> I'm really not familiar with humanfriendly - could you at least give us
> a hint on what backward incompatible changes were made?
the upgrade was rather huge, we went form 4.18 to 8.1 so there could
be several changes.
You may want to have a look at the upstream changelog, available at:
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2020 03:49:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#936114: fixed in alabaster 0.7.8-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #936114,
regarding alabaster: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2020 03:34:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#954527: fixed in cutesdr 1.20-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #954527,
regarding cutesdr: FTBFS: discover.h:24:10: fatal error: stropts.h: No such
file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2020 03:35:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937468: fixed in pylibmc 1.5.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #937468,
regarding pylibmc: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing control commands:
> tags 936114 + patch
Bug #936114 [src:alabaster] alabaster: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) patch.
--
936114: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936114
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags 936114 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for alabaster (versioned as 0.7.8-1.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Regards.
diff -Nru alabaster-0.7.8/debian/changelog alabaster-0.7.8/debian/changelog
--- alabaster-0.7.8/debian/changelog 2016-06-11
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2020 03:16:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937830: fixed in python-imagesize 1.2.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #937830,
regarding python-imagesize: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2020 03:16:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#938125: fixed in python-redis 3.3.11-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #938125,
regarding python-redis: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2020 03:16:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937817: fixed in python-httplib2 0.14.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #937817,
regarding python-httplib2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2020 03:15:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925704: fixed in gramophone2 0.8.13a-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #925704,
regarding gramophone2: ftbfs with GCC-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2020 03:16:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937773: fixed in python-future 0.18.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #937773,
regarding python-future: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2020 03:16:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937549: fixed in pystemmer 1.3.0+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #937549,
regarding pystemmer: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937459 [src:pyinotify] pyinotify: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937459: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937459
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #937459 in pyinotify reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937468 [src:pylibmc] pylibmc: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937468: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #937468 in pylibmc reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937549 [src:pystemmer] pystemmer: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937549: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937549
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #937549 in pystemmer reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #937596 in python-babel reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937596 [src:python-babel] python-babel: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937596: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #937773 in python-future reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937773 [src:python-future] python-future: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937773: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937773
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi,
Ian Jackson wrote[1]:
> [ some git-debrebase invocation etc. ]
> + git reflog
> + egrep 'debrebase new-upstream.*checkout'
> + rc=1
>
> I have looked at the log and repro'd the bug.
>
> git-debrebase (which lives in src:dgit but does not depend on dgit)
> must invoke git-rebase. It sets
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937817 [src:python-httplib2] python-httplib2: Python2 removal in
sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937817: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937817
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #937817 in python-httplib2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937830 [src:python-imagesize] python-imagesize: Python2 removal in
sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937830: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937830
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #937830 in python-imagesize reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2
> from bullseye
> # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # See
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #936659 in gr-hpsdr reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #936659 [src:gr-hpsdr] gr-hpsdr: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
936659: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936659
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + fixed-upstream
Bug #950112 [gplaycli] gplaycli: 502 Bad Gateway, does not work at all
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #950112 to the same tags previously set
--
950112: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950112
Debian Bug Tracking
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 23:50:24 +0100 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> After installation, gplaycli --help works (but please do add
> a manual page), but nothing else:
The error is now different:
$ gplaycli -d com.skype.raider
[ERROR] Unknown error: New version of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> > > found 955152 + 1:2.26.0-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> > Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> found 955152 1:2.26.0-1
Bug #955152 [git] git-rebase
Control: tags 925704 + patch
Control: tags 925704 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gramophone2 (versioned as 0.8.13a-3.1) and
uploaded it to mentors for sponsoring. Please feel free to tell me if I
should remove it.
--
Regards
Sudip
diff -Nru
Processing control commands:
> tags 925704 + patch
Bug #925704 [src:gramophone2] gramophone2: ftbfs with GCC-9
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 925704 + pending
Bug #925704 [src:gramophone2] gramophone2: ftbfs with GCC-9
Added tag(s) pending.
--
925704:
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2020 00:34:39 +
with message-id <20200328003439.gk5...@tack.einval.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#925816: marked as done (qxw: ftbfs with GCC-9)
has caused the Debian Bug report #925816,
regarding qxw: ftbfs with GCC-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 955152 git
Bug #955152 [src:git, src:dgit] git breaks dgit autopkgtest: gdr-newupstream
test failed
Bug reassigned from package 'src:git, src:dgit' to 'git'.
No longer marked as found in versions dgit/9.10 and git/1:2.26.0-1.
Ignoring
Hi Alberto,
> libfiu now fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
>
> […]
>
> ./wrap-python 3 ./test-set_prng_seed.py
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../libfiu/
> LD_PRELOAD="../../preload/run/fiu_run_preload.so
> ../../preload/posix/fiu_posix_preload.so" ./tests/open.bin
>
On 2020-03-27 22:44:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 01:01:28PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/anarcat/gameclock/issues/1
>>
>> Understood.
>
> Hi Antoine,
> let's remove gameclock from the archive for now? When ported it
> can
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:04:29 -0700
with message-id <20200327230429.gt50...@kduck.mit.edu>
and subject line openafs armhf issues specific to buildd network configuration
has caused the Debian Bug report #953729,
regarding openafs: FTBFS on armhf
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: syrthes
Version: 4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1~exp1
Severity: serious
thanks
Dear Maintainer,
please add the missing LGPL licenses of some header files to your
debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:42:40AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:python-nemu
> Version: 0.3.1-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: py2removal
>
> Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> Python2 from
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:50:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944170: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #944170,
regarding kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-8)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:50:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955166: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #955166,
regarding FTBFS with gcc-9: undefined reference to bsd_getopt, etc.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:49:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944167: fixed in gcc-mingw-w64 22
has caused the Debian Bug report #944167,
regarding gcc-mingw-w64: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-8)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:49:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950090: fixed in gcc-mingw-w64 22
has caused the Debian Bug report #950090,
regarding gcc-mingw-w64: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
to be marked as done.
This means that
reassign 955152 git
found 955152 + 1:2.26.0-1
notfound 955152 + 1:2.25.1-1 1:2.11.0-3+deb9u5
retitle 955152 git-rebase ignores or squashes GIT_REFLOG_ACTION
user debian...@lists.debian.org
usertags 955152 - needs-update
thanks
Hi all. Thanks to Paul for actually filing this bug.
tl;dr: I think
It was the first time I reported a bug, as far as I remember.
Anyway, there seems to be some kind of "conflict" between the version which
would be installed of libgcc-8-dev and the already installed one of
libgcc-s1. Do you agree?
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 7:24 PM Sylvestre Ledru
wrote:
Yeah, I think this is a problem with gcc-8. I had that too on some system.
S
Le 27/03/2020 à 23:22, Mauricio Calvao a écrit :
Dear Sylvestre,
Let me be quite explicit about what is happening here within my Debian
sid(uction) KDE desktop machine.
yeah, please more explicit in the future
Dear Sylvestre,
Let me be quite explicit about what is happening here within my Debian
sid(uction) KDE desktop machine.
When, always as root of course, I issue the command:
apt install libclang-dev
I get the output:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
Hi Faidon,
Do you need some help ?
Do you think reporting this upstream can help ?
Also, I am not really used to report bug or help in bug triage.
So, tell me if I am doing something wrong.
Regards,
Jean-Marc
https://6jf.be/keys/ED863AD1.txt
pgpDHayJL2YQU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:59:35PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Moritz Mühlenhoff 2020-03-27
> <20200327215634.GA1565432@pisco.westfalen.local>
> > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 07:16:47PM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > > There has been some discussion about #936299 on the upstream mailing
> > >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 944170 + pending
Bug #944170 [kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build
(gcc-8)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
944170:
Re: Moritz Mühlenhoff 2020-03-27
<20200327215634.GA1565432@pisco.westfalen.local>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 07:16:47PM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > There has been some discussion about #936299 on the upstream mailing list,
> > and
> > there have been a few upstream commits starting to port the
Hi Justin,
Most likely, this is due to the new openssl version in unstable.
Lucas
On 27/03/20 at 17:15 -0400, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> James,
>
> I finally got a Debian sid environment up. However, I'm seeing a different
> sets of test failures right now against vanilla serf 1.4.x and
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 07:16:47PM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> There has been some discussion about #936299 on the upstream mailing list, and
> there have been a few upstream commits starting to port the code to Python3.
>
>
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 15:30 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Thanks for the report. Downgrading python3-humanfriendly to
> > buster's
> > version fixes the issue, so it looks like a backward-incompatible
> > change in the new version.
> >
> > Reference to the class using it:
> >
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 955166 + pending
Bug #955166 [src:kfreebsd-10] FTBFS with gcc-9: undefined reference to
bsd_getopt, etc.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
955166:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 01:01:28PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/anarcat/gameclock/issues/1
>
> Understood.
Hi Antoine,
let's remove gameclock from the archive for now? When ported it
can still be reintroduced, but currently it's among the last
handful
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 02:42:22AM -0500, Thomas Ross wrote:
> I've started to port Mirage to Python 3 + PyGObject here:
> https://gitlab.com/thomasross/mirage/tree/python3
What's the status? If this isn't complete, could we upload
that to experimental and remove mirage from unstable (which
Ah, yes, I didn’t re-run the cert creation...so, that might be why those
tests are failing. I just tried to run the cert creation script and it
seems that pyOpenSSL’s interfaces have changed.
But, the test that the Debian builder flagged didn’t fail...
So, I will start from your package and
Package: src:kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.3~svn300087-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
kfreebsd-10 FTBFS with gcc-9 due to:
| gcc-9 -D_GNU_SOURCE -isystem /usr/include/freebsd
-I/home/build/kfreebsd-10-10.3~svn300087/flavor-10.3-0-amd64/sys/modules/aic7xxx/aicasm
-I../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 945699 serious
Bug #945699 [src:pysiogame] pysiogame: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 945699 to the same value.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Source: r-cran-sf
Version: 0.9-0+dfsg-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
Since the upload of 0.9-0+dfsg-1, r-cran-sf fails its own autopkgtests
[1], which passed previously. I've copied what I hope is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 943075 serious
Bug #943075 [src:impressive] impressive: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
943075:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 945699 serious
Bug #945699 [src:pysiogame] pysiogame: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
945699:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:16:06AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:dvcs-autosync
> Version: 0.5+nmu1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: py2removal
>
> Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> Python2 from
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:15:24PM -0400, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> James,
>
> I finally got a Debian sid environment up. However, I'm seeing a different
> sets of test failures right now against vanilla serf 1.4.x and trunk (which
> works with the scons/python3 in sid without a patch AFAICT) -
James,
I finally got a Debian sid environment up. However, I'm seeing a different
sets of test failures right now against vanilla serf 1.4.x and trunk (which
works with the scons/python3 in sid without a patch AFAICT) - this is with
1.4.x branch:
---
== Running the unit tests ==
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:02:00 +0100
with message-id <77998651-4527-95b7-8a66-3bf8188d5...@debian.org>
and subject line node-unicode-13 released
has caused the Debian Bug report #954609,
regarding node-regexpu-core: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
Source: golang-github-facebookgo-stack
Version: 0.0~git20160209.0.7517733-7
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of golang-github-facebookgo-stack the autopkgtest
of
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:02:00 +0100
with message-id <77998651-4527-95b7-8a66-3bf8188d5...@debian.org>
and subject line node-unicode-13 released
has caused the Debian Bug report #954592,
regarding node-regjsparser: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
node-unicode-13.0.0
to be
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:02:00 +0100
with message-id <77998651-4527-95b7-8a66-3bf8188d5...@debian.org>
and subject line node-unicode-13 released
has caused the Debian Bug report #954546,
regarding node-regenerate-unicode-properties: FTBFS: build-dependency not
installable:
Source: upx-ucl
Version: 3.96-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of upx-ucl the autopkgtest of upx-ucl fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
Package: python3-openshot
Version: 0.2.2+dfsg1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After the transition to Python 3.8 one is no longer able to install Openshot:
$ sudo apt install python3-openshot
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
Source: git, dgit
Control: found -1 git/1:2.26.0-1
Control: found -1 dgit/9.10
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of dgit
Processing control commands:
> found -1 git/1:2.26.0-1
Bug #955152 [src:git, src:dgit] git breaks dgit autopkgtest: gdr-newupstream
test failed
Marked as found in versions git/1:2.26.0-1.
> found -1 dgit/9.10
Bug #955152 [src:git, src:dgit] git breaks dgit autopkgtest: gdr-newupstream
test
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 21:47:50 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#955144: libclang-dev: package could not be installed
has caused the Debian Bug report #955144,
regarding libclang-dev: package could not be installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hello,
Le 27/03/2020 à 19:37, Mauricio Calvao a écrit :
Package: libclang-dev
Version: 1:9.0-49.1
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I think the problem showed up after I did a recent full-upgrade of my
operating system
* What exactly did you do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 954302 tika/1.5-1
Bug #954302 [src:tika] tika: CVE-2020-1951
Marked as found in versions tika/1.5-1.
> found 954303 tika/1.5-1
Bug #954303 [src:tika] tika: CVE-2020-1950
Marked as found in versions tika/1.5-1.
>
End of message, stopping
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 20:14:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#936855: fixed in libextractor-python 1:0.6-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #936855,
regarding libextractor-python: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 20:15:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#938586: fixed in sugar-datastore 0.116-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #938586,
regarding sugar-datastore: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 20:14:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937803: fixed in python-gwebsockets 0.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #937803,
regarding python-gwebsockets: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 955151 RUSTSEC-2020-0006: Flaw in `realloc` allows reading unknown
> memory
Bug #955151 [src:rust-bumpalo] rust-bumpalo: RUSTSEC-2020-0006:Flaw in
`realloc` allows reading unknown memory
Changed Bug title to 'RUSTSEC-2020-0006: Flaw in
Source: rust-bumpalo
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
Forwarded: https://github.com/fitzgen/bumpalo/issues/69
Hi
Please see https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2020-0006.html and
the upstream issue at
> Thanks for the report. Downgrading python3-humanfriendly to buster's
> version fixes the issue, so it looks like a backward-incompatible
> change in the new version.
>
> Reference to the class using it:
>
>
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:24:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955146: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936770,
regarding jsonpipe: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:25:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955147: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938237,
regarding python-ucltip: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:21:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955141: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938359,
regarding rest2web: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:23:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955145: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938176,
regarding python-smbpasswd: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:21:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955140: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #935738,
regarding python-webunit: please port to python 3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:21:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955140: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938260,
regarding python-webunit: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:24:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955143: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936474,
regarding elib.intl: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:22:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955142: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936188,
regarding bbqsql: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:20:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955047: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938124,
regarding python-recaptcha: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:19:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#920500: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938040,
regarding python-poster: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 955000 azure-cli
Bug #955000 [python3-humanfriendly] azure-cli: Autopkgtest failure in unstable
Added indication that 955000 affects azure-cli
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
955000:
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:00:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944769: fixed in h5py 2.10.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #944769,
regarding python3-h5py fails to import if offline due to apparent MPI failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:44:59 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#955139: calendar-google-provider: Missing build of
package for thunderbird/lightning versions 1:65.* and 1:68.*
has caused the Debian Bug report #955139,
regarding calendar-google-provider: Missing build
On Friday, March 27, 2020 12:53:41 PM EDT Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2020, 09:47 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> > Package: src:salt
> > Version: 3000+dfsg1-3
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 2.2.1
> >
> > This package uses python pip to download and
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
