Bug#500794: uswsusp - s2ram does not follow kernel

2008-10-02 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): It is unusable on an unknown amount of machines. I would have no problem with that if it is only installed on request, but it is included in the laptop task and therefor a standard package. So? That still makes a good argument for Severity:

Bug#500818: memtest86+: don't work when compiled with gcc-4.3

2008-10-02 Thread Rob Browning
I was looking through the RC bug list and I noticed this one. The following bugs suggest that switching from -Os to -O1 may fix the problem: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217324 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/246412 Hope this helps -- Rob Browning rlb

Bug#500794: uswsusp - s2ram does not follow kernel

2008-10-02 Thread Tim Dijkstra
severity 500794 whishlist tags 500794 +willnotfix thanks First of all, if you know what command-line arguments you need to suspend you can use those with --force. If you use hal (via gnome-power-manager) you can create a .fdi file that will by-pass the white-list. Bastian Blank schreef: On Wed,

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#500794: uswsusp - s2ram does not follow kernel

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 500794 whishlist Severity level `whishlist' is not known. Recognized are: critical, grave, serious, important, normal, minor, wishlist, fixed. tags 500794 +willnotfix Unknown tag/s: willnotfix. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo

Bug#500778: libnss-ldapd: groups resolve to nogroup after boot

2008-10-02 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
Hi, On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 10:27:04PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: Can you produce logs of nslcd? It should report whether the LDAP server was reachable or not. If you can run nslcd with the -d option it should report more information that will help in tracking this down. attached is a log,

Bug#500873: blosxom: XSS problem in the error flavour

2008-10-02 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Package: blosxom Version: 2.1.1-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Hi! Yoshinori Ohta of Business Architects Inc. found a XSS issue in blosxom related to handling of unknown flavour types. The fix is now commited to upstream CVS:

Bug#500873: blosxom: XSS problem in the error flavour

2008-10-02 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, October 2, 2008 10:43, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Yoshinori Ohta of Business Architects Inc. found a XSS issue in blosxom related to handling of unknown flavour types. The fix is now commited to upstream CVS: http://blosxom.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/blosxom/blosxom2/blosxom.cgi?r

Bug#500591: marked as done (GC-unsafe operations in C stubs lead to random crashes)

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Oct 2008 08:48:00 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#500591: fixed in ocaml-ssl 0.4.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #500591, regarding GC-unsafe operations in C stubs lead to random crashes to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#500873: blosxom: XSS problem in the error flavour

2008-10-02 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-02 10:53:54 CEST]: On Thu, October 2, 2008 10:43, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Yoshinori Ohta of Business Architects Inc. found a XSS issue in blosxom related to handling of unknown flavour types. The fix is now commited to upstream CVS:

Processed: found 500873 in 2.0-13

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 500873 2.0-13 Bug#500873: blosxom: XSS problem in the error flavour Bug marked as found in version 2.0-13. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#500873: blosxom: XSS problem in the error flavour

2008-10-02 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
severity 500873 important thanks On Thu, October 2, 2008 11:25, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Not in itself, but it might be the case in connection with some plugin extensions that enable comments or web editing (none of them are shipped in Debian). I'm sorry to have wrongly put it as medium into the

Processed: Re: Bug#500873: blosxom: XSS problem in the error flavour

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 500873 important Bug#500873: blosxom: XSS problem in the error flavour Severity set to `important' from `critical' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Peter Leipold
Package: dmraid Version: 1.0.0.rc14-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system I upgraded dmraid from an earlier version, I don't know which one, but it was from the pre-udev startup. After the upgrade the boot stops at waiting for the root filesystem. I get a busybox prompt. I

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
tags 500883 moreinfo thanks Peter Leipold ha scritto: After the upgrade the boot stops at waiting for the root filesystem. I get a busybox prompt. I figured out what to type to continue booting up: $ modprobe dm-mirror $ dmraid -ay $ exit I need some debug logs. Extract the attached

Processed: tagging 500883

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 tags 500883 moreinfo Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#433996: severity of 433996 is grave

2008-10-02 Thread Nico Golde
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # security bug severity 433996 grave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Peter
Hi Giuseppe, I've done it, but the log files are not there. Looks like udev does not call this activate script at all. The block devices do exist, I've seen these in busybox: brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 0 2008-10-02 15:54 /dev/sda brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 1 2008-10-02 15:54 /dev/sda1

Processed: severity of 433996 is grave

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # security bug severity 433996 grave Bug#433996: unsecure usage of /tmp files Severity set to `grave' from `grave' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#492970: #492970 - nfs-common 1:1.1.3-1 client disallows access to files/directories where it should allow access - Debian Bug report logs

2008-10-02 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:06:46PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: Confirmed. The kernel's mountd client doesn't even bother to unmarshal the auth flavor list in the server's reply. I'll work on a fix. Chuck Lever was able to confirm this bug. On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 01:30:54PM +0200, Rasmus Bøg

Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662

2008-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, I read in #499662 that you propose to remove /usr/lib/libcairo-directfb/lib/libcairo.so.* and only rely on the libcairo-directfb.so.* library. However I’m afraid this is going to break the GTK+ DirectFB build. Currently, it is very hackish, and relies on the availability of those files in

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Hi Peter, Peter ha scritto: I now suspect the ENV{ID_FS_USAGE}==raid option in udev rules file. How should udev supposed to know if a disk is raid? Maybe I should rename something to this raid? See below my raid settings: udevadm info --query=all --name=sda udevadm info --query=all

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Peter
On Thursday 02 October 2008 14.32.18 Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: udevadm info --query=all --name=sda udevadm info --query=all --name=sdb Paste the output please. Giuseppe. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# udevadm info --query=all --name=sda P: /block/sda N: sda S:

Bug#495184: Downgrade or close?

2008-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, since this bug is most probably a user error or misconfiguration, maybe it should be closed, or at least downgraded? Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Peter
Here are all the partitions. The 1st one is a windoze, then the root, swap and data. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# udevadm info --query=all --name=sda1 P: /block/sda/sda1 N: sda1 S: disk/by-id/ata-SAMSUNG_SP2004C_S07GJ1LYB11332-part1 S: disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_SAMSUNG_SP2004CS07GJ1LYB11332-part1 S:

Bug#494058: epiphany-browser: Download window is broken

2008-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 07 août 2008 à 00:51 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit : Package: epiphany-browser Version: 2.22.3-1 Severity: important This is rather strange. Today I noticed that the download window had been redesigned. It now looks like the window from Firefox 3, except that it no longer displays any

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Peter ha scritto: This 2nd partition is one of my raid1 volume, containing the root filesystem. I see ID_FS_USAGE is not raid as it should. Do I have a screwed raid setup? :) Do you know how could I change that ID_FS_USAGE? ID_FS_USAGE on sdaX isn't important. The real problem is that

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Peter
On Thursday 02 October 2008 15.05.41 Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: Peter ha scritto: This 2nd partition is one of my raid1 volume, containing the root filesystem. I see ID_FS_USAGE is not raid as it should. Do I have a screwed raid setup? :) Do you know how could I change that ID_FS_USAGE?

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Peter ha scritto: Ok, thanks! This is then an udev issue, so I should search there (already Can you elaborate please? Why this is an udev issue and not a bug in your controller/bios ? found some bug-reports where udev incorrectly read device metadata for raid devices), Can you link them

Bug#492970: #492970 - nfs-common 1:1.1.3-1 client disallows access to files/directories where it should allow access - Debian Bug report logs

2008-10-02 Thread Steve Dickson
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: In my case I run Debian stable (nfs-utils 1.0.10) on the server and Debian unstable (1.1.3) on the client. I have not tried upgrading the server (which is probably not an option until Debian Lenny is released), but running the client with sec=sys solves the

Bug#492970: #492970 - nfs-common 1:1.1.3-1 client disallows access to files/directories where it should allow access - Debian Bug report logs

2008-10-02 Thread Steve Dickson
What is logged in /var/log/messages you turn on the in-kernel mount debugging via: rpcdebug -m nfs -s mount then do the following three mounts: mount -o sec=none madhat:/home /mnt/home mount -o sec=sys madhat:/home /mnt/home mount madhat:/home /mnt/home I got: Oct 2 09:23:10 rawhat

Bug#497740: marked as done (guile-1.6 FTBFS with gcc-4.3)

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:17:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#497740: fixed in guile-1.6 1.6.8-6.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #497740, regarding guile-1.6 FTBFS with gcc-4.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: tagging 433996

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26ubuntu13 tags 433996 pending Bug#433996: unsecure usage of /tmp files Tags were: security Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: tagging 500415

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26ubuntu13 tags 500415 pending Bug#500415: viruskiller: crashes at startup Tags were: patch Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#500909: libxpp3-java: includes javax.xml.namespace.QName class

2008-10-02 Thread Marcus Better
Package: libxpp3-java Version: 1.1.3.4.O-3 Severity: serious The xpp3.jar file contains the QName class from JAXP. This breaks the GroovyWS web service client, since it ends up loading the class into two different classloaders (the bootstrap class loader of the JRE and the Groovy class loader

Bug#500910: CVE-2008-4194 denial of service

2008-10-02 Thread Nico Golde
Package: pdnsd Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was published for pdnsd. CVE-2008-4194[0]: | The p_exec_query function in src/dns_query.c in pdnsd before 1.2.7-par | allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) |

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Peter
On Thursday 02 October 2008 15.21.14 Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: Peter ha scritto: Ok, thanks! This is then an udev issue, so I should search there (already Can you elaborate please? Why this is an udev issue and not a bug in your controller/bios ? Well, it can of course be a controller bug.

Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662

2008-10-02 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 14:33 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Hi, I read in #499662 that you propose to remove /usr/lib/libcairo-directfb/lib/libcairo.so.* and only rely on the libcairo-directfb.so.* library. Sort of - certainly public symbols in a /usr/lib/lib*/ directory is a bad idea as

Bug#494058: epiphany-browser: Download window is broken

2008-10-02 Thread Sam Morris
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 15:00 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 07 août 2008 à 00:51 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit : Package: epiphany-browser Version: 2.22.3-1 Severity: important This is rather strange. Today I noticed that the download window had been redesigned. It now looks like

Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662

2008-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 15:21 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit : The reason is that pangocairo can link to each of the two cairo libraries, and therefore we don’t rebuild it for the DirectFB version. Looking ahead to Squeeze, would it be possible to implement the same solution for pango and

Bug#494058: epiphany-browser: Download window is broken

2008-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 15:32 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit : In 2 months time, this bug never occurred once to me. Do you have any idea of how to reproduce it? Unfortunately not. It just happens after a totally random amount of time; along with various other weird and wonderful effects,

Bug#494058: epiphany-browser: Download window is broken

2008-10-02 Thread Sam Morris
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 16:47 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 15:32 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit : In 2 months time, this bug never occurred once to me. Do you have any idea of how to reproduce it? Unfortunately not. It just happens after a totally random amount of

Processed: Re: Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 500883 normal Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4 Severity set to `normal' from `critical' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#500883: dmraid: boot fails after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-4

2008-10-02 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
severity 500883 normal thanks Peter ha scritto: Well, it can of course be a controller bug. I'm not that familiar with these issues. I was only thinking it to be an udev bug because as I've read these fakeraid cards are hard to support under linux because of their proprietary bios

Bug#471642: remove pango-graphite from lenny

2008-10-02 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Thomas Viehmann [Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:59:38 +0200]: Hi, pango-graphite owns a critical bug, #471642 and dupes, since April with no visible maintainer activity. As it's not been released with stable before and has no reverse dependencies, it appears to be an ideal removal candidate. Marked

Bug#494058: epiphany-browser: Download window is broken

2008-10-02 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 03:54:38PM +0100, Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 16:47 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 15:32 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit : In 2 months time, this bug never occurred once to me. Do you have any idea of how to

Bug#499931: D compiler front end license

2008-10-02 Thread Thomas Viehmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, walter Walter Bright of Digital Mars kindly licensed the D Programming Language Compiler Front End under the GPL Version 1 or above and asked me to forward the licensing notice to the bugs. Below is his mail to this end (irrelevant parts edited

Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662

2008-10-02 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:45:37 +0200 Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 15:21 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit : Can we not separate the entire DirectFB question into dedicated packages using predictable filenames and directories - just as if these were actually

Bug#492970: #492970 - nfs-common 1:1.1.3-1 client disallows access to files/directories where it should allow access - Debian Bug report logs

2008-10-02 Thread Chuck Lever
Hi Steve- As I understand it, the documented bug refers to running nfs-utils 1.1.3 on kernels older than 2.6.22 (ie the problem is with the legacy mount command, not with the in-kernel mount parser, which has a different, less harmful bug that masks these symptoms). To reproduce this you

Bug#500921: sdcv_0.4.2-4(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc in test cases

2008-10-02 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Package: sdcv Version: 0.4.2-4 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of sdcv_0.4.2-4 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98 Build started at 20081002-1750 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.0

Processed: tagging 494936

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 tags 494936 + pending Bug#494936: bnx2 fails to load on bootup, succeeds on manual load There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#494058: epiphany-browser: Download window is broken

2008-10-02 Thread Sam Morris
Also, when it freezes, try to grab a backtrace. The backtrace: Thread 7 (Thread 0x40b5e950 (LWP 17423)): #0 0x7ffee712ed96 in poll () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x7ffeef511667 in _pr_poll_with_poll (pds=0x98f368, npds=1,

Processed: tagging 500692

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 tags 500692 + pending Bug#500692: [firmware-nonfree] FTBFS: depends on linux-support-2.6.25-2 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#494058: epiphany-browser: Download window is broken

2008-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 17:15 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit : I can reproduce the hanging problem fairly easily. 1. Open Page Info window 2. In a new tab, go to about:config 3. Try to modify a string value 4. Try to close the about:config tab To me, this looks like #393837, which is

Bug#494058: epiphany-browser: Download window is broken

2008-10-02 Thread Sam Morris
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 18:36 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 17:15 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit : I can reproduce the hanging problem fairly easily. 1. Open Page Info window 2. In a new tab, go to about:config 3. Try to modify a string value 4. Try to close

Bug#500637: marked as done (ndisgtk: Fails w/ndiswrapper not found)

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:47:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#500637: fixed in ndisgtk 0.8.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #500637, regarding ndisgtk: Fails w/ndiswrapper not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Downgrade

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 479533 important Bug#479533: Cc: field in not filled in when replying Severity set to `important' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#500910: CVE-2008-4194 denial of service

2008-10-02 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Package: pdnsd Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was published for pdnsd. If someone fixes this, fixing #490047 would be much appreciated as well by the l10n folks (and this is certainly not

Bug#500910: CVE-2008-4194 denial of service

2008-10-02 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 04:25:54PM +, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Package: pdnsd Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was published for pdnsd. If someone fixes this, fixing #490047

Bug#499931: gdc-4.2: diff for NMU version 0.25-4.2.4-3.1

2008-10-02 Thread Thomas Viehmann
tags 499931 + patch pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for gdc-4.2 (versioned as 0.25-4.2.4-3.1) will upload provided that it builds correctly. Note that the maintainer should look into pruning unneeded information from debian/copyright. Kind regards T. diff -u

Processed: gdc-4.2: diff for NMU version 0.25-4.2.4-3.1

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 499931 + patch pending Bug#499931: gdc-4.1: dmd front-end license is incompatible with gcc There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#400066: NMU diff

2008-10-02 Thread Thiemo Seufer
After talking with Jose I NMU'ed lcdproc to allow building on almost all architectures again. Appended is the full diff. Thiemo lcdproc (0.5.2-1.2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Support all architectures except s390. * Add support for kfreebsd, thanks Cyril Brulebois.

Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662

2008-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
tag 499662 + patch thanks Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 16:38 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit : This would really be the very same version of the library, with more symbols. Nothing can break more than when you simply upgrade the library to a new version. Except that the diversion can also be

Processed: Re: Proposed changes for #499662

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 499662 + patch Bug#499662: libcairo-directfb2-dev: directfb2-dev build is missing a libtool archive Tags were: patch Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#499931: gdc-4.2: diff for NMU version 0.25-4.2.4-3.1

2008-10-02 Thread Arthur Loiret
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 08:14:31PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: tags 499931 + patch pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for gdc-4.2 (versioned as 0.25-4.2.4-3.1) will upload provided that it builds correctly. Note that the maintainer should look into pruning unneeded

Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662

2008-10-02 Thread Dave Beckett
The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do any cairo work today. One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The customer for debian is really just the installer, so limiting the packages for that was a

Bug#291734: Move to wastbin on different partitions silently deletes the file

2008-10-02 Thread Benjamin Mesing
severity 291734 minor thanks My sincere apologies the mistake was on my side. I've tried the same under another account, and the behaviour is as expected. It seems that somewhen in the past I must have checked the do not ask again box. After figuring that out, I was able to reenabled the

Bug#499927: gdc-4.1: diff for NMU version 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-23.2

2008-10-02 Thread Thomas Viehmann
tags 499927 + patch pending thanks Hi Arthur, here is the corresponding NMUdiff for gdc-4.1 (versioned as 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-23.2). Kind regards T. diff -u gdc-4.1-0.25-20080616-4.1.2/debian/changelog gdc-4.1-0.25-20080616-4.1.2/debian/changelog ---

Processed: Re: Bug#291734: Move to wastbin on different partitions silently deletes the file

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 291734 minor Bug#291734: gthumb: Can't send images to trashcan across partitions Severity set to `minor' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#499568: Not just Emacs

2008-10-02 Thread Steve Cotton
Bug #484305 reports the same problem in Vim, X-Chat, Gnumeric, python-nautilus and gedit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: gdc-4.1: diff for NMU version 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-23.2

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 499927 + patch pending Bug#499927: gdc-4.1: dmd front-end license is incompatible with gcc There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662

2008-10-02 Thread Luk Claes
Dave Beckett wrote: The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do any cairo work today. One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The customer for debian is really just the installer, so limiting the

Bug#500070: plan for #500070 - darkstat.db is replaced every time darkstat is restarted

2008-10-02 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi Rene, so what is your plan regarding #500070? It is showing up on the NMU target (= 7 days old bugs) list by now. Could you upload a fixed version or comment on when you will? Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#500070: plan for #500070 - darkstat.db is replaced every time darkstat is restarted

2008-10-02 Thread Rene Mayorga
tags 500070 + pending On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:02:53PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Hi Rene, Hi Thomas so what is your plan regarding #500070? It is showing up on the NMU target (= 7 days old bugs) list by now. Could you upload a fixed version or comment on when you will? I'm just

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#500070: plan for #500070 - darkstat.db is replaced every time darkstat is restarted

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 500070 + pending Bug#500070: darkstat.db is replaced every time darkstat is restarted There were no tags set. Tags added: pending On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:02:53PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Bug#499931: marked as done (gdc-4.1: dmd front-end license is incompatible with gcc)

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:17:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#499931: fixed in gdc-4.2 0.25-4.2.4-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #499931, regarding gdc-4.1: dmd front-end license is incompatible with gcc to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#500940: [mlview] segfaults when saving in tree view

2008-10-02 Thread Simon Wenner
Package: mlview Version: 0.9.0-2.1 Severity: grave Mlview segfaults when I save a file in the tree view. 1. create a new file with root 'test' 2. go to 'tools'-'new view'-'tree view' 3. save the file 4. segfault --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 Debian

Bug#496954: bind9: 496954: more info needed

2008-10-02 Thread Maykel Moya
On jue, 2008-10-02 at 12:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 16:13 -0400, Maykel Moya wrote: With respect to the data at the point of the crash ... I suspected as much. I don't know enough about the bind code to know if it is correct, but I suspect this should fix the

Bug#500941: rdiff-backup does not function with current unstable version of encfs

2008-10-02 Thread Orion
Package: encfs Version: 1.4.2-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Hi The current unstable version of encfs causes rdiff-backup to break when the remote volume is encfs. The cause appears to be that the latest version of encfs does not follow the specifications for the

Bug#499927: marked as done (gdc-4.1: dmd front-end license is incompatible with gcc)

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:47:08 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#499927: fixed in gdc-4.1 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-23.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #499927, regarding gdc-4.1: dmd front-end license is incompatible with gcc to be marked as done. This means

Bug#499740: Can't reproduce the FTBFS of libwx-perl

2008-10-02 Thread Damyan Ivanov
tags 499740 unreproducible thanks I can't reproduce the FTBFS in my amd64 sid cowbuilder. Also no FTBFS in the i386 sid cowbuilder. Both were non-parallel builds. Bastian, can you (or anyone else) still reproduce it? dam -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers

Processed: Can't reproduce the FTBFS of libwx-perl

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 499740 unreproducible Bug#499740: libwx-perl - FTBFS: Failed 2/4 test scripts. 6/9 subtests failed. There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#499568: Not just Emacs

2008-10-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-10-02 20:56 +0200, Steve Cotton wrote: Bug #484305 reports the same problem in Vim, X-Chat, Gnumeric, python-nautilus and gedit. And there are very likely dozens of other applications affected where the problem just isn't known yet. Unfortunately the Python guys don't seem to be

Bug#500075: more info?

2008-10-02 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi Christoph, it seems that without more info (unless you are able to get some hardware to reproduce this to someone who wants to debug this, but you don't seem to live near Bonn, Germany ;) ), we would have difficulties to fix this bug. Could you try to build a debug-enabled package and get a

Bug#499740: Bug in libwx-perl fixed in revision 25765

2008-10-02 Thread pkg-perl-maintainers
tag 499740 + pending thanks Some bugs are closed in revision 25765 by Damyan Ivanov (dmn) Commit message: debian/rules: run tests with -j1; this disables parallel make during tests even if the build targed was invoked with -jN (N1). Closes: #499740 -- FTBFS: Failed 2/4 test scripts. 6/9

Processed: Bug in libwx-perl fixed in revision 25765

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 499740 + pending Bug#499740: libwx-perl - FTBFS: Failed 2/4 test scripts. 6/9 subtests failed. Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#500644: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#500644: nvidia-kernel-source: Cannot build on 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64

2008-10-02 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 07:10:31PM -0700, Deekoo L. wrote: Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 1.0.8776-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Attempts to build the package according to the instructions in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian fail with

Bug#500778: libnss-ldapd: groups resolve to nogroup after boot

2008-10-02 Thread Arthur de Jong
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 10:28 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: attached is a log, while the problem exists. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ % ls -l test -rw-rw-r-- 1 schoenfeld nogroup 0 12. Sep 09:49 test Interesting enough: The symptom is similar to the system behaviour, if nslcd is _not_ running.

Processed: fuse: diff for NMU version 2.7.4-1.1

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 499352 + patch pending Bug#499352: invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/udev not found. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#499352: marked as done (invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/udev not found.)

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:32:13 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#499352: fixed in fuse 2.7.4-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #499352, regarding invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/udev not found. to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: jppy: Missing dependency on python-vobject

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 496748 + patch Bug#496748: jppy: Missing dependency on python-vobject There were no tags set. Tags added: patch kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: tagging 500767

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 tags 500767 + sid Bug#500767: gnome-python-extras: Build fails due to removed gdl-icons.h header file There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing

Bug#499740: Additional information

2008-10-02 Thread gregor herrmann
Afer Dam's last mail we tried a few things, coordinating via IRC. The tests showed that the FTBFS in the test suite happen reproducibly with parallel builds and don't occur with non-parallel builds. That's why we finally decided to disable running the tests in parallel for the time being. Cheers,

Bug#500644: nvidia-kernel-source: Cannot build on 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64

2008-10-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-10-02 23:05 +0200, Lennart Sorensen wrote: I just hope lenny gets released soon. This has gotten annoying. :) Do you have plans to get the Nvidia drivers into the release? Or are they supposed to be sid-only nowadays? Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#500660: marked as done (liblapack-doc: failed to upgrade when libblas-doc is installed)

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:32:21 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#500660: fixed in lapack 3.1.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #500660, regarding liblapack-doc: failed to upgrade when libblas-doc is installed to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#499740: marked as done (libwx-perl - FTBFS: Failed 2/4 test scripts. 6/9 subtests failed.)

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:32:28 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#499740: fixed in libwx-perl 0.86-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #499740, regarding libwx-perl - FTBFS: Failed 2/4 test scripts. 6/9 subtests failed. to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#499352: fuse: diff for NMU version 2.7.4-1.1

2008-10-02 Thread Thomas Viehmann
tags 499352 + patch pending thanks Hi, this bug is indeed serious: As fuse-utils does not depend on udev (but on makedev | udev) it must not require udev. The problem does also happen in usual dbootstrapped chroots. I'm uploading version 2.7.4-1.1 with attached diff. Kind regards T. diff -u

Processed: severity of 499636 is normal

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 severity 499636 normal Bug#499636: nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx: Incorrect version number encoded into nvidia.ko Severity set to `normal' from `critical' End of message, stopping

Bug#500956: unable to boot on a500 (hppa)

2008-10-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-parisc64 Version: 2.6.26-6 Severity: serious the lenny installer does work, the kernel installed by the installer fails to boot. The etch kernel does boot. Command line for kernel: 'root=/dev/sda3 HOME=/ console=ttyS0 TERM=vt102 palo_kernel=2/vmlinux' Selected

Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662

2008-10-02 Thread Otavio Salvador
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dave Beckett wrote: The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do any cairo work today. One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The customer for debian is really

Bug#435386: marked as done (nvidia-kernel-source: bad attempt to nest fakeroot sessions)

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:47:10 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#435386: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx 96.43.07-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #435386, regarding nvidia-kernel-source: bad attempt to nest fakeroot sessions to be marked

  1   2   >