Bug#682203: moodle: diff for NMU version 2.2.3.dfsg-2.2

2012-07-23 Thread Didier Raboud
Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for moodle (versioned as 2.2.3.dfsg-2.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru moodle-2.2.3.dfsg/debian/changelog moodle-2.2.3.dfsg/debian/changelog --- moodle-2.2.3.dfsg/debian/changelog

Bug#682527: haskell-yesod-routes: FTBFS: Don't use ghc-ghci virtual-package-name on Build-Depends

2012-07-23 Thread Hiroyuki Yamamoto
(2012-07-24 02:30 +), Clint Adams wrote: On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:05:28AM +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote: Don't use ghc-ghci virtual-package-name on Build-Depends, because it has not been allowed yet by Debian-Policy to use the virtual-package-name of ghc-ghci. How is this a FTBFS?

Processed: severity of 682125 is minor

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 682125 minor Bug #682125 [ca-certificates] ca-certificates: removes directories that were installed by another package: /etc/ssl/certs/ Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#682183: the list of FTBFSes

2012-07-23 Thread Aron Xu
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 09:19:40PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: Thank you! We'll need to make sure this version be unblocked by release team so newly built binaries depending on liblua5.1 can migrate to testing without

Bug#682527: marked as done (haskell-yesod-routes: FTBFS: Don't use ghc-ghci virtual-package-name on Build-Depends)

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:59:27 + with message-id 20120723175927.ga19...@scru.org and subject line Re: Bug#682527: haskell-yesod-routes: FTBFS: Don't use ghc-ghci virtual-package-name on Build-Depends has caused the Debian Bug report #682527, regarding haskell-yesod-routes:

Bug#682203: marked as done (Multiple security issues)

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:32:13 + with message-id e1stnqt-0005jp...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#682203: fixed in moodle 2.2.3.dfsg-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #682203, regarding Multiple security issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#675971: Bug#682010: [mumble] Communication failures due to CELT codec library removal

2012-07-23 Thread Chris Knadle
On Monday, July 23, 2012 13:26:57, Don Armstrong wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Chris Knadle wrote: On Monday, July 23, 2012 10:34:28, Ian Jackson wrote: Of these 2. would seem to be the best option. I agree. [...] I believe in order to actually evaluate any of these solutions,

Bug#682384: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Fix race condition in parallel execution of make install.

2012-07-23 Thread Ethan Jackson
Looks good, thanks. Ethan On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote: ovs-vsctl is listed, incorrectly, in both bin_PROGRAMS and bin_SCRIPTS. This meant that make install with the -j option could try to install ovs-vsctl two times in parallel, a race that occasionally

Bug#682384: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Fix race condition in parallel execution of make install.

2012-07-23 Thread Ben Pfaff
Thanks. I pushed this fix to master and branch-1.[87654]. On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:34:33PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: Looks good, thanks. Ethan On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote: ovs-vsctl is listed, incorrectly, in both bin_PROGRAMS and bin_SCRIPTS.

Bug#682574: live-tools, procps: live-tools and procps must consistently handle /usr/bin/uptime

2012-07-23 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: live-tools,procps Severity: serious Hi, live-utils (3.0.3-1) * diverts /usr/bin/uptime to /usr/bin/uptime.procps * does not divert uptime.1.gz * ships /usr/bin/uptime - live-uptime procps (1:3.3.3-2) * ships /usr/bin/uptime * ships uptime.1.gz * installs an alternative for uptime if

Processed: tagging 672870, tagging 664261, tagging 682382, tagging 682499, found 682574 in live-utils/3.0.3-1 ...

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 672870 - moreinfo + upstream Bug #672870 {Done: Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de} [nvidia-glx] nvidia-glx: Hang when switching to text-mode (only when using Xinerama), nvidia-295.40 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. Bug #672870 {Done: Andreas

Bug#682433: marked as done (pandoc: FTBFS[mips* sparc s390x]: threading detection broken)

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:48:04 + with message-id e1stpxw-0004im...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#682433: fixed in pandoc 1.9.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #682433, regarding pandoc: FTBFS[mips* sparc s390x]: threading detection broken to be marked as done. This

Bug#682248: marked as done (monodoc-browser: postinst errors)

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:47:50 + with message-id e1stpxi-0004gq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#682248: fixed in mono-tools 2.10-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #682248, regarding monodoc-browser: postinst errors to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#682401: dbmmanage: please use Digest::SHA instead of Digest::SHA1

2012-07-23 Thread Arno Töll
tags 682401 + pending thanks Hi, On 22.07.2012 22:22, Stefan Fritsch wrote: AFAICS, dbmmanage has not seen a single code commit upstream since the C variant, htdbm, has been introduced in 2001. Maybe we should get rid of dbmmanage in the 2.4 packages. But unbreaking it for wheezy by using

Processed: Re: Bug#682401: dbmmanage: please use Digest::SHA instead of Digest::SHA1

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 682401 + pending Bug #682401 [apache2-utils] dbmmanage: please use Digest::SHA instead of Digest::SHA1 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 682401:

Bug#672439: marked as done (ufw: destroy all iptable rules on purging (breaks e.g. fail2ban))

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:03:12 + with message-id e1strei-0005dz...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#672439: fixed in ufw 0.31.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #672439, regarding ufw: destroy all iptable rules on purging (breaks e.g. fail2ban) to be marked as done. This

Bug#682574: live-tools, procps: live-tools and procps must consistently handle /usr/bin/uptime

2012-07-23 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:18:28PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Mixing diversions and alternatives is not trivial ... I know from cleaning up the nvidia-graphics-driver and fglrx-driver diversion mess for /usr/lib/libGL.so* :-) I believe there is also something about packages diverting others

Bug#681347: still encountering this bug

2012-07-23 Thread unk
Hi, I'm still getting this bug, using the Wheezy weekly build http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-xfce+lxde-CD-1.iso from 23-Jul-2012. It also still occurs in the corresponding weekly netinst image. regards Nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: reopening Bug#671785: segfaults when running reportbug

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unarchive 671785 Bug #671785 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org} [python2.7] segfaults when running reportbug Unarchived Bug 671785 reopen 671785 Bug #671785 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org} [python2.7] segfaults when running reportbug

Bug#682384: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Fix race condition in parallel execution of make install.

2012-07-23 Thread Simon Horman
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: ovs-vsctl is listed, incorrectly, in both bin_PROGRAMS and bin_SCRIPTS. This meant that make install with the -j option could try to install ovs-vsctl two times in parallel, a race that occasionally caused a build failure, e.g.:

Bug#669384: jxplorer: simple authentification (user + password) unavailable

2012-07-23 Thread Gabriele Giacone
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 03:45:16PM +0200, Luc Novales wrote: anonymous acces works perfectly but user + password acces return an error : Error opening connection: [LDAP: error code 49 - Invalid Credentials] using sourceforge version 3.3b3 allow connexion on the same server (but have

Bug#682602: libnet-dns-perl_0.68-1 FTBFS: missing build-dep on netbase

2012-07-23 Thread Adam Conrad
Package: libnet-dns-perl Version: 0.68-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Okay, so I'm not going to bother including an actually diff/patch for a 9-character addition to debian/control, but consider this a verbal patch. :P On several buildds (and it should have been on all of them), the testsuite

Bug#681069: NMUing

2012-07-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
No maintainer reply for ~ 2 weeks on a bug that's been RC for ~a week, so I'll go ahead an upload it. NMU diff attached. Note that this bug doesn't currently affect testing, only unstable, but if the python2.7 update gets let through, then it will. Scott Kdiff -Nru

Bug#681069: marked as done (Throws exceptions when run)

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2012 03:32:11 + with message-id e1stvr1-0003dd...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#681069: fixed in linkchecker 7.9-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #681069, regarding Throws exceptions when run to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: fixed 677801 in 1.1-3

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: fixed 677801 1.1-3 Bug #677801 {Done: Carl Chenet cha...@debian.org} [python-pip] AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'uses_fragment' Marked as fixed in versions python-pip/1.1-3. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: tagging 680931

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 680931 + fixed-upstream Bug #680931 [g++-4.7] libarmadillo-dev: trivial program fails to compile Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 680931:

Bug#679454: Switching to 2.6 is the wrong answer

2012-07-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
All you have to do is make sure you catch the attribute error at these two lines: gwibber/gwui.py:if gwibber not in urlparse.uses_query: gwibber/gwui.py: urlparse.uses_query.append(gwibber) if urlparse.uses_qwery doesn't exist (as it doesn't in the 2.7.3 in unstable). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#470294: About PHP Code Sniffer

2012-07-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 07/23/2012 07:09 PM, Ruben Rubio Rey wrote: Hi Thomas, hereby Cc:-ing), I don't know if it is still relevant for the latest version that I have NMUed. What is to find out is if it is still relevant with version 1.3.4-0.1 The patch that you did is working for me.

Bug#681069: First NMU was wrong

2012-07-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
Here's the revised NMU diff.diff -Nru linkchecker-7.9/debian/changelog linkchecker-7.9/debian/changelog --- linkchecker-7.9/debian/changelog 2012-07-23 23:03:31.0 -0400 +++ linkchecker-7.9/debian/changelog 2012-07-24 01:02:14.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +linkchecker (7.9-2.2)

Bug#681069: marked as done (Throws exceptions when run)

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2012 05:17:18 + with message-id e1stxuk-00044f...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#681069: fixed in linkchecker 7.9-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #681069, regarding Throws exceptions when run to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#682183: the list of FTBFSes

2012-07-23 Thread Aron Xu
, and will follow-up when it gets done. Hi, The rebuild was done, and no regression was found, build logs are at: http://people.debian.org/~aron/rebuild/lua5.1/20120723/ -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Bug#682574: live-tools, procps: live-tools and procps must consistently handle /usr/bin/uptime

2012-07-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/24/2012 01:16 AM, Craig Small wrote: A possible solution that should work: * procps ships uptime.procps and uptime.procps.1.gz * live-utils ships live-uptime and live-uptime.1.gz * both register an alternative for uptime with uptime.1.gz slave Yep, would of done it had I known about it,

<    1   2