Package: prayer-templates-dev,prayer-templates-src
Version: prayer-templates-dev/1.3.2-dfsg1-3
Version: prayer-templates-src/1.3.2-dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-11-19
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation te
Package: libmesh-doc,tulip-doc
Version: libmesh-doc/0.6.4.dfsg-1
Version: tulip-doc/3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-11-19
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
sa
Package: gnuradio-companion,grc
Version: gnuradio-companion/3.2.2.dfsg-1
Version: grc/1.3
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-11-19
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 509367 mono-devel/2.4.2.3+dfsg-3
Bug #509367 [chicken-bin,mono-devel] chicken-bin: /usr/bin/csc conflicts with
mono-devel
The source mono-devel and version 2.4.2.3+dfsg-3 do not appear to match any
binary packages
Bug Marked as found in ve
Package: liblua5.1-iconv0,lua-iconv
Version: liblua5.1-iconv0/6-2
Version: lua-iconv/6-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-11-19
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same
Package: hunspell-de-de-frami,myspell-de-de-oldspell
Version: hunspell-de-de-frami/1:3.2.0~beta-1
Version: myspell-de-de-oldspell/1:2-25.1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-11-19
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation te
Package: liblua5.1-orbit0,liblua5.1-orbit1
Version: liblua5.1-orbit0/2.0.2-3
Version: liblua5.1-orbit1/2.1.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-11-19
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that sh
tags 556972 +pending
thanks
Hi,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Manoj Srivastava on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:14:32 -0600.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
[libselinux]: Do not ship /selinux
S
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 556972 +pending
Bug #556972 [libselinux] /selinux not in FHS
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Oops... I accidentally sent an unfinished mail.
The info I did not put:
On GParted bugzilla, a bug about parted 1.9.0 not informing the kernel
of changes to the partition table has been confirmed [1]. I believe this
bug also exists in the parted 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-5, which is now in
Debian Sid
Package: parted
Version: 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-5
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
*** Please type your report below this line ***
On GParted bugzilla, a bug about parted 1.9.0 not informing the kernel
of changes to the partition table has been confirmed [1]. I believe this
b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Thu Nov 19 07:03:42 UTC 2009
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: gtkhotkey
> tags 557026 + pending
Bug #557026 [wnpp] ITP: gtkhotkey -- Gtk hotke
Package: parted
Version: 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Parted 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19 not informing the kernel of changes to the partition
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Arch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 556972 serious
Bug #556972 [libselinux] /selinux not in FHS
Severity set to 'serious' from 'minor'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Kenton,
On 18 November 2009 at 19:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 18 November 2009 at 17:10, Kenton Varda wrote:
| | I've created a 2.2.0a release:
| |
| | SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/
| | tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2
| |
Package: haskell-regex-posix
Version: 0.93.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Looks like a missing B-D:
| Text/Regex/Posix.hs:67:7:
| Could not find module `Text.Regex.Base':
| Perhaps you haven't installed the profiling libraries for package
`regex-base-0.93.1'?
| Use -v
Package: haskell-regex-base
Version: 0.93.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Log excerpt:
| touch build-ghc6-stamp
| mv dist-ghc6 dist
| [ ! -x /usr/bin/haddock ] || debian/hlibrary.setup haddock --hyperlink-source
| hlibrary.setup: hscolour version >=1.8 is required but it could not be fo
Your message dated Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:47:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556824: fixed in meshlab 1.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #556824,
regarding meshlab: FTBFS: a2x: ERROR: xmllint --nonet --noout --valid
/build/user-meshlab_1.2.2-1-amd64-3RyqSI/meshlab-1.2.2/meshlab.1
Your message dated Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:02:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#557028: fixed in libtokyocabinet-perl 1.33-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #557028,
regarding FTBFS: BD
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Package: r-bioc-hilbertvis
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Log excerpt:
| ** R
| ** inst
| ** preparing package for lazy loading
| Warning in library(pkg, character.only = TRUE, logical.return = TRUE, lib.loc
= lib.loc) :
| there is no package called 'lattice'
| Error :
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #libtokyocabinet-perl (1.33-2) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * add zlib1g-dev and libbz2-dev to build deps (Closes: #557028)
> #
> limit source libtokyocabinet-perl
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of
'libtokyocabinet
tag 557006 patch
thanks
This seems to fix the problem I'm facing for non-ant packages. And a
random test (libjgoodies-looks-java) seems to show it's ok for ant
packages.
Mraw,
KiBi.
From 3f5175e56c5678fd06300d6336795ff548b3a556 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyril Brulebois
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 200
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 557028 + pending
Bug #557028 [libtokyocabinet-perl] FTBFS: BD
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 557006 patch
Bug #557006 [debhelper] Can't exec "ant" [broken buildsystem detection]
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
tag 557028 + pending
thanks
Some bugs are closed in revision 47455
by Ryan Niebur (ryan)
Commit message:
* add zlib1g-dev and libbz2-dev to build deps (Closes: #557028)
* Add myself to Uploaders
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On 18 November 2009 at 21:01, Robert Edmonds wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Still just one package: mumble (as mumble and mumble-server come from the
| > same source package, hence count as one, and protobuf-c-compiler comes from
| > protobuf itself and counts as zero leaving exactly one pa
retitle 557006 Can't exec "ant" [broken buildsystem detection]
thanks
Cyril Brulebois (19/11/2009):
> Build system detection is totally broken, many other packages FTBFS
> because “ant” is “detected, while it can't be executed (neither
> being in the chroots, or in Build-Depends).
Update the tit
Package: libtokyocabinet-perl
Version: 1.33-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
ld: -lz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 557006 Can't exec "ant" [broken buildsystem detection]
Bug #557006 [debhelper] dh_auto_clean: warning: ant does not support building
out of source tree
Changed Bug title to 'Can't exec "ant" [broken buildsystem detection]' from
'dh_auto_
Cyril Brulebois (19/11/2009):
> | conftest.c:42: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
> | /usr/lib/gcc/i486-kfreebsd-gnu/4.3.4/../../../libfvm.so: undefined
> reference to `sincos'
> | /usr/lib/gcc/i486-kfreebsd-gnu/4.3.4/../../../libfvm.so: undefined
> reference to `sqrt'
> | collect
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 557006 grave
Bug #557006 [debhelper] dh_auto_clean: warning: ant does not support building
out of source tree
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Still just one package: mumble (as mumble and mumble-server come from the
> same source package, hence count as one, and protobuf-c-compiler comes from
> protobuf itself and counts as zero leaving exactly one package -- mumble).
protobuf-c-compiler is built from the prot
On 18 November 2009 at 17:10, Kenton Varda wrote:
| I've created a 2.2.0a release:
|
| SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/
| tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2
| Diff from 2.2.0: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=246
|
|
On 18 November 2009 at 20:39, Robert Edmonds wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 18 November 2009 at 18:55, Robert Edmonds wrote:
| > | since the changes from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 have demonstrably broken ABI
| > | compatibility, the SONAME really should be bumped, regardless of NEW
| > | delays, e
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 555834 pending
Bug #555834 [python2.5] python-opengl: cannot import most submodules
Added tag(s) pending.
> severity 555834 important
Bug #555834 [python2.5] python-opengl: cannot import most submodules
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> at least /usr/share/freeguide/lib/retroweaver-rt-1.2.5.jar and
> /usr/share/freeguide/lib/tagsoup-1.0.1.jar is shipped as part of the
> source and installed directly without any recompilation.
Both of these jars have no been removed from the install, and there are
no others.
This change will sh
Your message dated Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:47:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#522334: fixed in came 1.9-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #522334,
regarding came: Linked with OpenSSL, seems to be a GPL violation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 18 November 2009 at 18:55, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> | since the changes from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 have demonstrably broken ABI
> | compatibility, the SONAME really should be bumped, regardless of NEW
> | delays, etc. because it is the correct thing to do, rather than breaking
On 19 November 2009 at 01:45, Sune Vuorela wrote:
| On Wednesday 18 November 2009 23:13:44 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Patrick,
| >
| > I am sorry about the breakage in mumble. I had coordinated the NMU I made
| > for protobuf 2.2 with Iustin who had suggested that I contact
| > debian-release
Package: code-saturne
Version: 2.0.0.beta2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Log excerpt:
| checking for bft version >= "1.1.0"... compatible bft version found
| configure: error: in
`/build/buildd-code-saturne_2.0.0.beta2-1-alpha-XJMnQb/code-saturne-2.0.0.beta2':
| configure: error: compa
Kenton Varda wrote:
> I've created a 2.2.0a release:
>
> SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/
> tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2
> Diff from 2.2.0: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=246
>
> I will make it live on the offi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Description: message body text
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 18 November 2009 at 18:55, Robert Edmonds wrote:
| [ kenton varda, upstream release engineer for protobuf, added to Cc. ]
|
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > I am not sure what the b
I've created a 2.2.0a release:
SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/
tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2
Diff from 2.2.0: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=246
I will make it live on the official site as soon as you confirm t
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 23:13:44 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> I am sorry about the breakage in mumble. I had coordinated the NMU I made
> for protobuf 2.2 with Iustin who had suggested that I contact
> debian-release.
>
> Nobody at the Debian release lists followed up on my pos
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:00:25PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The mathematics of Shamir secret sharing do not work correctly with x_i = 0,
> i.e. a component foo.000, so the library should reject any sharenrs array
> that contains 0, and the utilities should not produce such arrays. I'll
> prep
Bumping the soname is part of our release process, since C++ ABI
compatibility is practically impossible to maintain. Unfortunately, if SVN
is to be believed, it appears that somehow this didn't happen with the 2.2.0
release. And here I thought I had finally done a release without screwing
anythi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 553110 + patch
Bug #553110 [hercules] hercules: postinst-must-call-ldconfig
/usr/lib/libhercu.so by the dynamic library loader. Therefore,
the package must call "ldconfig" in its postinst script.
Added tag(s) pat
tags 553110 + patch
thanks
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 at 23:56:37 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 8.1.1 (ldconfig) for details.
I started to prepare an NMU for this. The libraries in Hercules don't seem
to be intended for system-wide use, and don't have proper SON
Your message dated Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:33:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556939: fixed in libgfshare 1.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #556939,
regarding libgfshare-bin: can produce broken shares containing foo.000
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
tag 555834 pending
severity 555834 important
thanks
no, it doesn't make the python2.5 package unusable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 at 14:22:38 +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> Indeed, the zero-share is not useful since in theory it'd be the data
> unchanged.
Thankfully, due to an implementation quirk, the share 000 output is a copy
of share 001, so the only differences are:
* it's mislabelled and won't
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:48:53PM +0100, Tibor Zenis wrote:
> Hello,
> the original bug is still present. To complete the upgrade I had to
> change the XkbLayout to "us" (file /etc/default/console-setup).
Do you mean that version 1.47 spans >1000 grep, sed, sort processes?
This was the bug I be
Patrick,
I am sorry about the breakage in mumble. I had coordinated the NMU I made
for protobuf 2.2 with Iustin who had suggested that I contact debian-release.
Nobody at the Debian release lists followed up on my posts. Nobody followed
up when I pointed out that the upstream soname of protobu
Am Mittwoch, 18. November 2009 09:02:45 schrieb Volker Behr:
I am very sorry. Didn't want to send that empty mail. Just a little bit clumsy
when it comes to clicking ;-).
--
GnuPG: https://www1.inf.tu-dresden.de/~s3418892/micuintus.asc
Fingerprint:1A15 A480 1F8B 07F6 9D12 3426 CEFE 74
Am Mittwoch, 18. November 2009 09:02:45 schrieb Volker Behr:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 01:05 +0100, Michael wrote:
> > Package: cups-pdf
> > Version: 2.5.0-12
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: patch
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > I do not know, whether this is a CUPS-PDF bug or not,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #aptitude (0.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * New upstream release.
> #+ Fix several crashes in the "why" code. (Closes: #546446)
> #+ The dependency solver should now ignore Recommendations that are
> # already unsatisfied. (C
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 556991 serious
Bug #556991 [sawfish] /usr/share/doc/sawfish is empty
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
severity 556991 serious
thanks
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:57:53PM -0500, Philipp Weis wrote:
> $ ll -d /usr/share/doc/sawfish*
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root6 Nov 18 14:54 sawfish
>
> $ ll /usr/share/doc/sawfish
> total 0
Oh, no :(
Thanks for the report, I'll handle it asap.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hello,
the original bug is still present. To complete the upgrade I had to
change the XkbLayout to "us" (file /etc/default/console-setup).
Best regards,
Tibor
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:36:39PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 17:31 +0100, Dirk Vogt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > (the spots marked in the pngs look 1:1 the same as in the PDF on my screen)
>
> I think that the pngs and pdf look the same IS the problem, and by the
> way logical, as the pngs are screen shots of the PDF viewer's output.
>
> In t
I have been able to reproduce the problem. I updated the mime.cache
(update-mime-database.real ~./local/share/mime). After a reboot, all
those applications (Pidgin, Iceweasel, Icedove) do segfault again, when
I try to access files (to send or save). After removing the file and
restarting the ap
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 553106 4.6.21-15
Bug #553106 [libdb4.6-java] libdb4.6-java: postinst-must-call-ldconfig
/usr/lib/libdb_java-4.6.so by the dynamic library loader.
Therefore, the package must call "ldconfig" in its postinst
scri
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:09:52 +0100
with message-id <20091118200952.ga26...@usha.takhisis.invalid>
and subject line Re: Bug#553106: libdb4.6-java: postinst-must-call-ldconfig
/usr/lib/libdb_java-4.6.soby the dynamic library loader.
Therefore, the package must call
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 555631 fixed-upstream pending
Bug #555631 [netemul] netemul: Segmentation fault while edit IP in a netcard
Added tag(s) pending and fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
clone 556810 -1
reassign -1 imagemagick
retitle -1 Please comment this strange behaviour of 'convert'
thanks
>> I've installed last sid snapshot into chroot and tried to call convert
>> util. It works fine on my environment.
LN> Well, it's totally reproducible for me. Use pbuilder, or clean up yo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 556810 -1
Bug#556810: fluxbox: FTBFS: sh: wmf2eps: not found
Bug 556810 cloned as bug 556988.
> reassign -1 imagemagick
Bug #556988 [src:fluxbox] fluxbox: FTBFS: sh: wmf2eps: not found
Bug reassigned from package 'src:fluxbox' to 'imagemagi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 536683
Bug #536683 {Done: Anton Zinoviev } [console-setup]
console-setup: Installation/upgrade freezes when non-standard XKBLAYOUT used
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to
reopen 536683
thank you
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:26:22AM +0100, Erich Schubert wrote:
>
> Note that I didn't choose "Other" in the first place. Could it be that
> the script tries to interpret "Other" as 'Go back to previous menu', but
> then just gets the cached debconf options again, thus end
[Norbert Tretkowski]
> Martin, could you please try to get this patch into the upstream
> repository?
Any news on this? It would be great to have this issue fixed before
Squeeze.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi. Any hope of having this fixed soon? Would be great if a fix was
uploaded before Squeeze. :)
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 at 15:09:07 +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> If you lose a number of shares equal-to-or-greater-than the number
> required to reconstruct the share, it might arguably provide you with a
> short period of time in which to revoke those keys. I'd be quite happy
> to receive a pa
Package: ofono-phonesim
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
> In debian/copyright
> you have the copyright holder as Intel. As far as I can tell, most
> of the files are (C) Trolltech. Should probably be corrected in a
> subsequent upload.
>
Thanks! I will fix that in the next upload. I'm filin
Hi. Any hope of having this issue fixed soon? Would be great to have
a fix in place before Squeeze. :)
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi. Any hope of having this fixed soon? Would be great to have a fix
uploaded before Squeeze. :)
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:18:16PM +0200, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 of November 2009 18:23:02 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:11:27PM +0200, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
> > > Yes, I already did that, but that didn't solve the /etc/qemu-ifup
> > > conflict...
> >
I had the same problem with gimp crashing, too. The culprit was
"~/.local/share/mime/mime.cache" I deleted it and all is fine!!!
Elliot
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:12:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556788: fixed in net-snmp 5.4.2.1~dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #556788,
regarding libsnmp-base: Please provide a more clear warning that downloading
MIBs can take hours
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:12:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552976: fixed in net-snmp 5.4.2.1~dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #552976,
regarding net-snmp: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat
`debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/netsnmp_python-1.0a1-py2.4.egg-info':
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:29:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556627: fixed in qemu 0.11.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #556627,
regarding trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/qemu-user.1.gz', which is
also in package qemu 0:0.11.0-1
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:29:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556627: fixed in qemu 0.11.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #556627,
regarding [qemu] Cannot update from 0.10.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:29:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556627: fixed in qemu 0.11.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #556627,
regarding should conflict/replace/whatever a list of packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:29:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556627: fixed in qemu 0.11.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #556627,
regarding qemu: same files in several packages without replace/conflict
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Wednesday 18 of November 2009 18:23:02 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:11:27PM +0200, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
> > Yes, I already did that, but that didn't solve the /etc/qemu-ifup
> > conflict...
> >
> > Unpacking qemu-system (from .../qemu-system_0.11.0-3_amd64.deb) ...
> >
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:54:29PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Package: libc-bin
> Version: 2.10.1-7
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Can break upgrade
>
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to upgrade an unstable system (that has not been upgraded for
> several months). The upgrade fails due to po
Hi,
> (the spots marked in the pngs look 1:1 the same as in the PDF on my screen)
I think that the pngs and pdf look the same IS the problem, and by the
way logical, as the pngs are screen shots of the PDF viewer's output.
In the PDFs and PNGs, a can see obvious problems concerning the kerning
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 556627 0.11.0-4
Bug #556627 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [qemu] should
conflict/replace/whatever a list of packages
Bug #556655 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [qemu] [qemu] Cannot
update from 0.10.6-1
Bug #556737 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [qemu] trying
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:11:27PM +0200, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 of November 2009 18:00:28 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > notfound 556627 0.11.0-3
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:39:58PM +0200, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
> > > found 556627 0.11.0-3
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Proble
Le mercredi 18 novembre 2009 à 05:47 -0800, otizonai...@yahoo.com a
écrit :
> sorry guys, my bad. I did not install all build dependencies :-(
> I assumed "apt-get -t experimental source atlas" would automatically gather
> those.
>
> "custom" target works as expected. I also noticed, as in bug
On Wednesday 18 of November 2009 18:00:28 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> notfound 556627 0.11.0-3
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:39:58PM +0200, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
> > found 556627 0.11.0-3
> > thanks
> >
> > Problems still exist in qemu 0.11.0-3...
> >
> > Unpacking qemu-system (from .../qemu-syst
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 556627 0.11.0-3
Bug#556627: should conflict/replace/whatever a list of packages
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#556655: [qemu] Cannot update from 0.10.6-1
Bug#556737: trying to overwrite '/usr/sha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 556627 0.11.0-3
Bug #556627 [qemu] should conflict/replace/whatever a list of packages
Bug #556655 [qemu] [qemu] Cannot update from 0.10.6-1
Bug #556737 [qemu] trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/qemu-user.1.gz',
which is also in pa
notfound 556627 0.11.0-3
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:39:58PM +0200, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
> found 556627 0.11.0-3
> thanks
>
> Problems still exist in qemu 0.11.0-3...
>
> Unpacking qemu-system (from .../qemu-system_0.11.0-3_amd64.deb) ...
>
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:37:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556836: fixed in libpadre-plugin-vi-perl 0.22-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #556836,
regarding libpadre-plugin-vi-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:35:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556806: fixed in haskell-regex-base 0.93.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #556806,
regarding haskell-regex-base: FTBFS: dh_haskell: Command not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
On Nov 17, Ji??í Pale??ek wrote:
>> Try to reproduce the issue in single user mode for a start.
> I did, and it is reproducible.
Try to reproduce the issue after booting with init=/bin/bash and running
ata_id from the command line with no udevd process running.
> Note that bugs causing data loss
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:35:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556834: fixed in haskell-regex-posix 0.93.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #556834,
regarding haskell-regex-posix: FTBFS: make: dh_haskell: Command not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On 18/11/09 at 15:55 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Hi, Lucas!
>
> I've installed last sid snapshot into chroot and tried to call convert
> util. It works fine on my environment.
Well, it's totally reproducible for me. Use pbuilder, or clean up your
chroot using debfoster before building.
>
Hi,
> One thing that the two failures had in common is that component x.000 was
> produced and was used to remake the share; with the default 3-of-5 setting,
> this can be expected to happen in around 2% of calls to gfsplit.
That indeed seems to fit my observations.
> The mathematics of Shamir s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 556239 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214559
Bug #556239 [amarok] amarok: new version is not able to play songs in random
order
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214559' from
'https://bugs.k
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 556627 0.11.0-3
Bug #556627 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [qemu] should
conflict/replace/whatever a list of packages
Bug #556655 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [qemu] [qemu] Cannot
update from 0.10.6-1
Bug #556737 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [qemu] trying
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
