked as done (gtamsanalyzer.app: FTBFS: /bin/sh: /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#450461: fixed in gtamsanalyzer.app 0.42-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#457014: ocaml-nox: Bad permissions on ocamldoc-api-ref-config

Package: ocaml-nox Version: 3.10.0-9 Severity: serious I'm seeing several ocaml-related build failures. For example, from my cryptgps build log using an i386 pbuilder chroot: ... ocamlopt -inline 1 -unsafe -c crypt_3des.ml ocamlopt -inline 1 -unsafe -c crypt_blowfish32.ml ocamlopt

Processed: severity of 456651 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > severity 456651 important Bug#456651: chameleon: should this package be removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please conta

Processed: severity of 456650 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > severity 456650 important Bug#456650: motioneye: should this package be removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please conta

Processed: severity of 456649 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > severity 456649 important Bug#456649: epplets: should this package be removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: severity of 456648 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > severity 456648 important Bug#456648: array-util: should this package be removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please cont

Processed: severity of 456652 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > severity 456652 important Bug#456652: mozart-gtk: should this package be removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please cont

Processed: severity of 456655 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > severity 456655 important Bug#456655: pixelize: should this package be removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contac

Bug#456851: rmpi: FTBFS: error: mpi.h: No such file or directory

On 18 December 2007 at 09:09, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | Package: rmpi | version: 0.5-5-1 | Severity: serious | User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071217 qa-ftbfs | Justification: FTBFS on i386 This will be fixed tomorrow. I just uploaded a new Open MPI package and wrote and tested a pat

Bug#456721: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Processed: Re: Bug#456721:libpetsc.so depends on unexistent libraries

On 18 December 2007 at 21:23, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | 5) Some Lintian warnings remain (but I now added two more silencers, so the | last two should go) -- could you try and see why your man page patch | doesn't cover'em ? | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/SVN/build-area> lintian

Bug#456721: marked as done (libpetsc.so depends on unexistent libraries)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456721: fixed in openmpi 1.2.4-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#456721: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Processed: Re: Bug#456721:libpetsc.so depends on unexistent libraries

On 19 December 2007 at 01:29, Manuel Prinz wrote: | Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2007, 18:12 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | > IIRC "we have no choice" as Policy mandates static builds. May be a | > 'recommends' though. | | I'm not sure about that. I didn't see that on a quick read of chapters 8 | a

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

At 01:46 on Dec 19 2007, Lucas Nussbaum said : > clone 444715 -1 > reassign -1 wnpp > severity -1 normal > retitle -1 O: skippy -- full-screen X11 task/window switcher, similar to OSX > Expose > thanks > > Hi, > > Since the situation hasn't evolved, I am now orphaning this package. > I sti

Processed: Change submitter address for archived bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Changing my submitter address for archived bug reports. > # I'm sorry for the noise! > unarchive 376857 Unarchived Bug 376857 > unarchive 319185 Unarchived Bug 319185 > unarchive 279062 Unarchived Bug 279062 > unarchive 441272 Unarchived Bug 441272

Bug#456860: gromacs: FTBFS: checking size of int... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (int)

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 12:47:55AM +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote: > I just finished to develop a patch for our broken OpenMPI package. It > looks quite good in first tests. I'll do more tomorrow and will include > GROMACS. So I hope we'll have a fixed openmpi package in a few days. > I'll keep you info

Bug#456721: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Processed: Re: Bug#456721:libpetsc.so depends on unexistent libraries

On 19 December 2007 at 00:43, Manuel Prinz wrote: | Hi everyone! | | Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2007, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Manuel Prinz: | > I already noticed my mistake and am working with a modified version. | | Here's my new and modified patch for openmpi. It looks right to me and | first checks s

Bug#447244: marked as done (beast - FTBFS: error: 'SIGTRAP' was not declared in this scope)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#447244: fixed in beast 0.7.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#456721: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Processed: Re: Bug#456721:libpetsc.so depends on unexistent libraries

Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2007, 18:12 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > IIRC "we have no choice" as Policy mandates static builds. May be a > 'recommends' though. I'm not sure about that. I didn't see that on a quick read of chapters 8 and 10, though policy states in 10.2: > Packages that us

Bug#456861: renaissance: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmp////usr/include/GNUstep/ren aissance': No such file or directory

reassign 456861 renaissance thanks On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:31:28 -0700 Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ugh. I think this is actually a bug in gnustep-make. If you get > similar errors in other GNUstep packages, don't bother reporting it. Whoops. Actually, it *is* a bug in renaissanc

Bug#456560: Solución

Para solucionar este bug solo hace falta borrar la linea 357 del archivo /GDebi/GDebi.py en la cual se agrega la opción --always-ask-pass a el comando gksu. Atacho un parche que hace esto, pero debido a que no conozco cual es la forma correcta de generar parches para paquetes debian este puede esta

Processed: Not fixed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 358545 1.2-20072611-1 Bug#358545: FTBFS: ...skipped cscursor.so for lack of libcrystalspace.a... Bug marked as found in version 1.2-20072611-1 and reopened. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#358545: Not fixed

found 358545 1.2-20072611-1 thanks It is not allowed to link a shared object with non-PIC object files. Bastian -- It is a human characteristic to love little animals, especially if they're attractive in some way. -- McCoy, "The Trouble with Tribbles", stardate 4525.6 -- To

Bug#456992: smbfs: mount.cifs fails with "mount error: could not find target server. TCP name ... not found"

Hi Julian, On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:03:57PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Package: smbfs > Version: 3.0.28-1~lenny1 > Severity: serious > I have just upgraded from 3.0.27a-1 to this version, and now when I > try to mount my Samba partition, I get the following error: > euclid:~ # mount -t cifs

Processed: Re: Bug#456861: renaissance: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmp////usr/include/GNUstep/ren aissance': No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 456861 renaissance Bug#456861: renaissance: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmpusr/include/GNUstep/ren aissance': No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package `gnustep-make' to `renaissance'. > thank

Bug#456721: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Processed: Re: Bug#456721:libpetsc.so depends on unexistent libraries

Hi everyone! Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2007, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Manuel Prinz: > I already noticed my mistake and am working with a modified version. Here's my new and modified patch for openmpi. It looks right to me and first checks show that it's working. I'll have a larger test tomorrow and will

Bug#456861: renaissance: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmp////usr/include/GNUstep/ren aissance': No such file or directory

reassign 456861 gnustep-make thanks On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:45:34 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > dh_install -plibrenaissance0-dev > > --sourcedir=/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmp/ cp: cannot > > stat > > > `/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmpusr/inc

Processed: Re: Bug#456861: renaissance: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmp////usr/include/GNUstep/ren aissance': No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 456861 gnustep-make Bug#456861: renaissance: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `/build/user/renaissance-0.8.0/debian/tmpusr/include/GNUstep/ren aissance': No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package `renaissance' to `gnustep-make'. > than

Processed: NMUed, final patch attached.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 454519 + pending Bug#454519: gosmore: 10_bad_gpsd_header.dpatch not needed anymore There were no tags set. Bug#456843: gosmore: FTBFS: gosmore.cc:21:25: error: gpsd_config.h: No such file or directory Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping process

Processed: merging 454519 456843

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > merge 454519 456843 Bug#454519: gosmore: 10_bad_gpsd_header.dpatch not needed anymore Bug#456843: gosmore: FTBFS: gosmore.cc:21:25: error: gpsd_config.h: No such file or directory M

Bug#454519: NMUed, final patch attached.

tags 454519 + pending thanks A fixed version of gosmore was uploaded to DELAYED/7 (mainly because the last gpsd version is not built everywhere yet). Final patch attached. -- Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nuwr gosmore-0.0.0.20070901-testing/deb

Bug#451644: marked as done (libtorrent10: Dumps core)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:17:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#446988: fixed in libtorrent 0.11.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#451790: marked as done (libtorrent10: PeerConnectionSeed::event_write() wrong state.)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:17:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#446988: fixed in libtorrent 0.11.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#446988: marked as done (must compile -fno-strict-aliasing)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:17:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#446988: fixed in libtorrent 0.11.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#456996: util-vserver: Should not stop vservers without some kind of warning.

Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.214-6 Severity: critical Hi, When upgrading from version 0.30.214-5 to version 0.30.214-6 util-vserver decided to stop my vservers without asking anything, basicly shuting the vserver down. It's not even restarted. Note that it doesn't automaticly start on bo

Bug#456992: smbfs: mount.cifs fails with "mount error: could not find target server. TCP name ... not found"

Package: smbfs Version: 3.0.28-1~lenny1 Severity: serious I have just upgraded from 3.0.27a-1 to this version, and now when I try to mount my Samba partition, I get the following error: euclid:~ # mount -t cifs //WGS-SVR-001/RMStaff /mnt/wggs/rmstaff -o credentials=/etc/wggs.credentials,uid=jdg,

Bug#445792: zynaddsubfx: FTBFS: unmet b-dep fftw3-dev

On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Barry deFreese wrote: > tags 445792 + patch > > thank you > > Here is a patch that fixes this plus several other issues. As this does a lot of general "house keeping" and not just plain rc bug fixing, I have uploaded this to delayed/7. If you disagree with the fixes

Processed: The GSL issue affects adun.app as well

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 450469 with 456898 Bug#456898: libgsl0ldbl: Uses symbols from libcblas.so, but not linked with it Bug#450469: adun.app: FTBFS: /bin/sh: /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh: No such file or directory Was not blocked by any bugs. B

Bug#445792: zynaddsubfx: FTBFS: unmet b-dep fftw3-dev

tags 445792 + patch thank you Here is a patch that fixes this plus several other issues. Thank you, Barry deFreese reverted: --- zynaddsubfx-2.2.1/src/Makefile.inc +++ zynaddsubfx-2.2.1.orig/src/Makefile.inc @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ FFTW_VERSION=3 #Assembler FLOAT to INT conversions +ASM_F2I=YES

Processed: Re: zynaddsubfx: FTBFS: unmet b-dep fftw3-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 445792 + patch Bug#445792: zynaddsubfx: FTBFS: unmet b-dep fftw3-dev. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#427418: marked as done (file conflicts between packages)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:47:35 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427418: fixed in rubrica 2.0-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#394930: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.2: uses removed minimum/maximum operator)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:47:27 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#394930: fixed in gatos 0.0.5-17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#430229: marked as done (ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:47:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430229: fixed in crystalspace 1.2-20072611-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#456927: marked as done (crystalspace: should this package be removed?)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:47:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456927: fixed in crystalspace 1.2-20072611-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#358545: marked as done (FTBFS: ...skipped cscursor.so for lack of libcrystalspace.a...)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:47:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358545: fixed in crystalspace 1.2-20072611-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#456846: sfs: FTBFS: configure: error: Could not find NFS mount argument structure!

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: sfs > version: 1:0.8-0+pre20060720.1-1.1 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071217 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on

Processed: bug 456967 is forwarded to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504314

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > forwarded 456967 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504314 Bug#456967: gnome-keyring: keyring daemon segfaults Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugz

Processed: Re: gnome-keyring: keyring daemon segfaults

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 456967 + patch Bug#456967: gnome-keyring: keyring daemon segfaults There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Bug#456967: gnome-keyring: keyring daemon segfaults

tag 456967 + patch thanks I've attached a patch to the upstream bug report to fix the crash. -- Sam Morris http://robots.org.uk/ PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078 3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078 signature.asc Descrip

Bug#456970: pwlib: Please make it possible for pwlib to build with sudo

Package: pwlib Severity: serious Version: 1.8.4-1+sarge1 Hi Please upload 1.8.4-1+sarge2 to oldstable-proposed-updates being 1.8.4-1+sarge1 plus fixes for building with sudo (probably replacing PWD by CURDIR in debian/rules). Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Bug#456967: gnome-keyring: keyring daemon segfaults

Placing a breakpoint in the signal_handler function lets me get a better backtrace: #0 0xb7c4e9d8 in strcmp () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x0805a663 in gkr_keyring_item_match (item=0x807af20, type=GNOME_KEYRING_ITEM_NETWO

Bug#456868: erlang: FTBFS: hipe_x86_bifs.S:278:undefined reference to `erts_restore_fpu' - Bayesian Filter detected spam

On 12/18/07, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: erlang > version: 1:11.b.5dfsg-11 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071217 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build o

Bug#456967: gnome-keyring: keyring daemon segfaults

Package: gnome-keyring Version: 2.20.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Over the last few days I have noticed that the keyring daemon segfaults after it has been running for a while (which can be anything between 'a few minu

Bug#456826: marked as done (xzgv: FTBFS: main.c:37:21: error: gtk/gtk.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:17:21 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456826: fixed in xzgv 0.9+svn34-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#456203: dumb reportbug

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Nagy Elemer Karoly wrote: > > Dear Debian, > > So, reportbug forgot to inlcude the majority of the report: > > USB pendrive fails when syncing file systems (works OK with big sequential > copies) with "reset high speed USB device" and "device descriptor read/64, > error -110

Bug#456938: marked as done (openoffice.org-java-common: fails to upgrade)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:26:58 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456938: openoffice.org-java-common: fails to upgrade has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Processed: severity of 456203 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > severity 456203 important Bug#456203: linux-source-2.6.22: USB pendrive fails with "reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4" Severity set to `important' from `grave

Bug#444508: marked as done (polyxmass-bin: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:02:31 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444508: fixed in polyxmass-bin 0.9.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#456857: marked as done (taoframework: FTBFS: error CS0006: cannot find metadata file `/usr/lib/cli/nunit-2.2.6/nunit.framework.dll')

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:47:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456857: fixed in taoframework 2.0.0.svn20071027-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#454179: marked as done (kdesvn killed by SIGBUS)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:35:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454179: kdesvn killed by SIGBUS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#456860: gromacs: FTBFS: checking size of int... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (int)

block 456860 by 456721 thanks On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:51:19AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: gromacs > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This is collateral damage from #456721, and should be corrected by a re-rebuild once that's been clo

Processed: Re: Bug#456924: libgstreamer-perl: should this package be orphaned?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456924 normal Bug#456924: libgstreamer-perl: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456924 wnpp Bug#456924: libgstreamer-perl: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `libgstrea

Bug#456489: squashfs-tools: data corruption caused by lzma patches

> "Stefan" == Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello, Stefan> Removing the newly added lzma patches from squashfs Stefan> alltogether fixes these bugs (see attached debdiff Stefan> "squashfs_remove-lzma-patches.diff" and [4]) and results in

Bug#456937: gcc error.

forward 456937 gcc severity 456937 normal retitle 456937 FTBFS: gcc fails to compile pcsx without optimizations thanks This doesn't appear to be a bug with pcsx, but rather with gcc. Here is the upstream gcc bug report: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11203 . It is a popular bug, with

Bug#456924: libgstreamer-perl: should this package be orphaned?

severity 456924 normal reassign 456924 wnpp retitle 456924 RFA: libgstreamer-perl -- Perl interface to the gstreamer media processing framework thanks Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > libgstreamer-perl has been showing up in Bapase for a long time. Could > you consider orphaning it, o

Processed (with 1 errors): gcc error.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forward 456937 gcc Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > severity 456937 normal Bug#456937: FTBFS: pcsx fails to build from source. Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > retitle 456937 FTBFS: gcc fails to compile pcsx without optimi

Bug#456916: marked as done (virtualbox-ose-source: fails to build kernel module)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456916: fixed in virtualbox-ose 1.5.2-dfsg2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: merging 456890 456314

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > merge 456890 456314 Bug#456314: hal-info: renders hal unusable Bug#456890: hal-info: hald fails to start Merged 456314 456890. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Processed: reassign 456890 to hal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > reassign 456890 hal Bug#456890: hal-info: hald fails to start Bug reassigned from package `hal-info' to `hal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#456938: openoffice.org-java-common: fails to upgrade

Package: openoffice.org-java-common Version: 2.2.1-9~bpo40+1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable On upgrade I get: Preparing to replace openoffice.org-java-common 2.2.1-9~bpo40+1 (using .../openoffice.org-java-common_1%3a2.3.1-2~bpo40+1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement openo

Bug#456937: FTBFS: pcsx fails to build from source.

Package: pcsx-df Version: 1:1.813-1 Severity: serious I have attached the tail of the build output. Misc details: * I tried to build with: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip noopt" dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot * Build dependencies and versions (up-to-date Debian Testing): autotools-dev 2007

Bug#456789: marked as done (gclcvs: FTBFS: Uses way too much RAM.)

Your message dated 18 Dec 2007 11:15:52 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456789: gclcvs: FTBFS: Uses way too much RAM. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#456890: hal-info: hald fails to start

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456890 grave Bug#456890: hal-info: hald fails to start Severity set to `grave' from `critical' > merge 456890 456314 Bug#456314: hal-info: renders hal unusable Bug#456890: hal-info: hald fails to start Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be

Bug#456890: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#456890: hal-info: hald fails to start

severity 456890 grave merge 456890 456314 thanks Josselin Mouette schrieb: > Package: hal-info > Version: 20071212-1 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > After upgrading to the latest hal-info, hald fails to start, without any > kind of error message. I’m attaching th

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#423353: php-image-canvas: should this package be removed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 423310 ftp.debian.org Bug#423310: php-image-graph: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `php-image-graph' to `ftp.debian.org'. > forcemerge 423353 423310 Bug#423353: RM: php-image-graph, php-image-canvas -- RoQA ; licen

Processed: severity of 456824 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > severity 456824 important Bug#456824: Prevent setuid/setguid process to run Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#455872: splashy: Fails to initialize, messes up loading other modules

If you have libdirectfb-0.9.25-x installed, can you please remove it? It seems that even though Splashy links against libdirectfb-1.0.x (from Sid), the binary tries to access the older version of the lib causing the -3 errors. Please report back ASAP as we are getting ready to do a bug fix releas

Bug#456898: GSL linking issue with new '--as-needed' option to GNU ld [Was: Bug#456898: libgsl0ldbl: Uses symbols from libcblas.so, but not linked with it]

Brian, I need your input. Debian is switching to passing '-Wl,--as-needed' to the linker, and this seems to break the split between the gsl and gslcblas library files. A case in point is cited below and at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=456872 where qtiplot failes wit

Bug#456829: marked as done (tucnak2: FTBFS: configure: error: missing mandatory library/libraries)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456829: fixed in tucnak2 2.07-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#456873: rquantlib: FTBFS: error: no matching function for call to 'QuantLib::AnalyticEuropeanEngine::AnalyticEuropeanEngine()'

On 18 December 2007 at 13:35, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | On 18/12/07 at 06:25 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > severity 456873 normal | > thanks | > | > On 18 December 2007 at 09:10, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | > | Package: rquantlib | > | version: 0.2.7-1 | > | Severity: serious | > | User: [EM

Bug#423310: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#423353: php-image-canvas: should this package be removed?

forcemerge 423353 423310 owner 423353 ! thanks On 18/12/07 at 14:48 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > merge 423353 423310 > Bug#423310: php-image-graph: should this package be orphaned? > Bug#423353: php-image-canvas: should this package b

Processed: Re: Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 444715 -1 Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed? Bug 444715 cloned as bug 456926. > reassign -1 wnpp Bug#456926: skippy: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `skippy' to `wnpp'. > severity -1 normal Bug#456926

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

clone 444715 -1 reassign -1 wnpp severity -1 normal retitle -1 O: skippy -- full-screen X11 task/window switcher, similar to OSX Expose thanks Hi, Since the situation hasn't evolved, I am now orphaning this package. I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this orphaning could

Bug#456927: crystalspace: should this package be removed?

Package: crystalspace Version: 1.0-20070508-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * 2 RC bugs opened for a long time * low popcon If you think tha

Bug#456924: libgstreamer-perl: should this package be orphaned?

Package: libgstreamer-perl Version: 0.09-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi Marc, libgstreamer-perl has been showing up in Bapase for a long time. Could you consider orphaning it, or maintaining it inside a team? (what follows is my template:) - While re

Bug#453227: marked as done (ruby-defaults: FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for package libracc-runtime-ruby (line 30))

Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453227: fixed in ruby-defaults 1.8.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#444711: pugs: should this package be orphaned?

severity 444711 normal reassign 444711 wnpp retitle 444711 O: pugs -- Perl 6 Implementation thanks Hi, Since the situation didn't improve, and the maintainer never answered this bug report, I'm now orphaning the package, as originally suggested. Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED

Processed: Re: Bug#444711: pugs: should this package be orphaned?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 444711 normal Bug#444711: pugs: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 444711 wnpp Bug#444711: pugs: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `pugs' to `wnpp'. > retitle 444711

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#423353: php-image-canvas: should this package be removed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 423353 423310 Bug#423310: php-image-graph: should this package be orphaned? Bug#423353: php-image-canvas: should this package be removed? Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #423310 has `php-image-g

  1   2   >