I've taken a second look and I've noticed the CakePHP version in Debian
is a bit old and this might be the reason for the errors. The newest
version for the 1.3.x branch is 1.3.14. I think I should have filed this
bug to the cakephp package.
Can I help?
--
Bernat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: zynaddsubfx
Version: 2.4.0-1.2
Followup-For: Bug #661887
Dear Maintainer,
I experience the same situation on my system.
To investigate the problem, I have run zynaddsubfx via strace:
strace -ff -o log zynaddsubfx
That's what I've found in one of the logs, after I tried to select one of
> === release test-cluster-kill-workers ===
this one is being investigated at
http://bugs.debian.org/660802
> === release test-tls-server-verify ===
and this one at
http://bugs.debian.org/665093
thank you.
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.
Matthias Klose writes:
> On 21.03.2012 11:26, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Matthias Klose writes:
>>
>>> On 19.03.2012 15:34, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Did you read the wiki page?
Yes. Is the kind of information on which calling convention, b
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:09:22 -0500
with message-id <20331.23746.663804.755...@max.nulle.part>
and subject line Re: Bug#665239: fassets: FTBFS: Error : package 'fBasics'
could not be loaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #665239,
regarding fassets: FTBFS: Error : package 'fBasics'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # not a not a not parallel build issue, awk vs gawk
> severity 628247 serious
Bug #628247 [src:sofia-sip] sofia-sip: FTBFS: ./sofia-sip/sip_extra.h:2:1:
error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
On 22/03/12 17:43, Chris Lamb wrote:
Bernat wrote:
it just shows some strict errors and warnings instead of my cakephp
app.
Care to share?
This is the ouput:
*Strict Standards*: Non-static method App::core() should not be called
statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in
*/us
Hi Gregor,
Thanks for the bug report and thorough triaging. There were some recent
changes to the behavior of maven-debian-helper that have triggered a
cascade of FTBFS issues. We'll get this ironed out soon.
Cheers,
tony
On 03/22/2012 09:26 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> reassign 665076 velocit
Hello
First, if you don't agree with a bug's resolution please respond in
the bug itself and don't open a new one.
As the first bug reported was in the wireshark/1.0.2-3+lenny14 version
and the new one in 1.0.2-3+lenny16 I thought it was useful to report a
new bug
Actually the package is
Source: sgml-base
Version: 1.26+nmu1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering direc
On 22 March 2012 at 17:28, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| Source: fasianoptions
| Version: 2100.76-3
| Severity: serious
| Tags: wheezy sid
| User: debian...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
| Justification: FTBFS on amd64
|
| Hi,
|
| During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your
Source: ruby-prawn
Version: 1.0.0~rc1+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
08 - 6.643693e-09
> *
> iter 3910 DELTA 7.319769e-08 - 8.256553e-09
> *
> iter 3920 DELTA 2.253294e-07 - 1.448635e-08
> *****
> iter 3930 DELTA 1.873414e-04 - 4.177023e-0
On 22 March 2012 at 17:29, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| Source: fassets
| Version: 2100.78-3
| Severity: serious
| Tags: wheezy sid
| User: debian...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
| Justification: FTBFS on amd64
|
| Hi,
|
| During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your packa
Source: request-tracker3.8
Version: 3.8.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enteri
Source: ruby-childprocess
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> fakeroot debian/
Source: ruby-fast-gettext
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> fakeroot debian/
Source: sslh
Version: 1.10-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/«
Source: xml-core
Version: 0.13
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory `
Source: teseq
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `
Source: ruby-mathml
Version: 0.11-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: performous
Version: 0.6.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: ruby-net-http-persistent
Version: 2.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> fakeroot
Source: twidge
Version: 1.0.8.1+nmu1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direc
> make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
> # (catch top-levelBuild killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of
> inactivity
>
> Build finished at 20120322-0006
T
Source: request-tracker4
Version: 4.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ruby-treetop
Version: 1.4.10-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> fakeroot debian/rule
Source: r-cran-vgam
Version: 0.8-4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direc
Source: parcimonie
Version: 0.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering director
Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:32:07 +0100,
Paul Menzel a écrit :
> It has been failing since I wrote the original report and was never
> fully configured.
What is "dpkg -l policycoreutils" saying?
Cheers
Laurent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> debug 10
Debug level 10.
> forcemerge 664983 664991
considering bug 664983 for merge
$caller = 'main';
$param = '/usr/lib/debbugs/service';
$VAR3 = 887;
$VAR4 = 'Debbugs::Control::set_merged';
$VAR5 = 1;
$VAR6 = undef;
$VAR7 = undef;
$VAR8 = unde
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:47:00PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: libpng
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> This is CVE-2012-3045:
>
> Fix in Chromium repository:
> http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/third_party/libpng/pngrutil.c?r1=125311&r2=125310&pathrev=125311
I
Bernat wrote:
> it just shows some strict errors and warnings instead of my cakephp
> app.
Care to share?
Also, does your app work with PHP 5.4.0 outside of cakephp-instaweb..?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # now in unstable
> severity 661384 serious
Bug #661384 [gdb-msp430] gdb-msp430: FTBFS with gdb 7.4
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
661384: http://bugs.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # FTBFS
> severity 656669 serious
Bug #656669 [gedit-latex-plugin] gedit-latex-plugin: FTBFS due to
latex/latex/environment.py not in POTFILES.in
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Source: liborlite-mirror-perl
Version: 1.23-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: esorex
Version: 3.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory
Source: libpadre-plugin-git-perl
Version: 0.03-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: En
Source: libflexdock-java
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules buil
Source: cacti
Version: 0.8.7i-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: bustle
Version: 0.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: arbtt
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> test -x
Source: fassets
Version: 2100.78-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directo
Source: nodejs
Version: 0.6.12~dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: bluetile
Version: 0.5.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> test
Source: ax25-tools
Version: 0.0.10-rc2+cvs20120204-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]
ed subtests: 48 okay)
> t/50-pl-info.t ok
> make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
> make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
> make: *** Waiting for unfinishe
Source: fasianoptions
Version: 2100.76-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering d
Source: libanyevent-perl
Version: 6.140-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering
Source: libmoosex-method-signatures-perl
Version: 0.37-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: nfqueue-bindings
Version: 0.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: jenkins-commons-jelly
Version: 1.1-jenkins-20110627-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libpadre-plugin-datawalker-perl
Version: 0.04-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make
Source: libconfig-model-perl
Version: 2.011-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules
Source: libgnupg-perl
Version: 0.18-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering dire
Source: libzip
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory `
Source: ipython
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: gitalist
Version: 0.003006+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libcatalyst-modules-perl
Version: 43
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enteri
Source: libdancer-plugin-database-perl
Version: 1.81-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[
Source: mtasc
Version: 1.14-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/
Source: libpadre-plugin-perlcritic-perl
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make
Package: cakephp-instaweb
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading to PHP 5.4.0 it has stopped working. It starts normally but
when I open the browser it just shows some strict errors and warnings instead
of my cakephp app.
-- System Information:
De
Package: ensembl
Version: 63-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the attach
Dear Laurent,
Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2012, 11:08 +0100 schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
> Le Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:57:08 +0100,
> Paul Menzel a écrit :
> > Am Dienstag, den 20.03.2012, 19:02 + schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
> >
> > I still get this error.
> >
> > $ LANG=C sudo aptitude sa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 665076 velocity 1.7-2
Bug #665076 [src:libjpfcodegen-java] libjpfcodegen-java: FTBFS: [javac]
CodeGenerator.java:223: cannot find symbol
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libjpfcodegen-java' to 'velocity'.
No longer marked as found in
reassign 665076 velocity 1.7-2
retitle 665076 velocity: /usr/share/java/velocity.jar missing
affects 665076 libjpfcodegen-java
thanks
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:20:39 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libjpfcodegen-java
> Version: 0.4+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian.
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:25:17 +0100
with message-id <20120322162517.ga19...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#665062: flowscan: FTBFS: configure: error: Please
change /etc/services so that the service name for 80/tcp is http with alias www
has caused the Debian Bug report #
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:05:45 +0100
with message-id <20120322160545.ga18...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#665030: joblib: FTBFS: OSError: [Errno 13] Permission
denied
has caused the Debian Bug report #665030,
regarding joblib: FTBFS: OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denie
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:07:12 +0100
with message-id <20120322160712.ga19...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#665024: numexpr: FTBFS: OSError: [Errno 13] Permission
denied
has caused the Debian Bug report #665024,
regarding numexpr: FTBFS: OSError: [Errno 13] Permission den
severity #665207 important
tags #665207 + wontfix
thanks
As discussed on IRC this can not be fixed until the fixed version itself
is in testing.
I will close the bug, if the package migrates to testing.
Am 22.03.2012 16:47, schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
Package: otrs2
Version: 3.1.2+dfsg1-3
Seve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity #665207 important
Bug #665207 [otrs2] otrs2: fails to upgrade from testing
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags #665207 + wontfix
Bug #665207 [otrs2] otrs2: fails to upgrade from testing
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stoppin
Am 22.03.2012 16:47, schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
Step 2 of 23: Check framework version... done.
Step 3 of 23: Creating DynamicField tables (if necessary)... done.
Step 4 of 23: Create new dynamic fields for free fields (text, key, date)...
error encountered processing
/usr/share/dbconf
Package: libpng
Severity: grave
Tags: security
This is CVE-2012-3045:
Fix in Chromium repository:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/third_party/libpng/pngrutil.c?r1=125311&r2=125310&pathrev=125311
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.d
Package: otrs2
Version: 3.1.2+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
>From the attached log (scroll to the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> severity 664990 grave
Bug #664990 [libzip1] libzip1: CVE-2012-1162 CVE-2012-1163 Incorrect loop
construct and numeric overflow
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
>
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.4.3~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.2 Maintainer scripts idempotency
Dear Reader,
When configured with NIS, deluser doesn't work properly. This is a bug in
itself, but I can't find the right place to file *that*.
Since part of the upgrade process of *s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 665190 1.0.6-1
Bug #665190 [wireshark] wireshark: Wireshark hangs when clicking on any button
in interfaces selection box
Marked as fixed in versions wireshark/1.0.6-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
fixed 665190 1.0.6-1
thanks
Hi mediaf,
First, if you don't agree with a bug's resolution please respond in
the bug itself and don't open a new one.
2012/3/22, mediaf :
> Package: wireshark
> Version: 1.0.2-3+lenny16
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Actually the package
Package: slapd
Version: 2.4.28-1.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
(in 'squeeze'), remove (but not purge), distupgrade to 'wheezy',
and install again.
Before the second installation the
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:20:53 +0100
with message-id <1332429653.20998.5.camel@Nokia-N900-02-8>
and subject line Unblock sat4j
has caused the Debian Bug report #662976,
regarding [sat4j] Delay sat4j 2.3.1-1 transition to testing - breaks eclipse
plugins
to be marked as done.
This me
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 663269 + pending
Bug #663269 {Done: Bastian Blank } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-*: New kernels with real-time patches completely unusable
Bug #663379 {Done: Bastian Blank } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-amd64: X will not start w
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#665058: fixed in node-eio 0.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665058,
regarding node-eio: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/build/default/eio.node':
No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This
Package: wireshark
Version: 1.0.2-3+lenny16
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After starting Wireshark, I click on menu "Capture / Interfaces"
In this box, whatever button Iclick for any interface, Options, Start or even
Close, it makes Wireshark hang,
and there's nothing to
Package: petitboot
Severity: serious
Version: 12.03.09.18.03-ge7a5571-1
Package "petitboot" can't be removed.
cupt> purge petitboot --no-auto-remove
Building the package cache...
Initializing package resolver and worker...
Scheduling requested actions...
Resolving possible unmet dependenci
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:13:46 +0100
with message-id <20120322141343.ga24...@crater2.logilab.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#665092: libpcre3: libpcre.so.3 file missing
has caused the Debian Bug report #665092,
regarding libpcre3: libpcre.so.3 file missing
to be marked as done.
This mea
Package: libpcre3
Version: 8.30-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
It looks like there is some error in the name and/or version of .so files and
links
Found:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.2.13.1
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.2
Expected:
/lib/x86_6
On 22 March 2012 14:42, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> My version of /etc/services has:
> # cat /etc/services |grep http
> www 80/tcp http
According with netbase 4.47 [1]:
$ grep http /etc/services
...
http80/tcp www # WorldWideWeb HTTP
...
So, I gue
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:47:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#662748: fixed in highlight 2.16-1+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #662748,
regarding highlight: fails to install, remove, distupgrade, and install again -
prompting due to modified conffiles which wh
On 22/03/12 at 12:58 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:26:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > amd64.
> >
> > Relevant part:
> > > debian/rules build
> > > test -f debian/rules
> > > cp -p /u
This looks like an absent mounted /dev/shm or mounted without proper
permissions
Please verify
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: joblib
> Version: 0.6.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
> Justifi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:26:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part:
> > debian/rules build
> > test -f debian/rules
> > cp -p /usr/share/misc/config.guess /usr/share/misc/config.sub .
> > ./configur
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:18:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#664628: fixed in makehuman 1.0.0~alpha6-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #664628,
regarding makehuman: FTBFS when only building architecture-dependent package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: php5-xcache
Version: 1.3.2-1.1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Current version does not work with the php 5.4 in the archive, but crashes with
segfault.
#0 ZEND_SEND_VAL_SPEC_CONST_HANDLER (execute_data=0x7f687334e098)
at /tmp/buildd/php5-5.4.0/Zend/zend_
Package: gnome-boxes
Severity: grave
Version: 3.3.91-1
It fails with the following error message
(gnome-boxes:7818): Boxes-CRITICAL **: media-manager.vala:26: Error
connecting to Tracker:
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
org.freedesktop.Tracker1 was not provided by
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 664983 664991
Bug #664983 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" } [libpcre3]
libpcre3: wrong SONAME
Bug #664991 [libpcre3] libpcre.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
Marked Bug as
Fixed upstream. Did not get around to it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 664983 + desktop-file-utils
Bug #664983 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" } [libpcre3]
libpcre3: wrong SONAME
Added indication that 664983 affects desktop-file-utils
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 664991 libpcre3
Bug #664991 [desktop-file-utils] libpcre.so.3: cannot open shared object file:
No such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package 'desktop-file-utils' to 'libpcre3'.
No longer marked as found in versions desktop-file-u
Source: sitemesh
Version: 2.4.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering dir
101 - 200 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
