Your message dated Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:47:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#471121: fixed in xli 1.17.0+20061110-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #471121,
regarding xli: resource leaks leads to denial of service of X
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Sounds like a duplicate of #479209.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:59:23PM +0100, Michael Goetze wrote:
> This is with haskell-utils 1.11. Perhaps a versioned dependency would be
> appropriate.
What's your kernel version and architecture?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 505058 normal
Bug#505058: ghostscript: gv can't view the pages
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
severity 505058 normal
thanks
I see absolutely no reason for this bug to be realease critical. Not
being able to view two files is certainly not something that "breaks
unrelated software"...
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
>> Please have a look at bug 506977 (of which the last and most explaining
>> comment is below this email). The issue involved is a copyright
>> infringement in the source of fpc before version 2.2.2 (i.e. everything
>> version except for the one in unstable). I fear that we should either
>> update
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 506950 important
Bug#506950: ocfs2: ocfs2 issue: kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c:1977
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Package: ghc6
Version: 6.8.2-7
Severity: grave
Currently, I can't install ghc6:
Setting up ghc6 (6.8.2-7) ...
haskell-utils: timer_create: Invalid argument
dpkg: error processing ghc6 (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
This is with haskell-utils 1.1
Your message dated Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496395: fixed in apertium 3.0.7+1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #496395,
regarding The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
to be marked as done.
Th
Package: newlib
Version: 1.16.0-2.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of newlib_1.16.0-2.1 on schroeder by sbuild/sparc 99.99
> Build started at 20081127-2157
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Your message dated Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:18:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286905: fixed in perl 5.10.0-18
has caused the Debian Bug report #286905,
regarding perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree makes setuid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
After some days of recompiling with debug symbols and stepping endlessly
through programs, I
have become fairly sure that this problem has nothing at all to do with
DirectFb. Sorry for the
noise. It just happened that I was inside DirectFB mostly when the crash
occurred, but after
recompiling SDL t
Source: amaya
Version: 10.1~pre4+dfsg.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate
for removal from Debian, because:
* It has a long-standing RC bug
* Not in etch, and won't be in lenny
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> tags 286905 = security etch lenny sid
Bug#286905: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree makes setuid
Tags were: fixed woody security
Tags set to: security, etch, lenny, sid
> tags 286922
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 286922
Bug#286922: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree removes arbitrary
Bug#286905: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree makes setuid
Disconnected #286922 from all other report(s).
> found 286905 5.8.8-1
Bug#286905: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree m
unmerge 286922
found 286905 5.8.8-1
found 286922 5.8.8-1
fixed 286922 5.10.0-1
thanks
As discussed around
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/perl/porters/233695#233695
CVE-2005-0448 (File::Path::rmtree races) has resurfaced and is present
in all of etch, lenny, and sid.
To be precise, CVE-2
Package: ipsec-tools
Version: 1:0.7.1-1.2
Severity: serious
The ipsec-tools package ships a private lib without proper SONAME nor
headers in /usr/lib.
Bastian
--
Ahead warp factor one, Mr. Sulu.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> # will explain soon
> unarchive 286905
Bug 286905 [perl] perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree makes setuid
Bug 286922 [perl] perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree removes arbitrary
Unarchived
Package: racoon
Version: 0.7.1-1.2
Severity: grave
racoon fails to start after an upgrade:
| Setting up racoon (0.7.1-1.2) ...
| Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/racoon ...
| Starting IKE (ISAKMP/Oakley) server: racoon/usr/sbin/racoon: symbol lookup
error: /usr/sbin/racoon: unde
Hi,
Has there been any progress on this, now that wxwidgets2.8 is in unstable?
Cheers,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In Ubuntu I checked that the following packages builddepend on FPC:
>> lazarus
>> imapcopy
>> hedgewars
>> libhdate
>> gearhead
>> m-tx
>> python-soappy
>> poker-network
>> I assume, but have not check yet, that the same goes for Debian.
>
> Looks like quite a lot of packages seem to have go. T
reassign 506977 release.debian.org
thanks
On Thursday 27 November 2008 12:05, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > What is the correct way to remove packages from (old)stable? Should I
> > file a bug report against ftp.debian.org or is it done by the SRM?
>
> That's SRM stuff, so you need to file the bug
* Adeodato Simó [Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:30:36 +0100]:
> * Philippe Coval [Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:40:58 +0100]:
> > Hi,
> > Thank you for reporting this, I've fixed this among other things :
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tuxguitar/
> I reviewed this because I wanted to sponsor it.
* Evgeni Golov [Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:11:21 +0100]:
> Hey Philippe,
> I doubt your changes are too big to be accepted into Lenny.
> Can you post a -2 fixing only #506883, let it migrate to Lenny and then
> upload -3 with all the other changes into experimental?
I'm okay with them...
--
Adeodato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 506977 release.debian.org
Bug#506977: FPC: copyright infringement in pre 2.2.2 sources
Bug reassigned from package `fpc' to `release.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> close 506846
Bug#506846: openssl: MD5 calculations often segfault
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations t
Your message dated Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#505635: fixed in xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #505635,
regarding [xserver-xorg-input-evdev] keyboard acts as if I had pressed every
key multiple times
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:40:23PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> fixed #505237 5.4.1~dfsg-11
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> this bug does not affect the Lenny release.
> I tried to reproduce it on three machines (two Lenny, one sid) - also
> with di
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:39:31 +0100
Reinhard Karcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Severity: wishlist
>
> In NEWS.Debian.gz in /usr/share/doc/ttf-kochi-gothic the replacement of the
> kochi fonts by the sazinami fonts ist suggested, as these fonts are
> kochi-based.
>
> Is this suggestion stil
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 03:57:12PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Then you probably someowhen insxtalled it locally and it takes
> precendence? In any case, the package is 11. But that's an other data
> point that you just fucked up something ;-)
> > Running b43-fwcutter -l:
> >
> >
I see a lot of echoing about relicensing to GPL, and I regret naming that
option in the Ubuntu bugreport, since it should NOT be taken as gospel.
In case Debian/Ubuntu is serious about this, this is roughly the situation
of GPL licensing option:
-
The whole possibility of relicensing to GPL
Your message dated Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:56:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#507058: b43-fwcutter fails to install: input file is
wrong
has caused the Debian Bug report #507058,
regarding b43-fwcutter fails to install: input file is wrong
to be marked as done.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I'd debug your network connection. Or the file was at some time corrupted
> on the mirror. Nothing this package can influence.
Hey Rene, thank you so much for your speed-lightning reply !
If b43-fwcutter managed to download the fi
Package: openchange
Version: 1.0~svn894-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of openchange_1.0~svn894-1 on lofn by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20081127-1337
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 507059 0.92j
Bug#507059: initramfs-tools: Wrong check for udevadm in functions
Bug marked as found in version 0.92j.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tag 507058 + unreproducible
severity 507058 important
thanks
Hi,
Paulo Marcel Coelho Aragão wrote:
> Package: b43-fwcutter
> Version: 1:011-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Nonsense.
> Install of b43-fwcutter fails with these messages:
>
> Sorry, the input file is
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92l
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
scripts/functions:
303 # Wait for queued kernel/udev events
304 wait_for_udev()
305 {
306 [ -x "$(command -v udevadm)" ] && return 0
307 udevadm settle ${1:+--timeout=$1}
Package: b43-fwcutter
Version: 1:011-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Install of b43-fwcutter fails with these messages:
Sorry, the input file is either wrong or not supported by b43-fwcutter.
This file has an unknown MD5sum cb8d70972b885b1f8883b943c0261a3c.
This is the
Chris Karakas dijo [Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:39:23AM +0100]:
> Hello all,
>
> I definitely oppose the proposed patch and will NOT accept it in chm2pdf (I
> am one of the two authors)!
>
> Reasons:
>
> 1) There are easier ways to avoid the security risks.
> 2) It destroys the "--dontextract" opti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 506713 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38287
Bug#506713: g++-4.3: Incorrect code in SPARC shared libraries
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38287.
> tag 506713 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#506713: g++-4.3: Incorr
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:37:46AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:33:00AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > You claimed in your last mail that this package was uploaded
> > to the delayed queue. But I see it neither there nor in the archive.
> > Please check with you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 506428 unreproducible
Bug#506428: Data files are not downloaded
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tags 506428 unreproducible
thanks
I can't model the situation no matter how I try. My installation always
goes correctly. All the downloaded archives are unpacked and work. So I
mark the tag 'unreprodicible'.
On 11:48 Fri 21 Nov , Rafał Członka wrote:
RC> Package: rocksndiamonds
RC> Version:
Package: libvcp-perl
Version: 0.9-20050110-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* RC buggy (doesn't work with current Perl) w
* Vincent Danjean [Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:50:39 +0100]:
> reopen 500183
> found 500183 2.8.6.b-3
> forcemerge 500183 496660
> severity 500183 serious
> thanks
> Hi,
> I'm sorry to tell you that the patch proposed in 500183 in not
> applied in hplip 2.8.6.b-3 (whereas the changelog says it has b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 499244 -1
Bug#499244: sfs: should this package be removed?
Bug 499244 cloned as bug 507036.
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug#507036: sfs: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `sfs' to `wnpp'.
> severity -1 normal
Bug#507036: sfs: sh
clone 499244 -1
reassign -1 wnpp
severity -1 normal
retitle -1
thanks
Hi,
Since the status of this package has not evolved, I am now orphaning it.
I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this orphaning
could allow someone to adopt the package if appropriate.
Please reply to
clone 500646 -1
reassign -1 wnpp
severity -1 normal
retitle -1
thanks
Hi,
Since the status of this package has not evolved, I am now orphaning it.
I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this orphaning
could allow someone to adopt the package if appropriate.
Please reply to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 500646 -1
Bug#500646: directory-administrator: should this package be removed?
Bug 500646 cloned as bug 507037.
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug#507037: directory-administrator: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `directory-adminis
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:56:07PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> my suggestion is to remove fpc from oldstable and stable but unblock
> the unstable version 2.2.2-4 for lenny and trigger binNMUs for
> lazarus. What do you think?
>
> What is the correct way to remove packages from (old)stable? Sho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> reassign 361346 ftp.debian.org
Bug#361346: O: astrolog -- Customizable astrology chart calculation program
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 361346 R
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:33:00AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> You claimed in your last mail that this package was uploaded
> to the delayed queue. But I see it neither there nor in the archive.
> Please check with your sponsor whether he really uploaded it
> successfully.
Never mind. I just
You claimed in your last mail that this package was uploaded
to the delayed queue. But I see it neither there nor in the archive.
Please check with your sponsor whether he really uploaded it
successfully.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBS
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:59:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Thursday 20 November 2008 03:25:41 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >> > I have found all of the reported issues in BOTH versions marked as fixed.
>
* Philippe Coval [Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:40:58 +0100]:
> Hi,
> Thank you for reporting this, I've fixed this among other things :
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tuxguitar/
I reviewed this because I wanted to sponsor it. However, I found a
problem with it: you cannot move the packag
* Eduard Bloch [Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:23:38 +0100]:
> Version: 2.6.23-4
> #include
> * mariodebian [Wed, Nov 26 2008, 03:45:19PM]:
> > I'm very newie patching kernel stuff and he explain me some code bugs
> > like a excelent teacher.
> > David Howells is my personal hero for today. Many thanks D
Dear Nicolas and Moritz,
How long do you expect it will take to "in fact" fix this bug (which is
closed, pretend-fixed, still set to just "serious" severity)? Would it
cause problems if I posted the exploit on Monday 1 Dec?
Thanks, Paul
Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.
hello,
i have the same problem. i'm running kernel 2.6.26-1-vserver-686.
possible workarounds that work for me (i've only tested openssh sshd in the
vserver) are :
* downgrade to -3 version
* rebuild the -4 version without the 60securecaps.dpatch
* adding SYS_CHROOT bcapability
hope this helps
Hi,
Le mercredi 26 novembre 2008 à 15:09 -0600, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Dear FTP-masters,
>
> Please have a look at bug 506977 (of which the last and most explaining
> comment is below this email). The issue involved is a copyright
> infringement in the source of fpc before version 2.2.2 (i.e. ev
Hi,
Le mercredi 26 novembre 2008 à 10:42 -0600, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Package: fpc
> Version: 2.2.0-dfsg1-9
> Version: 2.0.0-4
> Severity: serious
> Thanks
>
> As can be read in the changelog of the latest version the old source of
> fpc has a copyright infringment:
> - Possible CodeGear Copyri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> found 501207 0.2.2-5.2
Bug#501207: destar doesn't start, backtrace shown
Bug marked as found in version 0.2.2-5.2 and reopened.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Package: helpdeco
Version: 2.1.3-3
Severity: grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I installed helpdeco to decompress some help files, but all I get from
it on amd64 is:
$ helpdeco bcb5tool.hlp
./bcb5tool.hlp isn't a valid WinHelp file !
Running helpdeco of same version on i3
Extra information on my system where the bug is found (see traces in
previous message)
$ reportbug --template destar
...
Package: destar
Version: 0.2.2-5.2
...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 506486 important
Bug#506486: gnome-power-manager: fails to execute action on low battery
condition
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping pr
63 matches
Mail list logo
